Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CreativEval: Evaluating Creativity of LLM-Based Hardware Code Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.08806 v1 pith:56VCYCVJ submitted 2024-04-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmscreativityhardwarecodeevaluatinggeneratingcreativedesigns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have proved effective and efficient in generating code, leading to their utilization within the hardware design process. Prior works evaluating LLMs' abilities for register transfer level code generation solely focus on functional correctness. However, the creativity associated with these LLMs, or the ability to generate novel and unique solutions, is a metric not as well understood, in part due to the challenge of quantifying this quality. To address this research gap, we present CreativeEval, a framework for evaluating the creativity of LLMs within the context of generating hardware designs. We quantify four creative sub-components, fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration, through various prompting and post-processing techniques. We then evaluate multiple popular LLMs (including GPT models, CodeLlama, and VeriGen) upon this creativity metric, with results indicating GPT-3.5 as the most creative model in generating hardware designs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SecVulEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Real-World C/C++ Vulnerability Detection

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SecVulEval provides a statement-level C/C++ vulnerability benchmark with context; state-of-the-art LLMs achieve only 23.83% F1 on locating vulnerable statements with correct reasoning.

Pith tools