Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06275 v4 pith:5IQPJ6PI submitted 2023-09-12 cs.CL

Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningllmspromptingthought-elicitingbidirectionalgeneralityinputlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

To enhance the reasoning capabilities of off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs), we introduce a simple, yet general and effective prompting method, Re2, i.e., \textbf{Re}-\textbf{Re}ading the question as input. Unlike most thought-eliciting prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), which aim to elicit the reasoning process in the output, Re2 shifts the focus to the input by processing questions twice, thereby enhancing the understanding process. Consequently, Re2 demonstrates strong generality and compatibility with most thought-eliciting prompting methods, including CoT. Crucially, Re2 facilitates a "bidirectional" encoding in unidirectional decoder-only LLMs because the first pass could provide global information for the second pass. We begin with a preliminary empirical study as the foundation of Re2, illustrating its potential to enable "bidirectional" attention mechanisms. We then evaluate Re2 on extensive reasoning benchmarks across 14 datasets, spanning 112 experiments, to validate its effectiveness and generality. Our findings indicate that, with the exception of a few scenarios on vanilla ChatGPT, Re2 consistently enhances the reasoning performance of LLMs through a simple re-reading strategy. Further analyses reveal Re2's adaptability, showing how it can be effectively integrated with different LLMs, thought-eliciting prompting, and ensemble strategies. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/Tebmer/Rereading-LLM-Reasoning/}

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Semantic Density Effect (SDE): Maximizing Information Per Token Improves LLM Accuracy

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Prompts with higher semantic density per token improve LLM accuracy by an average of 8.4 percentage points across five models and seven benchmarks, with no added tokens or latency.

  2. Ask Twice, Look Twice: Prompt Echoing Resolves the Question-First Paradox in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Repeating the question on both sides of the image (question echoing) closes the question-first accuracy gap in five open VLMs and beats standard single-pass orderings on several VQA benchmarks.

  3. OmniDPO: A Preference Optimization Framework to Address Omni-Modal Hallucination

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    OmniDPO extends direct preference optimization with audio-video alignment and modality-degradation preference pairs to reduce omni-modal hallucination.