REVIEW 4 cited by
Jet cross sections and transverse momentum distributions with NNLOJET
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This talk discusses recent results for next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) QCD corrections to jet cross sections and transverse momentum distributions. The results are obtained in the NNLOJET code framework, which provides an implementation of the antenna subtraction method for the handling of infrared singular contributions at NNLO. We briefly describe the NNLOJET implementation, with particular emphasis on the construction of the real radiation phase space, which is tailored to ensure stability in all infrared sensitive regions.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Second-order QCD corrections to event shape distributions in deep inelastic scattering
The NNLO QCD corrections to DIS event shape distributions and their mean values are computed for the first time, reducing scale uncertainties and improving the description of H1 and ZEUS data.
-
Precise Determination of the Strong Coupling Constant from Dijet Cross Sections up to the Multi-TeV Range
A complete NNLO QCD fit to LHC and HERA dijet data yields alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.1178 with a total uncertainty of 0.0022 and tests the running coupling from 7 GeV up to 7 TeV.
-
Combined effective field theory interpretation of Higgs boson, electroweak vector boson, top quark, and multi-jet measurements
CMS performs a combined SMEFT fit to multiple LHC measurements and precision data, yielding individual constraints on 64 Wilson coefficients and 43 linear combinations.
-
The impact of LHC precision measurements of inclusive jet and dijet production on the CTEQ-TEA global PDF fit
New LHC inclusive jet data push the CT18 gluon harder at high x and shrink its uncertainty, while dijet data show stronger scale dependence and are set aside.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.