Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Responsible Governance of Biological Design Tools

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.15936 v3 pith:5P6BEUDS submitted 2023-11-27 cs.CY cs.LG

classification cs.CYcs.LG
keywords bdtsdesignbiologicalaccuracycapabilitiesdevelopeddual-usemeasures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in generative machine learning have enabled rapid progress in biological design tools (BDTs) such as protein structure and sequence prediction models. The unprecedented predictive accuracy and novel design capabilities of BDTs present new and significant dual-use risks. For example, their predictive accuracy allows biological agents, whether vaccines or pathogens, to be developed more quickly, while the design capabilities could be used to discover drugs or evade DNA screening techniques. Similar to other dual-use AI systems, BDTs present a wicked problem: how can regulators uphold public safety without stifling innovation? We highlight how current regulatory proposals that are primarily tailored toward large language models may be less effective for BDTs, which require fewer computational resources to train and are often developed in an open-source manner. We propose a range of measures to mitigate the risk that BDTs are misused, across the areas of responsible development, risk assessment, transparency, access management, cybersecurity, and investing in resilience. Implementing such measures will require close coordination between developers and governments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Responsible Governing AI Proliferation

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a 'Proliferation' paradigm of AI, where small, hidden, augmented, decentralized, and open-weight models challenge compute-centric governance.

  2. Forbidden Science: Dual-Use AI Challenge Benchmark and Scientific Refusal Tests

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new 512-prompt benchmark claims to measure LLM over-refusal on scientific dual-use questions, but its design and labeling flaws undermine the claim.

  3. The Reality of AI and Biorisk

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review of the evidence finds no current, statistically significant uplift in biorisk from LLMs or AI biological tools, but the underlying studies are too nascent to justify strong conclusions.

  4. From Turing to Tomorrow: The UK's Approach to AI Regulation

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    The UK should establish a flexible, principles-based regulator for frontier AI development, plus defensive measures against biological risks and updated legal frameworks for copyright, discrimination, and AI agents.

Pith tools