Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 70 references

Helical Domain-Wall-Ring Networks Reshape Superconducting Correlations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that confining helical domain-wall states to closed rings suppresses inter-ring phase locking while keeping superconducting correlations strong.

desk verdict A carefully worked finite-size theory of interacting helical domain-wall rings with a genuinely new qualitative result; the variational method is uncontrolled, but the main claim is plausible and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.23599 v2 pith:5Y5K4Q6X submitted 2026-06-22 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Yi-Chun Hung , Arun Bansil This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords helicalLuttingerliquiddomain-wallringsmoirématerialssuperconductingcorrelationspairtunnelingphaselockingfinite-sizeeffectsself-consistentvariationalmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies superconducting correlations in helical domain-wall rings—closed one-dimensional channels that form around topological domains in twisted bilayer honeycomb moiré patterns. An infinite-size theory says pair tunneling between neighboring rings is renormalization-group relevant and should lock their superconducting phases at small twist angles. The authors then develop a self-consistent variational theory for finite rings. It shows that finite-size phase fluctuations suppress the induced phase-locking scale far below the infinite-size estimate, even where the infinite theory predicts strong coupling. At the same time, the superconducting scaling dimension keeps decreasing as the twist angle is reduced and stays insensitive to the bare pair-tunneling strength, so ring networks behave qualitatively differently from their infinite counterparts.

What carries the argument

The argument uses the bosonized helical Luttinger liquid on each ring, with fields φR and ϑR, plus inter-ring density-density interactions and superconducting pair tunneling between neighboring straight segments. For the finite-size theory, the load-bearing tool is a self-consistent variational Gaussian action with Green's function G⁻¹(mJ)=G⁻¹_HLL+mJ M, where the mass mJ measures inter-ring phase locking and is fixed by stationarity of the variational free energy. Pair tunneling enters through a fluctuation prefactor e^{-2CΘ(r)}, where CΘ(r) is the variance of the phase difference between neighboring rings. The superconducting scaling dimension ηSC is extracted from the finite-size form of t

What would settle it

Compute the same self-consistent or exact correlation functions on closed rings while retaining the zero-mode and winding-number sectors. If mJ rises toward the infinite-size strong-coupling estimate or ηSC gains a visible dependence on the bare pair-tunneling strength, the claimed decoupling would fail. Alternatively, measure the superconducting power-law exponent—through tunneling conductance or superfluid response—in a moiré domain-wall-ring system as the twist angle is tuned across θRG; finding that ηSC tracks the phase-locking mass instead of remaining insensitive to JSC(0) would falsify

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that confinement to closed rings changes the collective effect of inter-ring pair tunneling. In the infinite-length description, pair tunneling is relevant and, for twist angles below θRG, pins the antisymmetric phase field, driving the superconducting scaling dimension ηSC down toward the pinned-limit value. The finite-size calculation, based on a Gaussian trial action with a variational mass mJ, finds the opposite: the fluctuation-dressed phase-locking scale mJ is strongly suppressed by ring-induced phase fluctuations, while ηSC remains essentially independent of the bare pair-tunneling strength JSC(0) and decreases monotonically as the twist angle is reduced. Thus ηSC

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that zero-mode and winding sectors of the ring boson fields can be discarded because they do not change quantum fluctuations; if those compact modes contribute to phase correlations on a finite ring, the computed phase-locking mass and superconducting scaling dimension would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below the infinite-size strong-coupling angle θRG, a finite ring network need not develop strong inter-ring phase locking; θRG is therefore not a reliable predictor for finite closed loops.
  • In these networks the superconducting scaling dimension is set primarily by ring size and inter-ring density-density interactions, not by the bare pair-tunneling strength.
  • Decreasing the twist angle enhances superconducting correlations (smaller ηSC) even as the phase-locking mass is suppressed, so the two signatures of pairing decouple in confined geometries.
  • A crossover angle θU, where ηSC equals the density-density-only value, marks a finite-size boundary between two infinite-size scenarios and is computable from the same self-consistent data.
  • Superconducting correlations follow the finite-size scaling form L sin(πr/L) with increasing accuracy at small twist angles, so the extracted ηSC is well defined in the regime where the effect is strongest.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fluctuation-dressed suppression of pair tunneling should appear in other closed-loop quasi-one-dimensional networks, suggesting a geometry-dependent criterion for phase locking beyond simple length truncation.
  • Because ηSC is insensitive to JSC(0), experiments that tune inter-wall hybridization should see no corresponding change in the superconducting power law—a directly testable signature of the decoupling effect.
  • If the zero-mode and winding sectors excluded from the trial action contribute to phase variance on a compact ring, the numerical values of mJ and ηSC could shift; retaining those sectors in a small-ring calculation would be the most direct robustness check of the central mismatch.
  • The angle θU behaves like a geometric finite-size crossover scale; mapping ηSC(θt) across θRG and θU in a real moiré material could separate confinement effects from interaction-driven renormalization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies superconducting correlations in networks of helical domain-wall rings formed in twisted bilayer honeycomb moiré systems. For infinite-length domain-wall segments, a standard RG analysis shows that inter-ring Cooper-pair tunneling is relevant below a twist-angle scale θ_RG and should pin the relative superconducting phase, reducing the SC scaling dimension. To capture finite ring size, the authors develop a self-consistent Gaussian variational theory in which pair tunneling generates a variational mass m_J. Their main finite-size findings are that m_J is strongly suppressed relative to the infinite-size pinning scale even for θ_t < θ_RG, while the SC scaling dimension η_SC nevertheless decreases with decreasing twist angle and is insensitive to the bare pair-tunneling strength J_SC(0). The paper interprets this as evidence that finite ring networks exhibit qualitatively different collective behavior from infinite-length coupled helical Luttinger liquids.

Significance. If the central finite-size result is correct, it identifies a genuinely new effect: closed ring geometry and finite-size fluctuations can decouple the phase-locking scale from the SC correlation exponent, which would be important for interpreting moiré domain-wall-network experiments. The paper is commendably explicit: the SM provides the full bosonized mode expansion, the variational self-consistency equations, the RG estimates, and numerical convergence parameters (31×31 q-grid, 40 integration points, 1e-10 convergence). The central quantities m_J and η_SC are computed self-consistently rather than fitted, and the predicted θ_U crossover line is a falsifiable signature. However, the finite-size conclusions rest on an uncontrolled Gaussian trial action that discards the compactification and zero-mode structure of the ring boson fields; this is the load-bearing approximation of the paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text after Eq. (13); SM S5-1, Eq. (S74); SM Fig. S1] The central suppression of m_J is driven by the fluctuation factor e^{-2C_Θ(r)} in the self-consistent equation (SM Eq. S77–S80), where C_Θ is computed from the Gaussian trial action (SM Eq. S74). This trial action replaces the periodic pair-tunneling potential cos(2Θ) by an unbounded quadratic mass term. On a ring, ϑ is compact (the SC operator is e^{i2ϑ}), and the conjugate zero-mode/winding sectors enforce this compactification. The manuscript explicitly excludes zero modes with the statement that they 'do not alter the quantum fluctuations' (main text after Eq. (13); SM S5-1), but no support is given for that statement in the finite-ring context. If the zero modes and winding sectors are included, the variance of Θ modulo π is bounded, so the logarithmic growth of C_Θ with L — and hence the exponential suppression e^{-2C_Θ} — can saturate. The auxiliary check in SM Fig. S1 (setting C
  2. [SM S6, Eq. (S89); Fig. 2(b)] The SC scaling dimension η_SC is extracted from ⟨[ϑ_R(r)−ϑ_R(0)]²⟩_0 computed in the same noncompact Gaussian trial action, using the finite-size form η_SC ln[(L/πa) sin(πr/L)] + ζ. This form is appropriate for a free noncompact boson on a ring; it does not encode the compactification of ϑ or the winding sectors. If the compactification bound on phase fluctuations is important, the extracted η_SC is not the true SC scaling dimension and the result that η_SC continues to decrease with decreasing θ_t while remaining insensitive to J_SC could be an artifact of the trial state. The R² values reported in SM Fig. S3 indicate that the fit is internally consistent, but they do not test against the compactified theory. The authors should either include the zero-mode/winding sectors in the trial action or present an independent check (e.g., a lattice or bosonized Monte Carlo calculation for the sa
  3. [SM S5-4, Eq. (S85); Fig. 2(a)] The comparison in Fig. 2(a) is the ratio m_J/m_J^(pin), but the two quantities are defined through different procedures. m_J is a self-consistent variational mass in the finite-ring Gaussian action, while m_J^(pin) in SM Eq. (S85) is obtained by equating the RG strong-coupling gap in the infinite-size theory with a quadratic-mass dispersion. Even apart from the compactification issue, the ratio can be small simply because the variational mass parameter is not the same object as the RG-generated pinning mass. The interpretation that ring geometry suppresses the infinite-size phase-locking scale would be strengthened by a direct comparison of physical observables (e.g., the spectral gap of the ϑ_- mode in the finite-ring calculation versus Δ_gap from the RG), rather than a comparison of two differently defined mass parameters.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] References [4] and [5] are identical (Y. Cao et al., Nature 556, 43 (2018)); one duplicate should be removed.
  2. [Fig. 2] The black and white dashed lines are labeled in the caption as θ_RG and θ_U, but in the main text the white line is not defined until Eq. (21). It would help to state explicitly in the Fig. 2 caption which line is which and to define θ_U before the figure is discussed.
  3. [SM S3, Eq. (S11)–(S13)] The text says 'representative ratios 5≲D_g/w, D_g/d≲15' but the numerical range in Eq. (S13) should be checked: with the given formulas, the quoted range 1.2≲2V_0/(πℏv_F), 2U_0/(πℏv_F)≲2 follows only for a specific choice of the base of the logarithm; please clarify the units and the numerical evaluation.
  4. [Data availability] The data availability statement says the data are 'not publicly available upon publication' but available upon reasonable request. Given the reproducibility emphasis of the SM, consider depositing the numerical code or the self-consistent solver, at least as ancillary files, even if raw data are not shared.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the finite-size mass and scaling dimension are self-consistently computed from model inputs, and the infinite-size benchmarks are independent RG estimates, not fitted targets.

full rationale

The central result is obtained from a self-consistent variational calculation (SM S5-3, Eqs. S77–S80): the variational mass mJ is fixed by stationarity of F_var with respect to the trial Green's function, with the bare pair tunneling JSC(0) entering as a model input and the fluctuation factor e^{-2CΘ} computed from the trial action itself. No quantity called a prediction is used as an input to fit itself. The benchmarks mJ^(pin) and θRG are derived from the standard RG flow dJ̃SC/dl = 2(1−K_-^{-1})J̃SC (Eqs. 9–11 and SM S5-4) using the same model parameters, not from the finite-size results, so the reported suppression ratio is a genuine comparison rather than a tautology. ηSC is extracted by fitting the computed two-point function to a finite-size scaling form (SM S6), a standard definitional procedure, not a circular prediction. The self-citations [52–55, 60] are background references on coupled helical liquids and Majorana systems and do not carry the argument. The main assumptions—zero modes excluded ('Zero modes are excluded, as they do not alter the quantum fluctuations of the bosonic fields', main text after Eq. 13; SM S5) and the noncompact Gaussian trial action (SM S5-2, S5-3)—are technical modeling choices that may affect numerical accuracy but are not circular reductions of the result to its inputs. No circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model rests on standard bosonization, standard RG, and a Gaussian variational treatment, plus a set of domain-specific geometric and interaction approximations. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The quantitative inputs (V0, U0, JSC) are not fixed by experiment, and the zero-mode exclusion and Gaussian ansatz are the most fragile choices.

free parameters (4)
  • Intra-ring interaction strength 2V0/πℏvF = 1.18 (main figures); scanned 1.1–2.1 in SM
    Chosen from screened-Coulomb estimates in SM S3, with the main-text value selected so that θRG lies in the numerically accessible range. No experimental input pins it.
  • Inter-ring density-density interaction strength 2U0/πℏvF = 2.08 (main figures); scanned 1.1–2.1 in SM
    Model input from screened-Coulomb estimates; subject to the assumption U0 > V0 and 2(U0−V0)/πℏvF < 1.
  • Bare inter-ring SC pair-tunneling strength JSC(0) = scanned over a range, e.g., up to ~0.12 in Fig. 2
    Treated as an input parameter proportional to t⊥²; no microscopic value is computed from tight-binding overlaps. The central insensitivity claim is tested against this parameter.
  • Non-universal constant ζ in the ηSC fit = not reported
    Appears in the finite-size scaling fit of the SC correlation function (SM S6, Eq. S89); it is fitted but does not enter the central qualitative claims except through ηSC.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Standard bosonization of helical Luttinger liquids with spin-momentum locking and TRS.
    Used throughout to map the HLL to free bosons with Luttinger parameter K and velocity u (SM S1).
  • domain assumption TRS suppresses single-particle inter-ring tunneling; second-order process yields only SC pair tunneling.
    SM S2 argues the only symmetry-allowed low-energy two-particle inter-ring process is SC-pair tunneling; the RG and variational calculations are built on this selection.
  • domain assumption Rings are hexagonal with rounded corners negligible: ls≈L/6≈aM/√3, and continuum moiré relation aM≈a/[2 sin(θt/2)] holds; commensurability details are neglected.
    Stated in main text near Eq. (11) and footnote [62]; this geometric modeling choice sets the relation between twist angle and segment length.
  • domain assumption Screened-Coulomb estimate for V0 and U0 with representative dielectric/vF values; physical regime d≲w.
    SM S3 derives representative interaction ranges from metallic-gate screened Coulomb forms; the numerical scans are restricted to this physically motivated window.
  • standard math Standard leading-order RG flow for coupled infinite HLLs: dJSC/dl=2(1−K−1−)JSC.
    Invoked to define θRG and the infinite-size strong-coupling scale, following Ref. [67].
  • ad hoc to paper Gaussian variational trial action with pair-tunneling expanded quadratically around its minimum; zero modes excluded.
    The self-consistent scheme in SM S5 assumes this ansatz and discards zero modes with a one-line justification. The central suppression of mJ is sensitive to this choice (SM Fig. S1).
  • standard math Finite-size scaling form for the SC correlation function: ⟨[ϑ(r)−ϑ(0)]²⟩ = ηSC ln[L sin(πr/L)/(πa)] + ζ.
    Imported from conformal finite-size scaling [71]; used to extract the reported ηSC values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Helical Domain-Wall-Ring Networks Reshape Superconducting Correlations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5Y5K4Q6X

@misc{pith2026260623599,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Helical Domain-Wall-Ring Networks Reshape Superconducting Correlations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5Y5K4Q6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.23599}
}
read the original abstract

Extended domain-wall networks that emerge in moir\'e materials provide a distinct platform for quasi-one-dimensional electronic states. However, the interaction-driven orders in confined networks remain largely unexplored. Here, we discuss superconducting (SC) correlations in interacting helical domain-wall-ring networks in the closed topological domains formed within the moir\'e patterns of an underlying twisted bilayer honeycomb lattice. We first analyze the system within the framework of an infinite-size theory and show that inter-ring SC-pair tunneling is renormalization-group relevant and thus enhances SC correlations through inter-ring phase locking. To address finite-size effects resulting from the ring-network geometry, we present a self-consistent variational approach. Our analysis shows that even in the regime where the infinite-size theory predicts strongly coupled pair tunneling, the induced phase-locking scale remains strongly suppressed. In contrast, the SC scaling dimension continues to decrease with stronger inter-ring density-density interaction and a decreasing twist angle, while remaining insensitive to the pair-tunneling strength. This discrepancy demonstrates that ring networks do not simply approach their infinite-size counterparts but can exhibit qualitatively distinct collective behavior. Our study highlights how the interplay of confinement effects and ring-network geometry can reshape SC correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23599 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic of the helical domain-wall-ring network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Self-consistently determined (a) tunneling-induced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands, Nature Physics16, 725 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Isobe, N

    H. Isobe, N. F. Q. Yuan, and L. Fu, Unconventional superconductivity and density waves in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. X8, 041041 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  4. [5]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  5. [6]

    M. Oh, K. P. Nuckolls, D. Wong, R. L. Lee, X. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Yazdani, Evidence for unconventional superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature600, 240 (2021)

    2021

  6. [7]

    Y. Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, L. Holtzman, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, A. J. Millis, A. Pasupathy, and C. R. Dean, Superconductivity in 5.0°twisted bilayer wse2, Nature 637, 839 (2025)

    2025

  7. [8]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional chern insu- lator, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  8. [9]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

Show all 70 references
  1. [10]

    A. P. Reddy, F. Alsallom, Y. Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu, Fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted bilayer MoTe 2 and WSe 2, Phys. Rev. B108, 085117 (2023)

    2023

  2. [11]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  3. [12]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted MoTe 2, Nature622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  4. [13]

    Wu, C.-M

    X.-C. Wu, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Coupled-wire descrip- tion of the correlated physics in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 161405(R) (2019)

    2019

  5. [14]

    C. Chen, A. H. Castro Neto, and V. M. Pereira, Corre- lated states of a triangular net of coupled quantum wires: Implications for the phase diagram of marginally twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B101, 165431 (2020)

    2020

  6. [15]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact con- tinuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 013001 (2019)

    2019

  7. [16]

    J. S. Alden, A. W. Tsen, P. Y. Huang, R. Hov- den, L. Brown, J. Park, D. A. Muller, and P. L. 6 McEuen, Strain solitons and topological defects in bi- layer graphene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 11256 (2013)

    2013

  8. [17]

    Wang and C.-H

    H.-C. Wang and C.-H. Hsu, Electrically tunable corre- lated domain wall network in twisted bilayer graphene, 2D Materials11, 035007 (2024)

    2024

  9. [18]

    Gargiulo and O

    F. Gargiulo and O. V. Yazyev, Structural and electronic transformation in low-angle twisted bilayer graphene, 2D Materials5, 015019 (2017)

    2017

  10. [19]

    H. Wang, Z. Liu, Y. Jiang, and J. Wang, Giant anisotropic band flattening in twisted Γ-valley semicon- ductor bilayers, Phys. Rev. B108, L201120 (2023)

    2023

  11. [20]

    Kang, W.-T

    P. Kang, W.-T. Zhang, V. Michaud-Rioux, X.-H. Kong, C. Hu, G.-H. Yu, and H. Guo, Moir´ e impurities in twisted bilayer black phosphorus: Effects on the carrier mobility, Phys. Rev. B96, 195406 (2017)

    2017

  12. [21]

    D. J. P. de Sousa, S. Lee, F. Guinea, and T. Low, Moir´ e collapse and luttinger liquids in twisted anisotropic ho- mobilayers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences123, e2527371123 (2026)

    2026

  13. [22]

    Wang and X

    E. Wang and X. Zou, Moir´ e bands in twisted trilayer black phosphorene: effects of pressure and electric field, Nanoscale14, 3758 (2022)

    2022

  14. [23]

    Huang, B

    S. Huang, B. Yu, Y. Ma, C. Pan, J. Ma, Y. Zhou, Y. Ma, K. Yang, H. Wu, Y. Lei, Q. Xing, L. Mu, J. Zhang, Y. Mou, and H. Yan, Bright dipolar excitons in twisted black phosphorus homostructures, Science386, 526 (2024)

    2024

  15. [24]

    T. Cao, Z. Li, D. Y. Qiu, and S. G. Louie, Gate switchable transport and optical anisotropy in 90°twisted bilayer black phosphorus, Nano Letters16, 5542 (2016)

    2016

  16. [25]

    C. Lei, P. T. Mahon, and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e band theory for m-valley twisted transition metal dichalco- genides, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 196402 (2025)

    2025

  17. [26]

    C˘ alug˘ aru, Y

    D. C˘ alug˘ aru, Y. Jiang, H. Hu, H. Pi, J. Yu, M. G. Vergniory, J. Shan, C. Felser, L. M. Schoop, D. K. Efetov, K. F. Mak, and B. A. Bernevig, Moir´ e materials based on m-point twisting, Nature643, 376 (2025)

    2025

  18. [27]

    Jiang, U

    Y. Jiang, U. Petralanda, G. Skorupskii, Q. Xu, H. Pi, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, H. Hu, J. Xie, R. A. Mustaf, P. H¨ ohn, V. Haase, M. G. Vergniory, M. Claassen, L. Elcoro, N. Regnault, J. Shan, K. F. Mak, D. K. Efetov, E. Mo- rosan, D. M. Kennes, A. Rubio, L. Xian, C. Felser, L. M. Scho...

    2024 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Tomonaga, Remarks on bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics5, 544 (1950)

    S.-i. Tomonaga, Remarks on bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Progress of Theoretical Physics5, 544 (1950)

    1950

  20. [29]

    J. M. Luttinger, An exactly soluble model of a many- fermion system, Journal of Mathematical Physics4, 1154 (1963)

    1963

  21. [30]

    D. C. Mattis and E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of a many- fermion system and its associated boson field, Journal of Mathematical Physics6, 304 (1965)

    1965

  22. [31]

    C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Heli- cal liquids in semiconductors, Semiconductor Science and Technology36, 123003 (2021)

    2021

  23. [32]

    C.-H. Hsu, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, On the cutting edge: helical liquids in time-reversal-invariant topolog- ical materials, Journal of Physics: Materials9, 011001 (2025)

    2025

  24. [33]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  25. [34]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  26. [35]

    Gresch, G

    D. Gresch, G. Aut` es, O. V. Yazyev, M. Troyer, D. Van- derbilt, B. A. Bernevig, and A. A. Soluyanov, Z2pack: Numerical implementation of hybrid wannier centers for identifying topological materials, Phys. Rev. B95, 075146 (2017)

    2017

  27. [36]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump, Phys. Rev. B74, 195312 (2006)

    2006

  28. [37]

    C. Wu, B. A. Bernevig, and S.-C. Zhang, Helical liquid and the edge of quantum spin hall systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 106401 (2006)

    2006

  29. [38]

    Q. Li, Y. Han, K. Zhang, Y.-T. Zhang, J.-J. Liu, and Z. Qiao, Multiple majorana edge modes in mag- netic topological insulator–superconductor heterostruc- tures, Phys. Rev. B102, 205402 (2020)

    2020

  30. [39]

    Schulz, J

    F. Schulz, J. C. Budich, E. G. Novik, P. Recher, and B. Trauzettel, Voltage-tunable majorana bound states in time-reversal symmetric bilayer quantum spin hall hybrid systems, Phys. Rev. B100, 165420 (2019)

    2019

  31. [40]

    Kheirkhah, Y

    M. Kheirkhah, Y. Nagai, C. Chen, and F. Marsiglio, Ma- jorana corner flat bands in two-dimensional second-order topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B101, 104502 (2020)

    2020

  32. [41]

    Wang, C.-C

    Q. Wang, C.-C. Liu, Y.-M. Lu, and F. Zhang, High- temperature majorana corner states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 186801 (2018)

    2018

  33. [42]

    Z. Yan, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Majorana corner modes in a high-temperature platform, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 096803 (2018)

    2018

  34. [43]

    Kheirkhah, D

    M. Kheirkhah, D. Zhu, J. Maciejko, and Z. Yan, Corner- and sublattice-sensitive majorana zero modes on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B106, 085420 (2022)

    2022

  35. [44]

    Hsu, Interaction- and phonon-induced topologi- cal phase transitions in double helical liquids, Nanoscale Horiz.9, 1725 (2024)

    C.-H. Hsu, Interaction- and phonon-induced topologi- cal phase transitions in double helical liquids, Nanoscale Horiz.9, 1725 (2024)

    2024

  36. [45]

    Klinovaja, A

    J. Klinovaja, A. Yacoby, and D. Loss, Kramers pairs of majorana fermions and parafermions in fractional topo- logical insulators, Phys. Rev. B90, 155447 (2014)

    2014

  37. [46]

    Zhang and C

    F. Zhang and C. L. Kane, Time-reversal-invariantZ 4 fractional josephson effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 036401 (2014)

    2014

  38. [47]

    C. P. Orth, R. P. Tiwari, T. Meng, and T. L. Schmidt, Non-abelian parafermions in time-reversal-invariant in- teracting helical systems, Phys. Rev. B91, 081406(R) (2015)

    2015

  39. [48]

    Fleckenstein, N

    C. Fleckenstein, N. T. Ziani, and B. Trauzettel,z 4 parafermions in weakly interacting superconducting con- strictions at the helical edge of quantum spin hall insu- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 066801 (2019)

    2019

  40. [49]

    Chou and S

    Y.-Z. Chou and S. Das Sarma, Composite helical edges from abelian fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B110, 155117 (2024)

    2024

  41. [50]

    C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Majo- rana kramers pairs in higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 196801 (2018)

    2018

  42. [51]

    Laubscher, D

    K. Laubscher, D. Chughtai, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Kramers pairs of majorana corner states in a topological insulator bilayer, Phys. Rev. B102, 195401 (2020)

    2020

  43. [52]

    Hung, C.-H

    Y.-C. Hung, C.-H. Hsu, and A. Bansil, Majorana kramers pairs in synthetic high-spin chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B111, 245145 (2025). 7

    2025

  44. [53]

    Y.-C. Hung, B. Wang, C.-H. Hsu, A. Bansil, and H. Lin, Time-reversal soliton pairs in even spin chern number higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B110, 035125 (2024)

    2024

  45. [54]

    Wang, Y.-C

    B. Wang, Y.-C. Hung, X. Zhou, A. Bansil, and H. Lin, Higher-order topological phases hidden in quantum spin hall insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 245103 (2023)

    2023

  46. [55]

    B. Wang, X. Zhou, Y.-C. Hung, Y.-C. Lin, H. Lin, and A. Bansil, High spin-chern-number insulator inα- antimonene with a hidden topological phase, 2D Materi- als11, 025033 (2024)

    2024

  47. [56]

    Chung, D.-H

    C.-H. Chung, D.-H. Lee, and S.-P. Chao, Kane-mele hub- bard model on a zigzag ribbon: Stability of the topolog- ical edge states and quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B90, 035116 (2014)

    2014

  48. [57]

    Kainaris, I

    N. Kainaris, I. V. Gornyi, A. Levchenko, and D. G. Polyakov, Coulomb drag between helical luttinger liq- uids, Phys. Rev. B95, 045150 (2017)

    2017

  49. [58]

    Chou, Localization-driven correlated states of two isolated interacting helical edges, Phys

    Y.-Z. Chou, Localization-driven correlated states of two isolated interacting helical edges, Phys. Rev. B99, 045125 (2019)

    2019

  50. [59]

    Tsantilas, T

    A. Tsantilas, T. Devakul, and J. May-Mann, Shot noise in strongly correlated double quantum spin hall edges, Phys. Rev. B113, 075125 (2026)

    2026

  51. [60]

    Hung, C.-H

    Y.-C. Hung, C.-H. Hsu, and A. Bansil, Tunable compet- ing electronic orders in double quantum spin hall super- lattices, Phys. Rev. B112, 195127 (2025)

    2025

  52. [61]

    Bordoloi, D

    A. Bordoloi, D. Kaplan, and S. Singh, Relaxation- driven topological domains in moir´ e materials (2026), arXiv:2605.27548 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2026 arXiv

  53. [62]

    The corner re- gion, therefore, contributes only local corrections and can be neglected in the low-energy physics

    In the small twist-angle limit, the size of the rounded cornerl c remains much smaller than the length of the connecting domain-wall segment,l c ≪L. The corner re- gion, therefore, contributes only local corrections and can be neglected in the low-energy physics

  54. [63]

    See Supplemental Materials at [link-inserted-by-the- editor] for more details, which includes Refs. [64–66]

  55. [64]

    Maciejko, C

    J. Maciejko, C. Liu, Y. Oreg, X.-L. Qi, C. Wu, and S.- C. Zhang, Kondo effect in the helical edge liquid of the quantum spin hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 256803 (2009)

    2009

  56. [65]

    Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chu, Z. Pan, Y. Li, S. Zhao, and D. Li, Optoelectronic and mechanical properties of monolayer bismuthene under strain modulation: Insight from first- principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B110, 125429 (2024)

    2024

  57. [66]

    Singh, S

    D. Singh, S. K. Gupta, Y. Sonvane, and I. Lukaˇ cevi´ c, Antimonene: a monolayer material for ultraviolet optical nanodevices, J. Mater. Chem. C4, 6386 (2016)

    2016

  58. [67]

    Thakurathi, P

    M. Thakurathi, P. Simon, I. Mandal, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Majorana kramers pairs in rashba double nanowires with interactions and disorder, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045415 (2018)

    2018

  59. [68]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

  60. [69]

    Feynman,Statistical mechanics: a set of lectures, Frontiers in physics : a lecture note and reprint series (Sarat Book Distributors, 1972)

    R. Feynman,Statistical mechanics: a set of lectures, Frontiers in physics : a lecture note and reprint series (Sarat Book Distributors, 1972)

    1972

  61. [70]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, New York, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, New York, 2003)

    2003

  62. [71]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General17, L385 (1984). 8 Supplemental Materials: Helical Domain-Wall-Ring Networks Reshape Superconducting Correlations CONTENTS References 5 S1. Bosonization con...

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.