REVIEW 1 cited by
Estimation of High-Dimensional Normal Means through Inferential Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The classical multivariate normal means problem remains conceptually unresolved. While shrinkage and empirical Bayes methods improve risk by imposing external geometric or hierarchical structure, they fail to explain how information is shared across independent coordinates for a fixed, unstructured mean vector. We address this gap using the prior-free Inferential Models framework. By formulating a generalized probability integral transform (GPIT) for independent, non-i.i.d~observations combined with a reweighted Anderson-Darling predictive random set, we leverage the global shape of ordered observations for valid, efficient inference. Crucially, the auxiliary structure of this formulation provides a novel explanation for Stein's paradox, demonstrating that the maximum likelihood estimator becomes structurally implausible for $n\geq 3$. To ensure scalability, we introduce an i.i.d. sampling-with-replacement surrogate that connects our exact fixed-mean formulation to overparameterized $g$-modeling. Furthermore, we develop a maximin criterion for combining plausibility contours. Under squared error loss, our estimators are competitive with state-of-the-art auto-modeling methods and outperform classical shrinkage and empirical Bayes methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
An Improved Solution to the Two Normal Means Problem via Regularization
A new Wald-type test statistic built from a ridge-regularized estimator gives uniformly shorter valid confidence intervals than the partial-conditioning solution for marginal inference in the two-normal-means problem.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.