Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Identifying Band Inversions in Topological Materials Using Diffusion Monte Carlo

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a momentum-resolved atomic population analysis of the Diffusion Monte Carlo one-body reduced density matrix can detect band inversion, demonstrated by a near unit-electron swap of Te-p and Bi-p occupations at the…

desk verdict A clean, reproducible method for orbital-resolved DMC 1RDM analysis, but the Bi2Te3 demonstration inherits its band-inversion signal from the PBE trial wavefunction, so the many-body claim is not yet proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14388 v1 pith:63GIL6X3 submitted 2024-12-18 cond-mat.str-el physics.chem-ph

Annette Lopez , Cody A. Melton , Jeonghwan Ahn , Brenda M. Rubenstein , Jaron T. Krogel This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elphysics.chem-ph
keywords bandinversiondiffusionMonteCarlotopologicalinsulatorone-bodyreduceddensitymatrixLöwdinpopulationanalysisspin-orbitcouplingbismuthtelluride
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to give Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) a way to recognize topological band inversion, a feature DMC cannot reach through a conventional band-structure calculation. It resolves the DMC one-body reduced density matrix into atomic-orbital occupations at each crystal momentum, using a Löwdin projection, and compares occupations computed with and without spin-orbit coupling. In bulk Bi2Te3 the difference shows nearly an entire electron leaving Te-p states and entering Bi-p states at the Γ-point, the expected band-inversion signature; in monolayer Bi2Te3 the same analysis finds no such transfer. Because DMC treats electron correlation explicitly, the method offers a many-body check on whether correlated materials are topological insulators.

What carries the argument

The central object is the momentum-resolved one-body reduced density matrix $\hat{n}^k$ obtained from a spin-orbit DMC calculation, projected onto Löwdin-orthogonalized atomic orbitals via the overlap matrix $S_{ki}^{\ell} = \langle \psi_a^{\ell} | \phi_{ki} \rangle$. The per-orbital occupation $N_{a\ell}(k) = \sum_{o\in\ell} \langle \psi_a^o | \hat{n}^k | \psi_a^o \rangle$ gives the atomic-orbital content at each $k$-point, and the difference $\delta N_{a\ell}(k) = N^{\text{SOC}}_{a\ell}(k) - N^{\text{no-SOC}}_{a\ell}(k)$ isolates the spin-orbit-driven charge transfer. The analysis restricts attention to the diagonal elements of the 1RDM, treating the natural orbitals as unchanged to first order in correlation.

What would settle it

Apply the same $\delta N_{a\ell}(k)$ analysis to a correlated material where the true ground state is known to lack the band inversion predicted by the DFT input, and check whether the DMC signal still shows the swap; alternatively, compute the full off-diagonal 1RDM for bulk Bi2Te3 and test whether the near-unit Te-p to Bi-p transfer at Γ survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a momentum-resolved atomic population analysis of the DMC one-body reduced density matrix detects band inversion. In Bi2Te3, turning on spin-orbit coupling shifts about one electron of p-character from tellurium to bismuth at the Γ-point, with the Te-p occupation dropping by nearly a full electron and the Bi-p occupation rising by roughly 0.85 electrons. The monolayer of Bi2Te3, lacking interlayer interactions, shows no such signal. The paper also reports that a Jastrow-free variational Monte Carlo run reproduces the DFT occupancies exactly, and that the Jastrow factor shifts Te-p occupations by only 0.15–0.20 electrons, small compared with the spin-orbit signal. The authors conclude that ground-state DMC can be used to identify the orbital-character swap that marks a topological insulator.

Load-bearing premise

The DMC trial wavefunction is a Slater determinant of DFT spinors multiplied by a Jastrow factor, so the band-inversion signal is dominated by the orbital character of the DFT input; for the method to be useful in strongly correlated materials, that input dependence must stay weak and the diagonal-only 1RDM approximation must remain valid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method converts a ground-state DMC calculation into a diagnostic for band inversion, so no excited-state or band-structure information is needed.
  • It can compare the degree of inversion between related structures, as demonstrated by the bulk-versus-monolayer Bi2Te3 contrast.
  • Because the analysis is a post-processing step on the one-body density matrix, it transfers to other wavefunction-based methods that can produce a 1RDM.
  • For weakly correlated topological insulators it provides a many-body corroboration of DFT band-inversion predictions, and for correlated candidates it gives a first quantitative look at how correlation modifies the inversion signal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-unit spin-orbit signal is largely carried by the orbital character of the DFT-based Slater determinant, since the Jastrow factor shifts occupations by only about 0.15–0.20 electrons; the method's utility for strongly correlated materials depends on input dependence staying weak, which remains untested.
  • The diagonal-only 1RDM approximation could be relaxed; computing off-diagonal elements might change the inferred magnitude or location of the inversion signal.
  • A natural next test is to apply the same $\delta N_{a\ell}(k)$ diagnostic to correlated candidates such as MnBi2Te4 or SmB6, where mean-field and many-body methods may disagree about the presence of band inversion.
  • The quantitative size of the signal depends on the chosen atomic-orbital projection basis; the robust content is the sign and momentum localization of the charge swap, not its exact electron count.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a method to detect band inversion in topological materials using Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC). The approach constructs a momentum-resolved one-body reduced density matrix (1RDM) from DMC, projects it onto orthogonalized atomic orbitals via Löwdin population analysis, and defines the SOC-induced occupation difference δN_{aℓ}(k) = N^{SOC}_{aℓ}(k) − N^{no-SOC}_{aℓ}(k) as the band-inversion indicator. The method is implemented in QMCPACK and applied to bulk Bi2Te3 and monolayer Bi2Te3. For bulk Bi2Te3, the authors report a near-unit decrease in Te-p and increase in Bi-p occupation at the Γ-point when SOC is turned on, which they interpret as detection of the known band inversion. The monolayer, in contrast, shows no such Γ-point signal. The paper also validates the projection pipeline by showing that Jastrow-free VMC reproduces PBE occupations exactly and that including a Jastrow factor shifts the occupations by only 0.15–0.20 electrons.

Significance. If the method were shown to be robust, it would fill a real gap: continuum QMC methods cannot easily produce band structures, but a ground-state, momentum-resolved occupation analysis is cheap and could be applied to correlated topological insulators where DFT is uncertain. The paper's strengths include a parameter-free definition of the diagnostic, integration into an open-source code with the modifications publicly available, and an explicit validation step (no-Jastrow VMC matching DFT) that confirms the projection machinery. The authors are also transparent about two key limitations: they omit off-diagonal 1RDM elements and do not converge finite-size effects. However, as analyzed in the major comments, the central demonstration on Bi2Te3 is substantially inheriting the DFT input rather than independently predicting the inversion, so the significance for correlated materials remains unproven.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV C, Eqs. 12 and 6, Fig. 3 vs Fig. 5] The DMC trial wavefunction is a Slater determinant of PBE spinors multiplied by a real, positive Jastrow factor (Eq. 12), and fixed-phase DMC keeps the phase of this determinant fixed. Since the Jastrow cannot change the orbital mixing that encodes the SOC-driven band inversion, the near-unit δN at Γ in Fig. 5 is dominated by the PBE input; the Jastrow changes Te-p occupations by only 0.15–0.20e (Fig. 3). The claim that 'DMC can detect the band inversion' is therefore not an independent many-body detection; it demonstrates that the fixed-phase projection does not destroy the DFT signal. A trial-wavefunction dependence test (e.g., using spinors from a hybrid functional or self-consistent GW) is needed to establish that the diagnostic is not dominated by the input orbitals, especially for the correlated TIs the method is ultimately aimed at.
  2. [Section IV C, diagonal 1RDM approximation] The authors state that they 'chose to limit our analysis to the diagonal elements of the 1RDM, effectively making the approximation that the natural orbitals do not change to first-order in correlation.' This is an unvalidated assumption. Off-diagonal elements of n^k_ij can rotate the natural orbitals and thereby change the atomic occupations; this effect is expected to become more important precisely in the strongly correlated systems where the method is proposed to add value. The manuscript provides no estimate of the size of the neglected off-diagonal elements or any test of the approximation on a correlated system. This gap should be addressed before the method is presented as suitable for correlated topological insulators.
  3. [Section III C and Section IV C, finite-size effects] The paper explicitly states 'we do not converge our results with respect to one- and two-body finite-size effects' and instead focuses on methodology. Because the central observable is a quantitative occupation difference (Eq. 6), and the comparison between bulk and monolayer hinges on the magnitude of the Γ-point signal (~1e vs ~0.1e), the lack of twist-averaged finite-size corrections or any finite-size convergence analysis leaves open the possibility of significant systematic errors in the reported values. A finite-size convergence test on a subset of k-points, or at least a quantitative estimate of the expected finite-size error, is needed to support the quantitative claims.
  4. [Figures 4, 5 and Supplemental Tables S3-S7, S17-S18] No numerical statistical uncertainties are reported anywhere in the text or tables. Figure 4 and 5 show error bars, and the text refers to agreement 'within the statistical uncertainty,' but without numeric error values the reader cannot assess whether the Γ-point signals in bulk (near 1e) and the monolayer (average ~0.1e) are statistically distinguishable from zero or from each other. The authors should report uncertainties for the key values of δN at Γ for both bulk and monolayer.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References, Ref. [18]] Reference [18] appears as an empty entry, which interrupts the reference list and leaves the citation to QMC methods unspecified; it should be completed or removed.
  2. [Section IV B] The sentence 'We find the DFT and VMC no-Jastrow results match perfectly within the available statistical resolution' is internally inconsistent; 'perfectly' should be replaced by 'within the available statistical resolution' or an equivalent formulation.
  3. [Section IV B] The statement that the Jastrow removes 'roughly 0.15 − 0.20 electrons' from Te-p states should specify whether this is an average over the k-path or the entire Brillouin zone, and it would be useful to report the value at Γ as well.
  4. [Section IV C] In the paragraph discussing Figure 5, the phrase 'suggesting that charge is being transferred to the Tep orbitals from other sources as well' appears to be a typo; based on the preceding sentences it should read 'to the Bi-p orbitals.'
  5. [Section III B and III C] For reproducibility, the bulk lattice parameters and ICSD collection code should be given in the main text (only a reference to ICSD is provided), and the monolayer construction should specify whether atomic positions were relaxed or kept at bulk-truncated values.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The DMC band-inversion signal is to first order the PBE signal already present in the trial wavefunction; the many-body calculation does not independently detect the inversion.

  1. renaming known result [Section IV C (Eq. 12, Figs. 3 and 5)]
    "There is relatively good agreement between the PBE and DMC valence occupations (Equation 5), both with and without SOC, possibly because of the relatively weak electron correlation in Bi2Te3. The PBE and DMC predictions of the Bi-p occupations almost perfectly coincide across our k-path."

    The DMC trial wavefunction (Eq. 12) is a Slater determinant of PBE spinors times a positive Jastrow, and fixed-phase DMC preserves the trial phase, which encodes the SOC-driven spinor mixing. The paper's own Fig. 3 shows no-Jastrow VMC reproduces PBE exactly, and the Jastrow changes Te-p occupations by only 0.15-0.20 e, while the SOC-switch signal in Fig. 5 is about 1 e. Thus the reported DMC detection of band inversion is, to first order, the PBE band inversion already contained in the input spinors; the many-body calculation adds only a small correlation correction and does not constitute an independent confirmation of the inversion.

  2. self definitional [Section IV C (diagonal-only 1RDM approximation)]
    "We note that the Slki matrices introduce a systematic error with respect to k. To reduce this sensitivity, we chose to limit our analysis to the diagonal elements of the 1RDM, effectively making the approximation that the natural orbitals do not change to first-order in correlation."

    With off-diagonal elements discarded and natural orbitals assumed unchanged, the occupation N_aℓ(k) in Eq. 5 is defined as a projection of only the fixed PBE spinor occupancy weights. Changes in orbital character that would appear as changed natural orbitals or off-diagonal 1RDM elements are excluded by construction. The band-inversion signature is therefore defined inside the DFT orbital character supplied by the trial wavefunction, and the subsequent DMC analysis cannot revise that character; it can only rescale diagonal weights, which is the small 0.15-0.20 e Jastrow effect observed.

full rationale

The paper contains no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citation chain; the SOC-DMC implementation cited from Refs. 28-30 is external algorithmic machinery. The circularity concern is about the central demonstration. Eq. 12 constructs the trial wavefunction from PBE spinors and a positive Jastrow factor, while fixed-phase DMC freezes the phase that carries the SOC-induced orbital mixing. The no-Jastrow VMC limit exactly matches PBE, and the Jastrow shifts Te-p occupations by only 0.15-0.20 e, whereas the SOC-switch signal in Fig. 5 is about 1 e. Consequently, the reported DMC detection of band inversion is to first order the PBE band inversion already present in the trial wavefunction, not an independent many-body determination. The diagonal-only 1RDM approximation in Section IV C makes this input dependence structural by assuming natural orbitals do not change, so the observable is projected onto the fixed PBE spinor basis. This is a partial, not total, circularity: DMC does add a small correlation correction, and the monolayer Bi2Te3 result is a separate non-circular observation. However, the bulk Bi2Te3 benchmark does not test whether the DMC occupation signal survives when the DFT nodal/phase structure is wrong, so the abstract's suggestion that the method can 'validate prior DFT work' on correlated topological insulators rests on an untested assumption.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on domain assumptions about DMC accuracy (fixed-node/fixed-phase, ccECP pseudopotentials), on the adequacy of PBE DFT spinors as the trial wavefunction, on the diagonal-only approximation to the 1RDM, and on the interpretation of SOC-minus-nonSOC occupation differences as a band-inversion signature. No new physical entities are introduced, and no constants are fitted to the target result. The heaviest load is carried by the diagonal approximation and the assumed validity of the occupation-difference proxy.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The fixed-node and fixed-phase DMC approximations yield an accurate ground state 1RDM for Bi2Te3.
    Invoked in Section III C; these are standard QMC approximations, but their effect on the 1RDM is not benchmarked against experiment.
  • domain assumption PBE DFT spinors provide a sufficient single-particle basis and nodal surface for the DMC trial wavefunction.
    Used to construct the Slater determinant in Eq. 12; no systematic basis-set or functional convergence test is reported.
  • ad hoc to paper The diagonal elements of the 1RDM suffice to detect band inversion; off-diagonal elements are neglected.
    Stated in Section IV C: 'we chose to limit our analysis to the diagonal elements... natural orbitals do not change to first-order'. Untested for strongly correlated systems.
  • ad hoc to paper The SOC-minus-nonSOC occupation difference δN_{aℓ}(k) is a valid proxy for band inversion without access to conduction band states.
    Defined in Eq. 6 and used throughout Section IV; the connection to a topological invariant is not derived.
  • domain assumption ccECP pseudopotentials accurately reproduce the spin-orbit and correlation physics.
    Used in Section III B; relies on prior literature [45,46] without a specific validation here.
  • domain assumption The 23 Å vacuum in the monolayer model is sufficient to decouple periodic images.
    Stated in Section III A; no convergence test with vacuum thickness is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Identifying Band Inversions in Topological Materials Using Diffusion Monte Carlo." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/63GIL6X3

@misc{pith2026241214388,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Identifying Band Inversions in Topological Materials Using Diffusion Monte Carlo},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/63GIL6X3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14388}
}
abstract

Topological insulators are characterized by insulating bulk states and robust metallic surface states. Band inversion is a hallmark of topological insulators: at time-reversal invariant points in the Brillouin zone, spin-orbit coupling (SOC) induces a swapping of orbital character at the bulk band edges. In this work, we develop a novel method to detect band inversion within continuum quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods that can accurately treat the electron correlation and spin-orbit coupling crucial to the physics of topological insulators. Our approach applies a momentum-space-resolved atomic population analysis throughout the first Brillouin zone utilizing the L\"owdin method and the one-body reduced density matrix produced with Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC). We integrate this method into QMCPACK, an open source ab initio QMC package, so that these ground state methods can be used to complement experimental studies and validate prior DFT work on predicting the band structures of correlated topological insulators. We demonstrate this new technique on the topological insulator bismuth telluride, which displays band inversion between its Bi-p and Te-p states at the $\Gamma$-point. We show an increase in charge on the bismuth p orbital and a decrease in charge on the tellurium p orbital when comparing band structures with and without SOC. Additionally, we use our method to compare the degree of band inversion present in monolayer Bi$_2$Te$_3$, which has no interlayer van der Waals interactions, to that seen in the bulk. The method presented here will enable future, many-body studies of band inversion that can shed light on the delicate interplay between correlation and topology in correlated topological materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14388 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The crystal structure of bulk Bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The Bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison of total Te [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. PBE and DMC Bi and Te [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Differences in occupations between SOC and non-SOC calculations (Equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells, Science314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the hall ef- fect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  4. [4]

    Onoda and N

    M. Onoda and N. Nagaosa, Quantized anomalous hall effect in two-dimensional ferromagnets: Quantum hall effect in metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 206601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    to characterize the band inversion. 5 FIG. 2. (a) The Bi2Te3 PBE band structure with bands with Bi and Tepz character appearing in blue and gold, respectively. (b) As given by Equation 5, the total valence band PBE Te-p occupancies around theΓ-point in the kz = 0 plane, in the presence of SOC. (c) Difference in total valence band PBE Te-p occupancy (Equat...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science340, 167 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Anirban, 15 years of topological insulators, Nature Reviews Physics5, 267 (2023)

    A. Anirban, 15 years of topological insulators, Nature Reviews Physics5, 267 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Kane and J

    C. Kane and J. Moore, Topological insulators, Physics World24, 32 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Narang, C

    P. Narang, C. A. C. Garcia, and C. Felser, The topology of electronic band structures, Nature Materials20, 293 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021004 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Zhang, C.-X

    H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.- C. Zhang, Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface, Nature Physics 5, 438 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    L. Zhao, H. Deng, I. Korzhovska, M. Begliarbekov, Z. Chen, E. Andrade, E. Rosenthal, A. Pasupathy, V. Oganesyan, and L. Krusin-Elbaum, Emergent surface superconductivityinthetopologicalinsulatorsb2te3,Na- ture Communications6, 10.1038/ncomms9279 (2015)

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    Zhang and S.-C

    H. Zhang and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators from the perspective of first-principles calculations, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 7, 72 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Y.-J. Hao, P. Liu, Y. Feng, X.-M. Ma, E. F. Schwier, M. Arita, S. Kumar, C. Hu, R. Lu, M. Zeng, Y. Wang, Z. Hao, H.-Y. Sun, K. Zhang, J. Mei, N. Ni, L. Wu, K. Shimada, C. Chen, Q. Liu, and C. Liu, Gapless sur- face dirac cone in antiferromagnetic topological insulator mnbi2te4...

    2019

  7. [15]

    Vidal, X

    J. Vidal, X. Zhang, L. Yu, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, False-positive and false-negative assignments of topolog- ical insulators in density functional theory and hybrids, Phys. Rev. B84, 041109 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    L. Li, K. Sun, C. Kurdak, and J. Allen, Emergent mys- tery in the kondo insulator samarium hexaboride, Nature Reviews Physics2, 463–479 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    A. P. Sakhya and K. Maiti, Ground state anomalies in smb6, Scientific Reports10, 1262 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Neupane, N

    M. Neupane, N. Alidoust, S.-Y. Xu, T. Kondo, Y. Ishida, D. J. Kim, C. Liu, I. Belopolski, Y. J. Jo, T.-R. Chang, H.-T. Jeng, T. Durakiewicz, L. Balicas, H. Lin, A. Ban- sil, S. Shin, Z. Fisk, and M. Z. Hasan, Surface elec- tronic structure of the topological kondo-insulator ca...

    2013

  11. [19]

    M. H. Kalos, Monte carlo calculations of the ground state of three- and four-body nuclei, Phys. Rev. 128, 1791 (1962)

    1962

  12. [20]

    W. L. McMillan, Ground state of liquidhe4, Phys. Rev. 138, A442 (1965)

    1965

  13. [21]

    J. B. Anderson, A random-walk simulation of the schrodinger equation: H+3, The Journal of Chemical Physics 63, 1499 (1975)

    1975

  14. [22]

    J. B. Anderson, Quantum chemistry by random walk, The Journal of Chemical Physics65, 4121 (1976)

    1976

  15. [23]

    D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980)

    1980

  16. [24]

    Watanabe, R

    R. Watanabe, R. Yoshimi, M. Kawamura, M. Mogi, A. Tsukazaki, X. Z. Yu, K. Nakajima, K. S. Taka- hashi, M.Kawasaki,andY.Tokura,Quantumanomalous Hall effect driven by magnetic proximity coupling in all- telluride based heterostructure, Applied Physics Letters 115, 102403 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Quantum anoma- lous hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological in- sulator mnbi<sub>2</sub>te<sub>4</sub>, Science 367, 895 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    H. Deng, Z. Chen, A. Wotos, M. Konczykowski, K. Sobczak, J. Sitnicka, I. Fedorchenko, J. Borysiuk, T. Heider, L. Plucinski, K. Park, A. B. Georgescu, J. Cano, and L. Krusin-Elbaum, High-temperature quan- tum anomalous hall regime in a mnbi2te4/bi2te3 super- lattice, Nature Phy...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Liu and T

    J. Liu and T. Hesjedal, Magnetic topological insula- tor heterostructures: A review, Advanced Materials35, 2102427 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    C. A. Melton, M. Zhu, S. Guo, A. Ambrosetti, F. Ped- eriva, and L. Mitas, Spin-orbit interactions in electronic structure quantum monte carlo methods, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042502 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    C. A. Melton, M. C. Bennett, and L. Mitas, Quantum Monte Carlo with variable spins, The Journal of Chemi- cal Physics144, 244113 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    C. A. Melton and L. Mitas, Quantum monte carlo with variable spins: Fixed-phase and fixed-node approxima- tions, Phys. Rev. E96, 043305 (2017). 10

    2017

  23. [31]

    P.-O. Lowdin, On the nonorthogonality problem con- nected with the use of atomic wave functions in thee the- ory of molecules and crystals, The Journal of Chemical Physics 18, 365–375 (1950)

    1950

  24. [32]

    Löwdin, On the nonorthogonality problem, Ad- vances in Quantum Chemistry,5, 185 (1970)

    P.-O. Löwdin, On the nonorthogonality problem, Ad- vances in Quantum Chemistry,5, 185 (1970)

    1970

  25. [33]

    Sánchez-Portal, E

    D. Sánchez-Portal, E. Artacho, and J. M. Soler, Analysis of atomic orbital basis sets from the projection of plane- wave results, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter8, 3859 (1996)

    1996

  26. [34]

    I. T. Witting, T. C. Chasapis, F. Ricci, M. Peters, N. A. Heinz, G. Hautier, and G. J. Snyder, The thermoelec- tric properties of bismuth telluride, Advanced Electronic Materials 5, 1800904 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Y. L. Chen, J. G. Analytis, J.-H. Chu, Z. K. Liu, S.-K. Mo, X. L. Qi, H. J. Zhang, D. H. Lu, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S. C. Zhang, I. R. Fisher, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Experimental realization of a three-dimensional topolog- ical insulator, bi<sub>2</sub>te<sub>3</sub>, Sci- ence...

    2016

  28. [36]

    Michiardi, I

    M. Michiardi, I. Aguilera, M. Bianchi, V. E. de Carvalho, L. O. Ladeira, N. G. Teixeira, E. A. Soares, C. Friedrich, S.Blügel, andP. Hofmann,Bulkband structureof bi2te3, Phys. Rev. B90, 075105 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    I. A. Nechaev and E. V. Chulkov, Quasiparticle band gap in the topological insulator bi2te3, Phys. Rev. B88, 165135 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    H.-J. Noh, H. Koh, S.-J. Oh, J.-H. Park, H.-D. Kim, J. D. Rameau, T. Valla, T. E. Kidd, P. D. Johnson, Y. Hu, and Q. Li, Spin-orbit interaction effect in the electronic struc- ture of bi2te3 observed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Europhysics Letters81, 57006 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    Kioupakis, M

    E. Kioupakis, M. L. Tiago, and S. G. Louie, Quasipar- ticle electronic structure of bismuth telluride in thegw approximation, Phys. Rev. B82, 245203 (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    Bergerhoff, R

    G. Bergerhoff, R. Hundt, R. Sievers, and I. Brown, The inorganic crystal structure data base, J. Chem. Inf. Com- put. Sci.23, 66 (1983)

    1983

  33. [41]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  34. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. M...

    2009

  36. [44]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zoneintegrations,Phys.Rev.B 13,5188(1976)

    1976

  37. [45]

    M. C. Bennett, C. A. Melton, A. Annaberdiyev, G. Wang, L. Shulenburger, and L. Mitas, A new genera- tionofeffectivecorepotentialsforcorrelatedcalculations, The Journal of Chemical Physics147, 224106 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    G. Wang, B. Kincaid, H. Zhou, A. Annaberdiyev, M. C. Bennett, J. T. Krogel, and L. Mitas, A new generation of effective core potentials from correlated and spin–orbit calculations: Selected heavy elements, The Journal of Chemical Physics157, 054101 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Ra- jagopal, Quantum monte carlo simulations of solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 33 (2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    Ortiz, D

    G. Ortiz, D. M. Ceperley, and R. M. Martin, New stochastic method for systems with broken time-reversal symmetry: 2d fermions in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2777 (1993)

    1993

  41. [49]

    J. Kim, A. D. Baczewski, T. D. Beaudet, A. Benali, M. C. Bennett, M. A. Berrill, N. S. Blunt, E. J. L. Borda, M. Casula, D. M. Ceperley, S. Chiesa, B. K. Clark, R. C. Clay, K. T. Delaney, M. Dewing, K. P. Esler, H. Hao, O. Heinonen, P. R. C. Kent, J. T. Krogel, I. Kylänpää, Y....

    2018

  42. [50]

    P. R. C. Kent, A. Annaberdiyev, A. Benali, M. C. Ben- nett, E. J. Landinez Borda, P. Doak, H. Hao, K. D. Jordan, J. T. Krogel, I. Kylänpää, J. Lee, Y. Luo, F. D. Malone, C. A. Melton, L. Mitas, M. A. Morales, E. Neuscamman, F. A. Reboredo, B. Rubenstein, K. Sar- itas, S. Upadh...

    2020

  43. [51]

    J. T. Krogel, Nexus: A modular workflow management system for quantum simulation codes, Computer Physics Communications 198, 154 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Toulouse and C

    J. Toulouse and C. J. Umrigar, Optimization of quantum Monte Carlo wave functions by energy minimization, The Journal of Chemical Physics126, 084102 (2007)

    2007

  45. [53]

    C. Lin, F. H. Zong, and D. M. Ceperley, Twist-averaged boundary conditions in continuum quantum monte carlo algorithms, Phys. Rev. E64, 016702 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Saritas, J

    K. Saritas, J. T. Krogel, P. R. C. Kent, and F. A. Re- boredo, Diffusion monte carlo: A pathway towards an ac- curate theoretical description of manganese oxides, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 085801 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Wines, K

    D. Wines, K. Saritas, and C. Ataca, Intrinsic ferromag- netism of two-dimensional (2d) mno2 revisited: A many- bodyquantummontecarloanddft+u study,The Journal of Physical Chemistry C126, 5813 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Wines, K

    D. Wines, K. Choudhary, and F. Tavazza, Systematic dft+u and quantum monte carlo benchmark of magnetic two-dimensional (2d) crx3 (x = i, br, cl, f), The Journal of Physical Chemistry C127, 1176 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.