REVIEW 2 cited by
How May I Help You? Using Neural Text Simplification to Improve Downstream NLP Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The general goal of text simplification (TS) is to reduce text complexity for human consumption. This paper investigates another potential use of neural TS: assisting machines performing natural language processing (NLP) tasks. We evaluate the use of neural TS in two ways: simplifying input texts at prediction time and augmenting data to provide machines with additional information during training. We demonstrate that the latter scenario provides positive effects on machine performance on two separate datasets. In particular, the latter use of TS improves the performances of LSTM (1.82-1.98%) and SpanBERT (0.7-1.3%) extractors on TACRED, a complex, large-scale, real-world relation extraction task. Further, the same setting yields improvements of up to 0.65% matched and 0.62% mismatched accuracies for a BERT text classifier on MNLI, a practical natural language inference dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting
A contextual bandit that chooses among five query-rewrite strategies, conditioned on 17 linguistic features, reduces LLM hallucination on QA benchmarks and beats static prompting and no-rewrite baselines.
-
Can summarization approximate simplification? A gold standard comparison
Paragraph-by-paragraph BRIO summarization reaches ROUGE-L 0.654 against Newsela level-1 human simplifications, outperforming whole-document summarization but still far from human-level simplification.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.