Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

In-Distribution Consistency Regularization Improves the Generalization of Quantization-Aware Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13497 v2 pith:6442DOIS submitted 2024-02-21 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords generalizationabilityimprovesmethodmethodstrainingbaselinecompared
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although existing Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) methods intensively depend on knowledge distillation to guarantee performance, QAT still suffers from severe performance drop. The experiments have shown that vanilla quantization is sensitive to the perturbation from both the input and weights. Therefore, we assume that the generalization ability of QAT is predominantly caused by both the intrinsic instability (training time) and the limited generalization ability (testing time). In this paper, we address both issues from a new perspective by leveraging Consistency Regularization (CR) to improve the generalization ability of QAT. Empirical results and theoretical analysis verify that CR would bring a good generalization ability to different network architectures and various QAT methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art QAT methods and even the FP counterparts. On CIFAR-10, the proposed method improves by 3.79% compared to the baseline method using ResNet18, and improves by 3.84% compared to the baseline method using the lightweight model MobileNet.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Membership Inference Risks in Quantized Models: A Theoretical and Empirical Study

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quantizers can be ranked by privacy using r_Q, a rate constant built from the loss gap and variance of low-loss quantized checkpoints along the training trajectory.

Pith tools