Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automatic Feedback Generation for Short Answer Questions using Answer Diagnostic Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.15777 v1 pith:64AB2472 submitted 2025-01-27 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords feedbackstudentstextanswercomprehensionquestionsstructureautomatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Short-reading comprehension questions help students understand text structure but lack effective feedback. Students struggle to identify and correct errors, while manual feedback creation is labor-intensive. This highlights the need for automated feedback linking responses to a scoring rubric for deeper comprehension. Despite advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP), research has focused on automatic grading, with limited work on feedback generation. To address this, we propose a system that generates feedback for student responses. Our contributions are twofold. First, we introduce the first system for feedback on short-answer reading comprehension. These answers are derived from the text, requiring structural understanding. We propose an "answer diagnosis graph," integrating the text's logical structure with feedback templates. Using this graph and NLP techniques, we estimate students' comprehension and generate targeted feedback. Second, we evaluate our feedback through an experiment with Japanese high school students (n=39). They answered two 70-80 word questions and were divided into two groups with minimal academic differences. One received a model answer, the other system-generated feedback. Both re-answered the questions, and we compared score changes. A questionnaire assessed perceptions and motivation. Results showed no significant score improvement between groups, but system-generated feedback helped students identify errors and key points in the text. It also significantly increased motivation. However, further refinement is needed to enhance text structure understanding.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Struggle (06-2024) to Mastery (02-2025) LLMs Conquer Advanced Algorithm Exams and Pave the Way for Editorial Generation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The newest LLMs, especially o3-mini, score near the top of an advanced algorithms exam while older models fail, but visual graph problems remain hard.

Pith tools