Pith. sign in

REVIEW

E Pluribus Unum: Guidelines on Multi-Objective Evaluation of Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.10621 v1 pith:64OFZFKN submitted 2023-04-20 cs.IR

E Pluribus Unum: Guidelines on Multi-Objective Evaluation of Recommender Systems

classification cs.IR
keywords evaluationmulti-objectiverecommendersystemschallengeevalrsguidelinesmultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender Systems today are still mostly evaluated in terms of accuracy, with other aspects beyond the immediate relevance of recommendations, such as diversity, long-term user retention and fairness, often taking a back seat. Moreover, reconciling multiple performance perspectives is by definition indeterminate, presenting a stumbling block to those in the pursuit of rounded evaluation of Recommender Systems. EvalRS 2022 -- a data challenge designed around Multi-Objective Evaluation -- was a first practical endeavour, providing many insights into the requirements and challenges of balancing multiple objectives in evaluation. In this work, we reflect on EvalRS 2022 and expound upon crucial learnings to formulate a first-principles approach toward Multi-Objective model selection, and outline a set of guidelines for carrying out a Multi-Objective Evaluation challenge, with potential applicability to the problem of rounded evaluation of competing models in real-world deployments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.