Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 149 references

Delay-Independent Stability of Nonlinear Delay Differential Equations via Isospectral Reduction

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims a delay-independent sufficient condition for global exponential stability in a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous delay differential equations, obtained by analyzing approximating finite-dimensional matrices via isospe

desk verdict The DDE stability paper isn't actually in front of us — the supplied full text is a quant-ph article on magic harvesting, so soundness is unknowable and the claimed criterion is unreviewed. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16469 v2 pith:64ZF7IJL submitted 2025-08-22 math.DS

Quinlan Leishman , Benjamin Webb This is my paper
classification math.DS MSC 34K2005C50
keywords delaydifferentialequationsglobalexponentialstabilityisospectralreductiondelay-independentcriterionnonlinearnonautonomoussystemsreservoircomputingfinite-dimensionalapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove a delay-independent sufficient condition for global exponential stability in a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous delay differential equations. The method replaces the infinite-dimensional delayed system with a sequence of finite-dimensional matrices of increasing size, then applies the graph-theoretic operation of isospectral reduction to extract the spectral information that controls stability. If the claim holds, stability of such systems can be checked without knowing the delay, using finite matrix computations, in contrast to Lyapunov-based approaches that dominate the field. The same criterion is used to analyze consistency in delayed reservoir computing, giving a stability-based check on whether a reservoir computer's predictions are reliable.

What carries the argument

Isospectral reduction, a graph-theoretic operation that reduces a matrix (or weighted graph) to a smaller matrix preserving the non-reduced part of the spectrum. The paper uses it on a sequence of finite-dimensional matrices that approximate the delay differential equation; the spectra of the reduced matrices accumulate at the stability boundary of the infinite-dimensional system, and the criterion is expressed in terms of these spectra.

What would settle it

Take a benchmark nonlinear delay equation with a known delay-dependent stability boundary, such as the delayed logistic equation x'(t) = lambda x(t)(1 - x(t - tau)), and apply the isospectral-reduction criterion at parameter values where exact analysis shows instability for some delay. If the criterion declares global exponential stability there, the correspondence between reduced-matrix spectra and the true stability boundary is broken. Alternatively, simulate a delayed reservoir computer at the predicted consistency threshold and check whether its readout error actually stays bounded for all

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous delay differential equations, global exponential stability can be decided by a delay-independent criterion computed from finite-dimensional matrix approximations. The stability of the delayed system is governed by the spectral properties of these approximating matrices, and isospectral reduction—a technique from graph theory that compresses a matrix while preserving its spectrum—makes those properties computable. The result holds uniformly over the delay, so checking the criterion once gives a stability guarantee for all admissible delays. As an application, the criterion is specialized to delayed reservoir computing, wh

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that global exponential stability of the nonlinear delay equation is faithfully determined by the spectra of the finite-dimensional isospectral reductions—that is, that the reduction procedure converges to the correct infinite-dimensional stability boundary. It also assumes the nonlinearity obeys a Lipschitz or sector bound defining the 'broad class,' though that regularity condition is not stated in the abstract.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stability certificates for nonlinear DDEs can be produced by a finite matrix calculation that does not require the delay value.
  • The approach offers a computationally efficient alternative to Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals for a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous systems.
  • In delayed reservoir computing, the criterion gives a delay-independent consistency check that can be evaluated before training.
  • The finite-dimensional approximation suggests a natural route to numerical implementation with error control as the matrix size grows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spectral convergence is sharp, the criterion may be close to necessary as well as sufficient for the class considered, giving a tight stability region.
  • The same isospectral-reduction construction likely extends to retarded systems with multiple delays or time-varying delays, since the approximation sequence does not depend on a single fixed delay.
  • For reservoir computing, the criterion could be inverted into a design rule: choose the reservoir's internal weights so that the reduced matrices satisfy the spectral condition, making consistency robust to communication delays.
  • The technique may connect to pseudospectra: the finite-dimensional reductions could be used to assess transient growth and robustness under parameter perturbations, not just asymptotic stability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper, as represented by the abstract, claims a delay-independent stability criterion for global exponential stability in a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous delay differential equations, obtained by associating the system with a sequence of finite-dimensional matrices and applying graph-theoretic isospectral reduction, with an application to delayed reservoir computing. The full text supplied for review, however, is a quantum-information paper on magic-resource harvesting in anti-de Sitter spacetime; it contains no DDEs, no stability theorem, no isospectral reduction, and no reservoir-computing content. The technical material necessary to verify the abstract is thus entirely absent.

Significance. If the claimed result were present and correct, it would be a noteworthy contribution: a general, computationally efficient, delay-independent sufficient condition for global exponential stability in nonlinear nonautonomous DDEs would significantly complement Lyapunov-based approaches, and the reservoir-computing consistency application would broaden its impact. However, none of the claimed technical content appears in the manuscript under review. The abstract alone cannot support such a claim, and no strengths (machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or falsifiable predictions) can be verified from the supplied text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text (all)] The supplied full text, headed 'Analytic Tools for Harvesting Magic Resource in Curved Spacetime' with header arXiv:2508.16466v1 [quant-ph], is unrelated to the abstract. It contains no definition of the class of nonlinear nonautonomous DDEs, no theorem statement, no hypotheses, no proof, no construction of finite-dimensional approximating matrices, and no isospectral reduction analysis. Equations (1)-(11) concern detector transition probabilities and coherences, not stability. The central claim of the paper is therefore unevaluable from the provided manuscript.
  2. [Abstract] The claimed delay-independent criterion implicitly rests on at least two load-bearing premises: (i) a regularity/sector condition defining the 'broad class' of admissible nonlinearities, and (ii) convergence of the spectra of the finite-dimensional isospectral reductions to the stability boundary of the infinite-dimensional delay system. Neither is stated, derived, or supported anywhere in the supplied text. Without these, the assertion that the framework 'provides a general and computationally efficient alternative' is unsupported.
  3. [Abstract (application)] The claimed application to consistency in delayed reservoir computing systems appears only as an announcement. There are no definitions of consistency, no stability analysis of a reservoir system, no numerical experiments, and no comparison with existing results. This component cannot be checked and does not contribute to validating the proposed criterion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Header] The arXiv number in the full-text header is 2508.16466v1, while the manuscript is cited as 2508.16469. If this is not a transcription error, the wrong file may have been submitted for review.
  2. [Throughout] Even as an abstract, the statement 'a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous delay differential equations' lacks the precision expected for a stability theorem. A resubmission should explicitly state the delay type (discrete/distributed), the state space, and the Lipschitz or sector conditions on the nonlinearity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; supplied full text is a different paper, so the claimed derivation is not available for evaluation.

full rationale

The abstract describes a delay-independent stability criterion for nonlinear DDEs developed via isospectral reduction of finite-dimensional matrices, followed by an application to reservoir computing. The supplied full text, however, is a quantum physics paper titled 'Analytic Tools for Harvesting Magic Resource in Curved Spacetime' (arXiv:2508.16466v1 [quant-ph]) by different authors. It contains no DDEs, no isospectral reduction, no stability theorem, and no reservoir-computing analysis. Consequently, there is no derivation chain in the supplied text that could be checked for circularity. Per the hard rules, circularity can only be claimed with a specific quote and exhibited reduction; no such evidence exists here. The absence of the claimed content is a correctness/verifiability issue, not a circularity finding. Therefore the circularity score is 0, with no steps identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract exposes two implicit assumptions: a faithful finite-dimensional matrix encoding of the delayed system, and sufficient regularity of the nonlinearity to make the spectral criterion global. Both are domain assumptions characteristic of this method; neither can be audited because the supplied full text is an unrelated paper. No free parameters or invented entities are visible from the abstract alone, which means the ledger is incomplete by construction.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The nonlinear, nonautonomous delay system can be faithfully represented by a sequence of finite-dimensional matrices whose spectral data determines global exponential stability.
    Stated in the abstract as the core mechanism ('associates the delayed system with a sequence of finite-dimensional matrices... analyzed using isospectral reduction'); this equivalence is the load-bearing unproven premise.
  • domain assumption The nonlinearity in the 'broad class' of systems satisfies regularity conditions (for example Lipschitz or sector bounds) sufficient for the matrix criterion to apply.
    Invoked implicitly by the phrase 'a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous delay differential equations'; the conditions are not stated in the abstract and are needed for any global stability theorem.
  • domain assumption Isospectral reduction preserves the spectral information relevant to stability of the infinite-dimensional delay system.
    Isospectral reduction is an established graph and matrix technique, but its extension to delay operators is the paper's claimed contribution; the abstract gives no proof that spectral data survive the reduction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Delay-Independent Stability of Nonlinear Delay Differential Equations via Isospectral Reduction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/64ZF7IJL

@misc{pith2026250816469,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Delay-Independent Stability of Nonlinear Delay Differential Equations via Isospectral Reduction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/64ZF7IJL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16469}
}
read the original abstract

Time delays arise naturally in a wide range of natural and technological systems, yet their influence on the stability remains a challenge to characterize, particularly for nonlinear systems. In this paper, we develop a stability framework that yields a delay-independent criterion for global exponential stability in a broad class of nonlinear, nonautonomous delay differential equations. Our approach is based on a novel method that associates the delayed system with a sequence of finite-dimensional matrices of increasing size, which are analyzed using the graph-theoretic technique of isospectral reduction. In contrast to most existing results for nonlinear delay differential equations, which rely on Lyapunov-based methods, our framework provides a general and computationally efficient alternative. As an application, we apply this criterion to analyze consistency in delayed reservoir computing systems, illustrating how the proposed approach can be used to assess stability properties relevant to prediction tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. �� , 181602 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    Van Raamsdonk, Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Gen. Rel. Grav. �� , 2323 (2010), arXiv:1005.3035 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Susskind, Fortsch

    L. Susskind, Fortsch. Phys. �� , 49 (2016), arXiv:1411.0690 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Susskind, Fortsch

    L. Susskind, Fortsch. Phys. �� , 24 (2016), [Addendum: Fortsch.Phys. 64, 44–48 (2016)], arXiv:1403.5695 [hep- th]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Stanford and L

    D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D �� , 126007 (2014), arXiv:1406.2678 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 191301 (2016), arXiv:1509.07876 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Jefferson and R

    R. Jefferson and R. C. Myers, JHEP �� , 107, arXiv:1707.08570 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Chapman, J

    S. Chapman, J. Eisert, L. Hackl, M. P. Heller, R. Jef- ferson, H. Marrochio, and R. C. Myers, SciPost Phys. �, 034 (2019), arXiv:1810.05151 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 149 references
  1. [9]

    Couch, W

    J. Couch, W. Fischler, and P. H. Nguyen, JHEP �� , 119, arXiv:1610.02038 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Belin, R

    A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. S´ arosi, and A. J. Speranza, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 081602 (2022), arXiv:2111.02429 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Takayanagi, Phys

    T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 240001 (2025), arXiv:2506.06595 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. Lett. �� , 1351 (1981)

    1981

  5. [13]

    Visser, C

    M. Visser, C. Barcelo, and S. Liberati, Gen. Rel. Grav. �� , 1719 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0111111

    2002 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Barcelo, S

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living reviews in relativity �� , 1 (2011), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    T. G. Philbin, C. Kuklewicz, S. Robertson, S. Hill, F. Konig, and U. Leonhardt, Science ��� , 1367 (2008), arXiv:0711.4796 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [16]

    C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, and P. Delsing, Nature ��� , 376–379 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Steinhauer, Nature Phys

    J. Steinhauer, Nature Phys. �� , 959 (2016), arXiv:1510.00621 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    R. Howl, L. Hackerm¨ uller, D. E. Bruschi, and I. Fuentes, Adv. Phys. X �, 1383184 (2018), arXiv:1607.06666 [quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. J. Jacquet, S. Weinfurtner, and F. K¨ onig, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A ��� , 20190239 (2020), arXiv:2005.04027 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Peres and D

    A. Peres and D. R. Terno, Rev. Mod. Phys. �� , 93 (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0212023

    2004 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fuentes-Schuller and R

    I. Fuentes-Schuller and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. �� , 120404 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0410172

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    D. R. Terno, in NATO ASI on Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information (2005) arXiv:quant- ph/0508049

    2005

  15. [23]

    J. L. Ball, I. Fuentes-Schuller, and F. P. Schuller, Phys. Lett. A ��� , 550 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0506113

    2006 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Cliche and A

    M. Cliche and A. Kempf, Phys. Rev. A �� , 012330 (2010), arXiv:0908.3144 [quant-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    T. C. Ralph and R. B. Mann, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 220301 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    B. L. Hu, S.-Y. Lin, and J. Louko, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 224005 (2012), arXiv:1205.1328 [quant-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    D. M. T. Benincasa, L. Borsten, M. Buck, and F. Dowker, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 075007 (2014), arXiv:1206.5205 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    D. E. Bruschi, A. Dragan, A. R. Lee, I. Fuentes, and J. Louko, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 090504 (2013), arXiv:1201.0663 [quant-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, D

    E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, D. Aasen, and A. Kempf, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 160501 (2013), arXiv:1209.4948 [quant- ph]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    P. M. Alsing and I. Fuentes, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 224001 (2012), arXiv:1210.2223 [quant-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ahmadi, D

    M. Ahmadi, D. E. Bruschi, C. Sab ´ ın, G. Adesso, and I. Fuentes, Sci. Rep. �, 4996 (2014), arXiv:1307.7082 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Friis, G

    N. Friis, G. Vitagliano, M. Malik, and M. Huber, Nature Rev. Phys. �, 72 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Schumacher and M

    B. Schumacher and M. A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. A �� , 2629 (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9604022

    1996 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Loss and D

    D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A �� , 120 (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature ��� , 46 (2001)

    2001

  28. [36]

    Monroe, Nature ��� , 238 (2002)

    C. Monroe, Nature ��� , 238 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Wendin, Reports on Progress in Physics �� , 106001 (2017)

    G. Wendin, Reports on Progress in Physics �� , 106001 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Flamini, N

    F. Flamini, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Reports on Progress in Physics �� , 016001 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. �� , 865 (2009), arXiv:quant-ph/0702225

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Layden, E

    D. Layden, E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, and A. Kempf, Phys. Rev. A �� , 040301 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Simidzija, A

    P. Simidzija, A. Ahmadzadegan, A. Kempf, and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Phys. Rev. D��� , 036014 (2020), arXiv:1908.07523 [quant-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Kasprzak and E

    M. Kasprzak and E. Tjoa, J. Phys. A �� , 095301 (2025), arXiv:2408.00518 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    P. M. Alsing and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. �� , 180404 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0302179

    2003 arXiv

  37. [45]

    P. M. Alsing, D. McMahon, and G. J. Milburn, J. Opt. B �, 834 (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0311096

    2004 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ge and S

    X.-H. Ge and S. P. Kim, Class. Quant. Grav.�� , 075011 (2008), arXiv:0707.4523 [quant-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Pan and J

    Q. Pan and J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D �� , 065015 (2008), arXiv:0809.0811 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Friis, A

    N. Friis, A. R. Lee, K. Truong, C. Sabin, E. Solano, G. Johansson, and I. Fuentes, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 113602 (2013), arXiv:1211.5563 [quant-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    S.-Y. Lin, K. Shiokawa, C.-H. Chou, and B. L. Hu, Phys. Rev. D �� , 084063 (2015), arXiv:1502.03539 [gr-qc]. 7

    2015 arXiv

  42. [50]

    P. M. Alsing, I. Fuentes-Schuller, R. B. Mann, and T. E. Tessier, Phys. Rev. A �� , 032326 (2006), arXiv:quant- ph/0603269

    2006

  43. [51]

    Martin-Martinez, L

    E. Martin-Martinez, L. J. Garay, and J. Leon, Phys. Rev. D �� , 064006 (2010), arXiv:1006.1394 [quant-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Martin-Martinez and J

    E. Martin-Martinez and J. Leon, Phys. Rev. A �� , 042318 (2009), arXiv:0907.1960 [quant-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Martin-Martinez and J

    E. Martin-Martinez and J. Leon, Phys. Rev. A �� , 032320 (2010), arXiv:1001.4302 [quant-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Fuentes, R

    I. Fuentes, R. B. Mann, E. Martin-Martinez, and S. Moradi, Phys. Rev. D �� , 045030 (2010), arXiv:1007.1569 [quant-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Martin-Martinez, L

    E. Martin-Martinez, L. J. Garay, and J. Leon, Phys. Rev. D �� , 064028 (2010), arXiv:1007.2858 [quant-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Friis, D

    N. Friis, D. E. Bruschi, J. Louko, and I. Fuentes, Phys. Rev. D �� , 081701 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Friis, M

    N. Friis, M. Huber, I. Fuentes, and D. E. Bruschi, Phys. Rev. D �� , 105003 (2012), arXiv:1207.1827 [quant-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    E. G. Brown, E. Martin-Martinez, N. C. Menicucci, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D �� , 084062 (2013), arXiv:1212.1973 [quant-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Dragan and I

    A. Dragan and I. Fuentes, arXiv:1105.1192 [quant-ph] (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Friis and I

    N. Friis and I. Fuentes, J. Mod. Opt. �� , 22 (2013), arXiv:1204.0617 [quant-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    D. E. Bruschi, J. Louko, D. Faccio, and I. Fuentes, New J. Phys. �� , 073052 (2013), arXiv:1210.6772 [quant-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez and C

    E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez and C. Sutherland, Phys. Lett. B ��� , 74 (2014), arXiv:1404.5308 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  55. [63]

    D. E. Bruschi, C. Sab ´ ın, P. Kok, G. Johansson, P. Delsing, and I. Fuentes, Sci. Rep. �, 18349 (2016), arXiv:1311.5619 [quant-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Aspling and M

    E. Aspling and M. Lawler, arXiv:2402.10173 [quant-ph] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    P. A. LeMaitre, T. R. Perche, M. Krumm, and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 190601 (2025), arXiv:2411.00105 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Hotta, Phys

    M. Hotta, Phys. Rev. D �� , 045006 (2008), arXiv:0803.2272 [physics.gen-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Pozas-Kerstjens and E

    A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Martin-Martinez, Phys. Rev. D �� , 064042 (2015), arXiv:1506.03081 [quant-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  60. [68]

    T. R. Perche, B. Ragula, and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 085025 (2023), arXiv:2210.14921 [quant- ph]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Valentini, Phys

    A. Valentini, Phys. Lett. A ��� , 321 (1991)

    1991

  62. [70]

    Reznik, Found

    B. Reznik, Found. Phys. �� , 167 (2003), arXiv:quant- ph/0212044

    2003

  63. [71]

    Reznik, A

    B. Reznik, A. Retzker, and J. Silman, Phys. Rev. A �� , 042104 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0310058

    2005 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Silman and B

    J. Silman and B. Reznik, Phys. Rev. A �� , 052307 (2007)

    2007

  65. [73]

    Salton, R

    G. Salton, R. B. Mann, and N. C. Menicucci, New J. Phys. �� , 035001 (2015)

    2015

  66. [74]

    L. J. Henderson, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, A. R. H. Smith, and J. Zhang, JHEP �� , 178, arXiv:1809.06862 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    K. K. Ng, R. B. Mann, and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Phys. Rev. D �� , 125005 (2018), arXiv:1809.06878 [quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    G. L. Ver Steeg and N. C. Menicucci, Phys. Rev. D �� , 044027 (2009), arXiv:0711.3066 [quant-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Nambu, Entropy �� , 1847 (2013), arXiv:1305.4193 [gr-qc]

    Y. Nambu, Entropy �� , 1847 (2013), arXiv:1305.4193 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Martin-Martinez and N

    E. Martin-Martinez and N. C. Menicucci, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 214001 (2014), arXiv:1408.3420 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Kukita and Y

    S. Kukita and Y. Nambu, Entropy �� , 449 (2017), arXiv:1708.01359 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    L. J. Henderson, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, A. R. H. Smith, and J. Zhang, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 21LT02 (2018), arXiv:1712.10018 [quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    M. P. G. Robbins, L. J. Henderson, and R. B. Mann, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 02LT01 (2022), arXiv:2010.14517 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Gallock-Yoshimura, E

    K. Gallock-Yoshimura, E. Tjoa, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 025001 (2021), arXiv:2102.09573 [quant- ph]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    I. J. Membrere, K. Gallock-Yoshimura, L. J. Henderson, and R. B. Mann, arXiv:2304.07847 [quant-ph] (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Y. Ji, J. Zhang, and H. Yu, JHEP �� , 161, arXiv:2401.13406 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    S. J. Olson and T. C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 110404 (2011), arXiv:1003.0720 [quant-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Louko and A

    J. Louko and A. Satz, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 6321 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0606067

    2006 arXiv

  79. [87]

    D. E. Bruschi, J. Louko, E. Martin-Martinez, A. Dra- gan, and I. Fuentes, Phys. Rev. A �� , 042332 (2010), arXiv:1007.4670 [quant-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Hodgkinson and J

    L. Hodgkinson and J. Louko, J. Math. Phys. �� , 082301 (2012), arXiv:1109.4377 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  81. [89]

    K. K. Ng, L. Hodgkinson, J. Louko, R. B. Mann, and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Phys. Rev. D�� , 064003 (2014)

    2014

  82. [90]

    Sabin, B

    C. Sabin, B. Peropadre, M. del Rey, and E. Martin- Martinez, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 033602 (2012), arXiv:1202.1230 [quant-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Martin-Martinez, A

    E. Martin-Martinez, A. R. H. Smith, and D. R. Terno, Phys. Rev. D �� , 044001 (2016), arXiv:1507.02688 [quant-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  84. [92]

    B´ eny, C

    C. B´ eny, C. T. Chubb, T. Farrelly, and T. J. Osborne, Nature Commun. �, 3792 (2018), arXiv:1711.06658 [quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [93]

    L. J. Henderson, A. Belenchia, E. Castro-Ruiz, C. Bu- droni, M. Zych, ˇC. Brukner, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 131602 (2020), arXiv:2002.06208 [quant-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Z. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Yu, JHEP �� , 020, arXiv:2101.00114 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    Zhang and H

    J. Zhang and H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 065013 (2020), arXiv:2008.07980 [quant-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Z. Liu, J. Zhang, R. B. Mann, and H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 085012 (2022), arXiv:2111.04392 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Patterson and R

    E. Patterson and R. B. Mann, JHEP �� , 214, arXiv:2207.12226 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  90. [98]

    Suryaatmadja, R

    C. Suryaatmadja, R. . B. Mann, and W. Cong, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 076002 (2022), arXiv:2205.14739 [quant- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [99]

    M. R. Preciado-Rivas, M. Naeem, R. B. Mann, and J. Louko, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 025002 (2024), arXiv:2402.14908 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    S. Wang, M. R. P. Rivas, and R. B. Mann, arXiv:2504.00083 [gr-qc] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Gottesman, Phys

    D. Gottesman, Phys. Rev. A �� , 127 (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9702029

    1998 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Gottesman, in 22nd International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics(1998) pp

    D. Gottesman, in 22nd International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics(1998) pp. 32– 43, arXiv:quant-ph/9807006

    1998 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Gottesman and I

    D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang, Nature ��� , 390 (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9908010

    1999 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Phys. Rev. A �� , 052328 (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0406196

    2004 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Bravyi and A

    S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. A �� , 022316 8 (2005)

    2005

  98. [106]

    C. Lima, E. Patterson, E. Tjoa, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 105020 (2023)

    2023

  99. [107]

    ’t Hooft, Conf

    G. ’t Hooft, Conf. Proc. C ������ , 284 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

    1993 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Susskind, J

    L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. �� , 6377 (1995), arXiv:hep- th/9409089

    1995

  101. [109]

    J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. �, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    1998 arXiv

  102. [110]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B ��� , 105 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    1998 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Witten, Adv

    E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. �, 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. Mukhopadhyay, and A. Bayat, New Jour- nal of Physics �� , 083077 (2020)

    2020

  105. [113]

    C. D. White, C. Cao, and B. Swingle, Phys. Rev. B ��� , 075145 (2021), arXiv:2007.01303 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Liu and A

    Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, PRX Quantum �, 020333 (2022)

    2022

  107. [115]

    A. G. Catalano, J. Odavi´ c, G. Torre, A. Hamma, F. Franchini, and S. M. Giampaolo, arXiv:2406.19457 [quant-ph] (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    Hoshino, M

    M. Hoshino, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Ashida, arXiv:2503.13599 [quant-ph] (2025)

    2025

  109. [117]

    Chernyshev, C

    I. Chernyshev, C. E. P. Robin, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. Res. �, 023228 (2025)

    2025

  110. [118]

    Br¨ okemeier, S

    F. Br¨ okemeier, S. M. Hengstenberg, J. W. T. Keeble, C. E. P. Robin, F. Rocco, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. C ��� , 034317 (2025), arXiv:2409.12064 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  111. [119]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, arXiv:2405.10268 [nucl-th] (2024)

    2024

  112. [120]

    Hayden and J

    P. Hayden and J. Preskill, JHEP �� , 120, arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  113. [121]

    Belgiorno, S

    F. Belgiorno, S. L. Cacciatori, M. Clerici, V. Gorini, G. Ortenzi, L. Rizzi, E. Rubino, V. G. Sala, and D. Fac- cio, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 203901 (2010)

    2010

  114. [122]

    Yoshida and A

    B. Yoshida and A. Kitaev, arXiv:1710.03363 [hep-th] (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, S. Piemontese, S. True, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. A ��� , 062434 (2022)

    2022

  116. [124]

    R. J. Garcia, K. Bu, and A. Jaffe, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. ��� , e2217031120 (2023), arXiv:2208.10477 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Q. Liu, I. Low, and Z. Yin, arXiv:2503.03098 [quant-ph] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  118. [126]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, A. Hamma, L. Leone, W. Munizzi, and S. F. E. Oliviero, arXiv:2403.07056 [hep-th] (2024)

    2024

  119. [127]

    K. Goto, T. Nosaka, and M. Nozaki, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 126009 (2022), arXiv:2112.14593 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Nystr¨ om, N

    R. Nystr¨ om, N. Pranzini, and E. Keski-Vakkuri, Phys. Rev. Res. �, 033085 (2025), arXiv:2409.11473 [quant- ph]

    2025 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Cepollaro, S

    S. Cepollaro, S. Cusumano, A. Hamma, G. L. Giudice, and J. Odavic, arXiv:2412.11918 [quant-ph] (2024)

    2024

  122. [130]

    P. A. LeMaitre, arXiv:2508.11773 [quant-ph] (2025)

    2025

  123. [131]

    C. Lima, M. R. Preciado-Rivas, and S. Srivastava, arXiv:2508.15001 [quant-ph] (2025)

    2025

  124. [132]

    Szpak, arXiv:1410.1567 [quant-ph] (2014)

    N. Szpak, arXiv:1410.1567 [quant-ph] (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Tononi, L

    A. Tononi, L. Salasnich, and A. Yakimenko, A VS Quan- tum Science �, 10.1116/5.0211426 (2024)

    2024 doi

  126. [134]

    Huhtala and G

    P. Huhtala and G. E. Volovik, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. �� , 853 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0111055

    2002 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Stegmann and N

    T. Stegmann and N. Szpak, New J. Phys. �� , 053016 (2016), arXiv:1512.06750 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2016 arXiv

  128. [136]

    J. Yang, N. Afshordi, M. Torabian, S. A. Jafari, and G. Baskaran, JHEP �� , 226, arXiv:2412.08517 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  129. [137]

    W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D �� , 870 (1976)

    1976

  130. [138]

    B. S. DeWitt, in General Relativity: An Einstein Cen- tenary Survey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Is- rael (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980) pp. 680–745

    1980

  131. [139]

    Decanini and A

    Y. Decanini and A. Folacci, Phys. Rev. D �� , 044027 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511115

    2006 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Decanini and A

    Y. Decanini and A. Folacci, Phys. Rev. D �� , 044025 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0512118

    2008 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Jennings, Class

    D. Jennings, Class. Quant. Grav. �� , 205005 (2010), arXiv:1008.2165 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Saharian, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime (2020)

    A. Saharian, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime (2020)

    2020

  135. [143]

    A. R. H. Smith, Detectors, Reference Frames, and Time, Ph.D. thesis, U. Waterloo (main) (2017)

    2017

  136. [144]

    J. a. P. M. Pitelli, B. S. Felipe, and R. A. Mosna, Phys. Rev. D ��� , 045008 (2021), arXiv:2108.10192 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Louko, JHEP �� , 142, arXiv:1407.6299 [hep-th]

    J. Louko, JHEP �� , 142, arXiv:1407.6299 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  138. [146]

    Emerson, D

    J. Emerson, D. Gottesman, S. A. H. Mousavian, and V. Veitch, New J. Phys. �� , 013009 (2014), arXiv:1307.7171 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. Browne, P. Calpin, E. Campbell, D. Gosset, and M. Howard, Quantum �, 181 (2019), arXiv:1808.00128 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 050402 (2022), arXiv:2106.12587 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Veitch, S

    V. Veitch, S. A. H. Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, New J. Phys. �� , 013009 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.