Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS: discovery and physical description

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports that 3I/ATLAS, discovered on 2025 July 1, is a third interstellar object, an active comet on a hyperbolic orbit with eccentricity about 6.08 and velocity at infinity about 57 km/s.

desk verdict Solid early photometry of the third interstellar object, but the dust velocity/mass-loss section has a factor-30 unit error that must be fixed before those numbers enter the literature. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05252 v3 pith:673JQQNI submitted 2025-07-07 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM

Bryce T. Bolin , Matthew Belyakov , Christoffer Fremling , Matthew J. Graham , Ahmed. M. Abdelaziz , Eslam Elhosseiny , Candace L. Gray , Carl Ingebretsen
show 13 more authors
Gracyn Jewett Sergey Karpov Mukremin Kilic Martin Mašek Mona Molham Diana Roderick Ali Takey Carey M. Lisse Laura-May Abron Michael W. Coughlin Cheng-Han Hsieh Keith S. Noll Ian Wong
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords interstellarobject3I/ATLAScometactivitymulti-bandphotometrydustproductionrateAfrhohyperbolicorbitcolors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the discovery and physical characterization of 3I/ATLAS, the third known macroscopic interstellar object. Based on roughly 319 astrometric observations, the orbit has eccentricity e≈6.08 and velocity at infinity ≈57 km/s, which places its origin outside the solar system. Multi-band imaging at three ground-based telescopes yields colors (g–r=0.84±0.05, spectral slope 16.0±1.9%/100 nm) that are redder than the only previously known interstellar comet, 2I/Borisov. The comet shows a clear coma with Afrho≈281 cm and a dust cross-section of about 185 km² within 10,000 km, and the authors estimate it is ejecting dust at roughly 0.1–1 kg/s. If correct, the paper establishes that interstellar comets span a range of surface colors and that a third such body is active and dust-producing.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by four standard cometary relations: the Afrho parameter as a dust-production proxy; the cross-section conversion C = 1.5×$10^{6}$ $p_v^{{-1}}$ $10^{{-0.4H}}$; the sunward-coma relation v_e = [2 D_t $\beta$ g_sun]^{1/2} / r_h for dust ejection velocity; and the Fink & Rubin mass-loss relation Mdot = 4π ρ_d v_e r_d Afrho / (3 p_v). The comet's measured sunward coma extent D_t ≈ 1850 km and Afrho ≈ 281 cm are the inputs that carry the activity and mass-loss estimates.

What would settle it

Recompute Eq. 3 with the sunward coma extent D_t converted from kilometres to metres (D_t = 1.85×$10^{6}$ m) while keeping g_sun in m/$s^{2}$; for $\beta$≈1 the result is about 34 m/s, not 1.1 m/s, which would place the dust mass-loss rate at tens of kg/s rather than 0.1–1 kg/s. High-resolution imaging of the coma’s day-to-day expansion would independently measure the dust velocity and decide which value is physical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that 3I/ATLAS, discovered on 2025 July 1 by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System, is an interstellar comet on an unbound hyperbolic orbit (e≈6.08, v∞≈57 km/s) that is visibly active, with a resolved coma, red broadband colors, and measurable dust production. The photometry and surface brightness analysis show a coma FWHM of 2.2 arcsec, an Afrho value of 280.8±3.2 cm, and a spectral slope of 16.0±1.9%/100 nm, making it redder than 2I/Borisov but less red than 1I/‘Oumuamua. The paper derives a dust cross-section of 184.6±4.6 km² within 10,000 km and a dust mass-loss rate of roughly 0.1–1 kg/s, comparable to 2I/Borisov and to some Jupiter-family comets.

Load-bearing premise

The paper’s dust velocity and mass-loss numbers assume the sunward coma size D_t can be plugged into the velocity formula in kilometres even though the formula’s other quantities are in metres per second; applying standard units changes the dust velocity from about 1.1 m/s to about 34 m/s and scales the mass-loss estimate upward.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If 3I/ATLAS is interstellar, the known sample of interstellar objects now includes three bodies with distinctly different colors, from ‘Oumuamua’s red and inactive appearance to 3I’s red but active coma.
  • The measured dust production of roughly 0.1–1 kg/s implies that at least some interstellar comets are as active as typical solar-system comets at similar heliocentric distances.
  • The comet’s perihelion at 1.35 au in October 2025 provides a near-term opportunity to test whether its activity and colors evolve as it approaches the Sun.
  • The color difference between 3I and 2I suggests that interstellar comets may originate from a range of parent-body compositions, not a single common reservoir.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dust velocity is recomputed with the coma extent in metres as the standard formula requires, 3I/ATLAS’s dust production rate would be an order of magnitude or more higher than the stated 0.1–1 kg/s, making it one of the more active known comets.
  • The paper’s sample of three interstellar objects already spans a g–r range comparable to the entire main-belt asteroid population, hinting that interstellar bodies carry compositional diversity from multiple stellar systems.
  • A practical test would be to image the coma with sub-arcsecond resolution over consecutive nights; the observed expansion rate would directly measure the dust velocity and settle the unit discrepancy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery-era physical characterization of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS, using B,V,R,I,g,r,i,z photometry from the Kottamia 1.88-m, Palomar 200-inch, and ARC 3.5-m telescopes on 2025 July 2, 3, and 6. The paper derives colors, a spectral slope, A(0)f rho values, a dust cross-section within 10,000 km, and estimates of dust ejection velocity and mass-loss rate from the sunward extent of the coma. The central claim is that 3I/ATLAS is an active, reddish interstellar comet with dust production of roughly 0.1-1 kg/s.

Significance. If the quantitative dust estimates are corrected, the paper will be an important contribution to the small but growing sample of interstellar objects. The photometric colors and A(0)f rho measurements are new, independent observations and will serve as a reference for future studies of ISO physical properties. The paper also provides a useful comparison of 3I/ATLAS with 1I/'Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov, and its conclusion that interstellar objects span a wide range in color is supported by the data. The orbital solution confirms the interstellar origin with e ~ 6.08 and v_infinity ~ 57 km/s. However, the dust velocity and mass-loss estimates, which appear in the abstract, depend on a unit conversion error and must be revised.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3)] Equation (3) is dimensionally inconsistent as evaluated. The text states D_t is measured in km and g_sun is 0.006 m/s^2, but the numerical evaluation treats D_t = 1850 as a dimensionless number inside the square root. With D_t converted to meters, D_t = 1.85e6 m, the equation gives v_e = sqrt(2 * 1.85e6 * 0.006 * beta) / 4.43 = 33.6 sqrt(beta) m/s. For beta = 1 (approximately micron-sized grains) this is ~34 m/s, not ~1.1 m/s, and for mm-sized grains (beta ~ 0.001) it is ~1 m/s rather than ~0.01 m/s. The quoted range of 0.01-1 m/s in the abstract and the mass-loss estimate from Eq. (5) are therefore too low by a factor of ~30. The authors must correct Eq. (3) (and its units) and re-evaluate the dust velocity and mass-loss claims, including the comparison with 2I/Borisov.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (1)] The displayed equation H = V - 2.5 log10(r_h Delta) + Phi(alpha) is inconsistent with the reported value of H = 12.27 +/- 0.03 and with the derived cross-section of 184.6 +/- 4.6 km^2. Using the printed coefficient 2.5 with V = 18.28, r_h = 4.43 au, Delta = 3.43 au, and Phi(alpha) ~ -0.106 gives H ~ 15.2, which via Eq. (2) yields C ~ 12 km^2, an order of magnitude below the reported value. The numerical results are consistent with the standard coefficient 5 log10(r_h Delta). The equation must be corrected to 5 log10(r_h Delta) so that the paper is internally reproducible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2] In the sentence 'Plugging our calculated value of D_t of 1850 km into Eq. 4', the reference should be to Eq. (3), not Eq. (4).
  2. [§3.2] The text 'suggesting that m-scale to mm-scale particles are ejected' should read 'micrometer-scale to mm-scale' to match the abstract and the subsequent discussion.
  3. [§3.2] Equation (1) contains the expression 'Phi(alpha) = --0.04 alpha' with a double minus sign; this should be a single sign and the phase-function convention should be stated explicitly.
  4. [§4] The statement that 3I/ATLAS is 'less red compared to 1I/'Oumuamua' is confusing because the paper lists the same g-r for both objects (0.84 +/- 0.05); the comparison based on g-i (1.00 vs 1.15) should be made explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: central claims rest on new observations and external relations; self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

The central results—the interstellar orbit (e≈6.08, v∞≈57 km/s from JPL HORIZONS using 319 MPC astrometric observations), the new multi-band photometry and colours calibrated to Pan-STARRS1, the spectral slope, A(0)fρ, and the dust cross-section—are derived directly from new observations and external published relations (Jewitt & Meech 1986, 1987; A'Hearn et al. 1984; Fink & Rubin 2012), not from fitted parameters or from the paper's own assumptions. The dust ejection velocity in Eq. (3) is an algebraic application of a published relation to the measured sunward extent D_t=1850 km; the mass-loss in Eq. (5) is linear in that velocity and in the assumed dust radius, density, and albedo. No quantity is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations (Bolin et al. 2020, 2021, 2024, 2025a) are invoked only as standard photometric and surface-brightness profile reduction techniques, and as a comparison colour for 2I/Borisov, not as evidence that fixes 3I's properties. The manuscript itself notes the phase-function caveat on H, which is a stated limitation rather than a circular step. There is a unit-consistency concern in Eq. (3): D_t is stated in km while g_sun is in m/s^2, giving ~1.1√β m/s only if D_t is read as a bare number; using SI units gives ~34√β m/s. That is a correctness or units error, not circularity, because v_e is still an output of the formula rather than an input assumption. Verdict: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central numbers rest on four assumed inputs: dust albedo, dust density, a linear phase function, and a dust particle size range. The most fragile modeling assumption is the unit treatment in Eq. 3, which controls the dust velocity and mass-loss claims.

free parameters (4)
  • Dust albedo p_v = 0.10
    Assumed from cometary literature (Jewitt & Meech 1986); used in Eqs. 2 and 5 to convert V magnitude into cross-section and A(0)f rho into mass loss. Both derived values scale inversely with p_v.
  • Dust bulk density rho_d = 750 kg m^-3
    Taken from Fulle et al. (2016); linearly scales the mass-loss rate in Eq. 5.
  • Phase function slope phi(alpha) = -0.04 mag/deg
    Assumed for comets at phase angles below 20 deg (Bertini et al. 2017); applied at alpha = 2.65 deg. The paper itself cautions that H uncertainties are systematically underestimated because the phase function is unknown.
  • Dust particle size range = 1 micron to 1 mm (abstract) vs 1 mm to 1 m (body)
    The ejection velocity and mass-loss ranges are produced by choosing this size range. The abstract and body do not agree, and the corrected Eq. 3 would require mm-to-m sizes for 0.01-1 m/s.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The JPL HORIZONS orbit solution, based on about 319 astrometric observations from 2025 June 14 to July 4, is accurate enough to establish e = 6.08 and v_infinity = 57 km/s.
    The interstellar-origin claim rests entirely on the reliability of this orbit solution and the MPC astrometry.
  • domain assumption The Jewitt & Meech 1987 relation (Eq. 3) correctly models dust ejection velocity from a measured sunward coma extent, including the units used in the paper.
    This is the basis for the dust velocity and mass-loss estimates; the unit interpretation is a critical and questionable premise.
  • domain assumption The azimuthally averaged surface brightness profile gives a measurable sunward coma extent via Eq. 4.
    If the coma is not radially symmetric or is contaminated by background star trails, D_t is biased and the velocity estimate changes.
  • domain assumption The absolute magnitude relation H = V - 5 log10(r_h Delta) + Phi(alpha) applies, with the printed coefficient 2.5 treated as a typo.
    The reported H = 12.27 matches the 5-log version; the cross-section C in Eq. 2 depends directly on H.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS: discovery and physical description." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/673JQQNI

@misc{pith2026250705252,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS: discovery and physical description},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/673JQQNI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05252}
}
abstract

We describe the physical characteristics of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS, discovered on 2025 July 1 by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System. The comet has eccentricity, $e$ $\simeq$ 6.08 and velocity at infinity, v$_{\infty}$ $\simeq$ 57 km/s, indicating an interstellar origin. \textbf{We obtained B,V, R, I, g, r, i, and z photometry with the Kottamia Astronomical Observatory 1.88-m telescope, the Palomar 200-inch telescope, and the Astrophysical Research Consortium 3.5-m telescope on 2025 July 2, 3, and 6. We measured colour indices B-V=0.98$\pm$0.23, V-R=0.71$\pm$0.09, R-I=0.14$\pm$0.10, g-r=0.84$\pm$0.05 mag, r-i=0.16$\pm$0.03 mag, i-z=-0.02$\pm$0.07 mag, and g-i=1.00$\pm$0.05 mag and a spectral slope of 16.0$\pm$1.9 $\%$/100 nm.} We calculate the dust cross-section within 10,000 km of the comet to be 184.6$\pm$4.6 km$^2$, assuming an albedo of 0.10. 3I/ATLAS's coma has FWHM$\simeq$2.2 arcsec and A(0$^\circ$)f$\rho$=280.8$\pm$3.2 cm. \textbf{We estimate that 3I/ATLAS's \textmu m-scale to mm-scale dust is ejected at $\sim$0.01-1 m/s, implying a dust production of $\sim$0.1 - 1.0 kg/s.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05252 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Deep g, r, and i-band imaging of 3I/ATLAS taken with NGPS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Orbits of 3I/ATLAS and solar system planets. Top panel: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. The g, r, i, and z colours of 3I/ATLAS from our measurements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Near-Discovery Observations of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS with the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    New observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS produce the first near-infrared spectrum, showing a red slope that turns neutral at longer wavelengths, no water ice absorption, and a model-dependent upper limit of <7%...

  2. Palomar and Apache Point Spectrophotometry of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    3I/ATLAS, the third interstellar object, has a red spectral slope of about 19%/100 nm from 420 to 700 nm and a neutral 6%/100 nm slope from 700 to 1000 nm, with no obvious C2 or CO+ emission.

  3. X-SHOOTER Spectrum of Comet 3I/ATLAS: Insights into a Distant Interstellar Visitor

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    3I/ATLAS, the third known interstellar visitor, shows a red reflectance spectrum and no detectable OH or CN emission at 4.4 AU, with derived upper limits.

  4. Snapshot of a new interstellar comet: 3I/ATLAS has a red and featureless spectrum

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS has a red, featureless optical spectrum with no detected gas emission, indicating a dusty coma during early observations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    F., Schleicher D

    A'Hearn M. F., Schleicher D. G., Millis R. L., Feldman P. D., Thompson D. T., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113552 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984AJ.....89..579A 89, 579

    doi:10.1086/113552 1984

  2. [2]

    F., Millis R

    A'Hearn M. F., Millis R. C., Schleicher D. O., Osip D. J., Birch P. V., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.1995.1190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995Icar..118..223A 118, 223

    arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    A., et al., 2022, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1007/s10686-021-09802-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ExA....53...45A 53, 45

    Azzam Y. A., et al., 2022, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1007/s10686-021-09802-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ExA....53...45A 53, 45

    doi:10.1007/s10686-021-09802-z 2022

  4. [4]

    J., Mukremin K., Bolin B., Jewett G., Lisse C., 2025a, Palomar P200 and APO Imaging and Spectroscopy of Interstellar Object 3I/Atlas, @doi 10.22002/qdce4-pvm83

    Belyakov M., Fremling C., Graham M. J., Mukremin K., Bolin B., Jewett G., Lisse C., 2025a, Palomar P200 and APO Imaging and Spectroscopy of Interstellar Object 3I/Atlas, @doi 10.22002/qdce4-pvm83

    doi:10.22002/qdce4-pvm83

  5. [5]

    T., Fremling C., Graham M., 2025b, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ATel17276....1B 17276, 1

    Belyakov M., Bolin B. T., Fremling C., Graham M., 2025b, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ATel17276....1B 17276, 1

    work page

  6. [6]

    Bertini I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1850 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469S.404B 469, S404

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1850 2017

  7. [7]

    Bodewits D., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-1095-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs.tmp...85B

    doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1095-2 2020

  8. [8]

    T., Lisse C

    Bolin B. T., Lisse C. M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2192 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.4031B 497, 4031

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2192 2020

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa0c9 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852L...2B 852, L2

    Bolin B. T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa0c9 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852L...2B 852, L2

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    T., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9305 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160...26B 160, 26

    Bolin B. T., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9305 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160...26B 160, 26

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    T., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abd94b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..116B 161, 116

    Bolin B. T., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abd94b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..116B 161, 116

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad139 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527L..42B 527, L42

    Bolin B. T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad139 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527L..42B 527, L42

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    T., et al., 2025a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/adccbe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169..303B 169, 303

    Bolin B. T., et al., 2025a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/adccbe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169..303B 169, 303

    doi

  6. [14]

    T., et al., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025Icar..42516333B 425, 116333

    Bolin B. T., et al., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025Icar..42516333B 425, 116333

    2024

  7. [15]

    C., et al., 2016, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161205560C ( @eprint arXiv 1612.05560 )

    Chambers K. C., et al., 2016, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161205560C ( @eprint arXiv 1612.05560 )

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-1087-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4..861C 4, 861

    Cordiner M. A., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-1087-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4..861C 4, 861

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Cousins A. W. J., 1976, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976MmRAS..81...25C 81, 25

    1976

  10. [18]

    Denneau L., Siverd R., Tonry J., Erasmus N., Fitzsimmons A., Robinson J., 2025, MPEC

    2025

  11. [19]

    C., Hopkins M

    Dorsey R. C., Hopkins M. J., Bannister M. T., Lawler S. M., Lintott C., Parker A. H., Forbes J. C., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.16741 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250216741D p. arXiv:2502.16741

    2025 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    L., Schleicher D

    Farnham T. L., Schleicher D. G., A'Hearn M. F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.2000.6420 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000Icar..147..180F 147, 180

    2000

  13. [21]

    Fink U., Rubin M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.09.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Icar..221..721F 221, 721

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    Fitzsimmons A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab49fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885L...9F 885, L9

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    E., Doi M., Shimasaku K., Schneider D

    Fukugita M., Ichikawa T., Gunn J. E., Doi M., Shimasaku K., Schneider D. P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117915 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....111.1748F 111, 1748

    1996 doi

  16. [24]

    Fulle M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2299 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462S.132F 462, S132

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    F., Fitzsimmons A., Denneau L., Siverd R

    Gillan A. F., Fitzsimmons A., Denneau L., Siverd R. J., Smith K. W., Tonry J. L., Young D. R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/PSJ/ad1394 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PSJ.....5...25G 5, 25

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    E., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.3040G 116, 3040

    Gunn J. E., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.3040G 116, 3040

    1998 doi

  19. [27]

    Guzik P., Drahus M., Rusek K., Waniak W., Cannizzaro G., Pastor-Marazuela I., 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-019-0931-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs.tmp..467G p. 467

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Lintott C., Bannister M

    Hopkins M. J., Lintott C., Bannister M. T., Mackereth J. T., Forbes J. C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad03e6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166..241H 166, 241

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    H., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2c62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922L...9H 922, L9

    Hsieh H. H., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2c62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922L...9H 922, L9

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    Huehnerhoff J., et al., 2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. p. 99085H, @doi 10.1117/12.2234214

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Ivezi \'c Z ., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344077 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.2943I 124, 2943

    2002 doi

  24. [32]

    Ivezi \'c Z ., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...873..111I 873, 111

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Jewitt D., 1991, in Newburn Jr. R. L., Neugebauer M., Rahe J., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 167, IAU Colloq. 116: Comets in the post-Halley era. pp 19--65, @doi 10.1007/978-94-011-3378-4_2

    1991 doi

  26. [34]

    arXiv:2407.06475

    Jewitt D., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.06475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240706475J p. arXiv:2407.06475

    2024 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Jewitt D., Luu J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab530b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886L..29J 886, L29

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    J., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...310..937J 310, 937

    Jewitt D., Meech K. J., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...310..937J 310, 937

    1986 doi

  29. [37]

    C., Meech K

    Jewitt D. C., Meech K. J., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...317..992J 317, 992

    1987 doi

  30. [38]

    Jewitt D., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/829/1/L8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...829L...8J 829, L8

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    M., et al., 2024, Transient Name Server AstroNote, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024TNSAN.340....1K 340, 1

    Kasliwal M. M., et al., 2024, Transient Name Server AstroNote, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024TNSAN.340....1K 340, 1

    2024

  32. [40]

    S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.04.012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Icar..225..475K 225, 475

    Kelley M. S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.04.012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Icar..225..475K 225, 475

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    Kim Y., Jewitt D., Mutchler M., Agarwal J., Hui M.-T., Weaver H., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9228 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...895L..34K 895, L34

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    S., Levasseur-Regourd A.-C., Gustafson B

    Kolokolova L., Hanner M. S., Levasseur-Regourd A.-C., Gustafson B. . S., 2004, Physical properties of cometary dust from light scattering and thermal emission . pp 577--604

    2004

  35. [43]

    N., 2007, International Comet Quarterly, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ICQ....29...39M 29, 39

    Marcus J. N., 2007, International Comet Quarterly, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ICQ....29...39M 29, 39

    2007

  36. [44]

    J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature25020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.552..378M 552, 378

    Meech K. J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature25020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.552..378M 552, 378

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Micheli M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0254-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.559..223M 559, 223

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    O., 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 749, 10

    Ofek E. O., 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 749, 10

    2012

  39. [47]

    arXiv:2507.05226

    Opitom C., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2507.05226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250705226O p. arXiv:2507.05226

    2025 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Osman A. M. I., 2001, in IAU General Assembly. pp 179--186

    2001

  41. [49]

    G., Millis R

    Schleicher D. G., Millis R. L., Birch P. V., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.1997.5902 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Icar..132..397S 132, 397

    1998

  42. [50]

    Solontoi M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.10.008 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Icar..218..571S 218, 571

    2012 doi

  43. [51]

    Su K. Y. L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8cde , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977..277S 977, 277

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    E., Soskind Y., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

    Tang L., Hu Z., Ji H., 2023, in Busse L. E., Soskind Y., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 12428, Digital Optical Technologies 2023. p. 1242816, @doi 10.1117/12.2657248

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    L., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750...99T 750, 99

    Tonry J. L., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750...99T 750, 99

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    L., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130f4505T 130, 064505

    Tonry J. L., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130f4505T 130, 064505

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Xie C., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-025-08920-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025Natur.641..608X 641, 608

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.07.026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017JQSRT.202..104Z 202, 104

    Zubko E., Videen G., Shkuratov Y., Hines D. C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.07.026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017JQSRT.202..104Z 202, 104

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.