Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

FlameForge: Combustion of Generalized Wooden Structures

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read FlameForge claims a unified voxel-based simulator reproduces multi-phase combustion of arbitrary wooden structures, matching real interior temperature and mass-loss measurements.

desk verdict A solid systems paper that unifies existing combustion models into one volumetric pipeline; the SDF char-insulation proxy is a real limitation, but the hedged claims and genuine experiment make it worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16735 v1 pith:6CCO7VKI submitted 2024-12-21 cs.GR physics.comp-ph

Daoming Liu , Jonathan Klein , Florian Rist , Wojciech Pa{l}ubicki , Sören Pirk , Dominik L. Michels This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.GRphysics.comp-ph
keywords combustionsimulationcharringmaterialssigneddistancefieldvoxelgridsfirespreadwoodposition-baseddynamicsmultiresolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

FlameForge is a volumetric combustion simulator that claims to capture the full multi-phase burning of arbitrary wooden structures: heating, pyrolysis, char formation, and combustion of volatiles and char on a voxel grid, with a signed distance field standing in for the geometry needed to compute the insulating effect of the char layer. The paper argues that this simplified model is enough to reproduce the general trends of real combustion: simulated mass-loss curves match the parabola shape of charring wood and the S shape of non-charring acrylic, and simulated interior temperatures share the convex sub-surface and concave core structure seen in thermocouple measurements of burning cubes. If true, this gives computer graphics and fire-safety studies a way to predict how whole structures such as houses, boats, towers, and bridges deform, collapse, and spread fire across different materials and wind conditions, without resolving the full chemistry of combustion.

What carries the argument

The engine of the method is the combination of a multiresolution voxel grid for the material and a signed distance field that is iteratively updated as mass is consumed. The char insulation coefficient $c = c_{\min} + (1 - c_{\min}) \exp(-h c_r)$, where $h$ is the distance of a voxel from the material boundary, replaces the exact integral over all possible paths to the surface that true char insulation would require, and virgin wood and char are treated identically. Around this sit a one-step global pyrolysis model converting solid fuel into volatiles and char, a temperature-dependent reaction rate with a smooth interpolation function, and a bidirectional air-material temperature coupling that lets flames ignite material and combusting material feed flames.

What would settle it

Measure sub-surface temperature histories in an oven for a thin-walled wooden box whose wall thickness is comparable to the char layer thickness, or for a block with a detached char layer; if the simulated curve does not reproduce the real curve because the signed-distance proxy over- or under-insulates, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the multi-phase combustion of charring materials can be simulated at the scale of whole structures with a unified volumetric model. Wood pyrolysis is treated as an instantaneous one-step decomposition into volatiles and char; the char layer's insulating effect, which slows combustion of the material underneath, is computed from a signed distance field giving each voxel's distance to the material surface; and the air, temperature, smoke, and material fields are coupled through a multiresolution adaptive voxel grid. The quantitative evidence is a set of 40 mm cube experiments in an oven: real and simulated wood samples both show a parabolic mass-loss curve and the same convex-sub-surface/concave-core temperature split attributed to char insulation, while non-charring PMMA shows an S-shaped mass curve and a rapid inner temperature rise. The paper concludes that the simulator successfully reproduces the general trends of the measured curves, providing the basis for accurately capturing combustion phenomena, while noting that exact calibration to a given real environment is only partially addressed.

Load-bearing premise

Everything quantitative rests on the assumption that the char layer's insulation can be summarized by one voxel's distance to the material surface, with virgin wood and char treated identically; if that proxy fails for thin walls or concave geometry, the match with the cube experiment is a coincidence and the larger scenes are unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Arbitrary wooden geometries, from thin roof slats to thick walls, can burn in one framework, with fire spreading across connected and disconnected objects through the air.
  • Non-charring materials such as acrylic glass and non-combustible materials such as stone can be mixed into the same scene, changing how fire spreads and what remains standing.
  • Two-way coupling with position-based dynamics makes mechanical deformation, including the sagging of a burning bridge, follow from the combustion state.
  • Wind can be the deciding factor in whether a fire spreads from one object to a neighboring structure, as shown by the tree-to-house scenes.
  • The cube experiments give a quantitative baseline that the authors say provides the basis for accurately capturing combustion phenomena, even though exact calibration to a specific environment remains open.
  • If the simulator's distance-to-surface proxy for char insulation fails for thin walls, concave corners, or detached char layers, the cube-experiment match would be coincidental and the generalization to house, boat, and bridge scenes would not be supported.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The distance-to-surface proxy for char insulation is the likeliest point of failure: for thin walls, concave corners, or char layers that detach from the surface, a single signed distance cannot encode the integrated shielding along all paths, so the cube match may be coincidental for geometry that differs from a solid block.
  • A direct test would be to run the same oven experiment on a thin-walled box or a slab with a deliberate void; the simulator's char-insulation term would predict a different interior temperature history than a path-integral model, and the measured curve would decide.
  • The model contains no oxygen transport, so in enclosed spaces the simulated fire will likely burn longer than a real fire that self-extinguishes from oxygen starvation; adding a fuel-oxygen reaction term would change extinction behavior.
  • The claimed generality across wood species rests on a single calibration of a handful of parameters; transferring to different moisture contents or species-specific pyrolysis rates would require re-calibration from new measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents FlameForge, a voxel-based combustion simulator for generalized wooden structures. The system couples a low-resolution compressible-flow air solver with a high-resolution material grid, uses a signed distance field to evaluate char insulation, supports charring and non-charring materials, and demonstrates two-way coupling with position-based dynamics. The method is validated qualitatively on house, boat, tower, tree, and bridge scenes, and quantitatively against a new small-scale experiment in which cubic wood and PMMA samples are burned in an oven while subsurface temperatures and mass loss are recorded.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers a useful unification: a single volumetric framework for charring and non-charring solids with adaptive grids, SDF-based surface queries, and a working bidirectional coupling to a mechanical rod solver. The numerical building blocks (staggered MacCormack advection, AMGCL projection, fast sweeping for the SDF, OpenVDB data structures) are standard and appear to be implemented carefully. The inclusion of new external experimental data is a genuine strength, and the qualitative reproduction of the convex subsurface versus concave core temperature feature for wood is a promising indicator. However, the quantitative evidence is weaker than the abstract and Section 5.3 claim, and the char-insulation model that drives the headline validation is an acknowledged simplification whose generalization to arbitrary geometry is not directly tested.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2.3, Eq. (8)] The central generalization claim is only supported by a geometry-specific validation, because the char-insulation mechanism in Eq. (8) uses nearest-surface distance rather than the path-integrated insulation that the text itself identifies as physically correct. For concave regions, thin walls, and detached char, the proxy and the true path integral diverge, and the cube experiment cannot detect this divergence.
  2. [Section 5.3, Figure 8] The paper's headline quantitative claim is based on plots without error bars, metrics, or repeated trials; the admitted PMMA discrepancies show that the match is only qualitative. This is a core validation gap for a paper that claims to "quantitatively assess" the volumetric combustion process.
  3. [Table 1 and Section 3.2.4] Without exact parameter values and a sensitivity analysis, the reader cannot tell whether the good qualitative match on the cube is robust or the result of favorable parameter selection. This is especially important because many parameters are inherited from Pirk et al. [PJH*17] and are only given as ranges.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 8 caption] The caption labels appear to be copy-pasted from the charring panel and make the figure harder to read.
  2. [References, [HKV07]] This is a citation/presentation issue that should be corrected.
  3. [Table 1, units for TMc and TMv] The unit notation is confusing as written and should be reconciled with the relative-mass formulation.
  4. [Eq. (9) and Eq. (11)] A reader has to infer that Eq. (9) actually describes mass-loss rates (negative time derivatives of stored mass).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quantitative cube comparison rests on external measurements, and the char-insulation model is an acknowledged simplification rather than a fitted or self-referential identity.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claim is a comparison between simulated and measured sub-surface temperatures and mass-loss curves for cube samples (Section 5.3). The experimental data are new and external to the simulator; no equation in the paper fits the model to these measurements, and the 'general trends' comparison is therefore an actual test rather than a tautology. The char-insulation coefficient in Eq. (8) is explicitly imported from the authors' prior work [PJH*17] rather than derived in this paper, and the paper openly labels the SDF distance query a simplification of a path integral (Section 3.2.3). Reusing a previously published, externally validated model with overlapping authorship is self-citation, but it is not circular: the model is an assumption with acknowledged limits, and the cube experiment provides independent evidence that the model can reproduce the observed convex/concave and mass-curve trends. The stated calibration difficulty (Section 5.3) and the absence of quantitative sensor data for the large scenes limit generalization, but they remain correctness/validation concerns rather than circularity. No predicted quantity reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on roughly nine material and exchange parameters inherited from prior literature, reported partly as ranges, plus the SDF-proxy simplification for char insulation and the one-step pyrolysis model. No new physical entities are introduced. The empirical grounding is genuine but the undisclosed parameter picks and the distance-only insulation proxy are the items a replicating group would need to pin down.

free parameters (9)
  • Tm0 (pyrolysis/combustion lower threshold) = 150-280 K (range)
    Ignition threshold in Eq. (10). Table 1 gives a range, so the value used in the Section 5.3 cube validation is undisclosed. Inherited from Pirk et al. [PJH*17].
  • Tm1 (temperature limit for maximum combustion rate) = 400-500 K (range)
    Upper limit of the reaction-rate interpolation in Eq. (10). Inherited from Pirk et al.; actual pick undisclosed.
  • epsilon_v (volatiles mass loss rate) = 0.1 kg/s
    Linear combustion rate of volatiles in Eq. (9). Adapted from Pirk et al. [PJH*17]; sets the fast surface-burning phase.
  • epsilon_c (char mass loss rate) = 0.1-1.0e-3 kg/s (range)
    Linear combustion rate of char in Eq. (9). Range given in Table 1; the value used in validation is not stated.
  • Cr (char insulation rate) = 75.0 m^-1
    Exponent in Eq. (8), the char insulation model taken from Pirk et al. This coefficient directly shapes the convex/concave sensor-curve feature used as the main validation evidence.
  • Cmin (minimum char insulation) = 0.1
    Floor of insulation coefficient c in Eq. (8); from Pirk et al.
  • phi_a, phi_m (air-material heat exchange rates) = 5e-2 s^-1, 2e-2 s^-1
    Coupling rates in Eqs. (6)-(7); adapted from Pirk et al., not derived.
  • TMc, TMv (heat generation per consumed mass) = 3e7, 2e7 (as in Table 1)
    Convert consumed mass to temperature source in Eq. (11); taken from MacLeod et al. [MLH23].
  • beta, gamma_m (material diffusivity and radiative cooling) = 0.82e-7 m^2/s, 5.9e-14 K^-3 s^-1
    Material heat transport coefficients in Eq. (5); listed as adapted from Pirk et al. [PJH*17].
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Air flow follows the simplified compressible Navier-Stokes model of Nielsen et al.: Eqs. (1)-(2) with density rho approx rho_amb Tamb/Ta
    Borrowed from [NBHSB22]; adopted without separate validation in this paper.
  • domain assumption One-step global pyrolysis: a sufficiently hot voxel is immediately decomposed into volatiles and char (Section 3.2.2)
    From Di Blasi [DB93]. The paper notes a more complex model would improve realism.
  • domain assumption Char insulation is a function of SDF distance to the material surface only (Eq. (8), Section 3.2.3)
    The true treatment would integrate insulation over all paths to the surface; the paper replaces this with a distance query, stating the simplification explicitly.
  • domain assumption Virgin wood and pure char have identical insulation behavior (Section 3.2.3)
    Explicitly stated simplification; it is load-bearing for the temperature-profile validation.
  • domain assumption Combustion rate depends only on temperature through Eq. (10); oxygen availability is ignored
    The paper flags in Section 6 that oxygen starvation in enclosed areas is not modeled.
  • ad hoc to paper Parameters calibrated for wood combustion in prior literature transfer unchanged to this voxel discretization and to the specific wood species burned in the experiment (Table 1)
    The validation's validity depends on this transfer, and Table 1 reports ranges rather than the exact values used.
  • domain assumption Thermocouple readings at the surface, 5 mm, and 20 mm depth are reliable probes of the internal temperature field of the sample
    The paper itself reports that surface sensors detach and PMMA dismantles, so the usable experimental data is partial; the comparison therefore rests on readings whose integrity is only partially established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FlameForge: Combustion of Generalized Wooden Structures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CCO7VKI

@misc{pith2026241216735,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FlameForge: Combustion of Generalized Wooden Structures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CCO7VKI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16735}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a unified volumetric combustion simulator that supports general wooden structures capturing the multi-phase combustion of charring materials. Complex geometric structures can conveniently be represented in a voxel grid for the effective evaluation of volumetric effects. In addition, a signed distance field is introduced to efficiently query the surface information required to compute the insulating effect caused by the char layer. Non-charring materials such as acrylic glass or non-combustible materials such as stone can also be modeled in the simulator. Adaptive data structures are utilized to enable memory-efficient computations within our multiresolution approach. The simulator is qualitatively validated by showcasing the numerical simulation of a variety of scenes covering different kinds of structural configurations and materials. Two-way coupling of our combustion simulator and position-based dynamics is demonstrated capturing characteristic mechanical deformations caused by the combustion process. The volumetric combustion process of wooden structures is further quantitatively assessed by comparing our simulated results to sub-surface measurements of a real-world combustion experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16735 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustrations of different scenes showcasing the capabilities of our FLAMEFORGE simulator. Left: A house has been set on fire which is composed of two types of wood (walls/roof), acrylic windows, and a chimney made out of stone. Middle: The fire of a burning tree further spreads to the roof of a wooden house. Right: A watchtower has been ignited at the bottom causing both horizontal as well as strong vertical fire s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. – is its internal state representation, i.e., the overall con￾figuration of the scene at a given point in time. The state is updated iteratively to progress the simulation through time. The simulation takes place in a spatial domain Ω ⊂ R 3 that is filled with air (that also includes other gases) and material (burnable and non-burnable solids). For each point in time t ∈ R, the air is represented by fields for [PIT… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A scene featuring multiple materials simulating fire spread and combustion processes of a burning house which is composed of two types of wood (walls and roof are made up of different wood types), acrylic windows (non-charring), and a stone chimney (non-combustible). The roof catches fire (t0) such as after a lightning strike causing smoke development and fire spread (t1). After some time, the relatively thin wood o… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the grid projection in 2D. Left: Fine (orange) to coarse (blue). Black Lines: Material contour. Orange x: Voxels inside the material. Right: Neighborhood look up. Blue dashes: Material occupied voxels. and ξ(Tm) = 0 for Tm < Tm0 and ξ(Tm) = 1 for Tm > T…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of fire spread and combustion using com￾plex geometry: A traditional, relatively flat-bottomed Chinese boat fully made out of wood has been ignited at the bottom (upper left). The fire then spreads quickly to the roof (upper right) and further progresses (…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulation of fire spread across multiple objects: A tree is on fire (t0) which further spreads according to the wind direction igniting the roof (t1) of a house (top row) causing severe damage (t2). In contrast, if almost no wind is present, also in the long term (t3)…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experimental setup for mass loss and temperature measurement. Samples of different materials (wood and PMMA) are equipped with thermo probes and placed on a scale arm inside an oven that heats the sample up until the ignition temperature. During the combustion process,…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparisons of the temporal evolutions of mass and temperature between simulation and real experiment. Left: Simulation of a burning block with charring enabled and disabled (shown at the same time step). Middle: Temperature curves for different simulation settings and…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The historical King Louis Bridge built by Royal Bavarian State Railways (1847 to 1851) has been predominantly constructed from wood (larch, oak, and pine) as well as from iron and stone. This historical landmark of civil engineering – the oldest surviving bridge erecte…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Simulation of a burning watchtower with different ignition locations. Top row: The fire starts at the roof. Middle row: The tower is ignited from the side using a flamethrower. Bottom row: The fire starts at the bottom of the tower [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Illustration of the main element of the King Louis Bridge: Between the two stone pillars (light gray), the bridge is has been made almost entirely of wood (light brown for larch and dark brown for oak) as it is cheap and can absorb compressive forces well. However, wo…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FieryGS: In-the-Wild Fire Synthesis with Physics-Integrated Gaussian Splatting

    cs.GR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    FieryGS integrates LLM-based material reasoning, volumetric combustion simulation, and a unified renderer with 3D Gaussian Splatting to generate physically plausible and user-controllable fire in in-the-wild scenes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry.original add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 i...

  3. [3]

    : Wood: Sawn materials

    Blankenhorn P. : Wood: Sawn materials. In Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, Buschow K. J., Cahn R. W., Flemings M. C., Ilschner B., Kramer E. J., Mahajan S., Veyssière P., (Eds.). Elsevier, Oxford, 2001, pp. 9722--9732

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    : Position-Based Simulation Methods in Computer Graphics

    Bender J., Müller M., Macklin M. : Position-Based Simulation Methods in Computer Graphics . In EG 2015 - Tutorials (2015), Zwicker M., Soler C., (Eds.), The Eurographics Association

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    : Fluid simulation for computer graphics

    Bridson R. : Fluid simulation for computer graphics. CRC press, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    F., Spicer H

    Birch F., Schairer J. F., Spicer H. C. : Handbook of physical constants, vol. 36. Geological Society of America, 1942

    work page 1942

  7. [7]

    : Modeling and simulation of combustion processes of charring and non-charring solid fuels

    Di Blasi C. : Modeling and simulation of combustion processes of charring and non-charring solid fuels. Progress in energy and combustion science 19, 1 (1993), 71--104

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    : Amgcl: An efficient, flexible, and extensible algebraic multigrid implementation

    Demidov D. : Amgcl: An efficient, flexible, and extensible algebraic multigrid implementation. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics 40 (2019), 535--546

    work page 2019

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    C., Hu F., Pope C

    Edholm J., Stomakhin A., Deshprabhu R., Cebrian D. C., Hu F., Pope C. : Fire and explosions in avatar: The way of water. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Talks (New York, NY, USA, 2023), SIGGRAPH '23, Association for Computing Machinery

    2023

  2. [10]

    : Animating suspended particle explosions

    Feldman B., O'Brien J., Arikan O. : Animating suspended particle explosions. ACM Trans. Graph. 22 (07 2003), 708--715

    2003

  3. [11]

    : Wood buildings as a climate solution

    Himes A., Busby G. : Wood buildings as a climate solution. Developments in the Built Environment 4 (2020), 100030

    2020

  4. [12]

    T., Pa ubicki W., Pirk S., Michels D

    H \"a drich T., Banuti D. T., Pa ubicki W., Pirk S., Michels D. L. : Fire in paradise: Mesoscale simulation of wildfires. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 4 (2021), 1--15

    2021

  5. [13]

    : Directable, high-resolution simulation of fire on the gpu

    Horvath C., Geiger W. : Directable, high-resolution simulation of fire on the gpu. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 28, 3 (2009), 1--8

    2009

  6. [14]

    : Physically-based modeling, simulation and rendering of fire for computer animation

    Huang Z., Gong G., Han L. : Physically-based modeling, simulation and rendering of fire for computer animation. Multimedia Tools and Applications 71, 3 (Aug 2014), 1283--1309

    2014

  7. [15]

    Herrera J. A. A., H\"adrich T., Pa ubicki W., Banuti D. T., Pirk S., Michels D. L. : Weatherscapes: Nowcasting heat transfer and water continuity. ACM Transaction on Graphics 40, 6 (12 2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Herrera J. A. A., Klein J., Liu D., Pa ubicki W., Pirk S., Michels D. L. : Cyclogenesis: Simulating hurricanes and tornadoes. ACM Transaction on Graphics 43, 4 (7 2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Versteeg W

    Henk K. Versteeg W. M. : An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Pearson Education Limited, 2007

    2007

  10. [18]

    T., Pirk S., Michels D

    H\" a drich T., Makowski M., Pa ubicki W., Banuti D. T., Pirk S., Michels D. L. : Stormscapes: Simulating cloud dynamics in the now. ACM Transaction on Graphics 39, 6 (12 2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    L., Jiang C

    Huang L., Qu Z., Tan X., Zhang X., Michels D. L., Jiang C. : Ships, splashes, and waves on a vast ocean. ACM Transaction on Graphics 40, 6 (12 2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    : Wrinkled flames and cellular patterns

    Hong J.-M., Shinar T., Fedkiw R. : Wrinkled flames and cellular patterns. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3 (jul 2007), 47–es

    2007

  13. [21]

    : Geometry-based control of fire simulation

    Hong Y., Zhu D., Qiu X., Wang Z. : Geometry-based control of fire simulation. Vis. Comput. 26, 9 (sep 2010), 1217–1228

    2010

  14. [22]

    : Animation of Reactive Gaseous Fluids through Chemical Kinetics

    Ihm I., Kang B., Cha D. : Animation of Reactive Gaseous Fluids through Chemical Kinetics . In Symposium on Computer Animation (2004), Boulic R., Pai D. K., (Eds.), Eurographics

    2004

  15. [23]

    T., Fedkiw R

    Kwatra N., Gr\' e tarsson J. T., Fedkiw R. : Practical animation of compressible flow for shock waves and related phenomena. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (Goslar, DEU, 2010), SCA '10, Eurographics, p. 207–215

    2010

  16. [24]

    : Animation of Chemically Reactive Fluids Using a Hybrid Simulation Method

    Kang B., Jang Y., Ihm I. : Animation of Chemically Reactive Fluids Using a Hybrid Simulation Method . In Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (2007), Metaxas D., Popovic J., (Eds.), Eurographics

    2007

  17. [25]

    : Physics-inspired controllable flame animation

    Kim T., Lee J., Kim C.-H. : Physics-inspired controllable flame animation. 871–880

  18. [26]

    : Neuralvdb: High-resolution sparse volume representation using hierarchical neural networks

    Kim D., Lee M., Museth K. : Neuralvdb: High-resolution sparse volume representation using hierarchical neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04448 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A., Potter M

    Kroos K. A., Potter M. C. : Thermodynamics for Engineers, SI Edition. Cengage Learning, 2014

    2014

  20. [28]

    L., Pirk S., Palubicki W

    Kokosza A., Wrede H., Gonzalez Esparza D., Makowski M., Liu D., Michels D. L., Pirk S., Palubicki W. : Scintilla: Simulating combustible vegetation for wildfires. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 43, 4 (2024), 1--21

    2024

  21. [29]

    : Structural modeling of flames for a production environment

    Lamorlette A., Foster N. : Structural modeling of flames for a production environment. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3 (jul 2002), 729–735

    2002

  22. [30]

    : Melting and burning solids into liquids and gases

    Losasso F., Irving G., Guendelman E., Fedkiw R. : Melting and burning solids into liquids and gases. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 3 (may 2006), 343–352

    2006

  23. [31]

    : Fluid Mechanics Aspects of Fire and Smoke Dynamics in Enclosures

    Merci B., Beji T. : Fluid Mechanics Aspects of Fire and Smoke Dynamics in Enclosures. CRC Press, 2016

    2016

  24. [32]

    : Interactive simulation of fire

    Melek Z., Keyser J. : Interactive simulation of fire. Pacific Graphics (2002), 431--432

    2002

  25. [33]

    E., Law A., Hadden R

    MacLeod C. E., Law A., Hadden R. M. : Quantifying the heat release from char oxidation in timber. Fire Safety Journal 138 (2023), 103793

    2023

  26. [34]

    : Vdb: High-resolution sparse volumes with dynamic topology

    Museth K. : Vdb: High-resolution sparse volumes with dynamic topology. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 32, 3 (2013), 1--22

    2013

  27. [35]

    : Nanovdb: A gpu-friendly and portable vdb data structure for real-time rendering and simulation

    Museth K. : Nanovdb: A gpu-friendly and portable vdb data structure for real-time rendering and simulation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2021 Talks. 2021, pp. 1--2

    2021

  28. [36]

    B., Bojsen-Hansen M., Stamatelos K., Bridson R

    Nielsen M. B., Bojsen-Hansen M., Stamatelos K., Bridson R. : Physics-based combustion simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41, 5 (2022), 1--21

    2022

  29. [37]

    Q., Fedkiw R., Jensen H

    Nguyen D. Q., Fedkiw R., Jensen H. W. : Physically based modeling and animation of fire. In Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (2002), pp. 721--728

    2002

  30. [38]

    B., Stamatelos K., Bojsen-Hansen M., Bridson R

    Nielsen M. B., Stamatelos K., Bojsen-Hansen M., Bridson R. : Physics-based combustion simulation in bifrost. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Talks. 2019, pp. 1--2

    2019

  31. [39]

    : A second-order advection-reflection solver

    Narain R., Zehnder J., Thomaszewski B. : A second-order advection-reflection solver. Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech. 2, 2 (jul 2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    : Turbulent Combustion

    Peters N. : Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  33. [41]

    L., Palubicki W

    Pirk S., Jarz a bek M., H \"a drich T., Michels D. L., Palubicki W. : Interactive wood combustion for botanical tree models. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 6 (2017), 1--12

    2017

  34. [42]

    L., Pirk S

    Pa ubicki W., Makowski M., Gajda W., H \"a drich T., Michels D. L., Pirk S. : Ecoclimates: Climate-response modeling of vegetation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41, 4 (2022), 1--19

    2022

  35. [43]

    : Depicting fire and other gaseous phenomena using diffusion processes

    Stam J., Fiume E. : Depicting fire and other gaseous phenomena using diffusion processes. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (New York, NY, USA, 1995), SIGGRAPH '95, Association for Computing Machinery, p. 129–136

    1995

  36. [44]

    : An unconditionally stable maccormack method

    Selle A., Fedkiw R., Kim B., Liu Y., Rossignac J. : An unconditionally stable maccormack method. Journal of Scientific Computing 35 (2008), 350--371

    2008

  37. [45]

    Shao H., Huang L., Michels D. L. : A fast unsmoothed aggregation algebraic multigrid framework for the large-scale simulation of incompressible flow. ACM Transaction on Graphics 41, 4 (07 2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    : Augmented mpm for phase-change and varied materials

    Stomakhin A., Schroeder C., Jiang C., Chai L., Teran J., Selle A. : Augmented mpm for phase-change and varied materials. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4 (2014), 138:1--138:11

    2014

  39. [47]

    : Stable fluids

    Stam J. : Stable fluids. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (USA, 1999), SIGGRAPH '99, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., p. 121–128

    1999

  40. [48]

    : Stable fluids

    Stam J. : Stable fluids. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH (1999), 121--128

    1999

  41. [49]

    Tritton D. J. : Physical Fluid Dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  42. [50]

    : A semi-lagrangian high-order method for navier–stokes equations

    Xiu D., Karniadakis G. : A semi-lagrangian high-order method for navier–stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 172 (09 2001), 658--684

    2001

  43. [51]

    : A fast sweeping method for eikonal equations

    Zhao H. : A fast sweeping method for eikonal equations. Mathematics of computation 74, 250 (2005), 603--627

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.