Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 65 references

Nonlinear bias of collective oscillation frequency induced by asymmetric Cauchy noise

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Asymmetric Cauchy noise biases the frequency of collective oscillations, an effect missed by the standard Ott-Antonsen ansatz; circular cumulants quantify it.

desk verdict Asymmetric Cauchy noise produces a genuine nonlinear shift in Kuramoto collective frequency that the OA ansatz misses; the central claims are well supported and this deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02291 v1 pith:6CYSW2JP submitted 2025-01-04 cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.AO

Maria V. Ageeva , Denis S. Goldobin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AO MSC 82C3137N2560G5134C15
keywords asymmetricCauchynoisecircularcumulantsKuramotomodelcollectiveoscillationfrequencybiasLevyOtt-Antonsenansatzsynchronizationentrainment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that in a population of sine-coupled phase oscillators driven by independent asymmetric Cauchy noises, the collective oscillation frequency is shifted away from the mean natural frequency. The shift is nonlinear: it depends on the amplitude of the collective mode and vanishes near the Kuramoto synchronization transition. The paper derives the strong-coupling asymptotic law $\tilde{\omega} = (2\beta\sigma/\pi)(-S_0 + S_1(\gamma+\sigma)/\varepsilon)$ with $S_0=0.45158...$ and $S_1=0.60927...$, valid for $\varepsilon\gg\varepsilon_{\mathrm{cr}}$. This effect is completely absent on the Ott-Antonsen manifold, which is applicable only for symmetric Cauchy noise. The paper develops a circular-cumulant formalism to capture the effect and validates it against high-accuracy continued-fraction solutions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the infinite chain of circular-cumulant equations (Eq. 17), derived from the moment-generating function F(k,t)=langle $e^{{k e^{i phi}}$}rangle=sum_m Z_m k^m/m!. For asymmetric Cauchy noise the noise term is $\sigma$ dot{Phi}^{(xi)}(m)=-|m|+i(2 $\beta$ $\sigma$/pi) m ln|m|, producing coefficients $G_m^{{(beta)}}$. The chain is truncated in two ways: finite 2- and 3-CC reductions (Eqs. 13-15), and a rigorous perturbative series for the second cumulant kappa_2 (Eq. 29), whose terms are controlled by the coefficient C_m approximately (-1)^m m! ln m. Substituting kappa_2 into the equation for Z_1 and solving the real and imaginary parts yields Eqs. (41)-(42) for (|Z_1|, tilde{omega}), and the strong-coupling limit gives the closed law (45)-(46). The continued-fraction solution of the stationary Fourier-mode equations (Eqs. 47-50) with 2000 modes serves as the exact benchmark.

What would settle it

Direct numerical simulation of the Kuramoto ensemble with asymmetric Cauchy noise (or a high-order continued-fraction computation) for beta=1 and epsilon/epsilon_cr large should reproduce the asymptotic law (46); a persistent discrepancy larger than the stated truncation error, or a bias that does not saturate to a constant, would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a Kuramoto ensemble with intrinsic asymmetric Cauchy noise ($\alpha$=1, skewness $\beta$), the mean-field rotation frequency $\Omega$ is biased relative to the mean natural frequency omega_0: the bias tilde{omega}=$\Omega$-omega_0 is nonzero for $\beta$ $\sigma$ > 0 and epsilon > epsilon_cr, vanishes as the collective mode amplitude goes to zero near the transition, and saturates to -(2 $\beta$ $\sigma$/pi) S_0 plus a correction proportional to S_1(gamma+$\sigma$)/epsilon in the strong-coupling limit. The bias arises from higher circular cumulants and is exactly zero on the Ott-Antonsen manifold. The paper shows that the 2- and 3-circular-cumulant reductions are accurate for the order parameter across the parameter range, but for the rotation bias they retain a finite non-decaying error in the strong-coupling limit, whereas the rigorous linear-in-$\beta$-$\sigma$ expansion of the cumulant chain makes the error tend to zero.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative results rely on the perturbative series for the second circular cumulant converging fast enough; the paper states that fast decay is typical but not guaranteed, and it can fail for mostly conservative coupling.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Kuramoto transition threshold stays at epsilon_cr=2(gamma+sigma), independent of noise skewness beta, while the collective frequency bias grows from zero at threshold to a nonzero constant in strong coupling.
  • Any Ott-Antonsen-based neural-mass model applied to networks with asymmetric heavy-tailed endogenous noise will systematically miss a rotation-frequency shift of order beta sigma, even when the order-parameter amplitude is accurately captured.
  • For individual oscillator frequency entrainment, the noise asymmetry breaks symmetry between subpopulations with fast and slow natural frequencies; the deviation of individual average frequencies from the mean-field rotation depends nonmonotonically on detuning.
  • The 2- and 3-CC reductions are accurate for the order parameter across the whole parameter range, but for the rotation bias one needs the full perturbative series (26)-(29) to make the error vanish in the strong-coupling limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because physical noise with Cauchy-type tails is generically asymmetric when microscopic fluctuations are asymmetric (e.g., different strengths of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic pulses), the reported bias should be observable in networks where the diffusion approximation breaks down.
  • The same circular-cumulant construction should carry over to alpha != 1 Levy noises, but the skewness term changes shape, so the saturation constants S_0 and S_1 will be alpha-dependent and require separate derivation.
  • The convergence failure of the series (29) for mostly conservative coupling suggests that in that regime a different resummation or a finite-CC closure may be needed; the continued-fraction benchmark remains available to test any alternative approximation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies populations of sin-coupled phase oscillators driven by independent asymmetric Cauchy noises, a case where the Ott–Antonsen (OA) ansatz is no longer exact. The authors derive a hierarchy of equations for circular cumulants (Sec. III A–B), a linear-in-βσ asymptotic expansion for time-independent states (Sec. III C), and low-dimensional truncations. For the Kuramoto ensemble, they predict and quantify a nonlinear bias of the collective oscillation frequency that is completely absent under the OA ansatz, with an explicit strong-coupling asymptotic law (Eq. 46). They also analyze the entrainment of individual oscillator frequencies (Sec. III D, IV C). The theoretical results are validated against a high-order continued-fraction solution (Sec. IV D) and reported in Figs. 4–6.

Significance. The reported frequency-bias effect is new and physically well motivated: the argument for generic asymmetry of non-Gaussian stable noises (Sec. II) is persuasive, and the quantitative prediction (Eq. 46) with the constants S_0, S_1 is a falsifiable result that goes beyond the OA ansatz. The paper has important strengths: the derivations are self-contained, the low-dimensional reductions are benchmarked against an independent numerical solver, and the paper honestly reports the regimes where the series in Eq. (29) may not converge. However, the manuscript contains at least two substantial typographical errors in key formulas (Eq. 23 and the definition of S_n in Eq. 44) that currently prevent a reader from reproducing the convergence argument and the asymptotic constants. These issues are fixable without changing the main conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III C, Eq. (23)] The displayed approximation for C_m is misprinted. Eq. (23) reads C_m ≈ (−1)^m m! ln m, but the exact values (e.g., C_2 = ln 2, C_3 = (1/2) ln 3 − ln 2) and the approximate equality used in Eq. (30) show the intended formula is C_m ≈ (−1)^m / (m! ln m). With the printed formula, the terms of the series in Eq. (29) would be O(l! C_{l+1} (bZ1)^l) = O((l!)^2 ln l (bZ1)^l), which diverges for any nonzero bZ1; this would contradict the claim that the series converges for |bZ1| ≤ 1 and would undermine the asymptotic expansion (44)–(46). The authors should correct Eq. (23) and revise the convergence discussion in Sec. III C accordingly.
  2. [Sec. IV B, Eq. (44)] The definition of the constants S_n in Eq. (44) is unclear. The displayed formula 'S_n = Σ_{l=1}^∞ (−1)^{l+1} ln l! / 2^l C_{l+1}' is ambiguous and does not follow from expanding Eq. (31) around bZ1 = 1/2. Since S_0 and S_1 enter the central asymptotic law Eq. (46) and are compared with numerics in Fig. 5, the authors must give the correct definition (presumably involving l! C_{l+1}/2^l multiplied by a polynomial in l) and explain how the numerical values 0.45158... and 0.60927... were obtained.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III D, after Eq. (38)] There is a stray question mark at the end of the displayed formula for ν_ω in the β = 0 limit; this appears to be a typographical artifact and should be removed.
  2. [Sec. IV D] The 'exact' continued-fraction solution relies on the self-similarity closure B_{m∞+1} = B_{m∞} at m∞ = 2000. A brief convergence test (e.g., comparing m∞ = 1000 and 2000) would substantiate the claim of 'nearly machine accuracy' and would help the reader assess the reliability of the reference solution.
  3. [Sec. III C] The statement that 'the case of a fast decay of the series in Eq. (29) is expected to be typical but not guaranteed' should be sharpened after the correction of Eq. (23): for |bZ1| < 1 the series converges absolutely, so the caveat applies only to the mostly-conservative coupling regime (θ ≈ π/2).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the frequency-bias derivation is self-contained and independently cross-checked.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, the nonlinear collective-frequency bias ~ω = Ω − ω0 of Eq. (46), is derived through an explicit chain: the exact Fourier-mode equation (10), the asymmetric Cauchy noise characteristic function (9), the circular-cumulant hierarchy (17), the recursive asymptotic solution (28)-(29), and the self-consistency equation (31), which is then expanded in the strong-coupling limit to yield Eqs. (45)-(46). The constants S0 = 0.451582705... and S1 = 0.609274778... are defined as convergent infinite sums over the exact coefficients C_{l+1} from Eq. (22); they are not fitted to the bias they predict. The approximation (23) for C_m is used only for the convergence heuristic in Eq. (30), while the rigorous asymptotic expansion uses the exact coefficients, as confirmed by the numerical agreement reported in Fig. 5. The approximate 2CC and 3CC reductions are presented as low-dimensional reductions, not as the source of the asymptotic law; indeed the paper notes their finite non-decaying error for strong coupling and relies instead on the rigorous linear-in-βσ expansion. The 'exact' continued-fraction solution of Sec. IV D is an independent numerical path based on the same Fokker-Planck equation but not on the circular-cumulant truncation, so it provides a genuine cross-validation. The convergence caveat of Sec. III C is explicitly restricted to mostly-conservative coupling and does not undermine the Kuramoto θ=0 regime where Eq. (46) is claimed. The self-citations to the circular-cumulant formalism (Refs. 20, 21, 44) are contextual: the paper redefines circular cumulants via Eqs. (11)-(12) and rederives the equation chain (16)-(21), so the argument does not reduce to an unverified prior result. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation is equivalent by construction to its output. Hence there is no circular step of any of the enumerated kinds.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model inputs (coupling epsilon, noise intensity sigma, skewness beta, heterogeneity gamma) are physical parameters, not free parameters. The only user-chosen numbers are truncation orders for the circular cumulant reduction and for the continued fraction solver. The axioms are mostly standard domain assumptions of mean-field oscillator theory; the two ad hoc entries are the series convergence assumption and the numerical tail closure, both explicitly flagged in the paper.

free parameters (2)
  • Circular cumulant truncation order = 2 or 3
    The 2CC (kappa_3=0) and 3CC closures are chosen by hand. Their accuracy is checked against exact numerics; they are not fit to data, but the low-order results depend on this model-reduction choice.
  • Continued fraction truncation at m_infinity = 2000 modes
    Numerical truncation for the reference solution, with a self-similarity tail closure B_{m_infinity+1}=B_{m_infinity}. Convergence is checked by increasing the truncation, but no formal error bound is given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Microscopic fluctuations with heavy tails 1/|x|^(alpha+1) produce alpha-stable noise; asymmetric Cauchy noise is delta-correlated with characteristic function (1)-(2).
    Used in Sec. II and Appendix A to justify the fractional Fokker-Planck equation (A4) and the noise term in Eq. (8).
  • domain assumption The infinite-population limit is described by a probability density on the circle, and the Kuramoto-Daido order parameters Z_m obey the chain (10).
    Thermodynamic limit plus mean-field coupling; standard for Kuramoto-type models, invoked throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption For beta=0 the Ott-Antonsen manifold kappa_{m>=2}=0 is attracting, and for small beta sigma the circular cumulants are small enough that the linearized equations (24)-(25) apply.
    Secs. III A and III C use this to construct the perturbative expansion for the frequency bias. This is a perturbation assumption, not proved for all times and all parameters.
  • ad hoc to paper The series (29) for kappa_2 converges for the regimes where the frequency bias is reported.
    Sec. III C; the authors note that convergence is expected to be typical but not guaranteed, and can fail for mostly conservative coupling. This is the weakest structural premise for the asymptotic results.
  • ad hoc to paper The continued-fraction reference solution with m_infinity=2000 and the tail closure B_{m_infinity+1}=B_{m_infinity} is a faithful 'exact' solution.
    Sec. IV D, Eq. (50). The authors claim nearly machine accuracy, but this is a numerical ansatz rather than a proven theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear bias of collective oscillation frequency induced by asymmetric Cauchy noise." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CYSW2JP

@misc{pith2026250102291,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear bias of collective oscillation frequency induced by asymmetric Cauchy noise},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CYSW2JP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02291}
}
read the original abstract

We report the effect of nonlinear bias of the frequency of collective oscillations of sin-coupled phase oscillators subject to individual asymmetric Cauchy noises. The noise asymmetry makes the Ott-Antonsen Ansatz inapplicable. We argue that, for all stable non-Gaussian noises, the tail asymmetry is not only possible (in addition to the trivial shift of the distribution median) but also generic in many physical and biophysical set-ups. For the theoretical description of the effect, we develop a mathematical formalism based on the circular cumulants. The derivation of rigorous asymptotic results can be performed on this basis but seems infeasible in traditional terms of the circular moments (the Kuramoto-Daido order parameters). The effect of the entrainment of individual oscillator frequencies by the global oscillations is also reported in detail. The accuracy of theoretical results based on the low dimensional circular cumulant reductions is validated with the high-accuracy "exact" solutions calculated with the continued fraction method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02291 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. b perfectly fitted with shape (1). Further, we take a shot noise, which, for instance, one would find for trains of incoming synaptic pulses in neuronal populations with ran￾dom networks of synaptic links23 and finite globally coupled subpopulations:52,53 s(t) = ∑ j ζ jδ(t −tj), −8 −4 0 4 8 Ξ − µ 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 PDF −0.04 0 0.04 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 4 6 k 0 20ln F(k)   FIG. 2. The nature of the “diffusion appr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Macroscopic dynamics of Kuramoto ensemble subject t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The level of synchronization in the Kuramoto ensembl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The symmetry of the effects of entrainment of frequen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H.\ Strogatz, ``Integrability of a globally coupled oscillator array,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett

    S.\ Watanabe and S. H.\ Strogatz, ``Integrability of a globally coupled oscillator array,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 70 (16), 2391--2394 (1993).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2391

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.2391 1993

  2. [2]

    H.\ Strogatz, ``Constants of motion for superconducting Josephson arrays,'' Phys.\ D 74 (3--4), 197--253 (1994).\\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(94)90196-1

    S.\ Watanabe and S. H.\ Strogatz, ``Constants of motion for superconducting Josephson arrays,'' Phys.\ D 74 (3--4), 197--253 (1994).\\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(94)90196-1

    doi:10.1016/0167-2789(94)90196-1 1994

  3. [3]

    101 (26), 264103 (2008)

    A.\ Pikovsky and M.\ Rosenblum, ``Partially Integrable Dynamics of Hierarchical Populations of Coupled Oscillators,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 101 (26), 264103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.264103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.264103 2008

  4. [4]

    A.\ Marvel, R

    S. A.\ Marvel, R. E.\ Mirollo, S. H.\ Strogatz, ``Identical phase oscillators with global sinusoidal coupling evolve by M\"obius group action,'' Chaos 19 (4), 043104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3247089

    doi:10.1063/1.3247089 2009

  5. [5]

    M.\ Antonsen, ``Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators,'' Chaos 18 (3), 037113 (2008).\\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2930766

    E.\ Ott and T. M.\ Antonsen, ``Low dimensional behavior of large systems of globally coupled oscillators,'' Chaos 18 (3), 037113 (2008).\\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2930766

    doi:10.1063/1.2930766 2008

  6. [6]

    M.\ Antonsen, ``Long time evolution of phase oscillator systems,'' Chaos 19 (2), 023117 (2009)

    E.\ Ott and T. M.\ Antonsen, ``Long time evolution of phase oscillator systems,'' Chaos 19 (2), 023117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3136851

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3136851 2009

  7. [7]

    M.\ Abrams, R.\ Mirollo, S

    D. M.\ Abrams, R.\ Mirollo, S. H.\ Strogatz, and D. A.\ Wiley, ``Solvable Model for Chimera States of Coupled Oscillators,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 101 (8), 084103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.084103

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.084103 2008

  8. [8]

    H.\ Nagai and H.\ Kori, ``Noise-induced synchronization of a large population of globally coupled nonidentical oscillators,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 81 (6), 065202 (2010)

    K. H.\ Nagai and H.\ Kori, ``Noise-induced synchronization of a large population of globally coupled nonidentical oscillators,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 81 (6), 065202 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.065202

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.81.065202 2010

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    A.\ Matias, and P.\ Colet, ``Global dynamics of oscillator populations under common noise,'' EPL 99 (2), 20006 (2012).\\ https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/99/20006

    W.\ Braun, A.\ Pikovsky, M. A.\ Matias, and P.\ Colet, ``Global dynamics of oscillator populations under common noise,'' EPL 99 (2), 20006 (2012).\\ https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/99/20006

    2012 doi

  2. [10]

    V.\ Pimenova, D

    A. V.\ Pimenova, D. S.\ Goldobin, M.\ Rosenblum, and A.\ Pikovsky, ``Interplay of coupling and common noise at the transition to synchrony in oscillator populations,'' Sci.\ Rep. 6 , 38518 (2016).\\ https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38518

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    V.\ Dolmatova, D

    A. V.\ Dolmatova, D. S.\ Goldobin, and A.\ Pikovsky, ``Synchronization of coupled active rotators by common noise,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 96 (6), 062204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.062204

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    E.\ Omel'chenko and E.\ Knobloch, ``Chimerapedia: coherence--in\-co\-her\-ence patterns in one, two and three dimensions,'' New J.\ Phys

    O. E.\ Omel'chenko and E.\ Knobloch, ``Chimerapedia: coherence--in\-co\-her\-ence patterns in one, two and three dimensions,'' New J.\ Phys. 21 , 093034 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab3f6b

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Klinshov and I

    V. Klinshov and I. Franovi\'c, ``Two scenarios for the onset and suppression of collective oscillations in heterogeneous populations of active rotators,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 100 (6), 062211 (2019).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.062211

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Yasmine, Y

    B. Yasmine, Y. Li, W. Jia, and Y. Xu, ``Synchronization in the network-frustrated coupled oscillator with attractive-repulsive frequencies,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 106 (5), 054212 (2022).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.054212

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    D.\ Paz\'o and E.\ Montbri\'o, ``Low-dimensional dynamics of populations of pulsecoupled oscillators,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ X 4 (1), 011009 (2014).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011009

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    R.\ Laing, ``Exact neural fields incorporating gap junctions,'' SIAM J.\ Appl.\ Dyn.\ Syst

    C. R.\ Laing, ``Exact neural fields incorporating gap junctions,'' SIAM J.\ Appl.\ Dyn.\ Syst. 14 (4), 1899--1929 (2015).\\ https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1011287

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.012313

    \'A.\ Byrne, D.\ Avitabile, and S.\ Coombes, ``Next-generation neural field model: The evolution of synchrony within patterns and waves,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 99 (1), 012313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.012313

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    9 , 1128224 (2023)

    S.\ Coombes, ``Next generation neural population models'' Front.\ Appl.\ Math.\ Stat. 9 , 1128224 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2023.1128224

    2023

  11. [19]

    121 (12), 128301 (2018).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.128301

    M.\ di Volo and A.\ Torcini, ``Transition from asynchronous to oscillatory dynamics in balanced spiking networks with instantaneous synapses,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 121 (12), 128301 (2018).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.128301

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    I. V. Tyulkina, D. S. Goldobin, L. S. Klimenko, and A. Pikovsky, ``Dynamics of noisy oscillator populations beyond the Ott-Antonsen ansatz,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 120 (26), 264101 (2018).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.264101

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    D. S. Goldobin and A. V. Dolmatova, ``Ott-Antonsen ansatz truncation of a circular cumulant series,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Research 1 (3), 033139 (2019).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033139

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    I.\ Ratas and K.\ Pyragas, ``Noise-induced macroscopic oscillations in a network of synaptically coupled quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 100 (5), 052211 (2019).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.052211

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    di Volo, M

    M. di Volo, M. Segneri, D. S. Goldobin, A. Politi, and A. Torcini, ``Coherent oscillations in balanced neural networks driven by endogenous fluctuations,'' Chaos 32 (2), 023120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0075751

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    11 , 12960 (2021).\\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91389-8

    T.\ Zheng, K.\ Kotani, and Y.\ Jimbo, ``Distinct effects of heterogeneity and noise on gamma oscillation in a model of neuronal network with different reversal potential,'' Sci.\ Rep. 11 , 12960 (2021).\\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91389-8

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    D. S. Goldobin, ``Mean-field models of populations of quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons with noise on the basis of the circular cumulant approach,'' Chaos 31 (8), 083112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061575

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    R.\ Capocelli and L.\ Ricciardi, ``Diffusion approximation and first passage time problem for a model neuron,'' Kybernetik 8 , 214--223 (1971).\\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288750

    1971 doi

  19. [27]

    C.\ Tuckwell, Introduction to theoretical neurobiology: nonlinear and stochastic theories , Vol.\ 2 (Cambridge University Press, 1988)

    H. C.\ Tuckwell, Introduction to theoretical neurobiology: nonlinear and stochastic theories , Vol.\ 2 (Cambridge University Press, 1988)

    1988

  20. [28]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.052315

    R.\ T\"onjes and A.\ Pikovsky, ``Low-dimensional description for ensembles of identical phase oscillators subject to Cauchy noise,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 102 (5), 052315 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.052315

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.024315

    B.\ Pietras, R.\ Cestnik, and A.\ Pikovsky, ``Exact finite-dimensional description for networks of globally coupled spiking neurons,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 107 (2), 024315 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.024315

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    V.\ Pyragas and K.\ Pyragas, ``Effect of Cauchy noise on a network of quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons with non-Cauchy heterogeneities,'' Phys.\ Lett.\ A 480 , 128972 (2023).\\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2023.128972

    2023

  23. [31]

    A.\ Kostin, V

    V. A.\ Kostin, V. O.\ Munyaev, G. V.\ Osipov, and L. A.\ Smirnov, ``Synchronization transitions and sensitivity to asymmetry in the bimodal Kuramoto systems with Cauchy noise,'' Chaos 33 (8), 083155 (2023).\\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160006

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    M.\ Zolotarev, One-dimensional stable distribution , Translations of Mathematical Monographs Vol.\ 65 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1986)

    V. M.\ Zolotarev, One-dimensional stable distribution , Translations of Mathematical Monographs Vol.\ 65 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1986)

    1986

  25. [33]

    S.\ Goldobin, M.\ di Volo, and A.\ Torcini, ``Discrete synaptic events induce global oscillations in balanced neural networks,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett

    D. S.\ Goldobin, M.\ di Volo, and A.\ Torcini, ``Discrete synaptic events induce global oscillations in balanced neural networks,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 133 (23), 238401 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.238401

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    F.\ Shlesinger, ``Stochastic pathway to anomalous diffusion,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ A 35 (7), 3081--3085 (1987).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.3081

    J.\ Klafter, A.\ Blumen, and M. F.\ Shlesinger, ``Stochastic pathway to anomalous diffusion,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ A 35 (7), 3081--3085 (1987).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.3081

    1987 doi

  27. [35]

    S.\ Goldobin and A

    D. S.\ Goldobin and A. V.\ Dolmatova, ``Interplay of the mechanisms of synchronization by common noise and global coupling for a general class of limit-cycle oscillators,'' Commun.\ Nonlinear Sci.\ Numer.\ Simulat. 75 , 94--108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.03.026

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    173 (2), 278--289 (2009).\\ https://doi.org/10.1086/595755

    S.\ Petrovskii and A.\ Morozov, ``Dispersal in a statistically structured population: Fat tails revisited,'' Am.\ Nat. 173 (2), 278--289 (2009).\\ https://doi.org/10.1086/595755

    2009 doi

  29. [37]

    https://doi.org/10.1086/258792

    B.\ Mandelbrot, ``New methods in statistical economics,'' The Journal of Political Economy 71 (5), 421--440 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1086/258792

    1963 doi

  30. [38]

    A.\ Simkowitz and W

    M. A.\ Simkowitz and W. L.\ Beedles, ``Asymmetric Stable Distributed Security Returns,'' J.\ Am.\ Stat.\ Assoc. 75 (370), 306--312 (1980).\\ https://doi.org/10.2307/2287449

    1980 doi

  31. [39]

    I.\ Rabinovich and D

    M. I.\ Rabinovich and D. I.\ Trubetskov, Oscillations and Waves: In Linear and Nonlinear Systems Mathematics and Its Applications Vol. 50 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1989)

    1989

  32. [40]

    E.\ Lamb, Jr., ``Theory of an Optical Maser,'' Phys.\ Rev

    W. E.\ Lamb, Jr., ``Theory of an Optical Maser,'' Phys.\ Rev. 134 , A1429--A1450 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.134.A1429

    1964 doi

  33. [41]

    Phys.\ C 2 (10), 1717--1725 (1969).\\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/2/10/303

    P.\ Lloyd, ``Exactly solvable model of electronic states in a three-dimensional disordered Hamiltonian: non-existence of localized states,'' J. Phys.\ C 2 (10), 1717--1725 (1969).\\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/2/10/303

    1969 doi

  34. [42]

    S.\ Goldobin and A.\ Pikovsky, ``Synchronization and desynchronization of self-sustained oscillators by common noise,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 71 (4), 045201(R) (2005)

    D. S.\ Goldobin and A.\ Pikovsky, ``Synchronization and desynchronization of self-sustained oscillators by common noise,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 71 (4), 045201(R) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.045201

    2005 doi

  35. [43]

    A.\ Roberts, T

    J. A.\ Roberts, T. W.\ Boonstra, and M.\ Breakspear, ``The heavy tail of the human brain,'' Curr.\ Opin.\ Neurobiol. 31 , 164--172 (2015).\\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.10.014

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    V.\ Dolmatova, I

    A. V.\ Dolmatova, I. V.\ Tyulkina, and D. S.\ Goldobin, ``Circular cumulant reductions for macroscopic dynamics of oscillator populations with non- G aussian noise,'' Chaos 33 (11), 113102 (2023).\\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0159982

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    148 , 110976 (2021)

    Z.\ Wang, Y.\ Xu, Y.\ Li, T.\ Kapitaniak, and J.\ Kurths, ``Chimera states in coupled H indmarsh- R ose neurons with -stable noise,'' Chaos Soliton Fract. 148 , 110976 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110976

    2021

  38. [46]

    Stat.\ Mech.: Theory Exp

    Z.\ Wang, Y.\ Li, Y.\ Xu, T.\ Kapitaniak, and J.\ Kurths, ``Coherence-resonance chimeras in coupled HR neurons with alpha-stable L \'evy noise,'' J. Stat.\ Mech.: Theory Exp. 2022 , 053501 (2022).\\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ac6254

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Y. Li, Y. Xu, J. Kurths, and X. Yue, ``L\'evy-noise-induced transport in a rough triple-well potential,'' Phys.\ Rev. E 94 (4), 042222 (2016).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.042222

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0206094

    E.\ Rybalova, N.\ Nikishina, and G.\ Strelkova, ``Controlling spatiotemporal dynamics of neuronal networks by L \'evy noise,'' Chaos 34 (4), 041103 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0206094

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    186 , 115210 (2024)

    E.\ Rybalova, A.\ Ryabov, S.\ Muni, and G.\ Strelkova, `` L \'evy noise-induced coherence resonance in neural maps,'' Chaos Soliton Fract. 186 , 115210 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115210

    2024

  42. [50]

    184 , 115051 (2024).\\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115051

    E.\ Rybalova, V.\ Averyanov, R.\ Lozi, and G.\ Strelkova, ``Peculiarities of the spatio-temporal dynamics of a H \'enon- L ozi map network in the presence of L \'evy noise,'' Chaos Soliton Fract. 184 , 115051 (2024).\\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115051

    2024

  43. [51]

    S.\ Goldobin, ``Interspike interval statistics for quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons subject to alpha-stable noise,'' Cybernetics and Physics 13 (3), 206--210 (2024)

    D. S.\ Goldobin, ``Interspike interval statistics for quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons subject to alpha-stable noise,'' Cybernetics and Physics 13 (3), 206--210 (2024). https://doi.org/10.35470/2226-4116-2024-13-3-206-210

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    V.\ Klinshov and S

    V. V.\ Klinshov and S. Y.\ Kirillov, ``Shot noise in next-generation neural mass models for finite-size networks,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 106 (6), L062302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.L062302

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    Y.\ Kirillov, ``Constructive role of shot noise in the collective dynamics of neural networks,'' Chaos 33 (6), 061101 (2023)

    V.\ Klinshov, P.\ Smelov, and S. Y.\ Kirillov, ``Constructive role of shot noise in the collective dynamics of neural networks,'' Chaos 33 (6), 061101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147409

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    V.\ Chechkin, J.\ Klafter, V

    A. V.\ Chechkin, J.\ Klafter, V. Yu.\ Gonchar, R.\ Metzler, and L. V.\ Tanatarov, ``Bifurcation, bimodality, and finite variance in confined L\'evy flights,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ E 67 (1), 010102(R) (2003).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.010102

    2003 doi

  47. [55]

    M.\ Sokolov, and E

    R.\ Toenjes, I. M.\ Sokolov, and E. B.\ Postnikov, ``Nonspectral Relaxation in One Dimensional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 110 (15), 150602 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.150602

    2013 doi

  48. [56]

    S.\ Goldobin, E

    D. S.\ Goldobin, E. V.\ Permyakova, and L. S.\ Klimenko, ``Macroscopic behavior of populations of quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons subject to non-Gaussian white noise,'' Chaos 34 (1), 013121 (2024).\\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0172735

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    D. S. Goldobin, I. V. Tyulkina, L. S. Klimenko, and A. Pikovsky, ``Collective mode reductions for populations of coupled noisy oscillators,'' Chaos 28 (10), 101101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053576

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    S.\ Goldobin, ``Relationships between the Distribution of Watanabe-Strogatz Variables and Circular Cumulants for Ensembles of Phase Elements,'' Fluct.\ Noise Lett

    D. S.\ Goldobin, ``Relationships between the Distribution of Watanabe-Strogatz Variables and Circular Cumulants for Ensembles of Phase Elements,'' Fluct.\ Noise Lett. 18 (2), 1940002 (2019).\\ https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477519400029

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    Y.\ Kuramoto, in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics , edited by H.\ Araki, Springer Lecture Notes Phys., Vol.\ 39 (Springer, New York, 1975), p.\ 420

    1975

  52. [60]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3

    Y.\ Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3

    1984 doi

  53. [61]

    A.\ Acebr\'on, L

    J. A.\ Acebr\'on, L. L.\ Bonilla, C. J. P.\ Vicente, F.\ Ritort, and R.\ Spigler, ``The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena,'' Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys. 77 (1), 137--185 (2005).\\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137

    2005 doi

  54. [62]

    https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.76.576

    H.\ Sakaguchi and Y.\ Kuramoto, ``A Soluble Active Rotater Model Showing Phase Transitions via Mutual Entertainment,'' Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ 76 (3), 576--581 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.76.576

    1986 doi

  55. [63]

    Ya.\ Khinchin, Continued Fractions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1964)

    A. Ya.\ Khinchin, Continued Fractions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1964)

    1964

  56. [64]

    125 (24), 248101 (2020)

    E.\ Montbri\'o and D.\ Paz\'o, ``Exact Mean-Field Theory Explains the Dual Role of Electrical Synapses in Collective Synchronization,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 125 (24), 248101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.248101

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    W.\ Gardiner, Handbook of stochastic methods , 2nd edn.\ (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997)

    C. W.\ Gardiner, Handbook of stochastic methods , 2nd edn.\ (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997)

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.