The Fallacy of AI Functionality
Reviewed by Pithpith:6DP63UERopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Deployed AI systems often do not work. They can be constructed haphazardly, deployed indiscriminately, and promoted deceptively. However, despite this reality, scholars, the press, and policymakers pay too little attention to functionality. This leads to technical and policy solutions focused on "ethical" or value-aligned deployments, often skipping over the prior question of whether a given system functions, or provides any benefits at all. To describe the harms of various types of functionality failures, we analyze a set of case studies to create a taxonomy of known AI functionality issues. We then point to policy and organizational responses that are often overlooked and become more readily available once functionality is drawn into focus. We argue that functionality is a meaningful AI policy challenge, operating as a necessary first step towards protecting affected communities from algorithmic harm.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
GraphFlow: An Architecture for Formally Verifiable Visual Workflows Enabling Reliable Agentic AI Automation
GraphFlow is an architecture for formally verifiable visual workflows that treats diagrams as executable specs with proof-checkable contracts, backed by a pilot of 8728 runs at 97.08% completion on an early prototype ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.