REVIEW 4 cited by
TRAM: Benchmarking Temporal Reasoning for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Reasoning about time is essential for understanding the nuances of events described in natural language. Previous research on this topic has been limited in scope, characterized by a lack of standardized benchmarks that would allow for consistent evaluations across different studies. In this paper, we introduce TRAM, a temporal reasoning benchmark composed of ten datasets, encompassing various temporal aspects of events such as order, arithmetic, frequency, and duration, designed to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of the TeR capabilities of large language models (LLMs). We evaluate popular LLMs like GPT-4 and Llama2 in zero-shot and few-shot scenarios, and establish baselines with BERT-based and domain-specific models. Our findings indicate that the best-performing model lags significantly behind human performance. It is our aspiration that TRAM will spur further progress in enhancing the TeR capabilities of LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
WaveformQA: Benchmarking LLM Temporal Reasoning on Digital Waveforms
LLMs answer simple waveform queries well but fail on multi-signal temporal reasoning, and event-time JSON waveforms beat standard VCD by 37–53% in accuracy, according to a new 360-question benchmark.
-
Temporal Preference Concepts and their Functions in a Large Language Model
Temporal preference in Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 localizes to layers 17–35 (especially L24 attention), has curved residual-stream geometry, is behaviorally unstable, and can be bidirectionally steered.
-
MARS-RA: Rank Aggregation for Credit Assignment via Multimodal Comparisons in Embodied Multi-Agent Cooperation
Credit assignment via LMM pairwise comparisons plus Bradley–Terry rank aggregation and potential-based shaping improves cooperative MARL under sparse rewards and dynamic agent counts.
-
TempoBench: Evaluating Temporal Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models
In TempoBench's formally verified temporal-causality tests, frontier LLMs score 65.6% F1 on normal causal attribution but 7.5% on hard instances, while trace simulation stays far higher.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.