Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Catalog of Fairness-Aware Practices in Machine Learning Engineering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.16683 v2 pith:6JIPCXQR submitted 2024-08-29 cs.SE cs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.LG
keywords learningmachineengineeringfairnesspracticescataloglifecyclemapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning's widespread adoption in decision-making processes raises concerns about fairness, particularly regarding the treatment of sensitive features and potential discrimination against minorities. The software engineering community has responded by developing fairness-oriented metrics, empirical studies, and approaches. However, there remains a gap in understanding and categorizing practices for engineering fairness throughout the machine learning lifecycle. This paper presents a novel catalog of practices for addressing fairness in machine learning derived from a systematic mapping study. The study identifies and categorizes 28 practices from existing literature, mapping them onto different stages of the machine learning lifecycle. From this catalog, the authors extract actionable items and implications for both researchers and practitioners in software engineering. This work aims to provide a comprehensive resource for integrating fairness considerations into the development and deployment of machine learning systems, enhancing their reliability, accountability, and credibility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Practitioner Insights on Fairness Requirements in the AI Development Life Cycle: An Interview Study

    cs.SE 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Practitioners recognize AI fairness but apply it unevenly, rarely document it formally, and frequently deprioritize it against accuracy, deadlines, and features.

  2. Data Preparation for Fairness-Performance Trade-Offs: A Practitioner-Friendly Alternative?

    cs.SE 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    FATE is a proposed genetic algorithm that searches over fairness-aware data preparation pipelines, but the paper reports no experiments and the empirical claim remains untested.

  3. From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits?

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A UTAUT2-based survey of 181 practitioners finds performance expectancy and habit drive fairness toolkit adoption.

Pith tools