A Structured Review of Reduced Order Modeling for Domain Decomposition Problems: State of the Art and Perspectives

Andreas G. Class; Gianluigi Rozza; Shenhui Ruan

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 300 references

A Structured Review of Reduced Order Modeling for Domain Decomposition Problems: State of the Art and Perspectives

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read All reduced-order domain-decomposition methods fit two families

desk verdict Useful engineering-oriented map of ROM+DD, but the binary intrusive/non-intrusive taxonomy is over-claimed and the corpus is not auditable. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.09623 v2 pith:6PE5W7HS submitted 2026-01-14 math.NA cs.NAphysics.flu-dyn

Shenhui Ruan , Andreas G. Class , Gianluigi Rozza This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NAcs.NAphysics.flu-dyn MSC 65N5565M99

keywords reducedordermodelsdomaindecompositionsubdomaincouplingintrusivemethodsnon-intrusivelocalbasesSchwarzphysics-informedneuralnetworks

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review tries to bring order to the many ways researchers combine reduced-order models with domain decomposition, a technique that splits a geometry into subdomains and glues local fast surrogates into a global solution. It claims that, despite dozens of individually adapted techniques, all coupling methods rest on a few concepts and can be sorted into intrusive (projection-based) and non-intrusive (data-driven) families. Within these, it maps monolithic versus iterative coupling and Schwarz-based, interpolation, optimization, and physics-informed neural network approaches. It further argues that training local models on small repeated archetype blocks is the most cost-effective offline strategy, and that a discontinuous-Galerkin-based reduced-basis method is the most promising route for engineering problems. If the review is right, a newcomer can choose a coupling method from the map, and research effort can concentrate on a few recommended families.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the local-ROM assembly pipeline and its two-family classification. Three common preliminaries — domain decomposition, parameterization, and local reduced-basis construction — precede every method. The coupling principle is uniform: minimize discontinuities at interfaces while satisfying the PDEs and boundary conditions. Named workhorses include monolithic RBEM (Lagrange multipliers), RDF (interface finite-element basis), SCRBEM (port/bubble static condensation), DGRBEM (penalized jumps), partition-of-unity weights, optimization-based functionals, and iterative Schwarz, Dirichlet-Neumann, and Robin-Robin schemes. The key organizational identity is the taxonomy itself,

What would settle it

A systematic literature search with explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria that finds a substantial family of coupling methods missing from the two-category map would falsify the completeness claim. Alternatively, a head-to-head benchmark on a repeating-geometry engineering problem (e.g., a thermal fin or blood-vessel flow) using the same snapshot budget — comparing DGRBEM against RBEM/SCRBEM, Dirichlet-Neumann Schwarz, and a data-driven interpolation method — would settle the 'most promising' claim: if DGRBEM is not the accuracy-per-cost winner, the recommendation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the review establishes that ROM+DD coupling methods, despite their diversity, rest on a few concepts and sort into two families: intrusive (projection-based) and non-intrusive (data-driven). Intrusive methods split into monolithic schemes (RBEM, RDF, SCRBEM, DGRBEM, partition of unity, optimization-based) and iterative Schwarz-type schemes; non-intrusive methods split into Schwarz-based, interpolation, optimization, and PINN groups. The review further argues that localized training on archetype blocks is the most cost-effective offline strategy, and that DGRBEM — a discontinuous-Galerkin reduced-basis element method whose jump-penalty interface terms glue local bases direct

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cited literature is a representative, faithfully categorized sample of the field; without an auditable search protocol, a skewed corpus would change both the taxonomy's completeness and the 'most promising' ranking.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A researcher entering ROM+DD can choose a coupling method by locating it on the two-family map instead of surveying the full literature.
If localized training on archetype blocks is as efficient as claimed, offline costs for large repeating geometries — heat exchangers, nuclear fuel assemblies, vascular networks — can be cut by training on small representative systems and transforming bases to each instance.
If DGRBEM is the most promising monolithic method, engineering-oriented ROM implementations will likely standardize on discontinuous-Galerkin assembly with jump penalties for interface continuity.
Iterative Schwarz-type couplings are predicted to reach commercial codes before monolithic methods because of their simpler formulation and natural fit with many subdomains and multiphysics.
The review implies research attention should move toward coupling many subdomains and toward robust FOM-ROM and ROM-ROM communication schemes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: the 'most promising' ranking is only as strong as the representativeness of the cited corpus; a different selection of papers could shift the ranking, so the recommendation should be read as a hypothesis about the literature rather than a measured fact.
Editorial extension: the review's localized-training premise — small networks represent large-system behavior — is directly testable by training on a small assembly and predicting on progressively larger assemblies to map the accuracy decay with scale.
Editorial extension: the taxonomy invites a shared benchmark suite that reports accuracy, offline cost, and online cost for the same repeating-geometry problem across all mapped families; such a benchmark would be the natural next step and would turn the map into a quantitative decision tool.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: this is a genuinely useful review for newcomers to ROM+DD, mostly because it organizes a diffuse literature into a clear hierarchy and makes explicit engineering judgments. It is not a research result, and the central taxonomy has a real inconsistency that the authors should fix.

What is new: the hierarchical classification — three common preliminaries plus coupling strategies, with monolithic vs iterative on the intrusive side and Schwarz/interpolation/optimization/PINN on the data-driven side — is a helpful organizing device. I don't know of another single text that puts RBEM, RDF, SCRBEM, DGRBEM, Schwarz variants, Gappy-POD, and PINN-based couplings side by side. The equations presented for the main intrusive methods are standard and mostly internally consistent. The paper is also honest about its own limits: Section 6 explicitly says the treatment may be too shallow for some readers and that a posteriori error analysis is omitted.

Soft spots: first, the binary intrusive/non-intrusive classification is not as clean as Section 6 claims. Section 1 defines non-intrusive as purely data-driven, but Section 5.1.3 admits PINNs can solve PDEs without data and include the PDE residual in the loss. The paper then classifies PINNs as non-intrusive because they don't algebraically manipulate a reduced system. That is an ad hoc shift of the defining criterion. It doesn't sink the review, but the claim that all methods can be 'adequately classified' into two categories is too strong. Better to present the data-driven grouping as a pragmatic division rather than a logical dichotomy. Second, the reader's concern about corpus audibility is fair. There is no documented search protocol, no inclusion/exclusion criteria, no coverage statistics. Many of the 'most promising' recommendations come from the authors' own research circles, and clustering-based local ROMs are excluded in one sentence. That makes the engineering conclusions hard to audit. Both are addressable in revision.

This is a paper for practitioners and new graduate students who want a map of the field and a starting bibliography. I would read it, and I would send it to peer review: the taxonomy issues are fixable, and the scope and clarity justify referee time.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey of reduced order modeling (ROM) combined with domain decomposition (DD). It proposes a hierarchical taxonomy: common preliminaries (domain decomposition, parameterization, dimensionality reduction), followed by a binary split into intrusive (projection-based) and non-intrusive (data-driven) coupling frameworks. Intrusive methods are further divided into monolithic and iterative schemes, and the review presents the underlying formulations for RBEM, RBHM, RDF, SCRBEM, DG-based methods, partition-of-unity methods, optimization-based methods, and Schwarz-type iterations. Non-intrusive methods are organized into Schwarz-based, interpolation-based, optimization-based, and physics-informed neural network (PINN) groups. The paper concludes that the field can be adequately classified in this way and recommends DGRBEM as the most promising method for engineering problems, with localized training and archetype blocks as the most cost-effective offline strategy.

Significance. If the taxonomy and the engineering recommendations are accepted, the paper provides a useful map of a fragmented literature and could help newcomers choose coupling strategies. Its strengths are the large collection of references, the worked algebraic descriptions for the intrusive families, and the up-to-date treatment of PINN-based domain decomposition, including cPINN, XPINN, DPINN, FBPINN, and related variants. The paper is less useful as a critical guide, however, because the central classification claim and the ‘most promising’ judgments rest on definitional choices and a corpus whose representativeness is not audited.

major comments (2)

[§1 vs. §5.1.3] The central dichotomy is internally inconsistent. In §1, non-intrusive methods are defined as ‘purely data-driven’ methods that ‘adopt a set of sampled data to train a surrogate model.’ In §5.1.3, the paper states that PINNs can solve PDEs ‘without requiring data’ and that the PINN loss includes the PDE residual, yet it classifies PINNs as non-intrusive because they do not ‘explicitly solve the PDE system through algebraic manipulation.’ This changes the defining criterion mid-paper. Under the original definition, PINNs are neither intrusive (no Galerkin projection) nor non-intrusive (not purely data-driven). Because PINN methods are reviewed extensively in §5.5 and are folded into the two-category conclusion in §6, the claimed dichotomy is not exhaustive. A consistent definition—or a third category such as ‘physics-constrained’ or ‘PDE-informed’—is needed, and the summary conclusions sh
[§6 and §1] The paper makes global knowledge claims—‘the available methods can be adequately classified into two categories’ and ‘DGRBEM is the most promising for engineering problems’—but it gives no literature-search protocol, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or coverage statistics. The set of roughly 300 references is therefore not auditable as a representative corpus. The scope note in §1 explicitly excludes clustering-based local ROMs, yet the concluding claim is unqualified. In addition, several of the recommended methods and illustrative examples come from the authors’ own research circle (e.g., refs. [16,74,107,108,135,136,138,177,178,205,217,246,261,291]); without explicit evaluation criteria (offline cost, online speedup, accuracy, implementation maturity, generality), the ‘most promising’ judgment is not transparent. I recommend adding a short methods subsection on corpus construction and ev

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (10)] The sentence following Eq. (10) is incomplete: ‘because w_{m,i}|’ is cut off. Please complete the explanation of why the interface term vanishes for the test space.
[§5 opening] The opening of §5 describes non-intrusive methods as operating ‘without requiring any modification of the underlying governing equations,’ which is a different criterion from the ‘purely data-driven’ definition in §1. This is exactly the ambiguity that leads to the PINN classification problem; the terminology should be harmonized.
[Eq. (7) and §4.1] The notation in Eq. (7) is typeset ambiguously: ‘F(w_i) v_j ∈ V, w_i ∈ W’ should be separated into two clauses. Also, the use of n for both the trial-space dimension and the outer normal is confusing in the same section.
[Headings] Heading capitalization is inconsistent (e.g., ‘parameterization techniques’ vs. ‘Physical Informed Neural Network’). Please standardize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the review's taxonomy and recommendations are qualitative summaries of cited work, not predictions forced by fitted inputs or by the authors' own definitions.

full rationale

This manuscript is a narrative literature review and contains no fitted parameters, no numerical predictions, and no first-principles derivation whose output could coincide with an input. Its load-bearing claims are (i) that ROM+DD methods can be organized into intrusive/non-intrusive, monolithic/iterative, and four data-driven families, and (ii) that DGRBEM and localized training are the most promising options. Both are presented as qualitative summaries of the cited literature: equations in §§4-5 are standard formulations taken from the cited methods, not new results derived from the taxonomy. The taxonomy is stipulated, not deduced. The notable tension is that §1 defines non-intrusive methods as 'purely data-driven,' while §5.1.3 admits PINNs 'can still solve PDEs without requiring data' and then reclassifies them as non-intrusive because they 'do not explicitly solve the PDE system through algebraic manipulation.' This is an internal inconsistency in the classification criteria and a legitimate correctness/validity concern, but it is not circularity: the category labels are stipulated, and the paper makes no prediction that is forced by an equation or by a definition. Self-citations (SISSA mathLab/KIT works) are numerous and several illustrative and recommended methods come from that circle, but the load-bearing recommendations (e.g., DGRBEM, oversampling/localized training) are also supported by independent citations such as [5,53,203] and [40,11,129,256], and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work. The absence of a documented literature-search protocol weakens the survey's auditability but does not make its conclusions circular. Hence no circular step is identifiable, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes a taxonomy, not a derivation: there are no free parameters, no new equations fitted to data, and no invented entities. Its dependence is on secondary-source fidelity and on the scope choice (spatial DD only). The three assumptions listed are the ones whose failure would change the conclusions.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The surveyed corpus of ~300 references is representative of the ROM+DD literature and is categorized faithfully.
The taxonomy and the §6 engineering recommendations rest entirely on the completeness and correct reading of the cited papers; the paper gives no search protocol to audit this.
domain assumption Spatial domain decomposition, not snapshot clustering, is the right frame for local ROMs.
§1 explicitly excludes clustering-based classifications (k-means etc., refs [3,4,278,227]); this boundary shapes every conclusion, e.g., the prognosis that generic/archetype decomposition will dominate.
domain assumption Localized training presupposes that phenomena in small archetype systems faithfully represent dynamics in the global system.
§3.3.3 states 'it is assumed that the dynamics that occur in small-scale networks can represent the physical behavior of the original large-scale systems'; the review's endorsement of localized training in §6 inherits this assumption, which the paper itself flags as an assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Structured Review of Reduced Order Modeling for Domain Decomposition Problems: State of the Art and Perspectives." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6PE5W7HS

@misc{pith2026260109623,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Structured Review of Reduced Order Modeling for Domain Decomposition Problems: State of the Art and Perspectives},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6PE5W7HS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.09623}
}

read the original abstract

Reduced Order Models (ROMs) have been regarded as an efficient alternative to conventional high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for accelerating the design and optimization processes in engineering applications. Many industrial geometries feature repeating subdomains or contain sub-regions governed by distinct physical phenomena, making them well-suited to Domain Decomposition (DD) techniques. The integration of ROM and DD is promising to further reduce computational costs by constructing local ROMs and assembling them into global solutions. Due to the complexity and necessity of coupling ROMs, many approaches have been proposed in recent years. This review provides a concise overview of existing methodologies combining ROM and DD. We categorize existing methods into intrusive (projection-based) and non-intrusive (data-driven) frameworks. Various strategies for generating local reduced bases and coupling them across subdomains are illustrated. Particular emphasis is placed on intrusive techniques, including equations, numerical algorithms, and practical implementations. The non-intrusive framework is also discussed, highlighting its general procedures, basic formulations, and underlying principles. Finally, we summarise the state of the literature, identify open challenges, and present perspectives on future implementation from an engineering viewpoint.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.09623 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Schematic of domain decomposition: (a) overlapping; (b) non-overlapping. The global [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Domain decomposition into 2 × 2 subdomains. Left: overlapping partition, redrawn based on [79]. Right: non-overlapping partition, redrawn based on [82]. 3.1.2 Conforming and non-conforming meshes The conforming and non-conforming high-resolution meshes along an interface are displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (34 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) Conforming and (b) non-conforming meshes for adjacent subdomains. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Examples of domain divisions for problems without repeating geometric parts. (a) K´arm´an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Decomposition for fluid-structure interaction problems. (a) Left: fluid; right: solid. Redrawn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Several generic parts can be used to assemble entire models. The real blocks are obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Sampling strategies in the space P = [−1, 1]2 . Grid-based (first row, from left to right): 4 × 4 uniform, 3 × 5 uniform, and 3 × 5 Clenshaw-Curtis. Statistical (second row, from left to right): random (15 points), Latin hypercube (15 points), and Smolyak sparse grid w…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Parameters for a carotid artery bifurcation [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Definition of the parameters of a marine propeller’s blade. The blade is represented by a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Generation of geometric samples with control points. Applications for (a) an aircraft wing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Two-dimensional FFD implementation for a bypass structure. FFD deforms a lattice (red) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FFD for local deformation of a cardiovascular structure. e.g., a blood vessel. Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Individual domain decomposition and local RBs for a backward-facing step problem. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Domain decomposition of a thermo-hydro-mechanical system. Many Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: The model for collecting high-dimensional data and dominant modes for archetypes. Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png]

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: A sketch of the Oversampling strategy for three archetype components, i.e., Ωˆint , Ωˆco and Ωˆed. Three small-scale models are constructed to generate high-fidelity solutions of each generic subdomain. Redrawn based on [256]. 3.3.4 RB for interior, interface, and bou…

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: Snapshots structures. (a) A domain and three regions: , Ω; interface, Γ; and global [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png]

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: The categorization of intrusive techniques. The abbreviation: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_19.png]

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: Port and Bubble training. Redraw based on [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_20.png]

**Figure 21.** Figure 21: Schematic description of the basis functions employed for Continuous Galerkin (left) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_21.png]

**Figure 22.** Figure 22: Sketch of PoU for a one-dimensional (1-D) case showing two subdomains Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_22.png]

**Figure 23.** Figure 23: Sketch and definition of the embedded boundary method. From left to right: the back [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_23.png]

**Figure 24.** Figure 24: The classification of data-driven techniques. The abbreviation: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_24.png]

**Figure 25.** Figure 25: A sketch of neural network architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_25.png]

**Figure 26.** Figure 26: Architectures of recurrent neural networks for a sequential dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_26.png]

**Figure 27.** Figure 27: Example of convolution and pooling layers in the convolutional neural network. Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_27.png]

**Figure 28.** Figure 28: A sketch of an autoencoder. High-fidelity snapshots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_28.png]

**Figure 29.** Figure 29: Architecture of a PINN [269]. The inputs are coordinates x in the computational domain and time t. The outputs are physical variables u(x, t) over the spatial and temporal domains. The MSE consists of two parts: the PDEs loss and the error with respect to the constrai…

**Figure 30.** Figure 30: PINN training data points for a domain to compute loss functions. Figure redrawn based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_30.png]

**Figure 31.** Figure 31: A subdomain and its neighbours. Redraw based on [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_31.png]

**Figure 32.** Figure 32: Global reconstruction using Gappy-POD. The entire domain is decomposed into non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_32.png]

**Figure 33.** Figure 33: Computational domain and cPINN training data points. Figure redrawn based on [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_33.png]

**Figure 34.** Figure 34: Local test functions of VPINN over each subdomain (first row). Results of each subdomain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_34.png]

**Figure 35.** Figure 35: One dimensional example of the FBPINN solver. (a) Domain decomposition and window [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_35.png]

**Figure 36.** Figure 36: Hierarchy of levels used in the multilevel FBPINN. Figure taken from [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_36.png]

**Figure 37.** Figure 37: A sketch of the Distributed Mosaic Flow Predictor. (a) FOM simulations are performed in a slightly larger model, and local snapshots are extracted from the solutions, which is similar to the oversampling technique explained in Section 3.3.3. (b) Mosaic Flow Predictor …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

[1]

C. C. Aggarwal et al.Neural networks and deep learning, volume 10. Springer, 2018

2018
[2]

Aletti and D

M. Aletti and D. Lombardi. A reduced-order representation of the Poincar´ e–Steklov operator: an application to coupled multi-physics problems.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 111(6):581–600, 2017

2017
[3]

Amsallem, J

D. Amsallem, J. Cortial, and C. Farhat. Towards real-time computational-fluid-dynamics-based aeroelastic computations using a database of reduced-order information.AIAA journal, 48(9): 2029–2037, 2010. 63
[4]

Amsallem, M

D. Amsallem, M. J. Zahr, and C. Farhat. Nonlinear model order reduction based on local reduced-order bases.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 92(10):891– 916, 2012

2012
[5]

P. F. Antonietti, P. Pacciarini, and A. Quarteroni. A discontinuous Galerkin reduced basis element method for elliptic problems.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 50(2):337–360, 2016

2016
[6]

Arcucci, C

R. Arcucci, C. Q. Casas, D. Xiao, L. Mottet, F. Fang, P. Wu, C. Pain, and Y.-K. Guo. A domain decomposition reduced order model with data assimilation (DD-RODA). InParallel Computing: Technology Trends, pages 189–198. IOS Press, 2020

2020
[7]

Arcucci, L

R. Arcucci, L. Mottet, C. A. Q. Casas, F. Guitton, C. Pain, and Y.-K. Guo. Adaptive domain decomposition for effective data assimilation. InEuro-Par 2019: Parallel Processing Workshops: Euro-Par 2019 International Workshops, G¨ ottingen, Germany, August 26–30, 2019, Revised Selected Papers 25, pages 583–595. Springer, 2020

2019
[8]

Babuska and R

I. Babuska and R. Lipton. Optimal local approximation spaces for generalized finite element methods with application to multiscale problems.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 9(1):373– 406, 2011

2011

Show all 300 references

[9]

Babuˇ ska and J

I. Babuˇ ska and J. M. Melenk. The partition of unity method.International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 40(4):727–758, 1997

1997
[10]

Babuˇ ska, G

I. Babuˇ ska, G. Caloz, and J. E. Osborn. Special finite element methods for a class of second order elliptic problems with rough coefficients.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 31(4): 945–981, 1994

1994
[11]

Babuˇ ska, R

I. Babuˇ ska, R. Lipton, P. Sinz, and M. Stuebner. Multiscale-spectral GFEM and optimal over- sampling.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 364:112960, 2020

2020
[12]

Bai and L

Z. Bai and L. Peng. Non-intrusive nonlinear model reduction via machine learning approxima- tions to low-dimensional operators.Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 8(1):28, 2021

2021
[13]

Baiges, R

J. Baiges, R. Codina, and S. Idelsohn. A domain decomposition strategy for reduced order mod- els. application to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 267:23–42, 2013

2013
[14]

Balajewicz and C

M. Balajewicz and C. Farhat. Reduction of nonlinear embedded boundary models for problems with evolving interfaces. 274:489–504. ISSN 00219991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.06.038. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021999114004458

2014 doi
[15]

Ballarin

F. Ballarin. Reduced-order models for patient-specific haemodynamics of coronary artery bypass grafts. 2015

2015
[16]

Ballarin and G

F. Ballarin and G. Rozza. POD-Galerkin monolithic reduced order models for parametrized fluid-structure interaction problems.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 82 (12):1010–1034, Dec. 2016. ISSN 0271-2091, 1097-0363. doi: 10.1002/fld.4252. Publisher: Wiley

2016 doi
[17]

Ballarin, A

F. Ballarin, A. Manzoni, G. Rozza, and S. Salsa. Shape Optimization by Free-Form Deformation: Existence Results and Numerical Solution for Stokes Flows.Journal of Scientific Computing, 60(3):537–563, Sept. 2014. ISSN 0885-7474, 1573-7691. doi: 10.1007/s10915-013-9807-8

2014 doi
[18]

Ballarin, E

F. Ballarin, E. Faggiano, S. Ippolito, A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni, G. Rozza, and R. Scrofani. Fast simulations of patient-specific haemodynamics of coronary artery bypass grafts based on a POD-Galerkin method and a vascular shape parametrization.Journal of Computational Physics...

2016 doi
[19]

Ballarin, A

F. Ballarin, A. D’Amario, S. Perotto, and G. Rozza. A POD-selective inverse distance weighting method for fast parametrized shape morphing.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 117(8):860–884, Feb. 2019. ISSN 0029-5981, 1097-0207. doi: 10.1002/nme.5982

2019 doi
[20]

Ballarin, S

F. Ballarin, S. Lee, and S.-Y. Yi. Projection-based reduced order modeling of an iterative scheme for linear thermo-poroelasticity.Results in Applied Mathematics, 21:100430, Feb. 2024. ISSN 25900374. doi: 10.1016/j.rinam.2023.100430

2024
[21]

Barnett, I

J. Barnett, I. Tezaur, and A. Mota. The Schwarz alternating method for the seamless coupling of nonlinear reduced order models and full order models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12551, 2022

2022 arXiv
[22]

Barzegar Gerdroodbary and S

M. Barzegar Gerdroodbary and S. Salavatidezfouli. A predictive surrogate model based on linear and nonlinear solution manifold reduction in cardiovascular FSI: A comparative study. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 189:109959, May 2025. ISSN 0010-4825. doi: 10.1016/j. compbio...

2025
[23]

Batta and A

A. Batta and A. Class. CFD analysis of pressure drop across grid spacers in rod bundles compared to correlations and heavy liquid metal experimental data.Nuclear Engineering and Design, 312:121–127, 2017

2017
[24]

Batta and A

A. Batta and A. G. Class. CFD validation of forced and natural convection for the open phase of IAEA benchmark CRP-I31038.Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, pages 1–7, 2024

2024
[25]

F. B. Belgacem. The mortar finite element method with Lagrange multipliers.Numerische Mathematik, 84:173–197, 1999

1999
[26]

Benaceur and A

A. Benaceur and A. Patera. Port-reduced reduced-basis component method for steady state Navier–Stokes and passive scalar equations. 2022

2022
[27]

Benner, S

P. Benner, S. Gugercin, and K. Willcox. A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems.SIAM review, 57(4):483–531, 2015

2015
[28]

Benner, W

P. Benner, W. Schilders, S. Grivet-Talocia, A. Quarteroni, G. Rozza, and L. Miguel Silveira. Model order reduction: volume 3 applications. De Gruyter, 2020

2020
[29]

Benner, W

P. Benner, W. Schilders, S. Grivet-Talocia, A. Quarteroni, G. Rozza, and L. Miguel Silveira. Model Order Reduction: Volume 2: Snapshot-Based Methods and Algorithms. De Gruyter, 2020

2020
[30]

T. L. Bergman.Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. John Wiley & Sons, 2011

2011
[31]

Bernardi

C. Bernardi. A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method.Technical Report, Universite Pierre at Marie Curie, 1990

1990
[32]

Bonaccorso.Machine Learning Algorithms: Popular algorithms for data science and machine learning

G. Bonaccorso.Machine Learning Algorithms: Popular algorithms for data science and machine learning. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2018

2018
[33]

B. N. Bond and L. Daniel. A piecewise-linear moment-matching approach to parameterized model-order reduction for highly nonlinear systems.IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 26(12):2116–2129, 2007

2007
[34]

S. P. Bordas, A. Menk, and S. Natarajan.Partition of unity methods. John Wiley & Sons, 2023

2023
[35]

N. W. Bressloff. Parametric geometry exploration of the human carotid artery bifurcation. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(11):2483–2491, 2007

2007
[36]

S. L. Brunton and J. N. Kutz.Data-driven science and engineering: Machine learning, dynamical systems, and control. Cambridge University Press, 2024

2024
[37]

Buffoni, H

M. Buffoni, H. Telib, and A. Iollo. Iterative methods for model reduction by domain decompo- sition.Computers & Fluids, 38(6):1160–1167, 2009. 65

2009
[38]

B¨ uhler and C

L. B¨ uhler and C. Mistrangelo. Geometric optimization of electrically coupled liquid metal man- ifolds for WCLL blankets.IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2024

2024
[39]

M. D. Buhmann. Radial basis functions.Acta numerica, 9:1–38, 2000

2000
[40]

A. Buhr, L. Iapichino, M. Ohlberger, S. Rave, F. Schindler, and K. Smetana. Localized model reduction for parameterized problems. InHandbook on Model Order Reduction. Walter De Gruyter, 2020

2020
[41]

Bui-Thanh, K

T. Bui-Thanh, K. Willcox, and O. Ghattas. Model Reduction for Large-Scale Systems with High- Dimensional Parametric Input Space.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30(6):3270–3288, Jan. 2008. ISSN 1064-8275, 1095-7197. doi: 10.1137/070694855

2008 doi
[42]

Canuto, M

C. Canuto, M. Y. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, and T. A. Zang.Spectral methods, volume 285. Springer, 2006

2006
[43]

Canuto, M

C. Canuto, M. Y. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, and T. A. Zang.Spectral methods: evolution to complex geometries and applications to fluid dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

2007
[44]

Carlberg, M

K. Carlberg, M. Barone, and H. Antil. Galerkin v. least-squares Petrov–Galerkin projection in nonlinear model reduction.Journal of Computational Physics, 330:693–734, 2017

2017
[45]

Chaturantabut and D

S. Chaturantabut and D. C. Sorensen. Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical inter- polation.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 32(5):2737–2764, 2010

2010
[46]

L. Chen, S. Jin, and G. Bu. Experimental investigation of a novel multi-tank thermal energy storage system for solar-powered air conditioning.Applied Thermal Engineering, 123:953–962, 2017

2017
[47]

S. Chen, Z. Ding, Q. Li, and S. J. Wright. A reduced order Schwarz method for nonlinear mul- tiscale elliptic equations based on two-layer neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02280, 2021

2021 arXiv
[48]

W. Chen, J. S. Hesthaven, B. Junqiang, Y. Qiu, Z. Yang, and Y. Tihao. Greedy nonintrusive reduced order model for fluid dynamics.AIAA Journal, 56(12):4927–4943, 2018

2018
[49]

Y. Chen, J. S. Hesthaven, and Y. Maday. A seamless reduced basis element method for 2D Maxwell’s problem: an introduction. InSpectral and High Order Methods for Partial Differ- ential Equations: Selected papers from the ICOSAHOM’09 conference, June 22-26, Trondheim, Norway, pa...

2011
[50]

Y. Chen, Y. Lin, X. Sun, C. Yuan, and Z. Gao. Tensor decomposition-based neural operator with dynamic mode decomposition for parameterized time-dependent problems.Journal of Computational Physics, 533:113996, 2025

2025
[51]

Chung, Y

E. Chung, Y. Efendiev, and T. Y. Hou. Adaptive multiscale model reduction with generalized multiscale finite element methods.Journal of Computational Physics, 320:69–95, 2016

2016
[52]

E. T. Chung, Y. Efendiev, and W. T. Leung. Generalized multiscale finite element methods for wave propagation in heterogeneous media.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 12(4):1691–1721, 2014

2014
[53]

S. W. Chung, Y. Choi, P. Roy, T. Moore, T. Roy, T. Y. Lin, D. T. Nguyen, C. Hahn, E. B. Duoss, and S. E. Baker. Train small, model big: Scalable physics simulators via reduced order modeling and domain decomposition.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 427:11...

2024
[54]

Cicci, S

L. Cicci, S. Fresca, S. Pagani, A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni, et al. Projection-based reduced order models for parameterized nonlinear time-dependent problems arising in cardiac mechanics. Mathematics in Engineering, 5(2):1–38, 2023

2023
[55]

Cinquegrana, R

D. Cinquegrana, R. Donelli, and A. Viviani. A hybrid method based on POD and domain decomposition to compute the 2-D aerodynamics flow field.AIMETA, Bologna, Italy, pages 1–10, 2011

2011
[56]

Class, M

A. Class, M. Viellieber, N. Moussiopoulos, and F. Barmpas. Two way coupled micro/meso scale method for wind farms.PAMM, 14(1):585–586, 2014

2014
[57]

A. G. Class, M. O. Viellieber, and S. R. Himmel. Coarse Grid CFD for underresolved simulation. InAPS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts, volume 63 ofAPS Meeting Abstracts, nov 2010

2010
[58]

C. W. Clenshaw and A. R. Curtis. A method for numerical integration on an automatic com- puter.Numerische Mathematik, 2:197–205, 1960

1960
[59]

Cockburn

B. Cockburn. Discontinuous Galerkin methods for computational fluid dynamics.Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, 2004

2004
[60]

Cockburn, G

B. Cockburn, G. E. Karniadakis, and C.-W. Shu.Discontinuous Galerkin methods: theory, computation and applications, volume 11. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

2012
[61]

Colciago, S

C. Colciago, S. Deparis, and A. Quarteroni. Comparisons between reduced order models and full 3D models for fluid-structure interaction problems in haemodynamics.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 265:120–138, Aug. 2014. ISSN 0377-0427. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013. ...

2014 doi
[62]

P. G. Constantine.Active subspaces: Emerging ideas for dimension reduction in parameter studies. SIAM, 2015

2015
[63]

Corigliano, M

A. Corigliano, M. Dossi, and S. Mariani. Domain decomposition and model order reduction methods applied to the simulation of multi-physics problems in MEMS.Computers & Structures, 122:113–127, 2013

2013
[64]

Corigliano, M

A. Corigliano, M. Dossi, S. Mariani, et al. Combined domain decomposition and model order reduction methods for the solution of coupled and non-linear problems. InProceedings of 11th. World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI); 5th. European Congress on Com- putationa...

2014
[65]

Corigliano, M

A. Corigliano, M. Dossi, and S. Mariani. Model order reduction and domain decomposition strategies for the solution of the dynamic elastic–plastic structural problem.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 290:127–155, 2015

2015
[66]

Coscia, A

D. Coscia, A. Ivagnes, N. Demo, and G. Rozza. Physics-informed neural networks for advanced modeling.Journal of Open Source Software, 8(87):5352, 2023

2023
[67]

Courtessole, H.-J

C. Courtessole, H.-J. Brinkmann, L. B¨ uhler, and J. Roth. Experimental investigation of MHD flows in a WCLL TBM mock-up.Fusion Engineering and Design, 202:114306, 2024

2024
[68]

T. L. D. Croft.Proper generalised decompositions: theory and applications. PhD thesis, Cardiff University, 2015

2015
[69]

Cuomo, V

S. Cuomo, V. S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next.Journal of Scientific Computing, 92(3):88, 2022. 67

2022
[70]

D’Amario.A Reduced-Order Inverse Distance Weighting Technique for the Efficient Mesh- Motion of Deformable Interfaces and Moving Shapes in Computational Problems

A. D’Amario.A Reduced-Order Inverse Distance Weighting Technique for the Efficient Mesh- Motion of Deformable Interfaces and Moving Shapes in Computational Problems. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, 2014

2014
[71]

de Castro, P

A. de Castro, P. Kuberry, I. Tezaur, and P. Bochev. A lagrange multiplier partitioned scheme for coupling reduced order models. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories and Stanford University, 2022

2022
[72]

A. G. de Castro, P. A. Kuberry, I. K. Tezaur, and P. B. Bochev. A partitioned method for reduced ordermodel-finite element model (ROM-FEM) and ROM-ROM couplings with separate reduced bases for interior and interface variables. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories and...

2023
[73]

N. Demo, M. Tezzele, and G. Rozza. EZyRB: Easy Reduced Basis method.The Journal of Open Source Software, 3(24):661, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00661

2018 doi
[74]

N. Demo, M. Tezzele, and G. Rozza. A non-intrusive approach for the reconstruction of POD modal coefficients through active subspaces.Comptes Rendus. M´ ecanique, 347(11):873–881, Nov. 2019. ISSN 1873-7234. doi: 10.1016/j.crme.2019.11.012

2019 doi
[75]

N. Demo, M. Tezzele, A. Mola, and G. Rozza. Hull Shape Design Optimization with Parameter Space and Model Reductions, and Self-Learning Mesh Morphing.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(2):185, Feb. 2021. ISSN 2077-1312. doi: 10.3390/jmse9020185

2021 doi
[76]

Deparis, D

S. Deparis, D. Forti, P. Gervasio, and A. Quarteroni. INTERNODES: an accurate interpolation- based method for coupling the Galerkin solutions of PDEs on subdomains featuring non- conforming interfaces.Computers & Fluids, 141:22–41, Dec. 2016. ISSN 00457930. doi: 10.1016/j.comp...

2016 doi
[77]

Diab and M

W. Diab and M. Al-Kobaisi. Temporal neural operator for modeling time-dependent physical phenomena.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20249, 2025

2025 arXiv
[78]

A. N. Diaz, Y. Choi, and M. Heinkenschloss. Nonlinear-manifold reduced order models with domain decomposition.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00713, 2023

2023 arXiv
[79]

A. N. Diaz, Y. Choi, and M. Heinkenschloss. A fast and accurate domain decomposition nonlinear manifold reduced order model.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 425: 116943, 2024

2024
[80]

Z. Ding, K. Wang, J. Li, and X. Cong. Flow field and oscillatory shear stress in a tuning- fork-shaped model of the average human carotid bifurcation.Journal of Biomechanics, 34(12): 1555–1562, 2001

2001
[81]

Discacciati, B

M. Discacciati, B. J. Evans, and M. Giacomini. An overlapping domain decomposition method for the solution of parametric elliptic problems via proper generalized decomposition.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 418:116484, 2024

2024
[82]

Discacciati and J

N. Discacciati and J. S. Hesthaven. Localized model order reduction and domain decomposition methods for coupled heterogeneous systems.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 124(18):3964–3996, 2023

2023
[83]

Discacciati and J

N. Discacciati and J. S. Hesthaven. Model reduction of coupled systems based on non-intrusive approximations of the boundary response maps.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 420:116770, 2024

2024
[84]

Dolean, A

V. Dolean, A. Heinlein, S. Mishra, and B. Moseley. Finite basis physics-informed neural net- works as a schwarz domain decomposition method. InInternational Conference on Domain Decomposition Methods, pages 165–172. Springer, 2022. 68

2022
[85]

Dolean, A

V. Dolean, A. Heinlein, S. Mishra, and B. Moseley. Multilevel domain decomposition-based architectures for physics-informed neural networks.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 429:117116, 2024

2024
[86]

Dossi.Combined Model Order Reduction and Domain Decomposition strategies for the so- lution of non-linear and multi-physics structural p

M. Dossi.Combined Model Order Reduction and Domain Decomposition strategies for the so- lution of non-linear and multi-physics structural p. PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Jan. 2015

2015
[87]

P. Du, J. Shan, B. Zhang, and L. K. Leung. Thermal-hydraulics analysis of flow blockage events for fuel assembly in a sodium-cooled fast reactor.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 138:496–507, 2019

2019
[88]

Dwivedi, N

V. Dwivedi, N. Parashar, and B. Srinivasan. Distributed learning machines for solving forward and inverse problems in partial differential equations.Neurocomputing, 420:299–316, 2021

2021
[89]

Efendiev and T

Y. Efendiev and T. Hou. Multiscale finite element methods for porous media flows and their applications.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 57(5-7):577–596, 2007

2007
[90]

Efendiev and T

Y. Efendiev and T. Y. Hou.Multiscale finite element methods: theory and applications, volume 4. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

2009
[91]

Efendiev, T

Y. Efendiev, T. Y. Hou, and V. Ginting. Multiscale finite element methods for nonlinear problems and their applications.Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 2(4):553–589, 2004

2004
[92]

Efendiev, J

Y. Efendiev, J. Galvis, and T. Y. Hou. Generalized multiscale finite element methods (GMs- FEM).Journal of computational physics, 251:116–135, 2013

2013
[93]

Efendiev, G

Y. Efendiev, G. Li, M. Presho, et al. Generalized multiscale finite element methods: Oversam- pling strategies.International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 12(6), 2014

2014
[94]

Eftang, D

J. Eftang, D. Huynh, D. Knezevic, E. Ronquist, and A. Patera. Adaptive port reduction in static condensation.IF AC Proceedings Volumes, 45(2):695–699, 2012

2012
[95]

J. L. Eftang and A. T. Patera. Port reduction in parametrized component static condensation: approximation and a posteriori error estimation.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 96(5):269–302, 2013

2013
[96]

J. L. Eftang and A. T. Patera. A port-reduced static condensation reduced basis element method for large component-synthesized structures: approximation and a posteriori error estimation. Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 1:1–49, 2014

2014
[97]

Eiximeno, A

B. Eiximeno, A. Mir´ o, B. Begiashvili, E. Valero, I. Rodriguez, and O. Lehmkuhl. PyLOM: a HPC open source reduced order model suite for fluid dynamics applications.Computer Physics Communications, 308:109459, 2025

2025
[98]

Ern and J.-L

A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond.Theory and practice of finite elements, volume 159. Springer, 2004

2004
[99]

Everson and L

R. Everson and L. Sirovich. Karhunen–loeve procedure for gappy data.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 12(8):1657–1664, 1995

1995
[100]

M. Fahl. Trust-region methods for flow control based on reduced order modelling. 2000

2000
[101]

L. Fan, Z. Tu, and S. H. Chan. Recent development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies: A review.Energy Reports, 7:8421–8446, 2021

2021
[102]

Farea, S

A. Farea, S. Khan, R. Daryani, E. C. Ersan, and M. S. Celebi. Learning Fluid-Structure In- teraction Dynamics with Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Immersed Boundary Methods, June 2025. arXiv:2505.18565 [cs]. 69

2025
[103]

Farhat, R

C. Farhat, R. Tezaur, and J. Toivanen. A domain decomposition method for discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of Helmholtz problems with plane waves and Lagrange multipliers.In- ternational journal for numerical methods in engineering, 78(13):1513–1531, 2009

2009
[104]

Feeney, Z

A. Feeney, Z. Li, R. Bostanabad, and A. Chandramowlishwaran. Breaking boundaries: Dis- tributed domain decomposition with scalable physics-informed neural pde solvers. InProceed- ings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analy...

2023
[105]

Ferrero, A

A. Ferrero, A. Iollo, and F. Larocca. Global and local POD models for the prediction of com- pressible flows with DG methods.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 116(5):332–357, 2018

2018
[106]

K. J. Fidkowski and G. Chen. Output-based mesh optimization for hybridized and embedded discontinuous Galerkin methods.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 121(5):867–887, 2020

2020
[107]

Forti.Comparison of Shape Parametrization Techniques for Fluid Structure Interaction Problems

D. Forti.Comparison of Shape Parametrization Techniques for Fluid Structure Interaction Problems. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Oct. 2012

2012
[108]

Forti and G

D. Forti and G. Rozza. Efficient geometrical parametrisation techniques of interfaces for reduced- order modelling: application to fluid-structure interaction coupling problems.International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 28(3-4):158–169, Mar. 2014. ISSN 1061-8562, 1029-

2014
[109]

Gadalla, M

M. Gadalla, M. Tezzele, A. Mola, and G. Rozza. BladeX: Python Blade Morphing.The Journal of Open Source Software, 4(34):1203, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01203

2019 doi
[110]

M. J. Gander and F. Kwok. Best Robin parameters for optimized Schwarz methods at cross points.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 34(4):A1849–A1879, 2012

2012
[111]

Garotta, N

F. Garotta, N. Demo, M. Tezzele, M. Carraturo, A. Reali, and G. Rozza. Reduced order isoge- ometric analysis approach for pdes in parametrized domains. InQuantification of Uncertainty: Improving Efficiency and Technology: QUIET Selected Contributions, pages 153–170. Springer, 2020

2020
[112]

Gervasio and A

P. Gervasio and A. Quarteroni. Analysis of the INTERNODES method for non-conforming discretizations of elliptic equations.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 334:138–166, 2018

2018
[113]

Gobat, S

G. Gobat, S. Fresca, A. Manzoni, and A. Frangi. Reduced Order Modeling of Nonlinear Vibrating Multiphysics Microstructures with Deep Learning-Based Approaches.Sensors, 23(6):3001, Mar
[114]

Gong.Data assimilation with reduced basis and noisy measurement: Applications to nuclear reactor cores

H. Gong.Data assimilation with reduced basis and noisy measurement: Applications to nuclear reactor cores. PhD thesis, Sorbonne Universit´ e, 2018

2018
[115]

M. A. Grepl and A. T. Patera. A posteriori error bounds for reduced-basis approximations of parametrized parabolic partial differential equations.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 39(1):157–181, 2005

2005
[116]

Griewank and A

A. Griewank and A. Walther.Evaluating derivatives: principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation. SIAM, 2008

2008
[117]

Gunzburger, J

M. Gunzburger, J. Peterson, and H. Kwon. An optimization based domain decomposition method for partial differential equations.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 37(10): 77–93, 1999. 70

1999
[118]

J. K. Hale and H. Ko¸ cak.Dynamics and bifurcations, volume 3. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

2012
[119]

R. Han, Y. Wang, W. Qian, W. Wang, M. Zhang, and G. Chen. Deep neural network based reduced-order model for fluid-structure interaction system.Physics of Fluids, 34(7), July 2022. ISSN 1070-6631, 1089-7666. doi: 10.1063/5.0096432. Publisher: AIP Publishing

2022 doi
[120]

He and L

J. He and L. J. Durlofsky. Constraint reduction procedures for reduced-order subsurface flow models based on pod–tpwl.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 103 (1):1–30, 2015

2015
[121]

C. E. Heaney, Z. Wolffs, J. A. T´ omasson, L. Kahouadji, P. Salinas, A. Nicolle, I. M. Navon, O. K. Matar, N. Srinil, and C. C. Pain. An AI-based non-intrusive reduced-order model for extended domains applied to multiphase flow in pipes.Physics of Fluids, 34(5), 2022

2022
[122]

Heinlein, A

A. Heinlein, A. Klawonn, M. Lanser, and J. Weber. Combining machine learning and domain decomposition methods for the solution of partial differential equations—a review.GAMM- Mitteilungen, 44(1):e202100001, 2021

2021
[123]

Henning and A

P. Henning and A. M ˚ alqvist. Localized orthogonal decomposition techniques for boundary value problems.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 36(4):A1609–A1634, 2014

2014
[124]

Henning and D

P. Henning and D. Peterseim. Oversampling for the multiscale finite element method.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 11(4):1149–1175, 2013

2013
[125]

Henning, A

P. Henning, A. M ˚ alqvist, and D. Peterseim. A localized orthogonal decomposition method for semi-linear elliptic problems.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 48(5): 1331–1349, 2014

2014
[126]

J. S. Hesthaven and T. Warburton.Nodal discontinuous Galerkin methods: algorithms, analysis, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

2007
[127]

J. S. Hesthaven, G. Rozza, B. Stamm, et al.Certified reduced basis methods for parametrized partial differential equations, volume 590. Springer, 2016

2016
[128]

Hoang, Y

C. Hoang, Y. Choi, and K. Carlberg. Domain-decomposition least-squares Petrov–Galerkin (DD- LSPG) nonlinear model reduction.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 384:113997, 2021

2021
[129]

T. Y. Hou and X.-H. Wu. A multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems in composite materials and porous media.Journal of computational physics, 134(1):169–189, 1997

1997
[130]

Hrebenshchykova

D. Hrebenshchykova. Multilevel and distributed physics-informed neural networks for the helmholtz equation. 2023

2023
[131]

Z. Hu, A. D. Jagtap, G. E. Karniadakis, and K. Kawaguchi. When do extended physics-informed neural networks (xpinns) improve generalization?SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 44 (5):A3158–A3182, 2022

2022
[132]

D. B. P. Huynh, D. J. Knezevic, and A. T. Patera. A static condensation reduced basis element method: Complex problems.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 259: 197–216, 2013

2013
[133]

D. B. P. Huynh, D. J. Knezevic, and A. T. Patera. A static condensation reduced basis element method: approximation and a posteriori error estimation.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 47(1):213–251, 2013

2013
[134]

Iapichino.Reduced basis methods for the solution of parametrized PDEs in repetitive and complex networks with application to CFD

L. Iapichino.Reduced basis methods for the solution of parametrized PDEs in repetitive and complex networks with application to CFD. PhD thesis, EPFL, 2012. 71

2012
[135]

Iapichino, A

L. Iapichino, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza. A reduced basis hybrid method for the coupling of parametrized domains represented by fluidic networks.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 221:63–82, 2012

2012
[136]

Iapichino, A

L. Iapichino, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza. Reduced basis method and domain decomposition for elliptic problems in networks and complex parametrized geometries.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 71(1):408–430, 2016

2016
[137]

Iollo, G

A. Iollo, G. Sambataro, and T. Taddei. A one-shot overlapping schwarz method for component- based model reduction: application to nonlinear elasticity.Computer Methods in Applied Me- chanics and Engineering, 404:115786, 2023

2023
[138]

Ivagnes, N

A. Ivagnes, N. Demo, and G. Rozza. A shape optimization pipeline for marine propellers by means of reduced order modeling techniques.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 125(7):e7426, Apr. 2024. ISSN 0029-5981, 1097-0207. doi: 10.1002/nme.7426

2024 doi
[139]

Iyengar, D

N. Iyengar, D. Rajaram, K. Decker, C. Perron, and D. N. Mavris. Nonlinear reduced order modeling using domain decomposition. InAIAA SciTech 2022 Forum, page 1250, 2022

2022
[140]

Iyengar, D

N. Iyengar, D. Rajaram, and D. Mavris. Domain decomposition strategy for combining nonlinear and linear reduced-order models.AIAA Journal, 62(4):1375–1389, 2024

2024
[141]

A. D. Jagtap and G. E. Karniadakis. Extended physics-informed neural networks (xpinns): A generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations.Communications in Computational Physics, 28(5), 2020

2020
[142]

A. D. Jagtap, E. Kharazmi, and G. E. Karniadakis. Conservative physics-informed neural net- works on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 365:113028, 2020

2020
[143]

Jensen.Discontinuous Galerkin methods for Friedrichs systems with irregular solutions

M. Jensen.Discontinuous Galerkin methods for Friedrichs systems with irregular solutions. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 2004

2004
[144]

L. Ju, Q. Du, and M. Gunzburger. Probabilistic methods for centroidal voronoi tessellations and their parallel implementations.Parallel Computing, 28(10):1477–1500, 2002

2002
[145]

E. N. Karatzas and G. Rozza. A reduced order model for a stable embedded boundary parametrized Cahn-Hilliard phase-field system based on cut finite elements. URLhttp: //arxiv.org/abs/2009.01596

2009 arXiv
[146]

E. N. Karatzas, F. Ballarin, and G. Rozza. Projection-based reduced order models for a cut finite element method in parametrized domains. 79(3):833–851, . ISSN 08981221. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.003. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0898122119303931

2019 doi
[147]

E. N. Karatzas, G. Stabile, N. Atallah, G. Scovazzi, and G. Rozza. A Reduced Order Approach for the Embedded Shifted Boundary FEM and a Heat Exchange System on Parametrized Ge- ometries, . URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1807.07753

arXiv
[148]

E. N. Karatzas, G. Stabile, L. Nouveau, G. Scovazzi, and G. Rozza. A reduced basis approach for PDEs on parametrized geometries based on the shifted boundary finite element method and application to a Stokes flow. 347:568–587, . ISSN 00457825. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.12.040. U...

2018 doi
[149]

E. N. Karatzas, G. Stabile, L. Nouveau, G. Scovazzi, and G. Rozza. A Reduced-Order Shifted Boundary Method for Parametrized incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. 370:113273, . ISSN 00457825. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113273. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10549. 72

2020
[150]

Karcher and T

N. Karcher and T. Franz. Adaptive sampling strategies for reduced-order modeling.CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 13(2):487–502, Apr. 2022. ISSN 1869-5582, 1869-5590. doi: 10.1007/ s13272-022-00574-6

2022
[151]

Kaulmann, M

S. Kaulmann, M. Ohlberger, and B. Haasdonk. A new local reduced basis discontinuous Galerkin approach for heterogeneous multiscale problems.Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 349(23-24): 1233–1238, 2011

2011
[152]

Kaulmann, B

S. Kaulmann, B. Flemisch, B. Haasdonk, K.-A. Lie, and M. Ohlberger. The localized reduced ba- sis multiscale method for two-phase flows in porous media.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 102(5):1018–1040, 2015

2015
[153]

T. Keil, M. Ohlberger, and F. Schindler. Adaptive localized reduced basis methods for large scale PDE-constrained optimization. InInternational Conference on Large-Scale Scientific Comput- ing, pages 108–116. Springer, 2023

2023
[154]

Kerfriden, O

P. Kerfriden, O. Goury, T. Rabczuk, and S. P.-A. Bordas. A partitioned model order reduction approach to rationalise computational expenses in nonlinear fracture mechanics.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 256:169–188, 2013

2013
[155]

D. E. Keyes and O. B. Widlund.Domain decomposition methods in science and engineering XVI. Springer, 2007

2007
[156]

Khamlich, F

M. Khamlich, F. Pichi, and G. Rozza. Model order reduction for bifurcating phenomena in fluid-structure interaction problems.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 94 (10):1611–1640, Oct. 2022. ISSN 0271-2091, 1097-0363. doi: 10.1002/fld.5118

2022 doi
[157]

Kharazmi, Z

E. Kharazmi, Z. Zhang, and G. E. Karniadakis. hp-vpinns: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 374:113547, 2021

2021
[158]

Koliesnikova, A

D. Koliesnikova, A. Mota, and I. K. Tezaur. The Dirichlet-Neumann Schwarz alternating method for contact problems in elastodynamics: techniques for reducing artificial oscillations. Technical report, Sandia National Lab.(SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States), 2023

2023
[159]

Koshakji, A

A. Koshakji, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza. Free Form Deformation techniques applied to 3D shape optimization problems.Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics, 4, Dec
[160]

Lasaint and P

P. Lasaint and P. Raviart. On a finite element method for solving the neutron transport equation. InMathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations, pages 89–123. Academic Press, 1974

1974
[161]

S. Lee, K. Jang, S. Lee, H. Cho, and S. Shin. Parametric model order reduction by machine learning for fluid-structure interaction analysis.Engineering with Computers, 40(1):45–60, Feb
[162]

S.-W. Lee, L. Antiga, J. D. Spence, and D. A. Steinman. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow.Stroke, 39(8):2341–2347, 2008

2008
[163]

K. Li, K. Tang, T. Wu, and Q. Liao. D3m: A deep domain decomposition method for partial differential equations.Ieee Access, 8:5283–5294, 2019

2019
[164]

Li, T.-Z

K. Li, T.-Z. Huang, L. Li, and S. Lanteri. Simulation of the interaction of light with 3-D metallic nanostructures using a proper orthogonal decomposition-Galerkin reduced-order discontinuous Galerkin time-domain method.Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 39(...

2023
[165]

R. Li, X. Gu, Y. Shen, K. Li, Z. Li, and Z. Zhang. Smart and rapid design of nanophotonic structures by an adaptive and regularized deep neural network.Nanomaterials, 12(8):1372, 2022

2022
[166]

W. Li, X. Xiang, and Y. Xu. Deep domain decomposition method: Elliptic problems. In Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning, pages 269–286. PMLR, 2020

2020
[167]

Liberge and A

E. Liberge and A. Hamdouni. Reduced order modelling method via proper orthogonal decom- position (POD) for flow around an oscillating cylinder.Journal of Fluids and Structures, 26 (2):292–311, Feb. 2010. ISSN 0889-9746. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2009.10.006. Publisher: Elsevier BV

2010 doi
[168]

T. Lieu, C. Farhat, and M. Lesoinne. Reduced-order fluid/structure modeling of a complete aircraft configuration.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195(41-43): 5730–5742, Aug. 2006. ISSN 0045-7825. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.08.026. Publisher: Elsevier BV

2006 doi
[169]

X. Liu, Z. Wang, H. Ji, and H. Gong. Application and comparison of several adaptive sampling algorithms in reduced order modeling.Heliyon, 10(15):e34928, Aug. 2024. ISSN 24058440. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34928

2024 doi
[170]

A. E. Løvgren, Y. Maday, and E. M. Rønquist. The reduced basis element method for fluid flows. InAnalysis and simulation of fluid dynamics, pages 129–154. Springer, 2006

2006
[171]

A. E. Løvgren, Y. Maday, and E. M. Rønquist. A reduced basis element method for the steady stokes problem.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 40(3):529–552, 2006

2006
[172]

Y. Ma, X. Xu, S. Yan, and Z. Ren. A Preliminary Study on the Resolution of Electro-Thermal Multi-Physics Coupling Problem Using Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN).Algorithms, 15(2):53, Feb. 2022. ISSN 1999-4893. doi: 10.3390/a15020053. Publisher: MDPI AG

2022 doi
[173]

Maday and E

Y. Maday and E. M. Rønquist. A reduced-basis element method.Journal of scientific computing, 17:447–459, 2002

2002
[174]

Maday and E

Y. Maday and E. M. Ronquist. The reduced basis element method: application to a thermal fin problem.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26(1):240–258, 2004

2004
[175]

Maier and B

I. Maier and B. Haasdonk. An iterative domain decomposition procedure for the reduced-basis- method. Master’s thesis, University of Stuttgart, 2011

2011
[176]

Maier and B

I. Maier and B. Haasdonk. A Dirichlet–Neumann reduced basis method for homogeneous domain decomposition problems.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 78:31–48, 2014

2014
[177]

Main and G

A. Main and G. Scovazzi. The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. Part I: Poisson and Stokes problems. 372:972–995, . ISSN 00219991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017. 10.026. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021999117307799

2017 doi
[178]

Main and G

A. Main and G. Scovazzi. The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. Part II: Linear advection–diffusion and incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. 372:996–1026, . ISSN 00219991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.01.023. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pi...

2018 doi
[179]

Manzoni, A

A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza. Model reduction techniques for fast blood flow sim- ulation in parametrized geometries.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 28(6-7):604–625, June 2012. ISSN 2040-7939, 2040-7947. doi: 10.1002/cnm.1465

2012 doi
[180]

Manzoni, A

A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza. Shape optimization for viscous flows by reduced basis methods and free-form deformation.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 70 (5):646–670, Oct. 2012. ISSN 0271-2091, 1097-0363. doi: 10.1002/fld.2712. 74

2012 doi
[181]

Manzoni, D

A. Manzoni, D. Bonomi, and A. Quarteroni. Reduced order modeling for cardiac electrophys- iology and mechanics: New methodologies, challenges and perspectives.Mathematical and nu- merical modeling of the cardiovascular system and applications, pages 115–166, 2018

2018
[182]

Martini, G

I. Martini, G. Rozza, and B. Haasdonk. Reduced basis approximation and a-posteriori error estimation for the coupled Stokes-Darcy system.Advances in Computational Mathematics, 41: 1131–1157, 2015

2015
[183]

M. D. McKay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.Technometrics, 42(1): 55–61, 2000

2000
[184]

J. M. Melenk and I. Babuˇ ska. The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 139(1-4):289–314, 1996

1996
[185]

I. D. Mienye, T. G. Swart, and G. Obaido. Recurrent neural networks: A comprehensive review of architectures, variants, and applications.Information, 15(9):517, 2024

2024
[186]

R. Milk, S. Rave, and F. Schindler. pyMOR-generic algorithms and interfaces for model order reduction.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 38(5):S194–S216, 2016

2016
[187]

A. Mola, M. Tezzele, M. Gadalla, F. Valdenazzi, D. Grassi, R. Padovan, and G. Rozza. Efficient Reduction in Shape Parameter Space Dimension for Ship Propeller Blade Design, May 2019. arXiv:1905.09815 [cs]

2019 arXiv
[188]

A. M. Morris, C. B. Allen, and T. C. S. Rendall. CFD-based optimization of aerofoils using radial basis functions for domain element parameterization and mesh deformation.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 58(8):827–860, Nov. 2008. ISSN 0271-2091, 1097-0363...

2008 doi
[189]

Moseley, A

B. Moseley, A. Markham, and T. Nissen-Meyer. Finite basis physics-informed neural networks (fbpinns): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equations.Advances in Computational Mathematics, 49(4):62, 2023

2023
[190]

A. Mota, I. Tezaur, and J. Hoy. The schwarz alternating method for multi-scale coupling and contact in solid mechanics. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories and University of Southern California, 2021

2021
[191]

A. Mota, D. Koliesnikova, I. Tezaur, and J. Hoy. Fundamentally new coupled approach to contact mechanics via the Dirichlet-Neumann Schwarz alternating method.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05643, 2023

2023 arXiv
[192]

Moukalled, L

F. Moukalled, L. Mangani, M. Darwish, F. Moukalled, L. Mangani, and M. Darwish.The finite volume method. Springer, 2016

2016
[193]

Mu and G

L. Mu and G. Zhang. A domain decomposition model reduction method for linear convection- diffusion equations with random coefficients.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 41(3): A1984–A2011, 2019

2019
[194]

M. N. Murthy. Sampling theory and methods. 1967

1967
[195]

Negri, A

F. Negri, A. Manzoni, and G. Rozza. Reduced basis approximation of parametrized optimal flow control problems for the stokes equations.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 69 (4):319–336, 2015

2015
[196]

M. A. Nielsen.Neural networks and deep learning, volume 25. Determination press San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015

2015
[197]

Nonino.On the application of the Reduced Basis Method to Fluid-Structure Interaction problems

M. Nonino.On the application of the Reduced Basis Method to Fluid-Structure Interaction problems. PhD Thesis, SISSA, Trieste, Italy, 2020. 75

2020
[198]

Nonino, F

M. Nonino, F. Ballarin, and G. Rozza. A Monolithic and a Partitioned, Reduced Basis Method for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems.Fluids, 6(6):229, June 2021. ISSN 2311-5521. doi: 10.3390/fluids6060229. Publisher: MDPI AG

2021 doi
[199]

Nonino, F

M. Nonino, F. Ballarin, G. Rozza, and Y. Maday. Projection Based Semi-Implicit Partitioned Reduced Basis Method for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems.Journal of Scientific Comput- ing, 94(1), Jan. 2023. ISSN 0885-7474, 1573-7691. doi: 10.1007/s10915-022-02049-6. Publisher: ...

2023 doi
[200]

Nonino, F

M. Nonino, F. Ballarin, G. Rozza, and Y. Maday. A reduced basis method by means of trans- port maps for a fluid-structure interaction problem with slowly decaying Kolmogorov n-width. Advances in Computational Science & Engineering (ACSE), 1(1), 2023

2023
[201]

Ohlberger and F

M. Ohlberger and F. Schindler. Error control for the localized reduced basis multiscale method with adaptive on-line enrichment.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 37(6):A2865–A2895, 2015

2015
[202]

Ohlberger, S

M. Ohlberger, S. Rave, and F. Schindler. True error control for the localized reduced basis method for parabolic problems.Model reduction of parametrized systems, pages 169–182, 2017

2017
[203]

Pacciarini, P

P. Pacciarini, P. Gervasio, and A. Quarteroni. Spectral based discontinuous Galerkin reduced basis element method for parametrized Stokes problems.Computers & Mathematics with Ap- plications, 72(8):1977–1987, 2016

1977
[204]

Padula and G

G. Padula and G. Rozza. Generative Models for Parameter Space Reduction applied to Reduced Order Modelling, June 2025. arXiv:2506.09721 [math]

2025 arXiv
[205]

Padula, F

G. Padula, F. Romor, G. Stabile, and G. Rozza. Generative Models for the Deformation of Indus- trial Shapes with Linear Geometric Constraints: model order and parameter space reductions, Aug. 2023. arXiv:2308.03662 [math]

2023 arXiv
[206]

Padula, M

G. Padula, M. Girfoglio, and G. Rozza. A brief review of reduced order models using intrusive and non-intrusive techniques.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.00559, 2024

2024 arXiv
[207]

Padula, F

G. Padula, F. Romor, G. Stabile, and G. Rozza. Generative models for the deformation of industrial shapes with linear geometric constraints: Model order and parameter space reduc- tions.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 423:116823, Apr. 2024. ISSN 00457825...

2024
[208]

Pan and D

X. Pan and D. Xiao. Domain decomposition for physics-data combined neural network based parametric reduced order modelling.Journal of Computational Physics, 519:113452, 2024

2024
[209]

Pasquariello, G

V. Pasquariello, G. Hammerl, F. ¨Orley, S. Hickel, C. Danowski, A. Popp, W. A. Wall, and N. A. Adams. A cut-cell finite volume – finite element coupling approach for fluid–structure interaction in compressible flow.Journal of Computational Physics, 307:670–695, Feb. 2016. ISSN...

2016 doi
[210]

Pegolotti, M

L. Pegolotti, M. R. Pfaller, A. L. Marsden, and S. Deparis. Model order reduction of flow based on a modular geometrical approximation of blood vessels.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 380:113762, 2021

2021
[211]

Pichi.Reduced order models for parametric bifurcation problems in nonlinear PDEs

F. Pichi.Reduced order models for parametric bifurcation problems in nonlinear PDEs. PhD thesis, SISSA, Trieste, Italy, 2019

2019
[212]

Pichi, A

F. Pichi, A. Quaini, and G. Rozza. A Reduced Order Modeling Technique to Study Bifurcating Phenomena: Application to the Gross–Pitaevskii Equation.SIAM Journal on Scientific Com- puting, 42(5):B1115–B1135, Jan. 2020. ISSN 1064-8275, 1095-7197. doi: 10.1137/20M1313106. 76

2020 doi
[213]

Pichi, M

F. Pichi, M. Strazzullo, F. Ballarin, and G. Rozza. Driving bifurcating parametrized nonlinear PDEs by optimal control strategies: application to Navier-Stokes equations with model order reduction.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 56(4):1361–1400, July
[214]

Pichi, B

F. Pichi, B. Moya, and J. S. Hesthaven. A graph convolutional autoencoder approach to model order reduction for parametrized pdes.Journal of Computational Physics, 501:112762, 2024

2024
[215]

Pitton, A

G. Pitton, A. Quaini, and G. Rozza. Computational reduction strategies for the detection of steady bifurcations in incompressible fluid-dynamics: Applications to coanda effect in cardiology. Journal of Computational Physics, 344:534–557, 2017

2017
[216]

Prusak.Application of optimisation-based domain–decomposition reduced order models to parameter-dependent fluid dynamics and multiphysics problems

I. Prusak.Application of optimisation-based domain–decomposition reduced order models to parameter-dependent fluid dynamics and multiphysics problems. PhD thesis, SISSA, 2023

2023
[217]

Prusak, M

I. Prusak, M. Nonino, D. Torlo, F. Ballarin, and G. Rozza. An optimisation–based domain– decomposition reduced order model for the incompressible navier-stokes equations.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 151:172–189, 2023

2023
[218]

Prusak, D

I. Prusak, D. Torlo, M. Nonino, and G. Rozza. Optimisation–based coupling of finite el- ement model and reduced order model for computational fluid dynamics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10570, 2024

2024 arXiv
[219]

Prusak, D

I. Prusak, D. Torlo, M. Nonino, and G. Rozza. A time-adaptive algorithm for pressure dominated flows: a heuristic estimator.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00428, 2024

2024 arXiv
[220]

Quarteroni and S

A. Quarteroni and S. Quarteroni.Numerical models for differential problems, volume 2. Springer, 2009

2009
[221]

Quarteroni and G

A. Quarteroni and G. Rozza, editors.Reduced Order Methods for Modeling and Computational Reduction. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014. ISBN 978-3-319-02089-1 978-3-319- 02090-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02090-7

2014 doi
[222]

Quarteroni and A

A. Quarteroni and A. Valli.Domain decomposition methods for partial differential equations. Oxford University Press, 1999

1999
[223]

Quarteroni, A

A. Quarteroni, A. Manzoni, and F. Negri.Reduced basis methods for partial differential equations: an introduction, volume 92. Springer, 2015

2015
[224]

Raissi, P

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis. Physics informed deep learning (part i): Data- driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10561, 2017

2017 arXiv
[225]

Raissi, P

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learn- ing framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations.Journal of Computational physics, 378:686–707, 2019

2019
[226]

Reyes and R

R. Reyes and R. Codina. Element boundary terms in reduced order models for flow problems: Domain decomposition and adaptive coarse mesh hyper-reduction.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 368:113159, 2020

2020
[227]

Riffaud.Reduced-order models: convergence between scientific computing and data for fluid mechanics

S. Riffaud.Reduced-order models: convergence between scientific computing and data for fluid mechanics. PhD thesis, Universit´ e de Bordeaux, 2020

2020
[228]

Riffaud, M

S. Riffaud, M. Bergmann, C. Farhat, S. Grimberg, and A. Iollo. The DGDD method for reduced- order modeling of conservation laws.Journal of Computational Physics, 437:110336, 2021

2021
[229]

S. Riva, C. Introini, and A. Cammi. Multi-physics model bias correction with data-driven reduced order techniques: Application to nuclear case studies.Applied Mathematical Modelling, 135:243–268, Nov. 2024. ISSN 0307904X. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2024.06.040. 77

2024 doi
[230]

Rivi` ere.Discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving elliptic and parabolic equations: theory and implementation

B. Rivi` ere.Discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving elliptic and parabolic equations: theory and implementation. SIAM, 2008

2008
[231]

Roelofs, H

F. Roelofs, H. Uitslag-Doolaard, D. Dovizio, B. Mikuz, A. Shams, F. Bertocchi, M. Rohde, J. Pacio, I. Di Piazza, G. Kennedy, et al. Towards validated prediction with RANS CFD of flow and heat transport in a wire-wrap fuel assembly.Nuclear Engineering and Design, 353:110273, 2019

2019
[232]

Romor, M

F. Romor, M. Tezzele, and G. Rozza. A Local Approach to Parameter Space Reduction for Regression and Classification Tasks.Journal of Scientific Computing, 99(3):83, June 2024. ISSN 0885-7474, 1573-7691. doi: 10.1007/s10915-024-02542-0

2024 doi
[233]

Romor, D

F. Romor, D. Torlo, and G. Rozza. Friedrichs’ systems discretized with the DGM: domain decomposable model order reduction and Graph Neural Networks approximating vanishing vis- cosity solutions.Journal of Computational Physics, page 113915, 2025

2025
[234]

Roos and A

P. Roos and A. Haselbacher. Thermocline control through multi-tank thermal-energy storage systems.Applied Energy, 281:115971, 2021

2021
[235]

Rozza.Shape design by optimal flow control and reduced basis techniques: Applications to bypass configurations in haemodynamics

G. Rozza.Shape design by optimal flow control and reduced basis techniques: Applications to bypass configurations in haemodynamics. PhD thesis, EPFL, 2005

2005
[236]

Rozza and K

G. Rozza and K. Veroy. On the stability of the reduced basis method for Stokes equations in parametrized domains.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 196(7): 1244–1260, 2007

2007
[237]

Rozza, D

G. Rozza, D. B. P. Huynh, and A. T. Patera. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations: application to transport and continuum mechanics.Archives of Computational Methods in Engineeri...

2008
[238]

Rozza, A

G. Rozza, A. Manzoni, and F. Negri. Reduction Strategies for Pde-Constrained Optimization Problems in Haemodynamics. Vienna, Austria, Sept. 2012

2012
[239]

Rozza, H

G. Rozza, H. Malik, N. Demo, M. Tezzele, M. Girfoglio, G. Stabile, and A. Mola. Advances in Reduced Order Methods for Parametric Industrial Problems in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Nov. 2018. arXiv:1811.08319 [math]

2018 arXiv
[240]

Rozza, G

G. Rozza, G. Stabile, and F. Ballarin.Advanced Reduced Order Methods and Applications in Computational Fluid Dynamics. SIAM, 2022

2022
[241]

Rozza, F

G. Rozza, F. Ballarin, L. Scandurra, and F. Pichi.Real Time Reduced Order Computational Mechanics. SISSA Springer Series. Springer Cham, 2024. ISBN 978-3-031-49891-6

2024
[242]

Rozza, F

G. Rozza, F. Ballarin, L. Scandurra, and F. Pichi.Real Time Reduced Order Computational Mechanics. Springer, 2024

2024
[243]

S. Ruan, J. Yanez, and A. G. Class. Local reduced subspaces of subchannel-inspired subdomains. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, page e7552, 2024

2024
[244]

Y. Ryu, S. Shin, W. B. Lee, and J. Na. Multiphysics generalization in a polymerization reactor using physics-informed neural networks.Chemical Engineering Science, 298:120385, Oct. 2024. ISSN 0009-2509. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120385. Publisher: Elsevier BV

2024
[245]

Salmoiraghi, F

F. Salmoiraghi, F. Ballarin, G. Corsi, A. Mola, M. Tezzele, and G. Rozza. Advances in Geometri- cal Parametrization and Reduced Order Models and Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics Problems in Applied Sciences and Engineering: Overview and Perspectives. InProceedings of t...

2016
[246]

Sambataro.Component-based model order reduction procedures for large scale THM systems

G. Sambataro.Component-based model order reduction procedures for large scale THM systems. PhD thesis, Bordeaux, 2022

2022
[247]

Schaback

R. Schaback. A practical guide to radial basis functions.Electronic Resource, 11:1–12, 2007

2007
[248]

Schindler, B

F. Schindler, B. Haasdonk, M. Ohlberger, and S. Kaulmann. The localized reduced basis mul- tiscale method. volume 9, pages 393–403, 09 2012

2012
[249]

Schleuß and K

J. Schleuß and K. Smetana. Optimal local approximation spaces for parabolic problems.Mul- tiscale Modeling & Simulation, 20(1):551–582, 2022

2022
[250]

T. W. Sederberg and S. R. Parry. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. InPro- ceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 151–160, 1986

1986
[251]

N. V. Shah, M. W. Hess, and G. Rozza. Discontinuous Galerkin model order reduction of geometrically parametrized Stokes equation. InNumerical Mathematics and Advanced Applica- tions ENUMATH 2019: European Conference, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, September 30-October 4, pag...

2019
[252]

Shukla, A

K. Shukla, A. D. Jagtap, and G. E. Karniadakis. Parallel physics-informed neural networks via domain decomposition.Journal of Computational Physics, 447:110683, 2021

2021
[253]

Siena, P

P. Siena, P. C. Africa, M. Girfoglio, and G. Rozza. On the accuracy and efficiency of reduced order models: towards real-world applications, Sept. 2024. arXiv:2407.03325 [math]

2024 arXiv
[254]

ARGOS: Advanced reduced order modeling online computational web server for parametric systems, 2021

SISSA MathLab. ARGOS: Advanced reduced order modeling online computational web server for parametric systems, 2021. URLhttp://argos.sissa.it/

2021
[255]

M. K. Sleeman and T. Colonius. Greedy recursion parameter selection for the one-way navier- stokes (owns) equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02320, 2025

2025 arXiv
[256]

Smetana and T

K. Smetana and T. Taddei. Localized model reduction for nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations: localized training, partition of unity, and adaptive enrichment.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 45(3):A1300–A1331, 2023

2023
[257]

doi: 10.1080/10618562.2014.932352

2014
[258]

Song and H

J. Song and H. Rui. A reduced-order Schwarz domain decomposition method based on POD for the convection-diffusion equation.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 160:60–69, 2024

2024
[259]

Stabile and G

G. Stabile and G. Rozza. Finite volume POD-Galerkin stabilised reduced order methods for the parametrised incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.Computers & Fluids, 2018. doi: 10.1016/ j.compfluid.2018.01.035

2018
[260]

F. Stenger. On the convergence and error of the Bubnov-Galerkin method. InProceedings of the Conference on the Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: 19, 20 October 1972, The University of Texas at Austin, pages 434–450. Springer, 1974

1972
[261]

Snyder, I

W. Snyder, I. Tezaur, and C. Wentland. Domain decomposition-based coupling of physics- informed neural networks via the schwarz alternating method.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00224, 2023

2023 arXiv
[262]

Tezaur, A

I. Tezaur, A. Mota, Y. Shimizu, and J. Barnett. The Schwarz alternating method for ROM- FOM and ROM-ROM coupling. Technical report, Sandia National Lab.(SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States); Stanford University, 2022

2022
[263]

Tezzele, F

M. Tezzele, F. Salmoiraghi, A. Mola, and G. Rozza. Dimension reduction in heterogeneous parametric spaces with application to naval engineering shape design problems.Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 5(1):25, Dec. 2018. ISSN 2213-7467. doi: 10.1186/s403...

2018 doi
[264]

Tezzele, N

M. Tezzele, N. Demo, and G. Rozza. Shape optimization through proper orthogonal decompo- sition with interpolation and dynamic mode decomposition enhanced by active subspaces, May
[265]

Taddei, X

T. Taddei, X. Xu, and L. Zhang. A non-overlapping optimization-based domain decomposition approach to component-based model reduction of incompressible flows.Journal of Computa- tional Physics, 509:113038, 2024. 79

2024
[266]

Tezzele, N

M. Tezzele, N. Demo, A. Mola, and G. Rozza. PyGeM: Python Geometrical Morphing.Software Impacts, 7:100047, Feb. 2021. ISSN 26659638. doi: 10.1016/j.simpa.2020.100047

2021
[267]

S. K. Thompson.Sampling, volume 755. John Wiley & Sons, 2012

2012
[268]

N. E. Todreas, M. S. Kazimi, and M. Massoud.Nuclear systems Volume II: Elements of thermal hydraulic design. CRC Press, 2021

2021
[269]

Trahan, M

C. Trahan, M. Loveland, and S. Dent. Quantum Physics-Informed Neural Networks. 26(8):649. ISSN 1099-4300. doi: 10.3390/e26080649. URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/26/8/649

doi
[270]

Tezzele, N

M. Tezzele, N. Demo, G. Stabile, A. Mola, and G. Rozza. Enhancing CFD predictions in shape design problems by model and parameter space reduction.Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 7(1):40, Dec. 2020. ISSN 2213-7467. doi: 10.1186/s40323-020-00177-y

2020 doi
[271]

Veroy and A

K. Veroy and A. T. Patera. Certified real-time solution of the parametrized steady incompressible navier–stokes equations: rigorous reduced-basis a posteriori error bounds.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 47(8-9):773–788, 2005

2005
[272]

Veroy, C

K. Veroy, C. Prud’Homme, D. Rovas, and A. Patera. A posteriori error bounds for reduced-basis approximation of parametrized noncoercive and nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations. In16th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, page 3847, 2003

2003
[273]

Viellieber and A

M. Viellieber and A. Class. Coarse-Grid-CFD for the thermal hydraulic investigation of rod- bundles.Pamm, 15(1):497–498, 2015

2015
[274]

Vierendeels, L

J. Vierendeels, L. Lanoye, J. Degroote, and P. Verdonck. Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid- structure interaction problems with reduced order models.Computers & Structures, 85(11-14): 970–976, June 2007. ISSN 0045-7949. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.006. Publisher: Elsevier BV

2007 doi
[275]

Vallagh´ e and A

S. Vallagh´ e and A. T. Patera. The static condensation reduced basis element method for a mixed-mean conjugate heat exchanger model.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 36(3): B294–B320, 2014

2014
[276]

K. Wang, A. Rallu, J.-F. Gerbeau, and C. Farhat. Algorithms for interface treatment and load computation in embedded boundary methods for fluid and fluid–structure interaction prob- lems. 67(9):1175–1206. ISSN 1097-0363. doi: 10.1002/fld.2556. URLhttps://onlinelibrary. wiley.c...

doi
[277]

Wang and Y

Z. Wang and Y. Li. Layer pattern thermal design and optimization for multistream plate-fin heat exchangers—a review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53:500–514, 2016. 80

2016
[278]

Washabaugh, D

K. Washabaugh, D. Amsallem, M. Zahr, and C. Farhat. Nonlinear model reduction for CFD problems using local reduced-order bases. In42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Ex- hibit, page 2686, 2012

2012
[279]

C. R. Wentland, F. Rizzi, J. Barnett, and I. Tezaur. The role of interface boundary conditions and sampling strategies for Schwarz-based coupling of projection-based reduced order models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04668, 2024

2024 arXiv
[280]

H. Wang, R. Planas, A. Chandramowlishwaran, and R. Bostanabad. Mosaic flows: A transferable deep learning framework for solving PDEs on unseen domains.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 389:114424, 2022

2022
[281]

Witteveen

J. Witteveen. Explicit and robust inverse distance weighting mesh deformation for CFD.48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Jan. 2010. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-165

2010 doi
[282]

Witteveen and H

J. Witteveen and H. Bijl. Explicit mesh deformation using inverse distance weighting interpo- lation. In19th AIAA computational fluid dynamics, page 3996. 2009

2009
[283]

Z. Wu, H. Wang, C. He, B. Zhang, T. Xu, and Q. Chen. The Application of Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Multiphysics Modeling in Chemical Engineering.Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(44):18178–18204, Nov. 2023. ISSN 0888-5885, 1520-5045. doi: 10.1021/ acs.i...

2023
[284]

C. Xiao, O. Leeuwenburgh, H. X. Lin, and A. Heemink. Non-intrusive subdomain POD-TPWL for reservoir history matching.Computational Geosciences, 23:537–565, 2019

2019
[285]

C. K. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen.Gaussian processes for machine learning, volume 2. MIT press Cambridge, MA, 2006

2006
[286]

C. Xiao, O. Leeuwenburgh, H. X. Lin, and A. Heemink. Efficient estimation of space varying parameters in numerical models using non-intrusive subdomain reduced order modeling.Journal of Computational Physics, 424:109867, 2021

2021
[287]

D. Xiao, P. Yang, F. Fang, J. Xiang, C. Pain, and I. Navon. Non-intrusive reduced order mod- elling of fluid-structure interactions.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 303:35–54, May 2016. ISSN 0045-7825. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.029. Publisher: Elsevier BV

2016 doi
[288]

D. Xiao, F. Fang, C. Heaney, I. Navon, and C. Pain. A domain decomposition method for the non-intrusive reduced order modelling of fluid flow.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 354:307–330, 2019. ISSN 0045-7825

2019
[289]

D. Xiao, F. Fang, C. E. Heaney, I. Navon, and C. Pain. A domain decomposition method for the non-intrusive reduced order modelling of fluid flow.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 354:307–330, 2019

2019
[290]

C. Xiao, O. Leeuwenburgh, H. X. Lin, and A. Heemink. Subdomain POD-TPWL with local parameterization for large-scale reservoir history matching problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08059, 2019

1901 arXiv
[291]

Zappon, A

E. Zappon, A. Manzoni, and A. Quarteroni. Efficient and certified solution of parametrized one- way coupled problems through DEIM-based data projection across non-conforming interfaces. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 49(2):21, Apr. 2023. ISSN 1019-7168, 1572-9044. doi:...

2023 doi
[292]

Zappon, A

E. Zappon, A. Manzoni, and A. Quarteroni. A staggered-in-time and non-conforming-in-space numerical framework for realistic cardiac electrophysiology outputs, Aug. 2023. arXiv:2308.03884 [math]. 81

2023 arXiv
[293]

Zappon, A

E. Zappon, A. Manzoni, P. Gervasio, and A. Quarteroni. A reduced order model for domain decompositions with non-conforming interfaces.Journal of Scientific Computing, 99(1):22, 2024

2024
[294]

X. Zeng, G. Stabile, E. N. Karatzas, G. Scovazzi, and G. Rozza. Embedded domain Reduced Basis Models for the shallow water hyperbolic equations with the Shifted Boundary Method. 398:115143. ISSN 00457825. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115143. URLhttps://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retr...

2022
[295]

D. Xiao, C. Heaney, F. Fang, L. Mottet, R. Hu, D. Bistrian, E. Aristodemou, I. Navon, and C. Pain. A domain decomposition non-intrusive reduced order model for turbulent flows.Com- puters & Fluids, 182:15–27, 2019

2019
[300]

Zhang, T

X. Zhang, T. Ji, F. Xie, C. Zheng, and Y. Zheng. Data-driven nonlinear reduced-order modeling of unsteady fluid-structure interactions.Physics of Fluids, 34(5), May 2022. ISSN 1070-6631, 1089-7666. doi: 10.1063/5.0090394. Publisher: AIP Publishing

2022 doi
[2019]

arXiv:1905.05483 [math]

1905 arXiv
[2022]

doi: 10.1051/m2an/2022044

ISSN 2822-7840, 2804-7214. doi: 10.1051/m2an/2022044
[2023]

doi: 10.3390/s23063001

ISSN 1424-8220. doi: 10.3390/s23063001. Publisher: MDPI AG

doi
[2024]

doi: 10.1007/s00366-023-01782-2

ISSN 0177-0667, 1435-5663. doi: 10.1007/s00366-023-01782-2. Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

C. C. Aggarwal et al.Neural networks and deep learning, volume 10. Springer, 2018

2018

[2] [2]

Aletti and D

M. Aletti and D. Lombardi. A reduced-order representation of the Poincar´ e–Steklov operator: an application to coupled multi-physics problems.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 111(6):581–600, 2017

2017

[3] [3]

Amsallem, J

D. Amsallem, J. Cortial, and C. Farhat. Towards real-time computational-fluid-dynamics-based aeroelastic computations using a database of reduced-order information.AIAA journal, 48(9): 2029–2037, 2010. 63

[4] [4]

Amsallem, M

D. Amsallem, M. J. Zahr, and C. Farhat. Nonlinear model order reduction based on local reduced-order bases.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 92(10):891– 916, 2012

2012

[5] [5]

P. F. Antonietti, P. Pacciarini, and A. Quarteroni. A discontinuous Galerkin reduced basis element method for elliptic problems.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 50(2):337–360, 2016

2016

[6] [6]

Arcucci, C

R. Arcucci, C. Q. Casas, D. Xiao, L. Mottet, F. Fang, P. Wu, C. Pain, and Y.-K. Guo. A domain decomposition reduced order model with data assimilation (DD-RODA). InParallel Computing: Technology Trends, pages 189–198. IOS Press, 2020

2020

[7] [7]

Arcucci, L

R. Arcucci, L. Mottet, C. A. Q. Casas, F. Guitton, C. Pain, and Y.-K. Guo. Adaptive domain decomposition for effective data assimilation. InEuro-Par 2019: Parallel Processing Workshops: Euro-Par 2019 International Workshops, G¨ ottingen, Germany, August 26–30, 2019, Revised Selected Papers 25, pages 583–595. Springer, 2020

2019

[8] [8]

Babuska and R

I. Babuska and R. Lipton. Optimal local approximation spaces for generalized finite element methods with application to multiscale problems.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 9(1):373– 406, 2011

2011