Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multilingual Needle in a Haystack: Investigating Long-Context Behavior of Multilingual Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10151 v1 pith:6PQWUPNO submitted 2024-08-19 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords multilinguallanguagellmscontextlong-contextneedlebehaviormodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

While recent large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable abilities in responding to queries in diverse languages, their ability to handle long multilingual contexts is unexplored. As such, a systematic evaluation of the long-context capabilities of LLMs in multilingual settings is crucial, specifically in the context of information retrieval. To address this gap, we introduce the MultiLingual Needle-in-a-Haystack (MLNeedle) test, designed to assess a model's ability to retrieve relevant information (the needle) from a collection of multilingual distractor texts (the haystack). This test serves as an extension of the multilingual question-answering task, encompassing both monolingual and cross-lingual retrieval. We evaluate four state-of-the-art LLMs on MLNeedle. Our findings reveal that model performance can vary significantly with language and needle position. Specifically, we observe that model performance is the lowest when the needle is (i) in a language outside the English language family and (ii) located in the middle of the input context. Furthermore, although some models claim a context size of $8k$ tokens or greater, none demonstrate satisfactory cross-lingual retrieval performance as the context length increases. Our analysis provides key insights into the long-context behavior of LLMs in multilingual settings to guide future evaluation protocols. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the multilingual long-context behavior of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating Posterior Salience Attenuation in Long-Context LLMs with Positional Contrastive Decoding

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Positional Contrastive Decoding, a training-free method that contrasts standard and over-rotated RoPE logits, improves long-context retrieval and QA by a few points.

  2. Not All Needles Are Found: How Fact Distribution and Don't Make It Up Prompts Shape Retrieval, Reasoning, and Hallucination in Long-Context LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a new extended needle-in-a-haystack benchmark, explicit anti-hallucination prompts and dispersed fact placement cause some long-context LLMs to over-refuse or collapse in accuracy, while others remain robust.

  3. Enhancing Large Language Models with Neurosymbolic Reasoning for Multilingual Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A prompt that combines symbolic fact extraction with executable Python code improves accuracy on a multilingual long-context 3-needle QA task, though the gains over chain-of-thought are about one percentage point and ...

Pith tools