Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 122 references

Distance-Ladder Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Recent Progress, Systematics, and Prospects

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Combining seven distance-ladder routes measures the Hubble constant at 73.30 ± 0.92 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}, still 5.6σ above the Planck value.

desk verdict A review that restates the local H0 tension from existing routes but leaves the seven-route covariance details unshown. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.26831 v1 pith:6URTNLXG submitted 2026-06-25 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.SR

Xiaodian Chen , Shu Wang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.SR
keywords HubbleconstantdistanceladderCepheidsTRGBtensionsupernovaecosmicexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews local distance-ladder measurements of the Hubble constant, which connect geometric anchors through stellar indicators to Hubble-flow objects and now reach percent-level precision. It frames the ladder as a covariance network that links the primary Cepheid-SN Ia route to six alternatives spanning level-1 and level-2 indicators. The central result is that a compact seven-route combination still yields 73.30 ± 0.92 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}. The work outlines how JWST and expanded samples could push toward one-percent local precision while testing shared systematics.

What carries the argument

The covariance network connecting level-0 geometric anchors, level-1 stellar distance indicators, and level-2 Hubble-flow probes, which propagates both shared and method-specific systematics into the final H0 uncertainty.

What would settle it

An independent measurement or re-analysis that shifts the combined seven-route H0 value to approximately 67 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} while preserving the reported uncertainties would falsify the persistent 5.6σ tension claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a compact seven-route covariance summary, combining the Cepheid--SN Ia route with three level-1 alternatives (TRGB, JAGB, and Mira) and three level-2 alternatives (SBF, Tully--Fisher, and SNe II) gives H0=73.30±0.92 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}, still 5.6σ above Planck base-ΛCDM.

Load-bearing premise

The covariance network that links the seven routes accurately captures both shared and method-specific systematics without under- or over-estimating the final uncertainty.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • JWST observations can directly test Cepheid crowding effects and enable independent TRGB-based H0 determinations.
  • Reaching one-percent local precision requires larger calibrator samples, cross-validated level-1 zero points, and explicit covariance propagation.
  • AI-assisted, pre-specified selection criteria for distance-indicator measurements can improve reproducibility across methods.
  • The tension with Planck base-ΛCDM remains at high significance after including multiple independent routes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the covariance summary holds, the Hubble tension is unlikely to be explained solely by unrecognized systematics in any single method.
  • Cross-validation of zero points between level-1 indicators could expose hidden correlations not captured in the current network.
  • A one-percent local H0 value would sharpen tests of whether new physics is needed beyond base-ΛCDM.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews recent local distance-ladder determinations of the Hubble constant, framing the measurements as a covariance network linking geometric anchors (level-0), stellar indicators (level-1: Cepheids, TRGB, JAGB, Mira), and Hubble-flow probes (level-2: SBF, Tully-Fisher, SNe II). It presents a compact seven-route combination yielding H0=73.30±0.92 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} that remains 5.6σ above Planck base-ΛCDM, and outlines prospects for JWST-enabled improvements.

Significance. If the covariance network is shown to be accurate, the synthesis would strengthen evidence that the local H0 value is robust against method-specific systematics, thereby sharpening the Hubble tension and motivating explicit covariance propagation in future work.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / seven-route covariance summary] Abstract and seven-route covariance summary: the combined H0=73.30±0.92 (5.6σ) is stated without the explicit 7×7 covariance matrix, the list of included data points, or an error-budget breakdown, so the quoted uncertainty cannot be verified from the text.
  2. [seven-route covariance summary] The headline result is obtained by re-weighting values taken from earlier papers; the manuscript therefore inherits any fitting choices made in those source measurements without additional cross-checks or independent derivation of the off-diagonal terms.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the three level-1 and three level-2 routes could be clarified with an explicit table listing each indicator and its anchor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on the presentation of our seven-route covariance summary. We address each major comment below and indicate the changes planned for the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / seven-route covariance summary] Abstract and seven-route covariance summary: the combined H0=73.30±0.92 (5.6σ) is stated without the explicit 7×7 covariance matrix, the list of included data points, or an error-budget breakdown, so the quoted uncertainty cannot be verified from the text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and compact summary do not provide the full supporting details needed for independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will add a new table in the main text that lists the seven routes, their individual H0 values and uncertainties, the assumed covariance matrix (or its key off-diagonal elements), and a concise error-budget breakdown. A reference to this table will be added to the abstract. This change directly addresses the verifiability issue while preserving the compact style of the summary. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [seven-route covariance summary] The headline result is obtained by re-weighting values taken from earlier papers; the manuscript therefore inherits any fitting choices made in those source measurements without additional cross-checks or independent derivation of the off-diagonal terms.

    Authors: This accurately describes the nature of the result. The manuscript is a review that synthesizes published measurements; the covariances are taken from the source papers rather than re-derived here. We will revise the text to state this explicitly and to note that independent cross-checks of the off-diagonal terms remain an important goal for future work. No new data reduction or fitting is performed in this paper, so the synthesis nature of the combination will be clarified rather than altered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: review compiles prior routes without self-referential derivation

full rationale

The manuscript is a review summarizing existing distance-ladder routes and presents the H0=73.30±0.92 value explicitly as the output of a compact seven-route covariance summary that combines previously published measurements (Cepheid-SN Ia plus TRGB/JAGB/Mira/SBF/TF/SNe II). No first-principles derivation, prediction, or uniqueness theorem is claimed within the paper itself; the central numerical result is a re-weighting of external inputs whose justification lies outside this work. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input renamings, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a literature synthesis rather than a closed loop.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All numerical inputs originate in prior publications; the paper itself adds no new free parameters, axioms, or entities beyond the organizational framework of the covariance network.

free parameters (1)
  • combined H0 = 73.30 ± 0.92
    Obtained by weighting seven literature routes inside the stated covariance network
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The seven-route covariance matrix correctly encodes shared and route-specific systematics
    Invoked when the abstract presents the 5.6σ tension as robust

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Distance-Ladder Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Recent Progress, Systematics, and Prospects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6URTNLXG

@misc{pith2026260626831,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Distance-Ladder Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Recent Progress, Systematics, and Prospects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6URTNLXG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.26831}
}
abstract

The Hubble constant, \(H_0\), links the nearby distance scale to the present cosmic expansion rate. Local distance-ladder measurements now reach percent-level precision and remain more than \(5\sigma\) higher than the value inferred from cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations in base-\(\Lambda\)CDM, making the reliability of the local ladder a central issue in the Hubble tension. We describe the ladder as a covariance network connecting level-0 geometric anchors, level-1 stellar distance indicators, and level-2 Hubble-flow probes. The Cepheid--Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) route remains the most precise single local ladder, but independent indicators including the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB), J-region asymptotic giant branch (JAGB) stars, Mira variables, surface-brightness fluctuations (SBF), the Tully--Fisher relation, and Type II supernovae (SNe II) now test shared and method-specific systematics. In a compact seven-route covariance summary, combining the Cepheid--SN Ia route with three level-1 alternatives (TRGB, JAGB, and Mira) and three level-2 alternatives (SBF, Tully--Fisher, and SNe II) gives \(H_0=73.30\pm0.92~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}\), still \(5.6\sigma\) above Planck base-\(\Lambda\)CDM. JWST has already tested Cepheid crowding and is making independent TRGB-based \(H_0\) measurements increasingly feasible. Over the next five years, a reliable one-percent local \(H_0\) requires larger calibrator samples, cross-validated level-1 zero points, explicit covariance propagation, and AI-assisted, reproducible, pre-specified selection criteria for distance-indicator measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26831 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example of the Cepheid–SN Ia distance ladder based on data from Riess et al. (2022). Left: ge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic view of the local distance-ladder network used throughout this review. Level-0 an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Example M101 Cepheid sample in optical color–magnitude and period–Wesenheit space. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of anchoring the TRGB luminosity with an edge measurement in an NGC 4258 halo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Representative scatter or luminosity-function width scales for local distance indicators, compiled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative values of H0 discussed in this review. Statistical and systematic components are added in quadrature for display where papers quote them separately; the table in the text preserves the quoted decompositions. The shaded bands show Planck base ΛCDM and SH0…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 85 2, 30

    2017

  2. [2]

    F., Aboubrahim, A., et al

    Abdalla, E., Abell´an, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., et al. 2022, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 34, 49 2

    2022

  3. [3]

    2021, Physical Review D, 103, 083533 2

    Alam, S., Aubin, C., Avila, S., et al. 2021, Physical Review D, 103, 083533 2

    2021

  4. [4]

    S., Tully, R

    Anand, G. S., Tully, R. B., Rizzi, L., Riess, A. G., & Yuan, W. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 932, 15 18

    2022

  5. [5]

    S., Riess, A

    Anand, G. S., Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 966, 89 19, 22, 31

    2024

  6. [6]

    I., Saio, H., Ekstr ¨om, S., Georgy, C., & Meynet, G

    Anderson, R. I., Saio, H., Ekstr ¨om, S., Georgy, C., & Meynet, G. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 591, A8 7

    2016

  7. [7]

    Arnett, W. D. 1982, The Astrophysical Journal, 253, 785 9

    1982

  8. [8]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 874, 4 2

    Aylor, K., Joy, M., Knox, L., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 874, 4 2

    2019

Show all 122 references
  1. [9]

    L., Freedman, W

    Beaton, R. L., Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 210 3

    2016

  2. [10]

    F., McArthur, B

    Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Feast, M. W., et al. 2007, The Astronomical Journal, 133, 1810 11

    2007

  3. [11]

    L., Verde, L., & Riess, A

    Bernal, J. L., Verde, L., & Riess, A. G. 2016, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016, 019 2

    2016

  4. [12]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 683, A234 7, 13

    Bhardwaj, A., Ripepi, V ., Testa, V ., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 683, A234 7, 13

    2024

  5. [13]

    J., Gal´an, A., et al

    Birrer, S., Shajib, A. J., Gal´an, A., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 643, A165 30

    2020

  6. [14]

    P., Jensen, J

    Blakeslee, J. P., Jensen, J. B., Ma, C.-P., Milne, P. A., & Greene, J. E. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 911, 65 3, 9, 21

    2021

  7. [15]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 533, 1550 21

    Boubel, P., Colless, M., Said, K., & Staveley-Smith, L. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 533, 1550 21

    2024

  8. [16]

    G., Kervella, P., et al

    Breuval, L., Riess, A. G., Kervella, P., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 939, 89 7, 24, 32

    2022

  9. [17]

    I., et al

    Breuval, L., Kervella, P., Anderson, R. I., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 913, 38 13

    2021

  10. [18]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 909, 26 16

    Brout, D., & Scolnic, D. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 909, 26 16

    2021

  11. [19]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 938, 110 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 15, 16, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29

    Brout, D., Scolnic, D., Popovic, B., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 938, 110 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 15, 16, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29

    2022

  12. [20]

    J., & Smith, H

    Catelan, M., Pritzl, B. J., & Smith, H. A. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 154, 633 8 Distance-Ladder Measurements of the Hubble Constant 35

    2004

  13. [21]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1081 8

    Chen, X., Zhang, J., Wang, S., & Deng, L. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1081 8

    2023

  14. [22]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 817 7 Cruz Reyes, M., & Anderson, R

    Chown, R., Scowcroft, V ., Chavez, J., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 817 7 Cruz Reyes, M., & Anderson, R. I. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 672, A85 7 CSST Collaboration, Gong, Y ., Miao, H., et al. 2026, Science China Physics, Mechanics...

    2020

  15. [23]

    S., et al

    Dhawan, S., Thorp, S., Mandel, K. S., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 235 14, 16, 26, 28, 29

    2023

  16. [24]

    2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 510, 2228 15 Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., & Mena, O

    Dhawan, S., Goobar, A., Smith, M., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 510, 2228 15 Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., & Mena, O. 2017, Physical Review D, 96, 043503 2 Di Valentino, E., Anchordoqui, L. A., Akarsu, ¨O., et al. 2021a, Astroparticle Phy...

    2022

  17. [25]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 505, 3866 2

    Efstathiou, G. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 505, 3866 2

    2021

  18. [26]

    J., Scolnic, D., Rest, A., et al

    Foley, R. J., Scolnic, D., Rest, A., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475, 193 15

    2018

  19. [27]

    Freedman, W. L. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 919, 16 2, 17

    2021

  20. [28]

    L., & Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. 2023, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023, 050 2

    2023

  21. [29]

    L., Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Hoyt, T. J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 985, 203 3, 19, 22, 28, 31

    2025

  22. [30]

    L., Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Scowcroft, V ., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 758, 24 2, 11, 28

    2012

  23. [31]

    L., Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., et al. 2001, The Astrophysical Journal, 553, 47 2, 6, 10

    2001

  24. [32]

    L., Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Hatt, D., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 882, 34 3, 8, 17, 28

    2019

  25. [33]

    L., Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Hoyt, T., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 891, 57 17, 31

    2020

  26. [34]

    G., et al

    Galbany, L., de Jaeger, T., Riess, A. G., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 679, A95 14

    2023

  27. [35]

    Groenewegen, M. A. T. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 654, A20 13

    2021

  28. [36]

    2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 466, 11 9, 14 H0DN Collaboration, Casertano, S., Anand, G

    Guy, J., Astier, P., Baumont, S., et al. 2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 466, 11 9, 14 H0DN Collaboration, Casertano, S., Anand, G. S., et al. 2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 708, A166 22, 28, 29, 32, 33

    2007

  29. [37]

    Hamuy, M., & Pinto, P. A. 2002, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 566, L63 10, 22

    2002

  30. [38]

    R., Moran, J

    Herrnstein, J. R., Moran, J. M., Greenhill, L. J., et al. 1999, Nature, 400, 539 6 H¨og˚as, M., & M¨ortsell, E. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 538, 883 13 H¨og˚as, M., & M¨ortsell, E. 2026, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 548, stag7...

    1999

  31. [39]

    Hoyt, T. J. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 590 17, 18, 31

    2023

  32. [40]

    J., Freedman, W

    Hoyt, T. J., Freedman, W. L., Beaton, R. L., et al. 2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 1002, 1 19

    2026

  33. [41]

    J., Jang, I

    Hoyt, T. J., Jang, I. S., Freedman, W. L., et al. 2024, arXiv:2407.07309 19, 31

    2024

  34. [42]

    D., Riess, A

    Huang, C. D., Riess, A. G., Hoffmann, S. L., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 857, 67 8, 20, 24

    2018

  35. [43]

    D., Riess, A

    Huang, C. D., Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 889, 5 8, 20

    2020

  36. [44]

    D., Yuan, W., Riess, A

    Huang, C. D., Yuan, W., Riess, A. G., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 963, 83 8, 20, 24, 28

    2024

  37. [45]

    1926, The Astrophysical Journal, 64, 321 2

    Hubble, E. 1926, The Astrophysical Journal, 64, 321 2

    1926

  38. [46]

    1929, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15, 168 2

    Hubble, E. 1929, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15, 168 2

    1929

  39. [47]

    Humphreys, E. M. L., Reid, M. J., Moran, J. M., Greenhill, L. J., & Argon, A. L. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 775, 13 6 Ivezi´c, ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 873, 111 15, 32

    2013

  40. [48]

    S., & Lee, M

    Jang, I. S., & Lee, M. G. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 835, 28 8

    2017

  41. [49]

    S., Hoyt, T

    Jang, I. S., Hoyt, T. J., Beaton, R. L., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 906, 125 18, 31

    2021

  42. [50]

    B., Blakeslee, J

    Jensen, J. B., Blakeslee, J. P., Cantiello, M., et al. 2025, arXiv:2502.15935 9, 21, 22, 26, 28

    2025

  43. [51]

    B., Blakeslee, J

    Jensen, J. B., Blakeslee, J. P., Ma, C.-P., Greene, J. E., & Milne, P. A. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 255, 21 21

    2021

  44. [52]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 984, 89 9

    Jia, Q., Chen, X., Wang, S., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 984, 89 9

    2025

  45. [53]

    O., Scolnic, D

    Jones, D. O., Scolnic, D. M., Foley, R. J., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 881, 19 15

    2019

  46. [54]

    Kamionkowski, M., & Riess, A. G. 2023, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 73, 153 2

    2023

  47. [55]

    Kasen, D., & Woosley, S. E. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 656, 661 9

    2007

  48. [56]

    2020, Physical Review D, 101, 043533 2

    Knox, L., & Millea, M. 2020, Physical Review D, 101, 043533 2

    2020

  49. [57]

    B., Courtois, H

    Kourkchi, E., Tully, R. B., Courtois, H. M., Dupuy, A., & Guinet, D. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 511, 6160 21

    2022

  50. [58]

    D., Cyr-Racine, F.-Y ., & Dor´e, O

    Kreisch, C. D., Cyr-Racine, F.-Y ., & Dor´e, O. 2020, Physical Review D, 101, 123505 2

    2020

  51. [59]

    S., & Pickering, E

    Leavitt, H. S., & Pickering, E. C. 1912, Harvard College Observatory Circular, 173, 1 2, 7

    1912

  52. [60]

    J., Freedman, W

    Lee, A. J., Freedman, W. L., Jang, I. S., Madore, B. F., & Owens, K. A. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 961, 132 8, 19, 20, 24

    2024

  53. [61]

    J., Freedman, W

    Lee, A. J., Freedman, W. L., Jang, I. S., Madore, B. F., & Owens, K. A. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 985, 182 20, 24

    2025

  54. [62]

    G., Freedman, W

    Lee, M. G., Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. 1993, The Astrophysical Journal, 417, 553 7, 17

    1993

  55. [63]

    G., Anand, G

    Li, S., Riess, A. G., Anand, G. S., et al. 2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 997, 115 31

    2026

  56. [64]

    G., Scolnic, D., Casertano, S., & Anand, G

    Li, S., Riess, A. G., Scolnic, D., Casertano, S., & Anand, G. S. 2025b, arXiv:2502.05259 8, 20, 22, 24, 28, 31

  57. [65]

    G., Scolnic, D., et al

    Li, S., Riess, A. G., Scolnic, D., et al. 2023, arXiv:2306.10103 19

    2023

  58. [66]

    S., Riess, A

    Li, S., Anand, G. S., Riess, A. G., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 976, 177 19, 22, 24, 31

    2024

  59. [67]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A2 6

    Lindegren, L., Hern´andez, J., Bombrun, A., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A2 6

    2018

  60. [68]

    2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 649, A4 6, 13, 24, 32

    Lindegren, L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 649, A4 6, 13, 24, 32

    2021

  61. [69]

    2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 055019 9

    Liu, Y .-Q., Chen, X.-D., Wang, S., et al. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 055019 9

    2025

  62. [70]

    Madore, B. F. 1982, The Astrophysical Journal, 253, 575 7

    1982

  63. [71]

    F., & Freedman, W

    Madore, B. F., & Freedman, W. L. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 899, 66 8, 19

    2020

  64. [72]

    F., Freedman, W

    Madore, B. F., Freedman, W. L., & Owens, K. A. 2023a, arXiv:2311.05048 17

  65. [73]

    F., Freedman, W

    Madore, B. F., Freedman, W. L., Owens, K. A., & Jang, I. S. 2023b, arXiv:2305.06195 19, 24

  66. [74]

    2014, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 52, 107 9, 14

    Maoz, D., Mannucci, F., & Nelemans, G. 2014, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 52, 107 9, 14

    2014

  67. [75]

    P., Marengo, M., Mart´ınez-V´azquez, C

    Mullen, J. P., Marengo, M., Mart´ınez-V´azquez, C. E., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 945, 83 8, 31, 32

    2023

  68. [76]

    E., Clementini, G., Sarro, L

    Muraveva, T., Delgado, H. E., Clementini, G., Sarro, L. M., & Garofalo, A. 2018, Monthly Notices of Distance-Ladder Measurements of the Hubble Constant 37 the Royal Astronomical Society, 481, 1195 8

    2018

  69. [77]

    R., & El-Badry, K

    Nagarajan, P., Weisz, D. R., & El-Badry, K. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 932, 19 31

    2022

  70. [78]

    R., Marengo, M., Bono, G., et al

    Neeley, J. R., Marengo, M., Bono, G., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 4254 8

    2019

  71. [79]

    A., Freedman, W

    Owens, K. A., Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., & Lee, A. J. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 927, 8 13

    2022

  72. [80]

    2022, New Astronomy Reviews, 95, 101659 2

    Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. 2022, New Astronomy Reviews, 95, 101659 2

    2022

  73. [81]

    W., Braatz, J

    Pesce, D. W., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 891, L1 30

    2020

  74. [82]

    R., Kenworthy, W

    Peterson, E. R., Kenworthy, W. D., Scolnic, D., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 938, 112 15, 16, 22, 26

    2022

  75. [83]

    Phillips, M. M. 1993, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 413, L105 9, 14

    1993

  76. [84]

    M., Ashall, C., Burns, C

    Phillips, M. M., Ashall, C., Burns, C. R., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 938, 47 14 Pietrzy´nski, G., Graczyk, D., Gieren, W., et al. 2013, Nature, 495, 76 6 Pietrzy´nski, G., Graczyk, D., Gallenne, A., et al. 2019, Nature, 567, 200 6, 8, 17, 24, 31, 32 Planck Collab...

    2022

  77. [85]

    L., Karwal, T., & Kamionkowski, M

    Poulin, V ., Smith, T. L., Karwal, T., & Kamionkowski, M. 2019, Physical Review Letters, 122, 221301 2

    2019

  78. [86]

    J., Pesce, D

    Reid, M. J., Pesce, D. W., & Riess, A. G. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 886, L27 6, 19, 24

    2019

  79. [87]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 911, L20 6

    Ren, F., Chen, X., Zhang, H., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 911, L20 6

    2021

  80. [88]

    G., & Breuval, L

    Riess, A. G., & Breuval, L. 2024, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 376, At the Crossroads of Astrophysics and Cosmology: Period–Luminosity Relations in the 2020s, 15 2

    2024

  81. [89]

    G., Casertano, S., Anderson, J., MacKenty, J., & Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Anderson, J., MacKenty, J., & Filippenko, A. V . 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 785, 161 11

    2014

  82. [90]

    G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al

    Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908, L6 2, 6, 7, 13, 24, 32

    2021

  83. [91]

    G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., & Scolnic, D. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 876, 85 2, 7, 13

    2019

  84. [92]

    G., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Macri, L. M., Hoffmann, S. L., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 826, 56 2, 10, 11, 14, 16

    2016

  85. [93]

    G., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 934, L7 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 32

    2022

  86. [94]

    G., Li, S., Anand, G

    Riess, A. G., Li, S., Anand, G. S., et al. 2025, arXiv:2509.01667 17, 27, 31

    2025

  87. [95]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 659, A167 7

    Ripepi, V ., Molinaro, R., Catanzaro, G., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 659, A167 7

    2022

  88. [96]

    B., Makarov, D., et al

    Rizzi, L., Tully, R. B., Makarov, D., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 661, 815 7, 8

    2007

  89. [97]

    Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A. 1976, The Astrophysical Journal, 210, 7 2

    1976

  90. [98]

    Sanders, J. L. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 2369 20, 24, 31, 32 Sch¨oneberg, N., Franco Abell´an, G., P´erez S´anchez, A., et al. 2022, Physics Reports, 984, 1 2

    2023

  91. [99]

    G., & Anand, G

    Scolnic, D., Boubel, P., Byrne, J., Riess, A. G., & Anand, G. S. 2024, arXiv:2412.08449 21, 26, 28

    2024

  92. [100]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 938, 113 15, 16, 26

    Scolnic, D., Brout, D., Carr, A., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 938, 113 15, 16, 26

    2022

  93. [101]

    G., Wu, J., et al

    Scolnic, D., Riess, A. G., Wu, J., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 954, L31 19, 24

    2023

  94. [102]

    2021, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 29, 9 2

    Shah, P., Lemos, P., & Lahav, O. 2021, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 29, 9 2

    2021

  95. [103]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507, 2423 30

    Shi, Y ., Yu, X., Mao, S., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507, 2423 30

    2021

  96. [104]

    2015, arXiv:1503.03757 32

    Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Baltay, C., et al. 2015, arXiv:1503.03757 32

    2015 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Tonry, J., & Schneider, D. P. 1988, The Astronomical Journal, 96, 807 9, 21

    1988

  98. [106]

    H., & Marshall, P

    Treu, T., Suyu, S. H., & Marshall, P. J. 2022, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 30, 8 2

    2022

  99. [107]

    1998, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 331, 815 9, 14 38 X

    Tripp, R. 1998, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 331, 815 9, 14 38 X. Chen & S. Wang

    1998

  100. [108]

    Tully, R. B. 2023, arXiv:2305.11950 2

    2023

  101. [109]

    B., & Fisher, J

    Tully, R. B., & Fisher, J. R. 1977, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 54, 661 10, 21

    1977

  102. [110]

    B., Kourkchi, E., Courtois, H

    Tully, R. B., Kourkchi, E., Courtois, H. M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 944, 94 10, 21

    2023

  103. [111]

    A., Burns, C

    Uddin, S. A., Burns, C. R., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 970, 72 14, 15, 26, 28, 29

    2024

  104. [112]

    2024, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 62, 287 2

    Verde, L., Sch¨oneberg, N., & Gil-Mar´ın, H. 2024, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 62, 287 2

    2024

  105. [113]

    Verde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 891 2

    2019

  106. [114]

    2005, General Relativity and Gravitation, 37, 1541 4

    Visser, M. 2005, General Relativity and Gravitation, 37, 1541 4

    2005

  107. [115]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 279, 56 31

    Wang, J., Chen, X., Zhang, J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 279, 56 31

    2025

  108. [116]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 517 30

    Wang, J.-M., Songsheng, Y .-Y ., Li, Y .-R., Du, P., & Zhang, Z.-X. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 517 30

    2020

  109. [117]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 852, 78 7

    Wang, S., Chen, X., de Grijs, R., & Deng, L. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 852, 78 7

    2018

  110. [118]

    A., Feast, M

    Whitelock, P. A., Feast, M. W., & van Leeuwen, F. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 386, 313 20

    2008

  111. [119]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 533, 2319 14, 16, 26

    Wojtak, R., & Hjorth, J. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 533, 2319 14, 16, 26

    2024

  112. [120]

    C., Suyu, S

    Wong, K. C., Suyu, S. H., Chen, G. C.-F., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 498, 1420 30

    2020

  113. [121]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 986, 54 31

    Yan, Z., Wang, S., Chen, X., & Deng, L. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 986, 54 31

    2025

  114. [122]

    G., Macri, L

    Yuan, W., Riess, A. G., Macri, L. M., Casertano, S., & Scolnic, D. M. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 886, 61 17

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.