Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 38 references

{\tau}-Ring: A Smart Ring Platform for Multimodal Physiological and Behavioral Sensing

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An open 2.4 g ring claims research-grade synchronized PPG, IMU, and temperature sensing.

desk verdict A genuinely useful open ring platform, but the 'multi-day autonomy' phrasing contradicts the battery and flash specs; the headline numbers need backing. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.00778 v1 pith:6VGMGWIF submitted 2025-08-01 cs.CE

Jiankai Tang , Zhe He , Mingyu Zhang , Wei Geng , Chengchi Zhou , Weinan Shi , Yuanchun Shi , Yuntao Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CE
keywords smartringwearablesensingphotoplethysmographyinertialmeasurementunitopen-sourcehardwarephysiologicalmonitoringofflineloggingAndroidapp
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces $\tau$-Ring, a finger-worn sensing platform intended to give wearable researchers an open, off-the-shelf alternative to proprietary smart rings. Its central claim is that the device delivers time-synchronized multi-channel PPG, 6-axis IMU, and skin-temperature streams in a 2.4 g ring, with adjustable firmware and a fully open Android app that supports both live streaming and 8+ hour offline logging. If the platform works as described, studies that previously required custom hardware or closed commercial devices could be replicated and compared on a common, open base. The authors support the claim with two demonstrations: heart-rate monitoring whose lowest mean absolute error was 5.18 BPM against a medical reference in stationary conditions, and IMU-based handwriting recognition reaching 88.5% letter accuracy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nRF52840 SoC's DPPI (Distributed Programmable Peripheral Interconnect), a hardware event-routing system used to trigger IMU sampling from PPG sampling edges so that all modalities share a common time base with jitter capped at $\leq 8\,\mu\mathrm{s}$. Around this sit the GH3026 PPG engine with per-LED current control, the ICM-42688P IMU, the GXT310 thermistor, a 128 MB flash for offline logging, and a BLE link to an open Android app that handles scanning, clock calibration, live charts, and log retrieval. The combination of adjustable firmware and open software is what the paper argues turns the hardware into a reproducible research platform rather than another prototype.

What would settle it

An independent bench test could settle it: power the ring from a fully charged 15 mAh cell, record PPG, IMU, and temperature at 100 Hz until shutdown, and simultaneously capture the DPPI trigger lines on a logic analyzer; if the battery dies before 8 hours or the trigger-to-sample delay ever exceeds 8 microseconds, the headline synchronization and autonomy claims fail. The same test could be repeated per modality to map actual power draw.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a complete smart-ring research platform can be assembled and released at the system level: hardware, firmware, and software in one open package. The ring combines a GH3026 three-wavelength PPG front end, an ICM-42688P 6-axis IMU, two-point GXT310 temperature sensing, and 128 MB flash on a flex PCB wrapped around the finger, driven by an nRF52840 SoC. The authors' key assertion is that the SoC's DPPI hardware triggers align IMU sampling edges with PPG sampling edges, capping inter-modality time-domain jitter at $\leq 8\,\mu\mathrm{s}$, which is what makes the streams research-grade synchronized. They further claim 8 hours of continuous three-modality recording at 100 Hz from a 15 mAh cell, and demonstrate in two user studies that the platform reproduces published ring-based heart-rate and handwriting results.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two headline hardware numbers are accurate: sensor streams stay synchronized to within 8 microseconds, and a 15 mAh battery sustains 8 hours of continuous three-modality recording at 100 Hz; the paper presents no measurement traces or test procedure for either figure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers can run ring-based physiological and behavioral studies out of the box, without fabricating custom hardware or relying on closed commercial devices.
  • The platform reproduces published results from prior ring research, including 88.5% letter accuracy in IMU handwriting recognition, which supports the claim that existing studies can be replicated on one common device.
  • Heart-rate monitoring with raw PPG yields a lowest mean absolute error of 5.18 BPM against an FDA-approved oximeter in stationary conditions, better than two commercial smart rings in the same comparison.
  • Offline logging to 128 MB flash enables 8+ hour recordings without a phone nearby, with BLE retrieval of logged segments afterward.
  • The full stack, from adjustable firmware to the Android app, is released open source, giving other groups a starting point rather than a black-box device.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the $\leq 8\,\mu\mathrm{s}$ synchronization figure survives independent measurement, the ring would be a useful calibration anchor for PPG-IMU fusion algorithms, since time misalignment is a common confound in such fusion.
  • Beyond the paper: the 128 MB flash and 15 mAh battery set a practical single-day ceiling; per-modality power measurements at lower sampling rates could show which configurations approach the multi-day autonomy phrasing.
  • Beyond the paper: the claim that 86 surveyed studies could in principle be replicated is directly testable by picking one interaction study and one physiological study from that survey and re-running them on this platform.
  • Beyond the paper: because the companion software is Android-only, an iOS or desktop BLE client would be the natural test of whether the zero-setup promise holds outside Android environments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents tau-Ring, a smart-ring platform intended for physiological and behavioral sensing research, and claims three contributions: (i) hardware combining time-synchronized multi-channel PPG, 6-axis IMU, temperature sensing, NFC, and on-board flash storage; (ii) adjustable firmware for sampling-rate, power-mode, and wireless-protocol reconfiguration; and (iii) an open-source Android suite supporting real-time streaming and offline logging. The platform is validated with two demonstration studies: a heart-rate benchmark, reported from the authors' companion paper [27], and a ring-based handwriting recognition study using a TCN-LSTM reconstruction pipeline inspired by the authors' own WritingRing [6]. The paper's central claim is that tau-Ring delivers research-grade synchronized PPG-IMU-TEMP streams in a 2.4 g finger form factor with multi-day autonomy and fully offline logging.

Significance. If the hardware specifications are verified and the internal inconsistency on battery life is resolved, the platform could make a useful contribution to reproducible wearable research: it combines an open firmware, an MIT-licensed Android app, on-board storage, and a finger form factor, which are not jointly available in the cited open-source alternatives. The open-source code release and the explicit goal of lowering the barrier to replicating prior ring-based studies are concrete strengths. However, the significance is currently contingent on measurement support for the synchronization jitter and battery/storage claims, and on honest re-scoping of the validation demonstrations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1(D) and Section 5] The paper contains a load-bearing internal contradiction about autonomy. Section 3.1(D) says the 15 mAh cell provides up to 8 h of continuous three-modality recording at 100 Hz and that the 128 MB flash enables 'multi-day logging'; the Conclusion repeats 'multi-day autonomy.' Yet Section 5 states that the battery 'requires recharging for multi-day continuous monitoring.' The storage arithmetic also does not support multi-day capture: at roughly 2.3 KB/s for 100 Hz three-modality data, 128 MB fills in about 16 hours, not multiple days. The 'multi-day' language should be removed or replaced with a measured storage and power budget that specifies sampling rates, bit depths, and any compression or downsampling used.
  2. [Section 3.1(B)] The claim that inter-modality time synchronization jitter is 'capped at ≤8 µs' via DPPI hardware triggers is asserted without any measurement trace, benchmark log, or test procedure. Because the phrase 'research-grade synchronised PPG-IMU-TEMP streams' depends on this number, the paper should either provide a direct jitter measurement with the methodology or clearly label the value as a design estimate and provide a protocol for users to verify it.
  3. [Section 3.4] The two demonstrations are not sufficient to validate the 'research-grade' and 'commercial-ready' claims as stated. The heart-rate result is referenced from the authors' companion paper [27] with no details on participant protocol, error bars, or comparison conditions in this manuscript. The handwriting study reports only n=3 participants, and results are given as single accuracy numbers without per-participant variance or statistical treatment. Please either provide the missing reporting or explicitly re-scope these demonstrations as feasibility checks rather than validation of the platform's research-grade performance.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Section 3.1(D), Section 6] The offline logging duration is inconsistently stated: the Abstract says '≥8-hour offline logging,' Section 3.1(D) says 'up to 8 h of continuous operation at 100 Hz,' and Section 6 says '8+ hour offline logging.' These should be reconciled.
  2. [Section 3.1(C)] The sentence describing the GXT310 temperature sensor as 'positioned in two points inside the ring and one point outside the ring' is ambiguous, since a single digital thermistor cannot be physically located at three points; please clarify the sensor topology or the number of temperature elements.
  3. [Throughout] Minor language and formatting issues include 'MIT-licence' should be 'MIT-licensed,' inconsistent capitalization such as 'dualring' vs. 'DualRing,' and a few informal phrases such as 'miniature oscilloscope'; a careful copyedit would improve polish.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the platform's validation uses external references and fresh user studies, though it leans on the authors' own companion paper for HR data.

full rationale

The paper is a systems/hardware contribution, not a derivation, so most circularity patterns do not apply. The heart-rate validation is quoted from companion paper [27] (same research group), but that study compares the ring's IR PPG against an FDA-approved CMS50D+ oximeter and commercial rings; this is an externally falsifiable benchmark rather than a definitional reduction. The handwriting demo reuses the authors' own WritingRing TCN-LSTM pipeline [6], but it is a new three-participant evaluation with newly reported accuracies (88.5% letters, 55.0% words), so it is a replication exercise, not a fitted input passed off as a prediction. No equation in the paper defines an output in terms of the quantity it claims to predict, and no parameter is fitted to a subset and then 'predicted' on a closely related subset. The main concern is an internal specification inconsistency: Section 3.1D claims 'multi-day logging' and the conclusion claims 'multi-day autonomy' with a 15 mAh battery and 128 MB flash, while Section 5 admits the battery 'requires recharging for multi-day continuous monitoring'; and the ≤8 µs jitter figure is asserted without measurement traces. These are correctness/verification risks, not circularity, so they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on unmeasured hardware specifications and on demonstration results taken from the authors' own prior work. No free parameters are fitted. The assumptions are the datasheet-level performance of the GH3026, ICM-42688P, and GXT310 sensors, the DPPI-based jitter cap of <=8 us, and the 15 mAh battery life of 8 h at 100 Hz.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Inter-modality time synchronization jitter is <=8 microseconds via DPPI hardware triggers.
    Stated in Section 3.1(B) without a benchmark or measurement trace in this paper.
  • domain assumption The 15 mAh Li-Po battery supports 8 hours of continuous three-modality recording at 100 Hz.
    Stated in Section 3.1(D); the paper's own Limitation section says the battery requires recharging for multi-day studies, so the operational envelope is uncertain.
  • domain assumption The GH3026 PPG, ICM-42688P IMU, and GXT310 thermistor function according to datasheet specifications in the ring form factor.
    Assumed throughout Section 3.1; no calibration or in-situ validation data are reported.
  • domain assumption The n=34 heart-rate comparison and its MAE 5.18 BPM result, reported in the authors' companion dataset paper [27], accurately characterize the tau-Ring hardware.
    Section 3.4 summarizes the result from reference [27] without providing methodology or raw data here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of {\tau}-Ring: A Smart Ring Platform for Multimodal Physiological and Behavioral Sensing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6VGMGWIF

@misc{pith2026250800778,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: \tau-Ring: A Smart Ring Platform for Multimodal Physiological and Behavioral Sensing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6VGMGWIF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.00778}
}
read the original abstract

Smart rings have emerged as uniquely convenient devices for continuous physiological and behavioral sensing, offering unobtrusive, constant access to metrics such as heart rate, motion, and skin temperature. Yet most commercial solutions remain proprietary, hindering reproducibility and slowing innovation in wearable research. We introduce {\tau}-Ring, a commercial-ready platform that bridges this gap through: (i) accessible hardware combining time-synchronized multi-channel PPG, 6-axis IMU, temperature sensing, NFC, and on-board storage; (ii) adjustable firmware that lets researchers rapidly reconfigure sampling rates, power modes, and wireless protocols; and (iii) a fully open-source Android software suite that supports both real-time streaming and 8-hour offline logging. Together, these features enable out-of-the-box, reproducible acquisition of rich physiological and behavioral datasets, accelerating prototyping and standardizing experimentation. We validate the platform with demonstration studies in heart-rate monitoring and ring-based handwriting recognition. Source code is available at GitHub: https://github.com/thuhci/OpenRing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.00778 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of 𝜏-Ring. (A) Worn on the finger for daily use. (B) Integrates PPG, IMU, TEMP, and NFC sensors. (C) Collection app main interface. (D) Real-time streaming with live visualization. (E) Offline logging for long-term data acquisition. ABSTRACT Smart rings have emerged as uniquely convenient devices for con￾tinuous physiological and behavioral sensing, offering unobtrusive, constant access to metrics such as h… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An overview of 𝜏-Ring’s system architecture, encompassing crucial aspects such as hardware selection, data links, and communication protocols. (A) Optical stack. The three-wavelength PPG engine is aGH30265 with individual LED current drivers (0-200 mA, 8-bit), a 24-bit TIA ADC and ambient light cancellation. We expose LED amplitude, pulse width and sampling frequency via adjustable firmware so researchers can replic… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Software UI and functionality. (A) Scan nearby rings and list metadata. (B) Connect and display device details. (C) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Jiankai Tang, Kegang Wang, Yingke Ding, Jiatong Ji, Zeyu Wang, Xiyuxing Zhang, Ping Chen, Yuanchun Shi, and Yuntao Wang. 2025. A Dataset and Toolkit for Multiparameter Cardiovascular Physiology Sensing on Rings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04172 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [6]

    Zhe He, Zixuan Wang, Chun Yu, Chengwen Zhang, Xiyuan Shen, and Yuanchun Shi. 2025. WritingRing: Enabling Natural Handwriting Input with a Single IMU Ring. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 731, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714066

    arXiv 2025

  3. [1]

    Roger Boldu, Alexandru Dancu, Denys JC Matthies, Pablo Gallego Cascón, Shanaka Ransir, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2018. Thumb-In-Motion: Evalu- ating thumb-to-ring microgestures for athletic activity. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction . 150–157

    work page 2018

  4. [2]

    Assim Boukhayma, Anthony Barison, Serj Haddad, and Antonino Caizzone. 2021. Ring-embedded micro-power mm-sized optical sensor for accurate heart beat monitoring. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 127217–127225

    work page 2021

  5. [3]

    Taizhou Chen, Tianpei Li, Xingyu Yang, and Kening Zhu. 2023. Efring: Enabling thumb-to-index-finger microgesture interaction through electric field sensing using single smart ring. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 4 (2023), 1–31

    work page 2023

  6. [4]

    Yizheng Gu, Chun Yu, Zhipeng Li, Zhaoheng Li, Xiaoying Wei, and Yuanchun Shi

    work page

  7. [5]

    Eija Halkola, Lauri Lovén, Marta Cortes, Ekaterina Gilman, and Susanna Pirt- tikangas. 2019. Towards measuring well-being in smart environments. InAdjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiq- uitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 1166–1169

    work page 2019

  8. [7]

    Josh Kaufman. 2021. google-10000-english. https://github.com/first20hours/ google-10000-english

    work page 2021

Show all 38 references
  1. [8]

    Keith Kim, Joel Murphy, and Conor Russomanno. 2015. OpenBCI: An Open- Source Brain–Computer Interface for Practical EEG Signal Acquisition. Frontiers in Neuroscience (2015). https://openbci.com

    2015

  2. [9]

    Heli Koskimäki, Hannu Kinnunen, Teemu Kurppa, and Juha Röning. 2018. How do we sleep: a case study of sleep duration and quality using data from oura ring. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM international joint conference and 2018 international symposium on pervasive and ubiquitou...

    2018

  3. [10]

    Chen Liang, Chun Yu, Yue Qin, Yuntao Wang, and Yuanchun Shi. 2021. DualRing: Enabling subtle and expressive hand interaction with dual IMU rings.Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies5, 3 (2021), 1–27

    2021

  4. [11]

    Hyunchul Lim, Jungmin Chung, Changhoon Oh, SoHyun Park, Joonhwan Lee, and Bongwon Suh. 2018. Touch+ Finger: Extending Touch-Based User Interface Capabilities with" Idle" Finger Gestures in the Air. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and ...

    2018

  5. [12]

    Ke Liu, Jiankai Tang, Zhang Jiang, Yuntao Wang, Xiaojing Liu, Dong Li, and Yuanchun Shi. 2024. Summit Vitals: Multi-Camera and Multi-Signal Biosensing at High Altitudes. In 2024 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC)

    2024

  6. [13]

    Md Shaad Mahmud, Honggang Wang, and Hua Fang. 2018. SensoRing: An inte- grated wearable system for continuous measurement of physiological biomarkers. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) . IEEE, 1–7

    2018

  7. [14]

    Elena Malakhatka, Anas Al Rahis, Osman Osman, and Per Lundqvist. 2021. Mon- itoring and predicting occupant’s sleep quality by using wearable device OURA ring and smart building sensors data (living laboratory case study). Buildings 11, 10 (2021), 459

    2021

  8. [15]

    Montgomery, Nitin Nair, Phoebe Chen, and Suzanne Dikker

    Sean M. Montgomery, Nitin Nair, Phoebe Chen, and Suzanne Dikker. 2023. Intro- ducing EmotiBit, an Open-Source Multi-Modal Sensor for Measuring Research- Grade Physiological Signals. Science Talks 6, 1 (2023), 100181. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.sctalk.2023.100181

    2023

  9. [16]

    Birut˙e Paliakait˙e, Peter H Charlton, Andrius Rapalis, Vilma Pluščiauskait˙e, Povilas Piartli, Eugenijus Kaniusas, and Vaidotas Marozas. 2021. Blood pressure estima- tion based on photoplethysmography: Finger versus wrist. In 2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC), Vol. 48. IEEE, 1–4

    2021

  10. [17]

    M Poongodi, Mounir Hamdi, Mohit Malviya, Ashutosh Sharma, Gaurav Dhiman, and S Vimal. 2022. Diagnosis and combating COVID-19 using wearable Oura smart ring with deep learning methods.Personal and ubiquitous computing (2022), 1–11

    2022

  11. [18]

    Sanjay Rajput, Alexandra Jamieson, Nishi Chaturvedi, Alan Hughes, and Michele Orini. 2023. Assessment of Consumer-Grade Wearable Devices to Track Sleep in Healthy Individuals in Free-Living Conditions. In 2023 Computing in Cardiology (CinC), Vol. 50. IEEE, 1–4

    2023

  12. [19]

    Mikko J Rissanen, Samantha Vu, Owen Noel Newton Fernando, Natalie Pang, and Schubert Foo. 2013. Subtle, Natural and Socially Acceptable Interaction Techniques for Ringterfaces—Finger-Ring Shaped User Interfaces. In Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions: First Intern...

    2013

  13. [20]

    Tobias Röddiger, Michael Küttner, and Philippet al. Lepold. 2025. OpenEarable 2.0: Open-Source Earphone Platform for Physiological Ear Sensing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 9, 1 (2025), 1–33. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3712069

    2025

  14. [21]

    Mauro Santos, Sarah Vollam, Marco AF Pimentel, Carlos Areia, Louise Young, Cristian Roman, Jody Ede, Philippa Piper, Elizabeth King, Mirae Harford, et al

  15. [22]

    Xiyuan Shen, Chun Yu, Xutong Wang, Chen Liang, Haozhan Chen, and Yuanchun Shi. 2024. MouseRing: Always-available Touchpad Interaction with IMU Rings. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–19

    2024

  16. [23]

    Yilei Shi, Haimo Zhang, Kaixing Zhao, Jiashuo Cao, Mengmeng Sun, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2020. Ready, steady, touch! sensing physical contact with a finger- mounted IMU. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 2 (2020), 1–25

    2020

  17. [24]

    Wei Sun, Franklin Mingzhe Li, Congshu Huang, Zhenyu Lei, Benjamin Steeper, Songyun Tao, Feng Tian, and Cheng Zhang. 2021. Thumbtrak: Recognizing micro-finger poses using a ring with proximity sensing. InProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer ...

    2021

  18. [25]

    Jiankai Tang, Xinyi Li, Jiacheng Liu, Xiyuxing Zhang, Zeyu Wang, and Yuntao Wang. 2024. Camera-Based Remote Physiology Sensing for Hundreds of Subjects Across Skin Tones. In CHI’24 Workshop PhysioCHI’24

    2024

  19. [26]

    Jiankai Tang, Jiacheng Liu, Renling Tong, Kai Zhu, Zhe Li, Xin Yi, Junliang Xing, Yuanchun Shi, and Yuntao Wang. 2025. Exploring Reliable PPG Authentication on Smartwatches in Daily Scenarios. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23930 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Jiankai Tang, Kegang Wang, Hongming Hu, Xiyuxing Zhang, Peiyu Wang, Xin Liu, and Yuntao Wang. 2023. ALPHA: AnomaLous Physiological Health Assess- ment Using Large Language Models. In AI Health Summit 23

    2023

  21. [29]

    M Usman, AK Gupta, and W Xue. 2019. Analyzing dry electrodes for wearable bioelectrical impedance analyzers. In 2019 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB). IEEE, 1–5

    2019

  22. [30]

    Zeyu Wang, Ruotong Yu, Xiangyang Wang, Jiexin Ding, Jiankai Tang, Jun Fang, Zhe He, Zhuojun Li, Tobias Röddiger, Weiye Xu, et al. 2025. Computing with Smart Rings: A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02459 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Katrin Wolf, Robert Schleicher, Sven Kratz, and Michael Rohs. 2013. Tickle: a surface-independent interaction technique for grasp interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction . 185–192

    2013

  24. [32]

    Chanphot Wongtaweesup, Kristina Thapa, Chutiporn Anutariya, Aekavute Su- jarae, and James Tisyakorn. 2023. Using Consumer-Graded Wearable Devices for Sleep Apnea Pre-Diagnosis: A Survey and Recommendations. In 2023 20th Inter- national Joint Conference on Computer Science and ...

    2023

  25. [33]

    Weitao Xu, Huanqi Yang, Jiongzhang Chen, Chengwen Luo, Jia Zhang, Yuliang Zhao, and Wen Jung Li. 2022. Washring: An energy-efficient and highly accurate handwashing monitoring system via smart ring. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 23, 1 (2022), 971–984

    2022

  26. [34]

    Xiyuxing Zhang, Yuntao Wang, Yuxuan Han, Chen Liang, Ishan Chatterjee, Jiankai Tang, Xin Yi, Shwetak Patel, and Yuanchun Shi. 2024. The earsavas dataset: Enabling subject-aware vocal activity sensing on earables. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiq...

    2024

  27. [35]

    Hao Zhou, Taiting Lu, Yilin Liu, Shijia Zhang, Runze Liu, and Mahanth Gowda

  28. [2020]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (2020), 1–29

    Qwertyring: Text entry on physical surfaces using a ring. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (2020), 1–29

    2020

  29. [2022]

    Journal of Medical Internet Research 24, 2 (2022), e28890

    The use of wearable pulse oximeters in the prompt detection of hypoxemia and during movement: Diagnostic accuracy study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 24, 2 (2022), e28890

    2022

  30. [2023]

    In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation

    One ring to rule them all: An open source smartring platform for finger motion analytics and healthcare applications. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation . 27–38

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.