REVIEW 1 cited by
Image-aware Evaluation of Generated Medical Reports
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The paper proposes a novel evaluation metric for automatic medical report generation from X-ray images, VLScore. It aims to overcome the limitations of existing evaluation methods, which either focus solely on textual similarities, ignoring clinical aspects, or concentrate only on a single clinical aspect, the pathology, neglecting all other factors. The key idea of our metric is to measure the similarity between radiology reports while considering the corresponding image. We demonstrate the benefit of our metric through evaluation on a dataset where radiologists marked errors in pairs of reports, showing notable alignment with radiologists' judgments. In addition, we provide a new dataset for evaluating metrics. This dataset includes well-designed perturbations that distinguish between significant modifications (e.g., removal of a diagnosis) and insignificant ones. It highlights the weaknesses in current evaluation metrics and provides a clear framework for analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Vision-Language Models for Automated Chest X-ray Interpretation: Leveraging ViT and GPT-2
On the IU-Xray dataset, SWIN-BART outperforms ViT-B16-BART, SWIN-GPT-2, and ViT-B16-GPT-2 on n-gram and embedding-based report metrics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.