Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Single-dimensional Contract Design: Efficient Algorithms and Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11661 v1 pith:6ZKYW2UA submitted 2025-02-17 cs.GT

Single-dimensional Contract Design: Efficient Algorithms and Learning

classification cs.GT
keywords contractdesignsingle-dimensionaladditiveapproximationseasierreductionagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study a Bayesian contract design problem in which a principal interacts with an unknown agent. We consider the single-parameter uncertainty model introduced by Alon et al. [2021], in which the agent's type is described by a single parameter, i.e., the cost per unit-of-effort. Despite its simplicity, several works have shown that single-dimensional contract design is not necessarily easier than its multi-dimensional counterpart in many respects. Perhaps the most surprising result is the reduction by Castiglioni et al . [2025] from multi- to single-dimensional contract design. However, their reduction preserves only multiplicative approximations, leaving open the question of whether additive approximations are easier to obtain than multiplicative ones. In this paper, we answer this question -- to some extent -- positively. In particular, we provide an additive PTAS for these problems while also ruling out the existence of an additive FPTAS. This, in turn, implies that no reduction from multi- to single-dimensional contracts can preserve additive approximations. Moreover, we show that single-dimensional contract design is fundamentally easier than its multi-dimensional counterpart from a learning perspective. Under mild assumptions, we show that optimal contracts can be learned efficiently, providing results on both regret and sample complexity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Regret Minimization in Single-Dimensional Contract-Design with Binary Actions

    cs.GT 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives tight Θ(T^{2/3}) regret independent of outcome count m for adversarial agent types and Õ(√T) regret via explore-then-commit for fixed hidden type in single-dimensional binary-action contract design.