REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Automated Machine Learning: Evaluation and Comparison of AutoML Approaches and Tools
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
There has been considerable growth and interest in industrial applications of machine learning (ML) in recent years. ML engineers, as a consequence, are in high demand across the industry, yet improving the efficiency of ML engineers remains a fundamental challenge. Automated machine learning (AutoML) has emerged as a way to save time and effort on repetitive tasks in ML pipelines, such as data pre-processing, feature engineering, model selection, hyperparameter optimization, and prediction result analysis. In this paper, we investigate the current state of AutoML tools aiming to automate these tasks. We conduct various evaluations of the tools on many datasets, in different data segments, to examine their performance, and compare their advantages and disadvantages on different test cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Interpretable by Design: MH-AutoML for Transparent and Efficient Android Malware Detection without Compromising Performance
MH-AutoML is a domain-specific AutoML framework for Android malware detection that combines automated modeling with built-in interpretability, and its evaluation shows competitive recall and higher transparency scores...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.