REVIEW 2 cited by
A nearby source of ultra-high energy cosmic rays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recently the Telescope Array collaboration reported an observation of cosmic ray event with very high energy 244 EeV ($2.44 \times 10^{20}$ eV). Importantly, the event is hard to correlate with the matter distribution in the local Universe, even after taking into account deflections in magnetic fields. This implies that the event is likely a nucleus with a large charge. An attenuation length of the nucleus of such a high energy in intergalactic space is quite small, therefore its source should be relatively close to our Galaxy. Using these arguments we derive a new upper bound on a distance to the closest ultra-high energy cosmic ray (UHECR) source and a lower bound on the UHECR source number density in general. The distance to the closest source should not exceed 5 Mpc at 95% C.L. and the 95% C.L. lower-bound on the sources number density is $\rho > 1.0 \times 10^{-4}$ Mpc$^{-3}$. The number density of UHECR sources emitting heavy nuclei is constrained for the first time.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Ultra-high-energy event KM3-230213A constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation in neutrino sector
Detection of the 220 PeV neutrino KM3-230213A implies that superluminal Lorentz violation in the neutrino sector must have a mass scale above 1.1x10^30 GeV (n=1) or 1.1x10^19 GeV (n=2), assuming the event originated e...
-
The Global Cosmic Ray Observatory -- Challenging next-generation multi-messenger astronomy with interdisciplinary research
GCOS is proposed as a 60,000 km2 cosmic-ray observatory that would boost exposure tenfold and enable charged-particle astronomy, though this paper only restates the design goals.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.