Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

Matrix Product States for Modulated Symmetries: SPT, LSM, and Beyond

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Modulated symmetries push through MPS tensors via site-dependent virtual unitaries, classifying 1D SPTs and yielding LSM constraints.

desk verdict Solid, self-contained MPS generalization of push-through to discrete modulated symmetries; new classifications and LSM models that recover known special cases. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.19189 v2 pith:75PH2SWG submitted 2026-03-19 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Amogh Anakru , Linhao Li , Sarvesh Srinivasan , Zhen Bi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords matrixproductstatesmodulatedsymmetriesSPTphasesLieb-Schultz-Mattispush-throughconditionexponentialsymmetrydipoleprojectiverepresentations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

One-dimensional gapped phases are routinely captured by matrix product states, and ordinary global symmetries act by pushing through each tensor as conjugate unitaries on the virtual bonds. When the symmetry itself varies from site to site—modulated symmetries that appear in tilted lattices, multipole conservation, and fractonic systems—that push-through rule must be rewritten. The paper derives the corrected rule: the physical on-site unitary is absorbed into two (generally different) virtual unitaries related by the modulation automorphism induced by translation. The virtual 2-cocycle is then forced to be invariant under that automorphism. This single algebraic condition classifies the strong SPT phases protected by the modulated symmetry and, when the physical sites themselves carry projective representations, produces Lieb–Schultz–Mattis-type obstructions that forbid a unique gapped symmetric ground state. Explicit exponential, charge-exponential, multipole and non-Abelian examples recover known classifications, construct parent Hamiltonians, and give concrete lattice models forced into degeneracy or gaplessness.

What carries the argument

The generalized push-through condition U_j · A ≅ v†_{j-1} A v_j together with the translation-compatibility relation v_j(g) ≅ v_{j-1}(T(g)). These two equations force the virtual cocycle to obey ω(g,h)=ω(T(g),T(h)) (up to coboundaries) and, when physical cocycles are present, produce the obstruction equations that forbid injective MPS.

What would settle it

Construct an injective translationally invariant MPS that is an eigenstate of a modulated symmetry whose virtual cocycle violates the T-invariance condition, or exhibit a unique gapped symmetric ground state for one of the explicit lattice models (e.g., the alternating exponential Z_N Hamiltonian) that the paper claims must be degenerate or gapless.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For an injective translationally invariant MPS that is an eigenstate of a discrete modulated symmetry, the physical action on each site pushes through as U_j · A ≅ v†_{j-1} A v_j, where the virtual unitaries satisfy v_j(g) ≅ v_{j-1}(T(g)). The resulting virtual 2-cocycle is invariant under the modulation automorphism T; that invariance classifies strong SPTs and, via the matching condition with physical cocycles, yields LSM and SPT-LSM constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the same MPS tensor remains an eigenstate of every larger periodic extension of the modulated symmetry, so that the virtual unitaries exist in the thermodynamic limit.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript generalizes the matrix-product-state (MPS) treatment of one-dimensional gapped phases to translationally invariant systems with discrete modulated symmetries. For an injective MPS that is an eigenstate of a modulated unitary Ug = ⊗j Ug,j, the authors derive a site-dependent push-through rule Uj · A ≔ v†j-1 A vj, with the virtual unitaries related by the modulation automorphism via vj(g) ≔ vj-1(T(g)). The resulting virtual 2-cocycle is invariant under T (up to coboundaries), which classifies strong SPTs protected by the modulated symmetry; when the physical on-site representations are themselves projective, the same algebra yields LSM and SPT-LSM obstructions (Eq. (5)). Explicit classifications and MPS representatives are given for exponential, charge-exponential and multipole symmetries, and lattice models realizing the predicted LSM constraints are constructed. A self-contained proof of the generalized push-through appears in Appendix B, together with an open-boundary extension.

Significance. The work supplies a unified, MPS-native language for SPT classification and LSM constraints under arbitrary discrete modulated symmetries, recovering known group-cohomology and cellular-complex results while constructing explicit parent Hamiltonians and lattice models. The Appendix B derivation via U-transfer-matrix norms and injectivity is self-contained and extends earlier dipole/multipole arguments; concurrent work is disclosed. If the thermodynamic-limit consistency condition is accepted as the natural discrete analogue of ordinary global-symmetry push-through, the paper fills a clear gap between conventional MPS SPT/LSM theory and the growing literature on modulated and fractonic symmetries.

minor comments (4)
  1. The thermodynamic-limit consistency condition (that the MPS on every kL-site concatenation remains an eigenstate of the k-fold extended symmetry) is stated after Eq. (1) and used heavily in Appendix B; a short explicit remark in the main text that this is the discrete analogue of ordinary global-symmetry push-through would help non-specialist readers.
  2. In the unfaithful-representation discussion of Appendix C6 the extra cocycle constraint arising from UkE = UkC is interesting; a one-sentence pointer in the main text would alert readers that faithfulness of the physical representation can further restrict the SPT classification beyond the T-invariance of the cocycle.
  3. Notation for the phase factors that appear in the push-through equalities (the “≔” symbol) is introduced only diagrammatically; a brief textual definition early in the main text would improve readability.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., occasional missing spaces around “mod N” and the mixed use of “Uj” versus “Ug,j”); a light copy-edit pass would clean them up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: generalized push-through, SPT classification, and LSM constraints are derived self-containedly from injectivity plus thermodynamic-limit consistency.

full rationale

The central derivation (Appendix B) starts from a left-canonical injective MPS that is an eigenstate of a discrete modulated symmetry Ug=⊗j Ug,j, plus the explicit thermodynamic-limit assumption that k-fold concatenations remain eigenstates of the k-fold extended symmetry. From these, Lemmas 1–3 and the U-transfer-matrix norm argument produce the site-dependent virtual unitaries satisfying Uj·A.=v†_{j-1} A vj and vj(g).=v_{j-1}(T(g)). The virtual 2-cocycle is then forced to be T-invariant (Eq. 4), which directly classifies strong SPTs; allowing projective physical cocycles yields the compatibility conditions (Eq. 5) that produce LSM/SPT-LSM obstructions. Special cases (exponential, charge+exponential, dipole/multipole, dihedral) recover known group-cohomology classifications by direct substitution, and explicit MPS tensors and lattice Hamiltonians are constructed as independent checks. Concurrent work is disclosed in the note added. No fitted parameters, no self-definitional loops, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems imported from the authors’ prior papers appear; the argument is algebraic and self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard MPS injectivity and the definition of modulated symmetries via an automorphism of a discrete on-site group; no free parameters or new physical entities are introduced. The thermodynamic-limit consistency condition is an extra domain assumption needed to guarantee the existence of the virtual unitaries.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Injectivity of the MPS tensor (unique dominant eigenvalue of the transfer matrix, finite injective length).
    Used throughout to guarantee that physical symmetries push through to virtual unitaries and that parent Hamiltonians exist (Appendix A, B).
  • domain assumption Modulated symmetry is specified by an automorphism T of a discrete on-site group G with T^L = id, realized by on-site unitaries.
    Defines the class of symmetries under study (Introduction and Sec. C1).
  • ad hoc to paper For every k the MPS on kL sites is an eigenstate of the k-fold extension of the modulated symmetry.
    Imposed after Eq. (1) to obtain a well-defined thermodynamic limit and to justify the existence of site-dependent virtual unitaries.
  • standard math Standard group-cohomology classification of projective representations (H^2(G,U(1))).
    Used to label virtual and physical cocycles (Eqs. (4)–(5)).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Matrix Product States for Modulated Symmetries: SPT, LSM, and Beyond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75PH2SWG

@misc{pith2026260319189,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Matrix Product States for Modulated Symmetries: SPT, LSM, and Beyond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75PH2SWG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.19189}
}
read the original abstract

Matrix product states (MPS) provide a powerful framework for characterizing one-dimensional symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases of matter and for formulating Lieb-Schultz-Mattis (LSM)-type constraints. Here we generalize the MPS formalism to translationally invariant systems with general modulated symmetries. We show that the standard symmetry "push-through" condition for conventional global symmetry must be revised to account for symmetry modulation, and we derive the appropriate generalized condition. Using this generalized push-through structure, we classify one-dimensional SPT phases with modulated symmetries and formulate LSM-type constraints within the same MPS-based framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.19189 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Generalized push-through rule for modulated uni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Push-through rule for dipole symmetries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Translationally Covariant Modulated Symmetries: Classification and Goldstone

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper classifies one-dimensional Abelian translationally covariant modulated symmetries via Jordan normal forms and derives their Goldstone actions, which modify the conventional theorem by type of symmetry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    push- through

    to strongly tilted optical lattices in cold atom setups [21, 22]. More broadly, modulated symmetries are the building blocks of fractonic matter [23–28], where exotic mobility restrictions emerge directly from local symmetry constraints [29–32]. While recent theoretical efforts have made many progress exploring the topological phases as- sociated with the...

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Matrix product state representa- tions.Quantum Info

    David Perez-Garcia, Frank Verstraete, Michael M Wolf, and J Ignacio Cirac. Matrix product state representa- tions.Quantum Info. Comput., 7:401–430, 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension.Physical review b, 81(6):064439, 2010

    Frank Pollmann, Ari M Turner, Erez Berg, and Masaki Oshikawa. Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension.Physical review b, 81(6):064439, 2010

    2010

  4. [4]

    Clas- sification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems.Physical Review B, 83(3):035107, 2011

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Clas- sification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems.Physical Review B, 83(3):035107, 2011

    2011

  5. [5]

    Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states.Physical review b, 84(16):165139, 2011

    Norbert Schuch, David P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, and Ignacio Cirac. Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states.Physical review b, 84(16):165139, 2011

    2011

  6. [6]

    Turner, and Masaki Oshikawa

    Frank Pollmann, Erez Berg, Ari M. Turner, and Masaki Oshikawa. Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems.Phys. Rev. B, 85:075125, Feb 2012

    2012

  7. [7]

    Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group.Phys

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu, and Xiao- Gang Wen. Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group.Phys. Rev. B, 87:155114, Apr 2013

    2013

  8. [8]

    Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain.Annals of Physics, 16(3):407–466, 1961

    Elliott Lieb, Theodore Schultz, and Daniel Mattis. Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain.Annals of Physics, 16(3):407–466, 1961

    1961

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Commensurability, excitation gap, and topology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice.Physical review letters, 84(7):1535, 2000

    Masaki Oshikawa. Commensurability, excitation gap, and topology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice.Physical review letters, 84(7):1535, 2000

    2000

  2. [10]

    Lieb-schultz-mattis in higher di- mensions.Physical Review B, 69(10):104431, 2004

    Matthew B Hastings. Lieb-schultz-mattis in higher di- mensions.Physical Review B, 69(10):104431, 2004

    2004

  3. [11]

    Topological order and absence of band insulators at integer filling in non- symmorphic crystals.Nature Physics, 9(5):299–303, 2013

    Siddharth A Parameswaran, Ari M Turner, Daniel P Arovas, and Ashvin Vishwanath. Topological order and absence of band insulators at integer filling in non- symmorphic crystals.Nature Physics, 9(5):299–303, 2013

    2013

  4. [12]

    Effective field theory for one-dimensional valence-bond-solid phases and their symmetry protection

    Yohei Fuji. Effective field theory for one-dimensional valence-bond-solid phases and their symmetry protection. Phys. Rev. B, 93:104425, Mar 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Filling constraints for spin-orbit cou- pled insulators in symmorphic and nonsymmorphic crys- tals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(47):14551–14556, 2015

    Haruki Watanabe, Hoi Chun Po, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Michael Zaletel. Filling constraints for spin-orbit cou- pled insulators in symmorphic and nonsymmorphic crys- tals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(47):14551–14556, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Gen- eral lieb–schultz–mattis type theorems for quantum spin chains.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 385(1):79–99, 2021

    Yoshiko Ogata, Yuji Tachikawa, and Hal Tasaki. Gen- eral lieb–schultz–mattis type theorems for quantum spin chains.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 385(1):79–99, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Twisted boundary con- dition and lieb-schultz-mattis ingappability for discrete symmetries.Phys

    Yuan Yao and Masaki Oshikawa. Twisted boundary con- dition and lieb-schultz-mattis ingappability for discrete symmetries.Phys. Rev. Lett., 126:217201, May 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Topological characterization of Lieb- Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry- enriched quantum criticality.SciPost Phys., 13:066, 2022

    Weicheng Ye, Meng Guo, Yin-Chen He, Chong Wang, and Liujun Zou. Topological characterization of Lieb- Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry- enriched quantum criticality.SciPost Phys., 13:066, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems.SciPost Phys., 15:051, 2023

    Meng Cheng and Nathan Seiberg. Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems.SciPost Phys., 15:051, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Boundary conditions and anomalies of confor- mal field theories in 1 + 1 dimensions.Phys

    Linhao Li, Chang-Tse Hsieh, Yuan Yao, and Masaki Os- hikawa. Boundary conditions and anomalies of confor- mal field theories in 1 + 1 dimensions.Phys. Rev. B, 110:045118, Jul 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Duality viewpoint of criticality

    Linhao Li and Yuan Yao. Duality viewpoint of criticality. Phys. Rev. B, 106:224420, Dec 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Lieb-schultz-mattis theorem for 1d quantum mag- nets with antiunitary translation and inversion symme- tries.Phys

    Yuan Yao, Linhao Li, Masaki Oshikawa, and Chang-Tse Hsieh. Lieb-schultz-mattis theorem for 1d quantum mag- nets with antiunitary translation and inversion symme- tries.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:136705, Sep 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Incompressible quantum liquids and new conservation laws.Physical review letters, 95(26):266405, 2005

    Alexander Seidel, Hui Fu, Dung-Hai Lee, J-M Leinaas, and Joel Moore. Incompressible quantum liquids and new conservation laws.Physical review letters, 95(26):266405, 2005. 6

    2005

  14. [22]

    Subdiffusion and heat transport in a tilted two-dimensional fermi-hubbard system.Physical Review X, 10(1):011042, 2020

    Elmer Guardado-Sanchez, Alan Morningstar, Ben- jamin M Spar, Peter T Brown, David A Huse, and Waseem S Bakr. Subdiffusion and heat transport in a tilted two-dimensional fermi-hubbard system.Physical Review X, 10(1):011042, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Observing non- ergodicity due to kinetic constraints in dark states.Na- ture communications, 596(7871):206–210, 2021

    Sebastian Scherg, Thomas Kohlert, Pablo Sala, Frank Pollmann, Bharath Hebbe Madhusudhana, Immanuel Bloch, and Monika Aidelsburger. Observing non- ergodicity due to kinetic constraints in dark states.Na- ture communications, 596(7871):206–210, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Quantum glassiness in strongly corre- lated clean systems: An example of topological overpro- tection.Physical review letters, 94(4):040402, 2005

    Claudio Chamon. Quantum glassiness in strongly corre- lated clean systems: An example of topological overpro- tection.Physical review letters, 94(4):040402, 2005

    2005

  17. [25]

    Local stabilizer codes in three dimen- sions without string logical operators.Physical Review A, 83(4):042330, 2011

    Jeongwan Haah. Local stabilizer codes in three dimen- sions without string logical operators.Physical Review A, 83(4):042330, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Fracton topological order, generalized lattice gauge theory and duality.arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04442, 2016

    Sagar Vijay, Jeongwan Haah, and Liang Fu. Fracton topological order, generalized lattice gauge theory and duality.arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04442, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Fractons

    Rahul M Nandkishore and Michael Hermele. Fractons. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10(1):295– 327, 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Fracton matter.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 35(06):2030003, 2020

    Michael Pretko, Xie Chen, and Yizhi You. Fracton matter.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 35(06):2030003, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Foliated frac- ton order from gauging subsystem symmetries.SciPost Physics, 6(4):041, 2019

    Wilbur Shirley, Kevin Slagle, and Xie Chen. Foliated frac- ton order from gauging subsystem symmetries.SciPost Physics, 6(4):041, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Fractons from vector gauge theory

    Djordje Radicevic. Fractons from vector gauge theory. Physical Review D, 99(2):025021, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Towards classification of fracton phases: the multipole algebra.Physical Review X, 9(3):031035, 2019

    Andrey Gromov. Towards classification of fracton phases: the multipole algebra.Physical Review X, 9(3):031035, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Subsystem symmetry protected topological or- der.Physical Review B, 98(3):035112, 2018

    Yizhi You, Tariq Devakul, Fiona J Burnell, and Shivaji L Sondhi. Subsystem symmetry protected topological or- der.Physical Review B, 98(3):035112, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Fractons and exotic spacetime symmetries.SciPost Physics, 9(4):046, 2020

    Nathan Seiberg and Shu-Heng Shao. Fractons and exotic spacetime symmetries.SciPost Physics, 9(4):046, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Lieb-schultz-mattis-type theorems and other nonperturbative results for strongly correlated sys- tems with conserved dipole moments.Physical Review B, 103(12):125133, 2021

    Peng Ye et al. Lieb-schultz-mattis-type theorems and other nonperturbative results for strongly correlated sys- tems with conserved dipole moments.Physical Review B, 103(12):125133, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Topological and frac- tonic insulators from exact geometric responses.Physical review letters, 129(10):106601, 2022

    Yuan Yao and Masaki Oshikawa. Topological and frac- tonic insulators from exact geometric responses.Physical review letters, 129(10):106601, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Lieb-schultz-mattis constraints from stratified anomalies of modulated symmetries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11266, 2024

    Yuta Suzuki et al. Lieb-schultz-mattis constraints from stratified anomalies of modulated symmetries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11266, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Salvatore D Pace and Xiao-Gang Wen. Classification of dipolar symmetry-protected topological phases: Matrix product states, stabilizer hamiltonians, and finite tensor gauge theories.Physical Review B, 109(11):115142, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Topological phases of matter protected by modulated symmetries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04838, 2024

    Yasuhiro Fuji and Akira Furusaki. Topological phases of matter protected by modulated symmetries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04838, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Generalized kramers-wanier duality from bilinear phase map.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16017, 2024

    Han Yan and Linhao Li. Generalized kramers-wanier duality from bilinear phase map.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16017, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gen- erating lattice non-invertible symmetries.SciPost Phys., 17:104, 2024

    Weiguang Cao, Linhao Li, and Masahito Yamazaki. Gen- erating lattice non-invertible symmetries.SciPost Phys., 17:104, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Classification of dipolar symmetry- protected topological phases: Matrix product states, sta- bilizer hamiltonians, and finite tensor gauge theories

    Ho Tat Lam. Classification of dipolar symmetry- protected topological phases: Matrix product states, sta- bilizer hamiltonians, and finite tensor gauge theories. Physical Review B, 109(11):115142, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Lattice translation modulated symmetries and tfts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.03889, 2025

    Ching-Yu Yao. Lattice translation modulated symmetries and tfts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.03889, 2025

    2025

  35. [43]

    Generalized symmetry-protected topological phases in mixed states from gauging dualities

    Linhao Li, Zhen Bi, and Weiguang Cao. Generalized symmetry-protected topological phases in mixed states from gauging dualities. 3 2026

    2026

  36. [44]

    Dyonic lieb-schultz-mattis theorem and symmetry protected topological phases in decorated dimer models

    Xu Yang, Shenghan Jiang, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Ying Ran. Dyonic lieb-schultz-mattis theorem and symmetry protected topological phases in decorated dimer models. Physical Review B, 98(12):125120, 2018

    2018

  37. [45]

    Generalized lieb-schultz-mattis theorem on bosonic symmetry protected topological phases.SciPost Physics, 11(2):024, 2021

    Shenghan Jiang, Meng Cheng, Yang Qi, and Yuan-Ming Lu. Generalized lieb-schultz-mattis theorem on bosonic symmetry protected topological phases.SciPost Physics, 11(2):024, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Lieb-schultz-mattis theorems for symmetry-protected topological phases.Annals of Physics, 470:169806, 2024

    Yuan-Ming Lu. Lieb-schultz-mattis theorems for symmetry-protected topological phases.Annals of Physics, 470:169806, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M

    D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M. M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac. String order and symmetries in quantum spin lattices.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:167202, Apr 2008

    2008

  40. [48]

    Hand- waving and interpretive dance: an introductory course on tensor networks.Journal of physics A: Mathematical and theoretical, 50(22):223001, 2017

    Jacob C Bridgeman and Christopher T Chubb. Hand- waving and interpretive dance: an introductory course on tensor networks.Journal of physics A: Mathematical and theoretical, 50(22):223001, 2017

    2017

  41. [49]

    Towards classification of fracton phases: The multipole algebra.Phys

    Andrey Gromov. Towards classification of fracton phases: The multipole algebra.Phys. Rev. X, 9:031035, Aug 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Defect networks for topological phases protected by modulated symmetries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06604, 2025

    Daniel Bulmash. Defect networks for topological phases protected by modulated symmetries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06604, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Pace and Daniel Bulmash

    Salvatore D. Pace and Daniel Bulmash. Lieb-schultz- mattis constraints from stratified anomalies of modulated symmetries, 2026

    2026

  44. [52]

    Ignacio Cirac, and Barbara Kraus

    David Sauerwein, Andras Molnar, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Barbara Kraus. Matrix product states: Entanglement, symmetries, and state transformations.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:170504, Oct 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Subsystem symmetries, quantum cellular automata, and computational phases of quantum matter.Quantum, 3:142, 2019

    David T Stephen, Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Juani Bermejo-Vega, Jens Eisert, and Robert Raussendorf. Subsystem symmetries, quantum cellular automata, and computational phases of quantum matter.Quantum, 3:142, 2019

    2019

  46. [54]

    Classifying one- dimensional quantum states prepared by a single round of measurements.PRX Quantum, 6(1):010329, 2025

    Rahul Sahay and Ruben Verresen. Classifying one- dimensional quantum states prepared by a single round of measurements.PRX Quantum, 6(1):010329, 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Stephen and Oliver Hart

    David T. Stephen and Oliver Hart. Preparing matrix product states via fusion: Constraints and extensions. Physical Review B, 112(23), December 2025

    2025

  48. [56]

    Smith, Abid Khan, Bryan K

    Kevin C. Smith, Abid Khan, Bryan K. Clark, S.M. Girvin, and Tzu-Chieh Wei. Constant-depth preparation of matrix product states with adaptive quantum circuits. PRX Quantum, 5:030344, Sep 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Characterizing matrix-product states and pro- jected entangled-pair states preparable via measurement and feedback.PRX Quantum, 5(4):040304, 2024

    Yifan Zhang, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and Georgios Styliaris. Characterizing matrix-product states and pro- jected entangled-pair states preparable via measurement and feedback.PRX Quantum, 5(4):040304, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    From the quantum breakdown model to the lattice gauge theory, 2024

    Yu-Min Hu and Biao Lian. From the quantum breakdown model to the lattice gauge theory, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Quantum breakdown condensate as a disorder-free quantum glass, 2025

    Yu-Min Hu, Zhaoyu Han, and Biao Lian. Quantum breakdown condensate as a disorder-free quantum glass, 2025

    2025

  52. [60]

    M. P. Qin, J. M. Leinaas, S. Ryu, E. Ardonne, T. Xiang, and D.-H. Lee. Quantum torus chain.Phys. Rev. B, 86:134430, Oct 2012

    2012

  53. [61]

    Anomalies and unusual stability of multicomponent luttinger liquids in 𭟋n ×𭟋 n spin chains.Phys

    Yahya Alavirad and Maissam Barkeshli. Anomalies and unusual stability of multicomponent luttinger liquids in 𭟋n ×𭟋 n spin chains.Phys. Rev. B, 104:045151, Jul 2021

    2021

  54. [62]

    Ma- trix product states for modulated topological phases: 7 Crystalline equivalence principle and lieb-schultz-mattis constraints, to appear

    Shang-Qiang Ning, Hiromi Ebisu, and Ho Tat Lam. Ma- trix product states for modulated topological phases: 7 Crystalline equivalence principle and lieb-schultz-mattis constraints, to appear

  55. [63]

    Ignacio Cirac, David P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete

    J. Ignacio Cirac, David P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete. Matrix product states and pro- jected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, the- orems.Rev. Mod. Phys., 93:045003, Dec 2021

    2021

  56. [64]

    Matrix product state classification of one- dimensional multipole symmetry-protected topological phases.Physical Review B, 112(19), November 2025

    Takuma Saito, Weiguang Cao, Bo Han, and Hiromi Ebisu. Matrix product state classification of one- dimensional multipole symmetry-protected topological phases.Physical Review B, 112(19), November 2025

    2025

  57. [65]

    Normal projected entangled pair states generating the same state.New Journal of Physics, 20(11):113017, November 2018

    Andras Molnar, Jos´ e Garre-Rubio, David P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, Norbert Schuch, and J Ignacio Cirac. Normal projected entangled pair states generating the same state.New Journal of Physics, 20(11):113017, November 2018

    2018

  58. [66]

    Spacetime symmetry-enriched symtft: from lsm anoma- lies to modulated symmetries and beyond.SciPost Physics, 20(1):007, 2026

    Salvatore D Pace, ¨Omer M Aksoy, and Ho Tat Lam. Spacetime symmetry-enriched symtft: from lsm anoma- lies to modulated symmetries and beyond.SciPost Physics, 20(1):007, 2026

    2026

  59. [67]

    Matrix product states: Entanglement, symmetries, and state transformations.Physical Review Letters, 123(17):170504, 2019

    David Sauerwein, Andras Molnar, J Ignacio Cirac, and Barbara Kraus. Matrix product states: Entanglement, symmetries, and state transformations.Physical Review Letters, 123(17):170504, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Matrix Product States for Modulated Symmetries: SPT, LSM, and Beyond

    David Perez-Garc´ ıa, Frank Verstraete, Michael M Wolf, and J Ignacio Cirac. Matrix product state represen- tations.Quantum Information and Computation, 7(5- 6):401–430, 2007. Supplemental Material for “Matrix Product States for Modulated Symmetries: SPT, LSM, and Beyond” A. R...

    2007

  61. [69]

    The product ofU-transfer matrices satisfies ∥EU1 · · ·E UL ∥=∥E tot∥= 1 (B16) where the operator norm is induced by the inner product in Eq. (B4). Claim.The above two conditions Eqs.(B15)and(B16)are equivalent asL→ ∞, and as a result each on-site unitary pushes through the MPS...

  62. [70]

    dipole-exponential

    or real-space defect network constructions [49]. 15 C2. Classification of Weak SPTs In Eqs. (B1) and (C8), there are two phasesφ(g) andϕ j(g) =ϕ(T j(g)). First we note that by redefiningv j(g), we can absorbφ(g) intoϕ j(g) in a way that preservesϕ j(g) =ϕ j−1(T(g)). For ordina...

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.