Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Quantum DPLL and Generalized Constraints in Iterative Quantum Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.02689 v1 pith:7BYVW54V submitted 2025-09-02 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords algorithmsquantumclassicalframeworkhybridproblemscomputerconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Too often, quantum computer scientists seek to create new algorithms entirely fresh from new cloth when there are extensive and optimized classical algorithms that can be generalized wholesale. At the same time, one may seek to maintain classical advantages of performance and runtime bounds, while enabling potential quantum improvement. Hybrid quantum algorithms tap into this potential, and here we explore a class of hybrid quantum algorithms called Iterative Quantum Algorithms (IQA) that are closely related to classical greedy or local search algorithms, employing a structure where the quantum computer provides information that leads to a simplified problem for future iterations. Specifically, we extend these algorithms beyond past results that considered primarily quadratic problems to arbitrary k-local Hamiltonians, proposing a general framework that incorporates logical inference in a fundamental way. As an application we develop a hybrid quantum version of the well-known classical Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) algorithm for satisfiability problems, which embeds IQAs within a complete backtracking based tree search framework. Our results also provide a general framework for handling problems with hard constraints in IQAs. We further show limiting cases of the algorithms where they reduce to classical algorithms, and provide evidence for regimes of quantum improvement.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. QAOA Parameter Transfer for Hypergraphs

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Analytical reweighting rules for QAOA parameters on hypergraphs improve performance by adjusting mixing terms beyond previous graph-based methods.

  2. Quantum Approximate Optimization via Noise-Directed Adaptive Warm-Starting

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bitflip-gauge warm-start QAOA that aligns the ansatz with amplitude-damping noise improves 100-qubit Ising approximation ratios over non-gauge iterative warm-start at no extra circuit cost.

  3. Compositional Quantum Heuristics for Max-Clique Detection

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Compositional quantum circuits with symmetry-induced invariant losses produce trainable equivariant quantum GNNs that generalize on max-clique problems and improve hybrid recursive search accuracy and scalability.

Pith tools