Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

Cutting with precision -- Leveraging Collapse Volumes to generate the next generation of zoom-in initial conditions

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A method that selects zoom-in regions from forward gravity-only runs produces boundaries stable against deformation and mixing, yielding uncontaminated volumes exceeding six virial radii.

desk verdict This paper introduces a boundary construction method for zoom-in ICs that their 20 test runs suggest keeps contamination low out to large radii. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.26230 v1 pith:7G23GEA5 submitted 2026-06-24 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Benjamin Seidel , Klaus Dolag , Jenny G. Sorce This is my paper
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords zoom-insimulationsinitialconditionsgalaxyclusterscosmologicalparticlecontaminationlocaluniverseconstrained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a technique for building layered zoom-in initial conditions by identifying collapse volumes through a preliminary low-resolution gravity-only evolution of the full parent box. This selection step is intended to place the high-resolution patch inside regions that will not experience boundary deformation or particle mixing during the full hydrodynamical run. Tests on twenty such regions drawn from a constrained local-universe simulation show that the chosen volumes remain free of high-mass particle contamination out to distances larger than six virial radii. The resulting initial conditions therefore support high-resolution modeling of cluster baryonic physics while preserving the large-scale environment. The approach is presented as a practical route to generating many directly comparable cluster analogues without the usual buffer-zone overhead.

What carries the argument

Collapse volumes identified by forward gravity-only evolution of the parent box; these volumes serve as the basis for placing stable, layered zoom-in boundaries that resist particle mixing.

What would settle it

A test simulation in which high-mass particles from outside the selected region cross the boundary and enter the high-resolution volume within a few virial radii would falsify the stability claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Selecting zoom-in regions via a forward run of a gravity-only version of the parent box produces initial conditions whose boundaries remain stable against deformation and mixing. The resulting high-resolution volumes stay free of high-mass particle contamination from outside the zoom region, reaching pristine extents larger than six virial radii around the target clusters.

Load-bearing premise

A forward gravity-only run of the parent box can reliably locate volumes that will remain free of high-mass particle contamination once the full hydrodynamical zoom-in simulation is performed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method supplies initial conditions for a set of directly comparable high-resolution local cluster simulations.
  • Baryonic processes inside clusters and their immediate environments can be followed without contamination from external high-mass particles.
  • The same construction can be applied to additional constrained local-universe volumes to enlarge the sample of pristine cluster analogues.
  • Comparisons between simulated and observed cluster properties, intracluster medium physics, and galaxy evolution become feasible at higher fidelity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same forward-run selection step could be tested on non-cluster objects such as galaxy groups or field galaxies to check whether the stability benefit generalizes.
  • If the pristine radius reliably exceeds six virial radii, the required buffer volume around each target can be reduced, lowering the particle count needed for a given science goal.
  • The technique may allow tighter coupling between constrained large-scale initial conditions and zoom-in hydrodynamics without intermediate re-simulation steps.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a method for generating stable layered zoom-in initial conditions by identifying collapse volumes via forward gravity-only evolution of the parent box. This is applied to the SLOW constrained simulation to produce ICs for 30 local clusters. Test simulations on 20 regions are reported to confirm boundary stability against deformation and mixing, yielding uncontaminated pristine volumes exceeding 6 virial radii and enabling high-fidelity local Universe cluster simulations.

Significance. If the central claims hold with quantitative support, the work would advance zoom-in techniques by providing a reproducible way to achieve unusually clean boundaries, facilitating direct observational comparisons for local clusters and their environments. The use of constrained simulations and explicit testing of the selection assumption via forward runs is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims that the test simulations 'demonstrate these initial conditions to be stable against deformation and mixing' and produce 'uncontaminated' regions 'exceeding 6 virial radii' to an 'unprecedented degree' are presented without any quantitative metrics (e.g., contamination fractions, particle mixing statistics, boundary displacement measures, or comparison baselines). This directly undermines evaluation of the central claim.
  2. [Methods/Results] Methods/Results: the assumption that gravity-only forward runs accurately predict contamination-free volumes in the full (presumably hydro) zoom-in simulations is load-bearing, yet no details are given on how contamination was quantified in the 20 test runs, what resolution or physics were used, or any error analysis supporting the >6 r_vir claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer with a short statement of the parent box properties and a reference to standard zoom-in contamination issues in the literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback. Below we address each major comment directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims that the test simulations 'demonstrate these initial conditions to be stable against deformation and mixing' and produce 'uncontaminated' regions 'exceeding 6 virial radii' to an 'unprecedented degree' are presented without any quantitative metrics (e.g., contamination fractions, particle mixing statistics, boundary displacement measures, or comparison baselines). This directly undermines evaluation of the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative support for these claims. The body of the manuscript presents results from the 20 test simulations, including measurements of pristine volumes. We will revise the abstract to include key quantitative metrics drawn from those results, such as the fraction of regions achieving pristine volumes beyond 6 r_vir and any reported boundary stability statistics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods/Results] Methods/Results: the assumption that gravity-only forward runs accurately predict contamination-free volumes in the full (presumably hydro) zoom-in simulations is load-bearing, yet no details are given on how contamination was quantified in the 20 test runs, what resolution or physics were used, or any error analysis supporting the >6 r_vir claim.

    Authors: The 20 test simulations are gravity-only runs performed at the resolution of the parent box, with contamination quantified by tracking high-mass particle IDs relative to the zoom-in boundaries. We will add a new subsection to the Methods detailing the exact quantification procedure, resolution, physics (gravity-only), and any error or robustness analysis supporting the >6 r_vir claim. We will also clarify that boundary stability is governed by gravitational dynamics, so the gravity-only forward runs provide a direct test of the selection method; full hydrodynamical effects on mixing will be addressed in future work once the ICs are used. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces a practical method for generating zoom-in initial conditions by selecting regions via a gravity-only forward run of the parent simulation and then validates boundary stability through independent test simulations on 20 regions. No mathematical derivation chain exists that reduces a claimed result to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no parameters are fitted and then relabeled as predictions, and no ansatzes are smuggled via prior work. The central claim (uncontaminated volumes exceeding 6 r_vir) rests on direct numerical tests rather than definitional equivalence or self-referential justification.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no details on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; assessment limited to surface description.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cutting with precision -- Leveraging Collapse Volumes to generate the next generation of zoom-in initial conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7G23GEA5

@misc{pith2026260626230,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cutting with precision -- Leveraging Collapse Volumes to generate the next generation of zoom-in initial conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7G23GEA5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.26230}
}
read the original abstract

Astrophysical processes happen across a wide range of scales. This poses a significant challenge from the perspective of modeling these processes. Modern cosmological simulations attempt to maximize the simulation volume to capture the full range of the density power spectrum while simultaneously optimizing spatial resolution for improved modeling of dynamics at galactic scales. Performing zoom-in simulations of galaxy clusters is a way to reconcile computational cost, mass resolution, and large-scale realism in simulations. To study the baryonic evolution of structures it is critical to ensure that the volume of interest is uncontaminated by high-mass particles from outside the zoom-in region. We introduce a new method of constructing stable boundaries for layered zoom-in initial conditions. Applying this method to clusters from the SLOW constrained simulation, we introduce the SLOW cluster zoom-in initial conditions. We select regions using a forward run of a gravity-only version of the parent box. We performed test simulations for a set of 20 regions created from the SLOW constrained simulations containing 30 local clusters. The simulations demonstrate these initial conditions to be stable against deformation and mixing of the boundary region. Consequently, they are uncontaminated to an unprecedented degree, reaching pristine regions of sizes exceeding 6 virial radii. These simulations will provide the basis for the first high-resolution simulations of a large set of directly comparable local galaxy cluster analogues and their environment to date. Their high fidelity in terms of stability and resolution in combination with the accuracy of the underlying local Universe model makes these simulations the first of their kind. They will enable comparisons with state-of-the art observations targeting both cluster properties and ICM physics as well as galaxy evolution in the local Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26230 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Thin slice of one cMpc/h through galaxy clusters from different simulation sets, showing a 70 cMpc/h region. For different sets of cluster ICs we show the high resolution particles (black) and the different layers of boundary particles (red and blue). The top row shows the initial state, the bottom row shows the evolved systems at z = 0. From left to right: on cluster from Eke1998 (Eke et al. 1998), Hutt (Dolag et a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the boundary creation process. Note that the collapsed FOF groups are not necessarily spherical, but are drawn as such for simplicity. The complete process to compute the Lagrangian volume is then as follows: 1. Extract FOF group from the snapshot at a = 1000 2. Create a Healpix tessellated distance map of these particles, where each angular pixel is mapped to the largest FOF parti￾cle di… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Layered ICs from the SLOW Perseus counterpart with five res￾olution levels. Each color represents a different mass resolution, resolu￾tion decreases with increasing radius. 4.1. Cleanliness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the boundary layer for the SLOW cluster (black), Dianoga cluster (blue) and TNG Cluster (red), always expressed in units of the virial radius of the cluster. The lower line indicates the minimum distance of a boundary particle to the cluster center. For th…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Minimal boundary distances for the individual regions from the SLOW cluster set (red vertical lines) at z = 0. The dark blue violins ad￾ditionally show the histogram of mixing layer thickness D + rmin across an NSIDE=16 healpix map centered on the main cluster. Values …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rates of tidal disruption events from constrained cosmological simulations of the local Universe: population properties and implications for transient surveys

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In simulated local clusters, tidal disruption events are dominated by cuspy satellite galaxies in extended halos, with a volumetric rate of ~600 Gpc^-3 yr^-1 inherited from empirical TDE scaling relations.

  2. The Quiescent Sloshing Core of Abell 496 with XRISM

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    XRISM Resolve measures the lowest turbulent velocity yet in a cluster core, indicating Abell 496 is dynamically quiescent despite prior cold fronts and weak radio activity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    O., Benson, A., & Gluscevic, V

    An, R., Nadler, E. O., Benson, A., & Gluscevic, V . 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 986, 128

    2025

  2. [2]

    2024, A&A, 690, A20

    Ayromlou, M., Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A20

    2024

  3. [3]

    Bagla, J. S. & Ray, S. 2005, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 358, 1076 Bahé, Y . M., Barnes, D. J., Dalla Vecchia, C., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 470, 4186 Bahé, Y . M., Schaye, J., Barnes, D. J., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 485, 2287

    2005

  4. [4]

    2014, in 15 Years of Science with Chandra, P8

    Baldi, A. 2014, in 15 Years of Science with Chandra, P8

    2014

  5. [5]

    & Steinmetz, M

    Bartelmann, M. & Steinmetz, M. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 431

    1996

  6. [6]

    1995, A&A, 297, 1

    Bartelmann, M., Steinmetz, M., & Weiss, A. 1995, A&A, 297, 1

    1995

  7. [7]

    M., Murante, G., Arth, A., et al

    Beck, A. M., Murante, G., Arth, A., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 455, 2110

    2016

  8. [8]

    2017, MNRAS, 468, 531

    Biffi, V ., Planelles, S., Borgani, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 531

    2017

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 418, 2234

    Bonafede, A., Dolag, K., Stasyszyn, F., Murante, G., & Borgani, S. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 418, 2234

    2011

  2. [10]

    2006, MNRAS, 367, 1641

    Borgani, S., Dolag, K., Murante, G., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1641

    2006

  3. [11]

    2004, MNRAS, 348, 1078

    Borgani, S., Murante, G., Springel, V ., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 1078

    2004

  4. [12]

    2020 [arXiv:2001.11067]

    Brough, S., Collins, C., Demarco, R., et al. 2020 [arXiv:2001.11067]

    2020

  5. [13]

    J., Aragón-Salamanca, A., Kuchner, U., et al

    Cornwell, D. J., Aragón-Salamanca, A., Kuchner, U., et al. 2023, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 2148

    2023

  6. [14]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 977

    Cui, W., Dave, R., Knebe, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 977

    2022

  7. [15]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 480, 2898 De Luca, F., De Petris, M., Yepes, G., et al

    Cui, W., Knebe, A., Yepes, G., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 480, 2898 De Luca, F., De Petris, M., Yepes, G., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 5383

    2018

  8. [16]

    H., et al

    Dietl, J., Pacaud, F., Reiprich, T. H., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A286

    2024

  9. [17]

    1999, A&A, 348, 351

    Dolag, K., Bartelmann, M., & Lesch, H. 1999, A&A, 348, 351

    1999

  10. [18]

    2004, A&A, 416, 853

    Dolag, K., Bartelmann, M., Perrotta, F., et al. 2004, A&A, 416, 853

    2004

  11. [19]

    2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 399, 497

    Dolag, K., Borgani, S., Murante, G., & Springel, V . 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 399, 497

    2009

  12. [20]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 405, 1544

    Dolag, K., Murante, G., & Borgani, S. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 405, 1544

    2010

  13. [21]

    & Schindler, S

    Dolag, K. & Schindler, S. 2000, A&A, 364, 491

    2000

  14. [22]

    G., Pilipenko, S., et al

    Dolag, K., Sorce, J. G., Pilipenko, S., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 677, A169

    2023

  15. [23]

    R., Navarro, J

    Eke, V . R., Navarro, J. F., & Frenk, C. S. 1998, ApJ, 503, 569 Euclid Collaboration, Zalesky, L., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2026, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 708, A104

    1998

  16. [24]

    2011, MNRAS, 416, 801

    Fabjan, D., Borgani, S., Rasia, E., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 801

    2011

  17. [25]

    S., Evrard, A

    Frenk, C. S., Evrard, A. E., White, S. D. M., & Summers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 472, 460

    1996

  18. [26]

    Gallagher, C., Yasin, T., Stiskalek, R., Desmond, H., & Jarvis, M. J. 2026, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 546, stag108 Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 622, 759

    2026

  19. [27]

    P., Valentini, M., & Dolag, K

    Groth, F., Steinwandel, U. P., Valentini, M., & Dolag, K. 2023, Mon Not R As- tron Soc, 526, 616

    2023

  20. [28]

    A., et al

    Groth, F., Valentini, M., Seidel, B. A., et al. 2025, Turbulence in Simu- lated Local Cluster Analogs: One-to-One Comparisons between SLOW and XRISM/Hitomi

    2025

  21. [29]

    2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 703, A112 Hernández-Martínez, E., Dolag, K., Seidel, B., et al

    Harvey, D., Revaz, Y ., Schaller, M., et al. 2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 703, A112 Hernández-Martínez, E., Dolag, K., Seidel, B., et al. 2024, Simulating the LOcal Web (SLOW) – II: Properties of Local Galaxy Clusters

    2025

  22. [30]

    & Ribak, E

    Hoffman, Y . & Ribak, E. 1991, The Astrophysical Journal, 380, L5

    1991

  23. [31]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 403, 1859 Article number, page 8 of 11 Seidel et al.: Cutting with precision

    Jenkins, A. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 403, 1859 Article number, page 8 of 11 Seidel et al.: Cutting with precision

    2010

  24. [32]

    A., Montes, M., et al

    Kluge, M., Hatch, N. A., Montes, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A13

    2025

  25. [33]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 2065

    Kuchner, U., Aragón-Salamanca, A., Rost, A., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 2065

    2021

  26. [34]

    G., & Aghanim, N

    Lebeau, T., Sorce, J. G., & Aghanim, N. 2024, EPJ Web of Conferences, 293, 00028

    2024

  27. [35]

    2024, A&A, 687, A129

    Lehle, K., Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Truong, N., & Rohr, E. 2024, A&A, 687, A129

    2024

  28. [36]

    I., Carlesi, E., Grand, R

    Libeskind, N. I., Carlesi, E., Grand, R. J. J., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 498, 2968

    2020

  29. [37]

    G., Dolag, K., & Aghanim, N

    Malavasi, N., Sorce, J. G., Dolag, K., & Aghanim, N. 2023, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 675, A76

    2023

  30. [38]

    Negri, A., Dalla Vecchia, C., Aguerri, J. A. L., & Bahé, Y . 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 2121

    2022

  31. [39]

    2024, Introducing the TNG- Cluster Simulation: Overview and Physical Properties of the Gaseous Intr- acluster Medium Oñorbe, J., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Maller, A

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Ayromlou, M., et al. 2024, Introducing the TNG- Cluster Simulation: Overview and Physical Properties of the Gaseous Intr- acluster Medium Oñorbe, J., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Maller, A. H., et al. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ...

    2024

  32. [40]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.10353

    Pilipenko, S., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., & Knollmann, S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.10353

    2025

  33. [41]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 4077 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P

    Pillepich, A., Springel, V ., Nelson, D., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 4077 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. a. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594, A13

    2018

  34. [42]

    2014, MNRAS, 438, 195

    Planelles, S., Borgani, S., Fabjan, D., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 195

    2014

  35. [43]

    2016, in Parallel Computing: On the Road to Exascale (IOS Press), 411–420

    Ragagnin, A., Tchipev, N., Bader, M., Dolag, K., & Hammer, N. 2016, in Parallel Computing: On the Road to Exascale (IOS Press), 411–420

    2016

  36. [44]

    J., et al

    Rines, K., Mahdavi, A., Geller, M. J., et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 558

    2001

  37. [45]

    2024, A&A, 686, A86

    Rohr, E., Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Ayromlou, M., & Zinger, E. 2024, A&A, 686, A86

    2024

  38. [46]

    A., Bower, R

    Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 446, 521

    2015

  39. [47]

    A., Dolag, K., Remus, R.-S., et al

    Seidel, B. A., Dolag, K., Remus, R.-S., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A243

    2025

  40. [48]

    2013, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 429, 323

    Sembolini, F., Yepes, G., De Petris, M., et al. 2013, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 429, 323

    2013

  41. [49]

    Sorce, J. G. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 450, 2644

    2015

  42. [50]

    Sorce, J. G. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 5199

    2018

  43. [51]

    G., Dubois, Y ., Blaizot, J., et al

    Sorce, J. G., Dubois, Y ., Blaizot, J., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 2998

    2021

  44. [52]

    G., Hoffman, Y ., & Gottlöber, S

    Sorce, J. G., Hoffman, Y ., & Gottlöber, S. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 1812

    2017

  45. [53]

    G., McGee, S

    Sorce, J. G., McGee, S. L., Dubois, Y ., et al. 2026 [arXiv:2603.23606]

    2026 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Sorce, J. G. & Tempel, E. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476, 4362

    2018

  47. [55]

    2005, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 364, 1105

    Springel, V . 2005, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 364, 1105

    2005

  48. [56]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 401, 791

    Springel, V . 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 401, 791

    2010

  49. [57]

    Springel, V ., White, S. D. M., Tormen, G., & Kauffmann, G. 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 328, 726

    2001

  50. [58]

    & White, S

    Steinmetz, M. & White, S. D. M. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 545

    1997

  51. [59]

    P., Dolag, K., Böss, L

    Steinwandel, U. P., Dolag, K., Böss, L. M., & Marin-Gilabert, T. 2024, ApJ, 967, 125

    2024

  52. [60]

    2025, A&A, 701, A114

    Tevlin, L., Berlok, T., Pfrommer, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A114

    2025

  53. [61]

    R., & White, S

    Tormen, G., Bouchet, F. R., & White, S. D. M. 1997, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 286, 865

    1997

  54. [62]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 470, 1121

    Tremmel, M., Karcher, M., Governato, F., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 470, 1121

    2017

  55. [63]

    R., Ricarte, A., et al

    Tremmel, M., Quinn, T. R., Ricarte, A., et al. 2019, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 483, 3336

    2019

  56. [64]

    C., Brooks, A

    Tremmel, M., Wright, A. C., Brooks, A. M., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 497, 2786

    2020

  57. [65]

    2024, A&A, 686, A200

    Truong, N., Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A200

    2024

  58. [66]

    B., Courtois, H

    Tully, R. B., Courtois, H. M., Dolphin, A. E., et al. 2013, The Astronomical Journal, 146, 86

    2013

  59. [67]

    E., et al

    Vurm, I., Nevalainen, J., Hong, S. E., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A62

    2023

  60. [68]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 868, 130

    Wang, Y ., Pearce, F., Knebe, A., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 868, 130

    2018

  61. [69]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 465, 3291

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V ., Hernquist, L., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 465, 3291

    2017

  62. [70]

    E., Hahn, O., et al

    Wu, H.-Y ., Evrard, A. E., Hahn, O., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 1982 XRISM Science Team. 2022, XRISM Quick Reference

    2015

  63. [71]

    K., & Diaferio, A

    Yoshida, N., Sheth, R. K., & Diaferio, A. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 669

    2001

  64. [72]

    1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 520, 413

    Zaroubi, S., Hoffman, Y ., & Dekel, A. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 520, 413

    1999

  65. [73]

    B., & Lahav, O

    Zaroubi, S., Hoffman, Y ., Fisher, K. B., & Lahav, O. 1995, The Astrophysical Journal, 449, 446 Zöller, R., Kluge, M., Bender, R., et al. 2025 [arXiv:2510.26889] Article number, page 9 of 11 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda_arxiv Appendix A: The SLOW cluster zoom-IC suite As me...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.