Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique

As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 22 of 22 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2411.08813.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2411.08813 v1

Coverage vector

measured 22 of 22 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.680086Z

measured 24 of 24 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-16T11:08:52.579973Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-16T11:08:54.189638Z

Reference resolution

22 of 22 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy19
unresolved3
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation dc0008f8-dfc7-45ed-827f-313574a9c126 · outbound

This paper cites Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Models.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Models

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.424186Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e17d0dc0-e8d4-46e3-8385-da6f85a08d9d · outbound

This paper cites CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.471691Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9e79be6e-43be-41a1-a73e-32c480cb72f8 · outbound

This paper cites Common Weakness Enumeration.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Common Weakness Enumeration

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.733229Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation b65cbe64-8059-4091-841f-d6abdafbfcbc · outbound

This paper cites Common Weakness Enumeration.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Common Weakness Enumeration

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.717042Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 55b76bea-45fc-40fc-b74f-055aa0a4f28a · outbound

This paper cites Semgrep: Lightweight static analysis for many languages.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Semgrep: Lightweight static analysis for many languages

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.701977Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 7233fb6d-c203-4310-beb1-4f0023c08e30 · outbound

This paper cites Cyberseceval 3: Advancing the evaluation of cybersecurity risks and capabilities in large language models,.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Cyberseceval 3: Advancing the evaluation of cybersecurity risks and capabilities in large language models,

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.649360Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation c56cd304-26ef-4b64-b7e7-229c15a6fa3b · outbound

This paper cites Our goal was to demonstrate statistical variability between our work and Meta’s previous work, we demonstrate this by highlighting percentage point residuals in Section 2.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Our goal was to demonstrate statistical variability between our work and Meta’s previous work, we demonstrate this by highlighting percentage point residuals in Section 2

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.405324Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 13311f67-440b-4466-941f-f69621516aa6 · outbound

This paper cites This is reflected in our experiments and results.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique This is reflected in our experiments and results

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.532247Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 34352644-6cb7-427a-b988-8f1c1d5e729e · outbound

This paper cites Limitations.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Limitations

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.517128Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation efffe38e-06bd-4e1e-953f-ea0581de270a · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not include theoretical results.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not include theoretical results

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.502045Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation fe63cb25-5d50-4d1e-880f-e079edf0d9ab · outbound

This paper cites Code and data is present in our linked repository.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Code and data is present in our linked repository

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.486508Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation b8ac6a2f-bdb0-472d-816e-3ae1135398da · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that paper does not include experiments requiring code.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that paper does not include experiments requiring code

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.470950Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation a152e23e-d69a-41e6-8e47-768e07e15d6c · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not include experiments.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not include experiments

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.456399Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation e02a0739-a668-4693-90db-59c44f080336 · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not involve crowdsourcing nor research with human subjects.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not involve crowdsourcing nor research with human subjects

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.926506Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 7dcc8101-474b-4cbb-85ce-b15e954feade · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not include experiments.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not include experiments

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.206401Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation d6079ee3-1e2a-477d-9799-39935b3bf0c3 · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the authors have not reviewed the NeurIPS Code of Ethics.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the authors have not reviewed the NeurIPS Code of Ethics

Reference 16

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.182711Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 7562f6e1-7dae-45c4-b6b6-6258205171fd · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that there is no societal impact of the work performed.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that there is no societal impact of the work performed

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.166596Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 5911e6ff-5788-4f03-9150-d3607f18e3d8 · outbound

This paper cites Justification: Our research rests on a critique of a previously formulated benchmark, rather than the release of a model or data that can pose risks.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Justification: Our research rests on a critique of a previously formulated benchmark, rather than the release of a model or data that can pose risks

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:34.055207Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 14ba8f22-f47f-4f6d-8903-ba40c4382788 · outbound

This paper cites Any past research that has informed our own work is explicitly referenced.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Any past research that has informed our own work is explicitly referenced

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.961039Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 063c1870-8160-4271-b491-bbf733e2ce6b · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not release new assets.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not release new assets

Reference 20

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.943599Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation dda8eebc-4db9-46ce-9527-b203d7261e30 · outbound

This paper cites Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not involve crowdsourcing nor research with human subjects.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique Guidelines: • The answer NA means that the paper does not involve crowdsourcing nor research with human subjects

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.873318Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 6c8c340b-eab1-4714-b014-f49eaefd3efe · outbound

This paper cites CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Models.

Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Models

Reference 2024

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T21:23:33.576348Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

Observation 3c598cbb-952b-4a90-8b7c-c2fb276ad48b · inbound

Give LLMs a Security Course: Securing Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation via Knowledge Injection cites this paper.

Give LLMs a Security Course: Securing Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation via Knowledge Injection Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique

Reference 2024

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-16T11:08:54.264098Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation d5e2da5e-bbbe-4567-a33b-8b8711e59f40 · inbound

Secure Code Generation at Scale with Reflexion cites this paper.

Secure Code Generation at Scale with Reflexion Rethinking CyberSecEval: An LLM-Aided Approach to Evaluation Critique

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T23:50:49.232342Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.