REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 110 references
In-depth characterization of the Kepler-10 three-planet system with HARPS-N radial velocities and Kepler transit timing variations
T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper reports that nearly 300 HARPS-N radial velocities and Kepler transit timing variations settle Kepler-10c's disputed mass at 11.29 Earth masses and reveal a non-transiting 151-day companion, Kepler-10d, near the 3:1 mean motion…
desk verdict This reanalysis settles the Kepler-10c mass at ~11 Earth masses with solid cross-checks, but the 151-day outer companion is a real possibility rather than a secure detection. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing mechanism is a reprocessed radial-velocity dataset: YARARA-v2 corrects the HARPS-N spectra for telluric lines, instrumental drifts, and low-level stellar activity before any Keplerian fitting, which the paper shows boosts the periodogram peaks of planets b and c. On top of that dataset, the argument runs through converging modeling tools, including a differential-evolution MCMC sampler, nested samplers, and a multidimensional Gaussian-process model that fits activity indicators jointly with the RVs. The identification of Kepler-10d is carried by the transit-timing super-period relation, which links the 466-day TTV period to a 150.5-day outer companion at the 3:1 resonance, and by a dynamical N-body fit of the RVs and TTVs that requires nonzero eccentricities for both planets c and d because second-order mean-motion-resonance TTVs vanish at zero eccentricity.
What would settle it
Re-fit the 291 HARPS-N radial velocities with the same planet model but with an exponential-kernel red-noise term included in the likelihood and with model selection performed on the noise-model average; if the 151-day signal's posterior inclusion probability falls below about 0.5, as it does in the paper's red-noise FIP periodograms, then Kepler-10d is not a secure detection. Alternatively, a longer radial-velocity baseline showing the 151-day amplitude and phase breaking coherence would rule out the Keplerian interpretation.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central discovery is a converged three-planet solution in which the long-disputed Keplerian signal of Kepler-10c has a semiamplitude of 2.17 ± 0.23 m/s rather than the roughly 3.3 m/s of the earliest analysis or the roughly 1.1–1.4 m/s of the HIRES-based analyses. The paper argues that the YARARA-v2 spectrum-level correction removes low-level systematics in the HARPS-N data and that three independent modeling techniques with white-noise likelihoods agree, yielding a mass for Kepler-10c of 11.29 ± 1.24 Earth masses and a density of 4.75 ± 0.53 g/cm³. The 466-day transit-timing super-period of Kepler-10c is shown to match a companion at 151 days near the 3:1 mean motion resonance, and a simultaneous dynamical fit of the RVs and TTVs gives a minimum mass of 12.00 ± 2.15 Earth masses and an eccentricity of 0.19 for Kepler-10d. On these values, Kepler-10b is a rocky super-Earth and Kepler-10c is consistent with a water-rich interior rather than a bare rocky one.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the 151-day signal in the YARARA-v2 HARPS-N radial velocities is a coherent Keplerian orbit rather than correlated stellar or instrumental noise; under an exponential-kernel red-noise model the false inclusion probability periodogram no longer shows the signal, and the paper's choice of white noise over that red model rests on heuristic grounds.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Kepler-10c's mass and density become consistent across modeling techniques, so interior models can treat it as a water-world candidate with a substantial water mass fraction rather than as a bare rocky planet.
- Kepler-10d, at 151 days and with a minimum mass of 12 Earth masses near the 3:1 resonance, makes the system a three-planet architecture that formation models must reproduce.
- No fourth planet near 83 days is supported: the four-planet models are disfavored by model comparison and incompatible with the transit timing variations.
- The completeness map rules out cold Jupiters within 10 AU around Kepler-10, supporting inward-migration scenarios without a giant-planet dynamical barrier.
Reading between the lines
- An independent check of this result would be to apply the same spectrum-level correction to other quiet stars with disputed long-period RV signals; some of those disputes may also resolve toward intermediate masses rather than either extreme.
- If Kepler-10c is indeed a water world, its formation beyond the snow line and subsequent inward migration could be tested by measuring its atmospheric composition with transmission spectroscopy, a test the paper does not perform.
- The fragility of the 151-day signal under a red-noise model suggests that the reported population of planets at periods near 150 days around quiet stars may be slightly overestimated unless noise-model-marginalized detection statistics are reported.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This manuscript presents an in-depth analysis of the Kepler-10 system using 291 HARPS-N radial velocities (55 reduced with DRS 3.7 and 236 with the new DRS plus YARARA-v2), 47 HIRES C2-decker radial velocities, and Kepler transit timing variations of planet c. The authors model the RVs with two- and three-planet Keplerian models using DE-MCMC, MultiNest, and PolyChord (with and without a multidimensional Gaussian process), and they additionally perform a simultaneous TTV+RV dynamical fit with TRADES. They report masses of Mp,b=3.24±0.32 M⊕ and Mp,c=11.29±1.24 M⊕, corresponding densities of 5.54 and 4.75 g cm−3, and a non-transiting planet Kepler-10d with minimum mass 12.00±2.15 M⊕ and period 151.06±0.48 d. The paper also discusses the inferred compositions, concluding that Kepler-10b is likely rocky and Kepler-10c may be a water world.
Significance. If the results are correct, the paper resolves a long-standing discrepancy in the mass of Kepler-10c, provides one of the best-characterized long-period sub-Neptunes, and identifies a plausible 3:1 resonant companion. The convergence of three independent sampling methods on consistent K values for planets b and c, the use of a simultaneous dynamical TTV+RV fit, and the explicit statement of priors in Table C.1 are notable strengths. However, the most novel claim—the detection of Kepler-10d—rests entirely on the reality of the 151 d RV signal, whose statistical significance is strongly dependent on the choice of noise model, as the authors themselves demonstrate in Appendix B.1.
major comments (2)
- [Appendix B.1] The detection of the 151.06 d signal is the load-bearing step for the existence and mass of Kepler-10d. Under the exponential-kernel red-noise model, the false inclusion probability of the 150.7 d signal is essentially unity (Fig. B.1), and the red-noise three-planet model has lower evidence than the red-noise two-planet model (Table B.2: ln Z = −735.53 vs −734.77). The model-averaged FIP of 0.16 is obtained by assigning equal prior probabilities to the white- and red-noise models (Eqs. B.5–B.9), so the detection probability is entirely inherited from the white-noise model. The paper's rebuttal in Appendix B.1—that red noise is expected to damp long-period signals and that the white-noise model shows a well-defined period—is heuristic and does not demonstrate that the exponential-kernel model is inappropriate for these data. A quantitative test is needed, for example a model comparison between a red-noise-only model and a red-noise plus 151 d Keplerian, or an injection-recovery experiment showing that the red-noise model does not absorb an injected 151 d signal. Without such a test, the Kepler-10d mass and period are not robustly established.
- [Section 3.2] The claimed TTV confirmation is not fully independent of the RV detection. The observed TTV periodicity at 466 d admits many candidate orbital periods in Table 3 (e.g., 100.33 d for the 2:1 resonance, 150.50 d for the 3:1 resonance, and others). The 3:1 solution is selected because it matches the RV period of 151 d, and the statement in Section 3.2 that the probability of chance agreement is 'quite low' is not backed by a quantitative false-alarm calculation that accounts for the number of candidate periods and resonances tested. To make the corroboration convincing, the authors should either pre-specify the resonance search before the RV period is known or compute a trial factor that penalizes the multiplicity of candidates in Table 3.
minor comments (4)
- [Section 2.2.2] The exclusion of the 17 B5-decker HIRES RVs is justified with a qualitative comparison against random two-month windows of HARPS-N data; providing the actual fitted K_b values for those windows, or a more formal outlier test, would improve reproducibility.
- [Section 3.4.2] MultiNest weakly favors the four-planet model (ΔlnZ = 1.1), while PolyChord finds insufficient evidence (ΔlnZ ≲ 1); the main text should state this discrepancy explicitly near the MultiNest results rather than only in the PolyChord section.
- [Figure B.2] The y-axis label of the apodized periodogram appears as '2 difference' and should read 'χ² difference'.
- [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, including 'di fferent' for 'different' and 'T ransit' in the Section 3.1 header; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.
Circularity Check
The claimed TTV confirmation of Kepler-10d is not independent: the 3:1 resonance candidate is selected because it matches the RV 151 d period, and the harmonic fold uses the RV-derived mean longitude; the b/c mass derivation itself is self-contained.
-
self definitional
[Section 3.2, 'Analysis of the transit timing variation signal', paragraph beginning 'Interestingly...']
"Interestingly, the signal at 151.06± 0.48 d found in the HARPS-N RVs (see Sects. 3.3, 3.4, and Table C.2) is 1σ consistent with the orbital period of 150.50+0.59−0.57 d required to generate the observed TTV period if the companion is relatively close to the 3:1 MMR with Kepler-10 c on an outer orbit. Given the relatively low uncertainty on both these periods, the probability that this is due to chance is quite low. The TTV signal therefore agrees with an orbital period of∼ 151 d for Kepler-10 d."
The 466 d TTV super-period is compatible with many resonances: Table 3 lists interior and exterior candidate periods for 2:1 (82.57/100.33 d), 3:2 (64.79/71.41 d), 4:3 (58.50/62.41 d), 3:1 (123.85/150.50 d), and other MMRs. The paper selects the exterior 3:1 row specifically because its 150.50 d period matches the RV-derived 151.06 d signal, and then presents this match as independent TTV agreement. By construction, the selected row reproduces the RV input, so the statement 'The TTV signal therefore agrees' adds no independent information about the period: a different RV period near any other Table 3 row could be 'confirmed' by the same selection procedure.
-
self definitional
[Section 3.2, final paragraph, and Fig. 4]
"We therefore verified if the TTV signal contains additional information on the interactions between planets c and d. Generalizing the results of Deck & Agol (2015), we know that the TTV signal expands as a function of the harmonics of the mean longitude of the perturbing planet (λd). We show the TTVs folded with respect to these harmonics in Fig. 4. ... As can be seen in Fig. 4, only the third harmonic shows a significant TTV amplitude."
The fold is made at harmonics of λd, the mean longitude of Kepler-10d, whose period, phase, and eccentricity are taken from the RV solution (Sect. 3.4, Table C.2), not from TTVs alone. The third harmonic (3λd) is exactly the harmonic that would be singled out if the RV ephemeris is correct and the pair is near the 3:1 resonance. Finding power at 3λd in data folded on the RV-derived ephemeris is therefore an echo of the RV input, not an independent TTV detection of the resonance. The conclusion that the 3:1 proximity dominates the TTV signal is built into the choice of folding harmonics.
full rationale
The core mass and density determinations for Kepler-10b and Kepler-10c are self-contained: they rest on HARPS-N RVs processed with YARARA-v2 plus Kepler transit parameters, with DE-MCMC, MultiNest, and PolyChord samplers yielding consistent Kb and Kc values that do not depend on the TTV analysis. No self-citation chain is load-bearing for those values, and the YARARA and FIP references are method citations rather than input-equivalent results. The circularity is confined to the Kepler-10d corroboration. In Sect. 3.2, the 150.50 d exterior-3:1 row of Table 3 is selected because it matches the RV period, so the quoted TTV agreement is a selection rather than an independent detection. The harmonic fold of Fig. 4 then uses the RV-derived mean longitude λd, making the 'only the third harmonic is significant' statement depend on the same RV solution. The red-noise FIP result in Appendix B is a model-dependence concern rather than a definitional circularity, because the paper explicitly states the equal-prior weighted average (p(W|y)=0.84, p(ω|R,y)=0); however, it does undercut the abstract's claim that all noise models converged to the same solution, and it should be treated as a correctness risk. Overall, the Kepler-10d confirmation is partially circular, while the Kepler-10b/c results retain independent content, giving a score of 6.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (10)
- K_b (RV semiamplitude of Kepler-10b) =
2.33 +/- 0.22 m/s
- K_c (RV semiamplitude of Kepler-10c) =
2.17 +/- 0.23 m/s
- K_d (RV semiamplitude of Kepler-10d) =
1.57 +/- 0.28 m/s
- e_c (orbital eccentricity of Kepler-10c) =
0.136 +/- 0.050
- e_d (orbital eccentricity of Kepler-10d) =
0.19 +/- 0.10
- sigma_j,HN-1 (white-noise jitter, old CCD) =
2.51 m/s
- sigma_j,HN-2 (white-noise jitter, new CCD) =
2.15 m/s
- TTV super-period =
466.2 +17.2/-16.2 d
- GP rotation period Prot =
54 +10/-9 d
- Water mass fraction of Kepler-10c =
40-70% H2O
assumptions (7)
- domain assumption Stellar mass, radius, age, and transit ephemerides of Kepler-10b and c from D14 are correct.
- domain assumption YARARA-v2 spectrum-level corrections remove systematics and activity without removing planetary signals.
- ad hoc to paper The white-noise plus jitter, or GP, noise models are adequate; the exponential red-noise model is deemed inappropriate.
- ad hoc to paper The 151d RV signal is a coherent Keplerian planet rather than quasi-periodic stellar activity.
- domain assumption HIRES B5-decker RVs are contaminated and can be excluded.
- domain assumption The half-Gaussian eccentricity prior from Van Eylen et al. (2019) applies to the c and d orbits.
- domain assumption Kepler-10b can be held fixed when fitting TTVs and RVs with TRADES because it cannot induce TTVs on c.
invented entities (1)
-
Kepler-10d (non-transiting planet candidate)
independent evidence
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of In-depth characterization of the Kepler-10 three-planet system with HARPS-N radial velocities and Kepler transit timing variations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7GVLLGAJ
@misc{pith2026250207996,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: In-depth characterization of the Kepler-10 three-planet system with HARPS-N radial velocities and Kepler transit timing variations},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7GVLLGAJ}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07996}
}
abstract
The old G3V star Kepler-10 is known to host two transiting planets, the ultra-short-period super-Earth Kepler-10b ($P=0.837$ d; $R_{\rm p}=1.47~\rm R_\oplus$) and the long-period sub-Neptune Kepler-10c ($P=45.294$ d; $R_{\rm p}=2.35~\rm R_\oplus$), and a non-transiting planet that causes variations in the Kepler-10c transit times. Measurements of the mass of Kepler-10c in the literature have shown disagreement, depending on the radial-velocity dataset and/or the modeling technique used. Here we report on the analysis of almost 300 high-precision radial velocities gathered with the HARPS-N spectrograph at the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo over $\sim11$~years, and extracted with the YARARA-v2 tool, which corrects for possible systematics and/or low-level activity variations at the spectrum level. To model these radial velocities, we used three different noise models and various numerical techniques, which all converged to the solution: $M_{\rm p, b}=3.24 \pm 0.32~\rm M_\oplus$ (10$\sigma$) and $\rho_{\rm p, b}=5.54 \pm 0.64~\rm g\;cm^{-3}$ for planet b; $M_{\rm p, c}=11.29 \pm 1.24~\rm M_\oplus$ (9$\sigma$) and $\rho_{\rm p, c}=4.75 \pm 0.53~\rm g\;cm^{-3}$ for planet c; and $M_{\rm p, d}\sin{i}=12.00 \pm 2.15~\rm M_\oplus$ (6$\sigma$) and $P=151.06 \pm 0.48$ d for the non-transiting planet Kepler-10d. This solution is further supported by the analysis of the Kepler-10c transit timing variations and their simultaneous modeling with the HARPS-N radial velocities. While Kepler-10b is consistent with a rocky composition and a small or no iron core, Kepler-10c may be a water world that formed beyond the water snowline and subsequently migrated inward.
Figures
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M., et al
Ahrer , E., Queloz , D., Rajpaul , V. M., et al. 2021, , 503, 1248
2021
-
[2]
Baluev , R. V. 2008, , 385, 1279
2008
-
[3]
M., Borucki , W
Batalha , N. M., Borucki , W. J., Bryson , S. T., et al. 2011, , 729, 27
2011
-
[4]
S., Dumusque , X., Massa , A., et al
Bonomo , A. S., Dumusque , X., Massa , A., et al. 2023, , 677, A33
2023
-
[5]
S., Sozzetti , A., Lovis , C., et al
Bonomo , A. S., Sozzetti , A., Lovis , C., et al. 2014, , 572, A2
2014
-
[6]
S., Zeng , L., Damasso , M., et al
Bonomo , A. S., Zeng , L., Damasso , M., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 416
2019
-
[7]
2019, , 484, 3233
Borsato , L., Malavolta , L., Piotto , G., et al. 2019, , 484, 3233
2019
-
[8]
2014, , 571, A38
Borsato , L., Marzari , F., Nascimbeni , V., et al. 2014, , 571, A38
2014
Show all 110 references
-
[9]
Brewer , B. J. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [ [arXiv] 1411.3921 ]
2014 arXiv
-
[10]
2014, , 564, A125
Buchner , J., Georgakakis , A., Nandra , K., et al. 2014, , 564, A125
2014
-
[11]
2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 463
Burn , R., Mordasini , C., Mishra , L., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 463
2024
-
[12]
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. 2004, Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261
2004
-
[13]
2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol
Cosentino , R., Lovis , C., Pepe , F., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 84461V
2012
-
[14]
2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol
Cosentino , R., Lovis , C., Pepe , F., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, ed. S. K. Ramsay , I. S. McLean , & H. Takami , 91478C
2014
-
[15]
C., & Pepe , F
Cretignier , M., Dumusque , X., Hara , N. C., & Pepe , F. 2021, , 653, A43
2021
-
[16]
2022, , 659, A68
Cretignier , M., Dumusque , X., & Pepe , F. 2022, , 659, A68
2022
-
[17]
Crossfield , I. J. M., Petigura , E., Schlieder , J. E., et al. 2015, , 804, 10
2015
-
[18]
N., & Zeng , L
Dai , F., Masuda , K., Winn , J. N., & Zeng , L. 2019, , 883, 79
2019
-
[19]
S., Astudillo-Defru , N., et al
Damasso , M., Bonomo , A. S., Astudillo-Defru , N., et al. 2018, , 615, A69
2018
-
[20]
Deck , K. M. & Agol , E. 2015, , 802, 116
2015
-
[21]
M., Payne , M., & Holman , M
Deck , K. M., Payne , M., & Holman , M. J. 2013, , 774, 129
2013
-
[22]
B., Hara , N., & S \'e gransan , D
Delisle , J. B., Hara , N., & S \'e gransan , D. 2020, , 635, A83
2020
-
[23]
2017, , 597, A37
Dorn , C., Venturini , J., Khan , A., et al. 2017, , 597, A37
2017
-
[24]
D., Charbonneau , D., Dumusque , X., et al
Dressing , C. D., Charbonneau , D., Dumusque , X., et al. 2015, , 800, 135
2015
-
[25]
2021, in Plato Mission Conference 2021
Dumusque , X. 2021, in Plato Mission Conference 2021. Presentations and posters of the online PLATO Mission Conference 2021, 106
2021
-
[26]
S., Haywood , R
Dumusque , X., Bonomo , A. S., Haywood , R. D., et al. 2014, , 789, 154
2014
-
[27]
S., & Agol , E
Eastman , J., Gaudi , B. S., & Agol , E. 2013, , 125, 83
2013
-
[28]
D., Rodriguez , J
Eastman , J. D., Rodriguez , J. E., Agol , E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.09480
2019 arXiv
-
[29]
T., & Hobson , M
Feroz , F., Balan , S. T., & Hobson , M. P. 2011, , 415, 3462
2011
-
[30]
P., Cameron , E., & Pettitt , A
Feroz , F., Hobson , M. P., Cameron , E., & Pettitt , A. N. 2019, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 2, 10
2019
-
[31]
2014, , 781, 67
Fogtmann-Schulz , A., Hinrup , B., Van Eylen , V., et al. 2014, , 781, 67
2014
-
[32]
2019, The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1864
Foreman-Mackey , D., Farr , W., Sinha , M., et al. 2019, The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1864
2019
-
[33]
W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J
Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306
2013
-
[34]
2011, , 197, 5
Fressin , F., Torres , G., D \'e sert , J.-M., et al. 2011, , 197, 5
2011
-
[35]
J., Petigura , E
Fulton , B. J., Petigura , E. A., Howard , A. W., et al. 2017, , 154, 109
2017
-
[36]
E., & Sari , R
Ginzburg , S., Schlichting , H. E., & Sari , R. 2018, , 476, 759
2018
-
[37]
1993, Icarus, 106, 247
Gladman, B. 1993, Icarus, 106, 247
1993
-
[38]
Gregory , P. C. 2005, , 631, 1198
2005
-
[39]
Gregory , P. C. 2016, , 458, 2604
2016
-
[40]
K., Howard , A
Grunblatt , S. K., Howard , A. W., & Haywood , R. D. 2015, , 808, 127
2015
-
[41]
& Schlichting , H
Gupta , A. & Schlichting , H. E. 2019, , 487, 24
2019
-
[42]
& Lithwick , Y
Hadden , S. & Lithwick , Y. 2016, , 828, 44
2016
-
[43]
D., Thompson , S
Hall , R. D., Thompson , S. J., Handley , W., & Queloz , D. 2018, , 479, 2968
2018
-
[44]
J., Hobson , M
Handley , W. J., Hobson , M. P., & Lasenby , A. N. 2015, , 453, 4384
2015
-
[45]
C., Bou \'e , G., Laskar , J., & Correia , A
Hara , N. C., Bou \'e , G., Laskar , J., & Correia , A. C. M. 2017, , 464, 1220
2017
-
[46]
C., Bou \'e , G., Laskar , J., Delisle , J
Hara , N. C., Bou \'e , G., Laskar , J., Delisle , J. B., & Unger , N. 2019, , 489, 738
2019
-
[47]
C., de Poyferr \'e , T., Delisle , J.-B., & Hoffmann , M
Hara , N. C., de Poyferr \'e , T., Delisle , J.-B., & Hoffmann , M. 2024, Annals of Applied Statistics, 18, 749
2024
-
[48]
C., Delisle , J.-B., Unger , N., & Dumusque , X
Hara , N. C., Delisle , J.-B., Unger , N., & Dumusque , X. 2022 a , , 658, A177
2022
-
[49]
C., Unger , N., Delisle , J.-B., D \' az , R
Hara , N. C., Unger , N., Delisle , J.-B., D \' az , R. F., & S \'e gransan , D. 2022 b , , 663, A14
2022
-
[50]
D., Collier Cameron , A., Queloz , D., et al
Haywood , R. D., Collier Cameron , A., Queloz , D., et al. 2014, , 443, 2517
2014
-
[51]
J., Mulders , G
Hippke , M., David , T. J., Mulders , G. D., & Heller , R. 2019, , 158, 143
2019
-
[52]
& Heller , R
Hippke , M. & Heller , R. 2019, , 623, A39
2019
-
[53]
W., Johnson , J
Howard , A. W., Johnson , J. A., Marcy , G. W., et al. 2010, , 721, 1467
2010
-
[54]
N., et al
Izidoro , A., Ogihara , M., Raymond , S. N., et al. 2017, , 470, 1750
2017
-
[55]
N., Morbidelli , A., Hersant , F., & Pierens , A
Izidoro , A., Raymond , S. N., Morbidelli , A., Hersant , F., & Pierens , A. 2015, , 800, L22
2015
-
[56]
1998, Theory of probability, Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences (The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York), xii+459, reprint of the 1983 edition
Jeffreys, H. 1998, Theory of probability, Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences (The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York), xii+459, reprint of the 1983 edition
1998
-
[57]
Kass, R. E. & Raftery, A. E. 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773
1995
-
[58]
Kipping , D. M. 2010, , 408, 1758
2010
-
[59]
Kipping , D. M. 2014, , 444, 2263
2014
-
[60]
M., Schmitt , A
Kipping , D. M., Schmitt , A. R., Huang , X., et al. 2015, , 813, 14
2015
-
[61]
R., Crossfield , I
Kosiarek , M. R., Crossfield , I. J. M., Hardegree-Ullman , K. K., et al. 2019, , 157, 97
2019
-
[62]
2024, , 687, L1
Leleu , A., Delisle , J.-B., Burn , R., et al. 2024, , 687, L1
2024
-
[63]
Liddle , A. R. 2007, , 377, L74
2007
-
[64]
J., Fabrycky , D
Lissauer , J. J., Fabrycky , D. C., Ford , E. B., et al. 2011, , 470, 53
2011
-
[65]
2012, , 761, 122
Lithwick , Y., Xie , J., & Wu , Y. 2012, , 761, 122
2012
-
[66]
Liu , S.-F., Hori , Y., Lin , D. N. C., & Asphaug , E. 2015, , 812, 164
2015
-
[67]
Lopez , E. D. 2017, , 472, 245
2017
-
[68]
Lopez , E. D. & Fortney , J. J. 2014, , 792, 1
2014
-
[69]
Lopez , E. D. & Rice , K. 2018, , 479, 5303
2018
-
[70]
2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1399
Luo , H., Dorn , C., & Deng , J. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1399
2024
-
[71]
& Pall \'e , E
Luque , R. & Pall \'e , E. 2022, Science, 377, 1211
2022
-
[72]
2016, PyORBIT: Exoplanet orbital parameters and stellar activity , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1612.008
Malavolta , L. 2016, PyORBIT: Exoplanet orbital parameters and stellar activity , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1612.008
2016
-
[73]
F., Cunha , K., Ghezzi , L., & Smith , V
Martinez , C. F., Cunha , K., Ghezzi , L., & Smith , V. V. 2019, , 875, 29
2019
-
[74]
J., & Rasio , F
Matsumura , S., Peale , S. J., & Rasio , F. A. 2010, , 725, 1995
2010
-
[75]
Matsumura , S., Takeda , G., & Rasio , F. A. 2008, , 686, L29
2008
-
[76]
S., Rajpaul , V
Mortier , A., Bonomo , A. S., Rajpaul , V. M., et al. 2018, , 481, 1839
2018
-
[77]
D., Jogesh Babu , G., et al
Mukherjee , S., Feigelson , E. D., Jogesh Babu , G., et al. 1998, , 508, 314
1998
-
[78]
2023, , 673, A42
Nascimbeni , V., Borsato , L., Zingales , T., et al. 2023, , 673, A42
2023
-
[79]
D., & Giles , H
Nava , C., L \'o pez-Morales , M., Haywood , R. D., & Giles , H. A. C. 2020, , 159, 23
2020
-
[80]
& Vokrouhlick \'y , D
Nesvorn \'y , D. & Vokrouhlick \'y , D. 2016, , 823, 72
2016
-
[81]
Owen , J. E. & Wu , Y. 2013, , 775, 105
2013
-
[82]
Owen , J. E. & Wu , Y. 2016, , 817, 107
2016
-
[83]
Owen , J. E. & Wu , Y. 2017, , 847, 29
2017
-
[84]
2015, MNRAS, 450, 3233
Parviainen, H. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3233
2015
-
[85]
2002, , 388, 632
Pepe , F., Mayor , M., Galland , F., et al. 2002, , 388, 632
2002
-
[86]
A., Reece, S., & Roberts, S
Rajpaul, V., Aigrain, S., Osborne, M. A., Reece, S., & Roberts, S. 2015, , 452, 2269
2015
-
[87]
A., & Aigrain , S
Rajpaul , V., Buchhave , L. A., & Aigrain , S. 2017, , 471, L125
2017
-
[88]
M., Buchhave , L
Rajpaul , V. M., Buchhave , L. A., Lacedelli , G., et al. 2021, , 507, 1847
2021
-
[89]
Rasmussen, C. E. & Williams, C. K. I. 2006, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)
2006
-
[90]
2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.05447
Rauer , H., Aerts , C., Cabrera , J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.05447
2024 arXiv
-
[91]
2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249
Rauer , H., Catala , C., Aerts , C., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249
2014
-
[92]
G., Otegi , J
Reinhardt , C., Meier , T., Stadel , J. G., Otegi , J. F., & Helled , R. 2022, , 517, 3132
2022
-
[93]
2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371, 20110550
Roberts, S., Osborne, M., Ebden, M., et al. 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371, 20110550
2013
-
[94]
Rogers, L. A. & Seager, S. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 712, 974
2010
-
[95]
S., Scandariato , G., et al
Singh , V., Bonomo , A. S., Scandariato , G., et al. 2022, , 658, A132
2022
-
[96]
S., Fortney , J
Spiegel , D. S., Fortney , J. J., & Sotin , C. 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111, 12622
2014
-
[97]
& Price, K
Storn, R. & Price, K. 1997, Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 341
1997
-
[98]
Ter Braak , C. J. F. 2006, Statistics and Computing, 16, 239
2006
-
[99]
S., et al
Van Eylen , V., Agentoft , C., Lundkvist , M. S., et al. 2018, , 479, 4786
2018
-
[100]
2019, , 157, 61
Van Eylen , V., Albrecht , S., Huang , X., et al. 2019, , 157, 61
2019
-
[101]
P., Guilera , O
Venturini , J., Ronco , M. P., Guilera , O. M., et al. 2024, , 686, L9
2024
-
[102]
M., Rogers , L
Weiss , L. M., Rogers , L. A., Isaacson , H. T., et al. 2016, , 819, 83
2016
-
[103]
L., Pan , M., & Ford , E
Zakamska , N. L., Pan , M., & Ford , E. B. 2011, , 410, 1895
2011
-
[104]
& K \"u rster , M
Zechmeister , M. & K \"u rster , M. 2009, , 496, 577
2009
-
[105]
& Jacobsen, S
Zeng, L. & Jacobsen, S. B. 2024, Icarus
2024
-
[106]
B., Sasselov , D
Zeng , L., Jacobsen , S. B., Sasselov , D. D., et al. 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 116, 9723
2019
-
[107]
& Sasselov , D
Zeng , L. & Sasselov , D. 2013, , 125, 227
2013
-
[108]
& Seager , S
Zeng , L. & Seager , S. 2008, , 120, 983
2008
-
[109]
, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline
ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...
-
[110]
write newline
" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...
Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.