REVIEW 2 cited by
Multivariate Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting via Conditioned Normalizing Flows
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Time series forecasting is often fundamental to scientific and engineering problems and enables decision making. With ever increasing data set sizes, a trivial solution to scale up predictions is to assume independence between interacting time series. However, modeling statistical dependencies can improve accuracy and enable analysis of interaction effects. Deep learning methods are well suited for this problem, but multivariate models often assume a simple parametric distribution and do not scale to high dimensions. In this work we model the multivariate temporal dynamics of time series via an autoregressive deep learning model, where the data distribution is represented by a conditioned normalizing flow. This combination retains the power of autoregressive models, such as good performance in extrapolation into the future, with the flexibility of flows as a general purpose high-dimensional distribution model, while remaining computationally tractable. We show that it improves over the state-of-the-art for standard metrics on many real-world data sets with several thousand interacting time-series.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
HDT: Hierarchical Discrete Transformer for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting
HDT forecasts multivariate time series by generating a discrete coarse trend of the future, then generating finer target tokens conditioned on that predicted trend, outperforming prior methods on five datasets.
-
RDIT: Residual-based Diffusion Implicit Models for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting
RDIT adds residual diffusion and variance calibration on top of a strong point forecaster, achieving best CRPS on seven of eight datasets and lower PICP distance in most settings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.