Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Charge density wave induced gapped nodal line

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A sublattice-antisymmetric charge density wave can fully gap a glide-protected nodal line, but only when its wavevector goes to zero.

desk verdict The symmetry argument that only the sublattice-antisymmetric CDW gaps the glide-protected nodal line is clean and likely correct; the quantitative 'explanation' of the ARPES experiment is a fit-assisted consistency check, not a prediction, but the paper deserves serious refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21117 v1 pith:7I3XQCXZ submitted 2025-08-28 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sergey Alekseev , Lei Chen , Jennifer Cano This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 71.45.Lr
keywords chargedensitywavenodallinesemimetalglidesymmetrysquare-netmaterialsGinzburg-LandautheoryFermisurfacenestingLaSbxTe2-xspectralweightsuppression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper explains how a charge density wave (CDW) can close the gap? actually open a gap in a glide-protected nodal-line semimetal. It shows that only the sublattice-antisymmetric component of the CDW order parameter can hybridize the crossing states that form the nodal line. When this order has wavevector Q=0, it explicitly breaks the glide symmetry and produces a true full gap. For small finite Q, the nodal crossing can still exist in principle but loses nearly all spectral weight, making it look gapped in photoemission. The theory reproduces the doping-driven gap opening and closing seen in recent experiments on LaSbxTe2-x.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair of sublattice-resolved CDW order parameters ΔA_Q and ΔB_Q, combined into the glide-even combination Δ0_Q = ΔA_Q + ΔB_Q and the glide-odd combination Δz_Q = ΔA_Q − ΔB_Q. The argument turns on the fact that the nodal-line crossing states have opposite glide phases, so only Δz_Q can hybridize them and open a gap; its glide transformation phase −e^{iα·Q} matches the phase difference between the crossing states. At Q=0 this order becomes a uniform sublattice charge imbalance that explicitly breaks the glide symmetry and fully gaps the nodal loop.

What would settle it

Measure the CDW wavevector by diffraction in LaSbxTe2-x at the doping where photoemission shows a fully gapped nodal line. If the wavevector is nonzero and the CDW supercell preserves an exact glide symmetry while a true full gap (no residual in-gap states) is observed, the claim that only Q=0 can fully gap the nodal line is contradicted. Conversely, if Q is observed to vanish exactly at the gap-opening doping, the central claim is directly confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the order parameter responsible for gapping a glide-protected nodal line is the sublattice-antisymmetric CDW component Δz_Q, not the symmetric component Δ0_Q. The crossing bands of the nodal line have opposite glide-symmetry phases, and the Δz component carries exactly the phase factor needed to hybridize them; Δ0 cannot. At Q=0, Δz becomes a uniform difference in charge density between the two square-net sublattices, which explicitly breaks the glide symmetry and opens a full gap. For small nonzero Q, the supercell may retain an exact or approximate glide symmetry that still protects the crossing, but the density of states at the crossing drops sharply as t

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the CDW in these materials is governed by the on-site attractive interaction of Eq. (4) and that its leading instability is the sublattice-antisymmetric Δz order at a single wavevector; if the real CDW is phonon-driven or has a different orbital texture, the proposed gap-opening mechanism may not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • When the chemical potential is far from the nodal line, the CDW opens gaps above and below the crossing while leaving the nodal line intact, matching earlier observations in GdSbxTe2-x.
  • As the chemical potential approaches the nodal line, the nesting vector Q shrinks and the density of states at the crossing falls monotonically.
  • For small nonzero Q, the nodal line can be practically invisible in ARPES even though the exact supercell glide symmetry protecting it is preserved.
  • At Q=0, the Δz order explicitly breaks the glide symmetry and produces a true, full gap at the nodal point.
  • The value of chemical potential at which Q vanishes grows approximately linearly with temperature, so the gapped phase extends over a wider doping window at higher temperature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open whether Q is exactly zero in the LaSbxTe2-x experiment; a direct diffraction measurement of the CDW wavevector across the doping-driven transition would distinguish a true glide-breaking gap from a finite-Q spectral-weight suppression.
  • The mechanism likely generalizes to other nonsymmorphic-symmetry-protected crossings: any order parameter whose glide-transformation phase matches the phase difference of the two crossing states can gap them, even when the order itself does not break the symmetry at Q=0.
  • The toy model suggests a broader criterion: the observable gap is controlled by the ratio Δ/q, so materials with larger CDW amplitude or smaller nesting vector will show apparently gapped nodal lines even without symmetry breaking, a trend that could be tested by systematically varying temperature or strain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Ginzburg-Landau (GL) theory for charge-density-wave (CDW) order in square-net materials, starting from a two-orbital, two-sublattice tight-binding model with an on-site attractive interaction. Two CDW order parameters, Δ0 and Δz, are introduced and shown to be related by a wave-vector shift; the authors find that the sublattice-antisymmetric Δz is the leading instability in the chemical-potential range relevant to LaSbxTe2−x. Section VI argues from eigenstate overlap and glide-symmetry transformation properties that only a Δz order parameter can hybridize the glide-protected nodal-line crossing, while a Δ0 CDW cannot. The paper then claims that for finite Q the nodal-line crossing remains gapless but may appear gapped in ARPES because spectral weight is redistributed, and that for Q=0 the order parameter explicitly breaks glide symmetry and opens a true gap. These trends are compared with the doping-dependent gap reported in Ref. [54].

Significance. If the mechanism holds, it resolves a genuine puzzle: a CDW can make a symmetry-protected nodal line appear gapped without actually breaking the protecting glide symmetry, and the relevant control parameter is the chemical potential relative to the nodal line. The group-theoretic argument in Sec. VI is clean and convincing, and the relation between Δ0 and Δz phases is a useful insight. The model also makes falsifiable predictions, e.g., the μ-dependence of Q and the appearance of in-gap states. However, the quantitative comparison to experiment is weakened by the calibration of the coupling constant, the vanishing quartic coefficient at the Q=0 point, and the absence of a spectral-function simulation for the finite-Q case. These issues do not invalidate the symmetry core, but they mean the experimental-consistency claim is currently over-sold.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V, Eq. (17) and Fig. 5] The coupling constant g is fixed by requiring that the Δz CDW transition occurs at μ=0.4 eV, the same chemical potential at which Ref. [54] reports gap closure. Since the comparison in Sec. VII then presents the doping evolution of the gap as consistent with experiment, part of that agreement is enforced by construction. Please state explicitly which quantities are fitted and which are predicted, and test the sensitivity of the reported trends (e.g., Q(μ), in-gap spectral weight) to varying g within a reasonable range. As written, the consistency argument has limited independent predictive power.
  2. [Sec. VII, K-deposition estimate; Fig. 4] The authors estimate that the K-deposition experiment starts at μ≈0.1 eV, where Fig. 4 gives Q≈0.085, i.e., a finite-Q CDW. In Sec. VI they correctly note that for Q≠0 the nodal-line crossing remains protected and has nonzero density of states. The claim that it nevertheless 'vanishes within experimental resolution' is supported only by the bare band color weights in Fig. 7 and by the 3×3 toy model in Appendix B. No ARPES spectral function, energy/momentum resolution convolution, or quantitative comparison to Ref. [54] is provided. This is load-bearing because the finite-Q resolution argument is the only mechanism that can explain the K-deposition experiment under the stated parameters. Please add a spectral-function simulation with realistic resolution, or soften the claim to a qualitative trend.
  3. [Sec. V, central panel of Fig. 5 and Eq. (17)] The order parameter in the Q=0 regime is computed from a fourth-order GL action whose quartic coefficient bz vanishes at μ≈0.06 eV, exactly where Q is claimed to go to zero. The expression |Δz|^2 = -(4/g+az)/(2bz) is then uncontrolled and higher-order terms are required. Since the Q=0 phase is the only case in which a true full gap opens, the quantitative prediction for this phase (|Δz|=0.3 at μ=0.05 eV in Fig. 7) is not reliable. Please include higher-order terms in the GL expansion or present the Q=0 phase only qualitatively.
  4. [Sec. II, Eq. (4) and Sec. IV] The microscopic model assumes an on-site attractive interaction and an orbital-trivial CDW order parameter. For the RSbTe and RTe3 families, the actual CDW may be phonon-driven or may carry a nontrivial orbital texture; the authors themselves note in Sec. IV that orbital order is beyond the present scope. The claim to explain the experiment in LaSbxTe2−x therefore relies on the assumption that the true CDW instability is dominated by the Δz channel defined here. Please either test this assumption against a more realistic model (e.g., adding electron-phonon coupling or orbital-dependent interactions) or explicitly frame the material comparison as a minimal symmetry-informed model rather than a microscopic prediction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV, after Eq. (6)] The sentence 'we omit summation over repeated orbital indices' is confusing. Since the order parameter is defined as a scalar in orbital space, please state that only the trace part is retained and specify the projection onto the σ0 component.
  2. [Eq. (14)] The coefficients c′ and c″ are introduced but never computed or constrained. Even if they do not affect the single-order-parameter solution, their signs/factors should be specified or their irrelevance explained.
  3. [Fig. 4] The central panel shows curves for tσ=2.0,3.0,4.0, but the legend is difficult to read. Use distinct markers or explicit labels. Also, the inset uses a very small μ range; consider enlarging or combining panels for clarity.
  4. [Appendix B] For the toy model, the spectral weight is defined as the squared magnitude of the second eigenvector component. Please explain how this relates to the folded spectral weight used in the main text and why it is a valid proxy for the in-gap state visibility.
  5. [Sec. VI, exact glide condition] The condition for an exact supercell glide ('there must exist integers n,m such that -e^{iQ·(nα+mβ)}=1 and n+m is odd') is stated without derivation. Please derive it directly from Eq. (8) and clarify the sign convention so the reader can verify it.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The central symmetry argument is independent, but the headline experimental consistency is partly circular: the coupling g is fitted to make the CDW transition occur at μ=0.4 eV, and the same μ=0.4 eV is then cited as where the experimental gap closes.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. V, Eq. (17) and Sec. VII]
    "To evaluate the order parameter Δz_Q, shown in the lower panel of Fig. 5, we evaluate Eq. 17 with value of the constant g chosen such that the CDW phase transition (where Δz_Q = 0) occurs at μ = 0.4 eV. This value of μ is chosen to approximately match the experimentally observed transition in Ref. [54]. ... Based on our estimates, the experiment begins at μ ≈ 0.1 eV — where the nodal line is gapped — and ends around μ ≈ 0.4 eV, where the gap is fully closed. Thus, this experiment is also consistent with our model."

    The parameter g is the free coupling that controls the magnitude of Δz and the location of the Δz=0 transition. It is fixed by imposing that the CDW transition occurs at μ=0.4 eV. The later claim that the experiment is consistent because the gap fully closes around μ≈0.4 eV therefore restates the fitting condition rather than providing an independent prediction. The microscopic trend that Δz grows as μ decreases is not forced by this fit, so the circularity is partial, but the quantitative agreement at the closure point is by construction.

full rationale

The paper's core mechanism—that a sublattice-antisymmetric Δz order parameter couples to the glide-protected crossing and can gap it (or make it vanish within resolution)—is derived from the tight-binding eigenstates and does not reduce to a fitted parameter. The GL coefficients are computed from Eqs. (3)-(4), and the selection of Δz over Δ0 is based on the computed az(Q) shown in Fig. 2, not on an imported uniqueness theorem. The self-citation to Ref. [31] for the Q-along-a nesting assumption is also reproduced in this paper's Fig. 2, so it is not load-bearing. The main circular step is the experimental comparison: g is chosen so that Δz=0 at μ=0.4 eV, and the same μ=0.4 eV is then presented as the experimental gap-closure point. That specific agreement is a fitted input. Separately, the finite-Q 'vanishing within experimental resolution' claim is supported only by bare-band spectral weights and the Appendix B toy model, without an ARPES resolution simulation; the authors themselves concede 'we cannot rule out the possibility that Q = 0 in the experiment.' These are evidence/correctness concerns rather than additional circular reductions. Overall, the central theoretical claim has independent content, but one prominent consistency claim is partially circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theory's load-bearing inputs are the microscopic interaction model, the single-Q truncation, and the fitted coupling and chemical-potential mapping. The symmetry analysis (Delta_z versus Delta_0) is independent of these parameters, but the quantitative claim that Q vanishes at the experimental doping relies on fitted or estimated parameters.

free parameters (4)
  • Four-fermion coupling g = Not given numerically; chosen so CDW transition occurs at mu=0.4 eV
    Section V: the value of g is chosen 'such that the CDW phase transition (where Delta_z_Q = 0) occurs at mu = 0.4 eV' to match Ref. [54]. This is a fit to the experimental transition point.
  • Hopping amplitudes t_sigma, t_pi, t_d = 2.0 eV, 0.37 eV, 0.16 eV
    Taken from Ref. [30] for a rare-earth tellurium square net. The quantitative Q(mu) and the magnitude of the order parameter depend on these values; the paper assumes they apply to the SbTe family without recalibration.
  • Temperature T = 0.03 eV (about 348 K)
    Fixed for the main calculations while the experiment is at 20 K. The paper studies T dependence in Fig. 6, but the comparison to experiment uses T=0.03 eV.
  • Chemical potential mu values = 0.05 to 0.4 eV, mapped from doping
    The experimental comparison maps Sb concentration and K dosing to mu 'based on our estimates' (Section VII). These estimates set the starting and ending points of the comparison.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The CDW is driven by an on-site attractive interaction (Eq. 4) with a single wave vector Q.
    Microscopic model central to the GL derivation. It assumes an electronic mechanism and ignores phonons.
  • domain assumption Single-Q CDW with Q along the Ka direction.
    Section V restricts to D2h point group and Q along Ka. The four-fold related nesting peaks in Fig. 2 are not treated simultaneously.
  • domain assumption The mean-field Hamiltonian is truncated to three bands h_{k-Q}, h_k, h_{k+Q} and is valid for small Delta_Q.
    Section VI: 'which is valid in the limit of small Delta_Q'. This truncation underlies all band-structure and spectral-weight plots.
  • domain assumption Nodal line is protected by glide symmetry even with longer-range hopping.
    Section III. A standard symmetry argument for nonsymmorphic groups; assumed to hold for the real material.
  • domain assumption The Q approximately 2 mu / t_sigma nesting relation from Refs. [30,31] applies.
    Used to interpret the Q(mu) curves and the limit Q to 0 as mu to 0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge density wave induced gapped nodal line." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7I3XQCXZ

@misc{pith2026250821117,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge density wave induced gapped nodal line},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7I3XQCXZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21117}
}
abstract

We investigate the interplay between charge density wave (CDW) order and topological nodal-line states in square-net materials. Our Ginzburg-Landau theory predicts a CDW instability that generically opens a gap at the Fermi energy while preserving the nodal line crossing. However, as the Fermi level approaches the nodal line, the density of states at the nodal line decreases, eventually disappearing as the CDW vector $\mathbf{Q}$ goes to zero. Exactly at $\mathbf{Q} = 0$, the order parameter explicitly breaks the glide symmetry protecting the nodal line, which allows a gap to open. Yet, for small but finite $\mathbf{Q}$, the nodal line may vanish within experimental resolution even when the glide symmetry is preserved. Our results provide a consistent explanation for recent experimental observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21117 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Upper left panel: Square lattice with two sublat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The quadratic coefficients in the GL theory, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The quadratic coefficient in the GL theory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Upper panel: The quadratic coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Energy bands in the presence of the CDW for multiple values of the chemical potential, at fixed temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematic illustration of band crossings be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Energy bands of the simplified Hamiltonian (B1) computed for a grid of parameters where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    X. Que, Q. He, L. Zhou, S. Lei, L. Schoop, D. Huang, and H. Takagi, Visualizing the internal structure of the charge-density-wave state in CeSbTe, Nature communi- cations 16, 3053 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 ɑz Q tσ (eV) 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 μ(eV) Q 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 μ(eV) Q FIG. 4. Upper panel: The quadratic coefficient az(Q, µ) in the GL theory for several fixed values of µ ranging from 0.05 eV to 0.40 eV. Crosses indicate the minima of these func- tions. Central panel: Q as...

    work page

  3. [2]

    DiMasi, M

    E. DiMasi, M. Aronson, J. Mansfield, B. Foran, and S. Lee, Chemical pressure and charge-density waves in rare-earth tritellurides, Physical Review B 52, 14516 (1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [3]

    Brouet, W

    V. Brouet, W. L. Yang, X. J. Zhou, Z. Hussain, N. Ru, K. Y. Shin, I. R. Fisher, and Z. X. Shen, Fermi surface reconstruction in the CDW state of CeTe 3 observed by photoemission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126405 (2004). 12

    work page 2004

  5. [4]

    Komoda, T

    H. Komoda, T. Sato, S. Souma, T. Takahashi, Y. Ito, and K. Suzuki, High-resolution angle-resolved photoemission study of incommensurate charge-density-wave compound CeTe3, Phys. Rev. B 70, 195101 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [5]

    Laverock, S

    J. Laverock, S. B. Dugdale, Z. Major, M. A. Alam, N. Ru, I. R. Fisher, G. Santi, and E. Bruno, Fermi surface nesting and charge-density wave formation in rare-earth tritellurides, Phys. Rev. B 71, 085114 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [6]

    H. J. Kim, C. D. Malliakas, A. T. Tomi´ c, S. H. Tessmer, M. G. Kanatzidis, and S. J. L. Billinge, Local atomic structure and discommensurations in the charge density wave of CeTe3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 226401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [7]

    C. D. Malliakas and M. G. Kanatzidis, Divergence in the behavior of the charge density wave in RETe 3 (RE = rare-earth element) with temperature and RE element, Journal of the American Chemical Society 128, 12612 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0641608

    work page doi:10.1021/ja0641608 2006

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    A. Fang, N. Ru, I. R. Fisher, and A. Kapitulnik, STM studies of TbTe 3: Evidence for a fully incommensurate charge density wave, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 046401 (2007)

    2007

  2. [9]

    Brouet, W

    V. Brouet, W. L. Yang, X. J. Zhou, Z. Hussain, R. G. Moore, R. He, D. H. Lu, Z. X. Shen, J. Laverock, S. B. Dugdale, N. Ru, and I. R. Fisher, Angle-resolved pho- toemission study of the evolution of band structure and charge density wave properties in RTe 3 (R=Y, La, Ce, Sm, G...

    2008

  3. [10]

    N. Ru, C. L. Condron, G. Y. Margulis, K. Y. Shin, J. Laverock, S. B. Dugdale, M. F. Toney, and I. R. Fisher, Effect of chemical pressure on the charge density wave transition in rare-earth tritellurides RTe 3, Phys. Rev. B 77, 035114 (2008)

    2008

  4. [11]

    Eiter, M

    H.-M. Eiter, M. Lavagnini, R. Hackl, E. A. Nowadnick, A. F. Kemper, T. P. Devereaux, J.-H. Chu, J. G. An- alytis, I. R. Fisher, and L. Degiorgi, Alternative route to charge density wave formation in multiband systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 64–69 (2012)

    2012

  5. [12]

    Sinchenko, P

    A. Sinchenko, P. Lejay, O. Leynaud, and P. Mon- ceau, Unidirectional charge-density-wave sliding in two- dimensional rare-earth tritellurides, Solid state commu- nications 188, 67 (2014)

    2014

  6. [13]

    Maschek, S

    M. Maschek, S. Rosenkranz, R. Heid, A. H. Said, P. Giraldo-Gallo, I. R. Fisher, and F. Weber, Wave- vector-dependent electron-phonon coupling and the charge-density-wave transition in TbTe 3, Phys. Rev. B 91, 235146 (2015)

    2015

  7. [14]

    Kogar, A

    A. Kogar, A. Zong, P. E. Dolgirev, X. Shen, J. Straqua- dine, Y.-Q. Bie, X. Wang, T. Rohwer, I.-C. Tung, Y. Yang, R. Li, J. Yang, S. Weathersby, S. Park, M. E. Kozina, E. J. Sie, H. Wen, P. Jarillo-Herrero, I. R. Fisher, X. Wang, and N. Gedik, Light-induced charge density wave...

    2019

  8. [15]

    A. Zong, A. Kogar, Y.-Q. Bie, T. Rohwer, C. Lee, E. Bal- dini, E. Erge¸ cen, M. B. Yilmaz, B. Freelon, E. J. Sie, H. Zhou, J. Straquadine, P. Walmsley, P. E. Dolgirev, A. V. Rozhkov, I. R. Fisher, P. Jarillo-Herrero, B. V. Fine, and N. Gedik, Evidence for topological defects i...

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Walmsley, S

    P. Walmsley, S. Aeschlimann, J. A. W. Straquadine, P. Giraldo-Gallo, S. C. Riggs, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDon- ald, and I. R. Fisher, Magnetic breakdown and charge density wave formation: A quantum oscillation study of the rare-earth tritellurides, Phys. Rev. B 102, 045150 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    Sharma, M

    B. Sharma, M. Singh, B. Ahmed, B. Yu, P. Walmsley, I. R. Fisher, and M. C. Boyer, Interplay of charge density wave states and strain at the surface of CeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 101, 245423 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    J. S. Liu, S. C. Huan, Z. H. Liu, W. L. Liu, Z. T. Liu, X. L. Lu, Z. Huang, Z. C. Jiang, X. Wang, N. Yu, Z. Q. Zou, Y. F. Guo, and D. W. Shen, Electronic structure of the high-mobility two-dimensional antiferromagnetic metal GdTe3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 114005 (2020)

    2020

  12. [19]

    F. Zhou, J. Williams, S. Sun, C. D. Malliakas, M. G. Kanatzidis, A. F. Kemper, and C.-Y. Ruan, Nonequilib- rium dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking into a hidden state of charge-density wave, Nature communica- tions 12, 566 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    Gonz´ alez-Vallejo, V

    I. Gonz´ alez-Vallejo, V. Jacques, D. Boschetto, G. Rizza, A. Hadj-Azzem, J. Faure, L. Bolloc’h, et al., Time- resolved structural dynamics of the out-of-equilibrium charge density wave phase transition in GdTe 3, Struc- tural Dynamics 9 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Y. Wang, I. Petrides, G. McNamara, M. M. Hosen, S. Lei, Y.-C. Wu, J. L. Hart, H. Lv, J. Yan, D. Xiao, J. J. Cha, P. Narang, L. M. Schoop, and K. S. Burch, Axial Higgs mode detected by quantum pathway interference in RTe3, Nature 606, 896 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    J. A. W. Straquadine, M. S. Ikeda, and I. R. Fisher, Evi- dence for realignment of the charge density wave state in ErTe3 and TmTe3 under uniaxial stress via elastocaloric and elastoresistivity measurements, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021046 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    A. G. Singh, M. D. Bachmann, J. J. Sanchez, A. Pandey, A. Kapitulnik, J. W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, S. A. Kivelson, and I. R. Fisher, Emergent tetragonality in a fundamentally orthorhombic material, arXiv:2306.14755 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    S. A. Kivelson, A. Pandey, A. G. Singh, A. Kapitul- nik, and I. R. Fisher, Emergent Z2 symmetry near a charge density wave multicritical point, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205141 (2023)

    2023

  18. [25]

    Chikina, H

    A. Chikina, H. Lund, M. Bianchi, D. Curcio, K. J. Dal- gaard, M. Bremholm, S. Lei, R. Singha, L. M. Schoop, and P. Hofmann, Charge density wave generated fermi surfaces in NdTe3, Phys. Rev. B 107, L161103 (2023)

    2023

  19. [26]

    Raghavan, M

    A. Raghavan, M. Romanelli, J. May-Mann, A. Aish- warya, L. Aggarwal, A. G. Singh, M. D. Bachmann, L. M. Schoop, E. Fradkin, I. R. Fisher, and V. Mad- havan, Atomic-scale visualization of a cascade of mag- netic orders in the layered antiferromagnet GdTe 3, arXiv:2308.15691 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    S. Kim, G. Orenstein, A. G. Singh, I. R. Fisher, D. A. Reis, and M. Trigo, Ultrafast measurements under anisotropic strain reveal near equivalence of competing charge orders in TbTe3, arXiv:2401.17437 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Singh, G

    B. Singh, G. McNamara, K.-M. Kim, S. Siddique, S. D. Funni, W. Zhang, X. Luo, P. Sakrikar, E. M. Kenny, R. Singha, S. Alekseev, S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. Hicken, C. Baine, H. Luetkens, Y. Wang, V. Plisson, M. G. annd Connor A. Occhialini, R. Comin, M. J. Graf, L. Zhao, J. Cano, R....

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Akatsuka, S

    S. Akatsuka, S. Esser, S. Okumura, R. Yambe, R. Yamada, M. M. Hirschmann, S. Aji, J. S. White, S. Gao, Y. Onuki, T.-H. Arima, T. Naka- 13 jima, and M. Hirschberger, Non-coplanar helimagnetism in the layered van-der-Waals metal DyTe 3 (2024), arXiv:2306.04854 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Johannes and I

    M. Johannes and I. Mazin, Fermi surface nesting and the origin of charge density waves in metals, Physical Review B 77, 165135 (2008)

    2008

  24. [31]

    H. Yao, J. A. Robertson, E.-A. Kim, and S. A. Kivelson, Theory of stripes in quasi-two-dimensional rare-earth tel- lurides, Phys. Rev. B 74, 245126 (2006)

    2006

  25. [32]

    Alekseev, S

    S. Alekseev, S. A. A. Ghorashi, R. M. Fernandes, and J. Cano, Charge density waves with nontrivial orbital textures in rare earth tritellurides, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205103 (2024), arXiv:2404.17635 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    L. M. Schoop, M. N. Ali, C. Straßer, A. Topp, A. Varykhalov, D. Marchenko, V. Duppel, S. S. Parkin, B. V. Lotsch, and C. R. Ast, Dirac cone protected by non- symmorphic symmetry and three-dimensional dirac line node in ZrSiS, Nature communications 7, 11696 (2016)

    2016

  27. [34]

    Klemenz, L

    S. Klemenz, L. Schoop, and J. Cano, Systematic study of stacked square nets: From Dirac fermions to material realizations, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165121 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Topological nodal semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235126 (2011)

    2011

  29. [36]

    Chiu and A

    C.-K. Chiu and A. P. Schnyder, Classification of reflection-symmetry-protected topological semimetals and nodal superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 90, 205136 (2014)

    2014

  30. [37]

    Muechler, A

    L. Muechler, A. Topp, R. Queiroz, M. Krivenkov, A. Varykhalov, J. Cano, C. R. Ast, and L. M. Schoop, Modular arithmetic with nodal lines: Drumhead surface states in ZrSiTe, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011026 (2020)

    2020

  31. [38]

    Q. Xu, Z. Song, S. Nie, H. Weng, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Two-dimensional oxide topological insulator with iron- pnictide superconductor lifeas structure, Phys. Rev. B 92, 205310 (2015)

    2015

  32. [39]

    M. M. Hosen, G. Dhakal, K. Dimitri, P. Maldonado, A. Aperis, F. Kabir, C. Sims, P. Riseborough, P. M. Op- peneer, D. Kaczorowski, T. Durakiewicz, and M. Neu- pane, Discovery of topological nodal-line fermionic phase in a magnetic material GdSbTe, Scientific reports 8, 13283 (2018)

    2018

  33. [40]

    L. M. Schoop, A. Topp, J. Lippmann, F. Or- landi, L. M¨ uchler, M. G. Vergniory, Y. Sun, A. W. Rost, V. Duppel, M. Krivenkov, S. She- oran, P. Manuel, A. Varykhalov, B. Yan, R. K. Kremer, C. R. Ast, and B. V. Lotsch, Tunable weyl and dirac states in the nonsymmorphic com- poun...

    2018 doi

  34. [41]

    M. Yang, Y. Qian, D. Yan, Y. Li, Y. Song, Z. Wang, C. Yi, H. L. Feng, H. Weng, and Y. Shi, Magnetic and electronic properties of a topological nodal line semimetal candidate: HoSbTe, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 094203 (2020)

    2020

  35. [42]

    S. Yue, Y. Qian, M. Yang, D. Geng, C. Yi, S. Kumar, K. Shimada, P. Cheng, L. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Weng, Y. Shi, K. Wu, and B. Feng, Topological electronic struc- ture in the antiferromagnet HoSbTe, Phys. Rev. B 102, 155109 (2020)

    2020

  36. [43]

    Y. Wang, Y. Qian, M. Yang, H. Chen, C. Li, Z. Tan, Y. Cai, W. Zhao, S. Gao, Y. Feng, S. Kumar, E. F. Schwier, L. Zhao, H. Weng, Y. Shi, G. Wang, Y. Song, Y. Huang, K. Shimada, Z. Xu, X. J. Zhou, and G. Liu, Spectroscopic evidence for the realization of a genuine topological no...

    2021

  37. [44]

    Pandey, D

    K. Pandey, D. Mondal, J. W. Villanova, J. Roll, R. Bas- net, A. Wegner, G. Acharya, M. R. U. Nabi, B. Ghosh, J. Fujii, J. Wang, B. Da, A. Agarwal, I. Vobornik, A. Politano, S. Barraza-Lopez, and J. Hu, Magnetic topo- logical semimetal phase with electronic correlation en- hanc...

    2021

  38. [45]

    Regmi, G

    S. Regmi, G. Dhakal, F. C. Kabeer, N. Harrison, F. Kabir, A. P. Sakhya, K. Gofryk, D. Kaczorowski, P. M. Oppeneer, and M. Neupane, Observation of multi- ple nodal lines in SmSbTe, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, L031201 (2022)

    2022

  39. [46]

    D. Yuan, D. Huang, X. Ma, X. Chen, H. Ren, Y. Zhang, W. Feng, X. Zhu, B. Wang, X. He, J. Wu, S. Tan, Q. Hao, Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Liu, Z. Liu, C. Cao, Q. Chen, and X. Lai, Observation of dirac nodal line states in topo- logical semimetal candidate PrSbTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045...

    2024

  40. [47]

    DiMasi, B

    E. DiMasi, B. Foran, M. Aronson, and S. Lee, Stability of charge-density waves under continuous variation of band filling in LaTe 2−xSbx (0 ≤ x ≤ 1), Physical Review B 54, 13587 (1996)

    1996

  41. [48]

    S. Lei, V. Duppel, J. M. Lippmann, J. Nuss, B. V. Lotsch, and L. M. Schoop, Charge density waves and magnetism in topological semimetal candidates GdSb xTe2−x−δ, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies 2, 1900045 (2019)

    2019

  42. [49]

    S. Lei, S. M. L. Teicher, A. Topp, K. Cai, J. Lin, G. Cheng, T. H. Salters, F. Rodolakis, J. L. McChes- ney, S. Lapidus, N. Yao, M. Krivenkov, D. Marchenko, A. Varykhalov, C. R. Ast, R. Car, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, N. P. Ong, and L. M. Schoop, Band engineer- ing of Dirac sem...

    2021 doi

  43. [50]

    S. Lei, A. Saltzman, and L. M. Schoop, Complex mag- netic phases enriched by charge density waves in the topological semimetals GdSb xTe2−x−δ, Phys. Rev. B 103, 134418 (2021)

    2021

  44. [51]

    Singha, T

    R. Singha, T. H. Salters, S. M. Teicher, S. Lei, J. F. Khoury, N. P. Ong, and L. M. Schoop, Evolving devil’s staircase magnetization from tunable charge density waves in nonsymmorphic dirac semimetals, Advanced Materials 33, 2103476 (2021)

    2021

  45. [52]

    P. Li, B. Lv, Y. Fang, W. Guo, Z. Wu, Y. Wu, D. Shen, Y. Nie, L. Petaccia, C. Cao, Z.-A. Xu, and Y. Liu, Charge density wave and weak kondo effect in a dirac semimetal CeSbTe, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 64, 237412 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    R. J. Kirby, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, A. Koch-Liston, S. Lei, I. Petrides, P. Narang, K. S. Burch, D. Fausti, G. D. Scholes, and L. M. Schoop, Ultrafast dynamics of the topological semimetal GdSbxTe2−x−δ in the presence and absence of a charge density wave, The Journal of Phys...

    2023

  47. [55]

    Bannies, M

    J. Bannies, M. Michiardi, H. H. Kung, S. Godin, J. W. Simonson, M. Oudah, M. Zonno, S. Gorovikov, S. Zh- danovich, I. S. Elfimov, A. Damascelli, and M. C. Aron- son, Electronically-driven switching of topology in LaS- bTe (2024), arXiv:2407.08798 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.