Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Formation of Giant Planets

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Most giant planets, in the Solar System and beyond, form by core accretion, while disk fragmentation mainly yields brown dwarfs and binary companions.

desk verdict A current, balanced review making the case for core accretion; the meteoritic timeline is the softest spot but is properly hedged. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13214 v1 pith:7IVLHEKV submitted 2025-01-22 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Andrew N. Youdin , Zhaohuan Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords giantplanetformationcoreaccretiongravitationaldiskfragmentationpebbleplanetesimalexoplanetdemographicscircumplanetarydisksJupitertimeline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the evidence now favors core accretion as the dominant route to giant planets, both in the Solar System and among extrasolar planets. In that picture, a solid core of roughly 5 to 20 Earth masses grows first, then captures a gas envelope that cools, contracts, and eventually runs away to become a gas giant. The authors weigh gravitational fragmentation of the gas disk as a rival mechanism and conclude that it more naturally produces brown dwarfs and stellar-mass binary companions than planets below about ten Jupiter masses. The case rests on converging lines of evidence: giant planets orbit mostly at 1 to 10 AU around metal-rich stars, their mass distribution declines steeply with increasing mass, their bulk metallicities track the core-accretion expectation, and the meteoritic NC/CC dichotomy places Jupiter's core at about 20 Earth masses within the first million years.

What carries the argument

The central organizing scale is the thermal mass, $M_{\rm th} = c_s^3/(G\Omega) = h^3 M_*$, the mass at which a growing planet's Bondi radius and Hill radius both equal the disk scale height, roughly 25 Earth masses at 10 AU in an irradiated solar-mass disk. This scale sets both formation routes: subthermal cores accrete from the disk midplane, while gravitationally fragmented disks produce clumps of order tens of $M_{\rm th}$. The argument then runs through the core-accretion sequence: streaming instability or pressure bumps gather pebbles into planetesimals; pebble and planetesimal accretion build a roughly 5 to 20 Earth-mass core; envelope growth proceeds by cooling ("to cool is to accrete"), with the luminosity minimum marking the onset of runaway growth; gap opening then limits the final mass. For the fragmentation channel, Toomre's $Q = c_s\Omega/(\pi G\Sigma_g)$ dropping below about unity and cooling times shorter than a few orbits set the condition, and radiation-hydrodynamic simulations put typical fragment masses near 45 $M_{\rm th}$, meaning tens of Jupiter masses.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a direct-imaging or microlensing survey that found a substantial population of giant planets at 10 to 100 AU with a mass function rising toward larger masses and host stars that are metal-poor; that is the opposite of the current F21 and N19 demographics and would show gravitational fragmentation contributes far more than the review allows.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's central claim is that the core accretion hypothesis—solids build a heavy-element core, the core acquires a hydrostatic gas envelope, envelope cooling drives Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction, and once the envelope mass approaches the core mass accretion runs away—is the formation path for the Solar System giants and for most detected extrasolar giants. It presents gravitational fragmentation of self-gravitating disks as a real but separate channel whose products are more likely brown dwarfs or massive binary companions. The evidence marshaled includes the radial-velocity occurrence peak at 1 to 10 AU, the drop in occurrence beyond 10 AU, the steeply falling giant-planet mass function above about one to ten Jupiter masses, the opposite metallicity trends of giant planets versus close binaries, the exoplanet mass-metallicity trend, and the Kruijer et al. meteoritic timeline for Jupiter. The review also identifies open questions: the rate-limiting role of envelope recycling in 3D flows, the uncertain initial entropy of giant planets, and the origin of the observed radius gap.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the early separation of carbon-rich and carbon-poor meteorite groups records the growth of Jupiter's core as a barrier, and the review itself lists other explanations—snow-line migration, late-arriving pebbles, and thermal processing—that would break this timeline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future interior measurements of Jupiter and Saturn should continue to find heavy-element cores, whether compact or dilute, and ice giants should remain metal-dominated; a core-free gas giant would contradict core accretion.
  • Occurrence surveys should keep seeing giant planets concentrated at roughly 1 to 10 AU around metal-rich stars, with abundance falling beyond about 10 AU.
  • The giant-planet mass function should decline with mass above about one Jupiter mass, while brown dwarf companions should show the opposite trend.
  • If the NC/CC meteoritic dichotomy is caused by Jupiter, then Jupiter's core reached about 20 Earth masses by 1 Myr and stayed below about 50 Earth masses for several million years, favoring early, rapid pebble accretion.
  • Gravitational fragmentation, where it does operate, should yield companions of tens of Jupiter masses or more, often on wide orbits and with high-entropy hot starts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the two-channel division is correct, the companion mass function across 10 to 100 AU should be bimodal—declining for planets and rising for brown dwarfs—so a single deep direct-imaging survey can map the transition.
  • Editorial inference: The review's logic implies that planet formation and binary formation are environmentally segregated: core accretion dominates in metal-rich disks while fragmentation feeds stellar binaries, so wide-orbit giant planets around binary stars may trace one channel more than the other.
  • Editorial inference: A hot-start luminosity for a young directly imaged planet would no longer uniquely signal disk fragmentation, because modern core-accretion models with realistic accretion shocks already produce warm-to-hot starts.
  • Editorial inference: The alternative meteoritic explanations listed in the review suggest a clean test: higher-resolution isotopic ages of NC and CC meteorite reservoirs could determine whether a Jupiter barrier or snow-line migration split the early Solar System.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. This review article synthesizes the current evidence and theory for the formation of giant planets, arguing that core accretion is the dominant pathway for both Solar System giants (Jupiter and Saturn) and most extrasolar giants, while gravitational fragmentation of gas disks is more likely to produce brown dwarfs or similar-mass binary companions. The review covers observational constraints (Solar System, meteoritic, exoplanet demographics, protoplanetary disks), theoretical scales, core growth by planetesimal and pebble accretion, envelope accretion in 1D and 3D, gravitational instability and fragmentation, initial entropy of giant planets, and concluding metallicity trends. It is written as a review chapter with cross-references to other works in the same volume.

Significance. The manuscript is a well-structured, up-to-date review that, if accurate in its synthesis, will provide a useful reference for the community. Its strengths include careful hedging on several uncertain points: the origin of the radius gap, the interpretation of the NC/CC meteorite dichotomy, the limitations of current 3D simulations in resolving planetary surfaces, and the uncertain role of recycling flows. The case for core accretion rests on multiple independent lines of evidence (RV occurrence trends, mass function decline, metallicity correlations, PDS 70 observations, fragment mass arguments), and the review explicitly flags its own weaker points. There are no machine-checked proofs or new derivations, but quantitative statements are traced to cited works. The review is internally consistent and does not rely on circular reasoning; the central conclusion is grounded in observational constraints that are independent of the authors' prior work.

major comments (1)
  1. [Meteoritic Constraints] The sentence 'This explanation of the meteoritic data is only consistent with the gradual formation of Jupiter by core accretion' is too strong, since the following sentences list three alternative explanations (snow line migration, late CC pebbles, thermal processing). The authors should either remove 'only' and say 'is often interpreted as evidence for', or provide a quantitative assessment of why the alternatives are less favored. As written, this section could be read as giving more weight to the K17 timescale than the evidence warrants, and this timescale is later used as a constraint on Jupiter's early formation in the synthesis. Please clarify the logical status of this constraint.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Eq. (10)] In Eq. (10), the factor involving orbital radius appears to have a missing exponent; dimensional analysis of the preceding expressions suggests it should be (r/10 AU)^{-1/2}, not r/10 AU as currently typeset.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption reads 'PDC 70b and c' but should read 'PDS 70b and c'.
  3. [Planetesimal Formation] The text contains a typo: 'Pebbble cloud collapse' should be 'Pebble cloud collapse'.
  4. [Pebble Accretion onto Cores] In the sentence about the difficulty of damping planetesimal velocities, 'difficutly' should be 'difficulty'.
  5. [Orbits, Moons and Rings] In the discussion of regular moons, 'modeste and I' should be 'modest e and I'.
  6. [Planetesimal Formation] The word 'accretaion' appears in the section describing planetesimal and pebble accretion; it should be 'accretion'.
  7. [Eq. (9)] In Eq. (9), the rendering of the factor depending on orbital radius is ambiguous ('r r 10 AU'); if the intended factor is sqrt(r/10 AU), please ensure it is typeset clearly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review is a synthesis of independent evidence; no derivation reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation paper. The central claim that most giant planets form by core accretion while disk fragmentation mainly produces brown dwarfs or binary companions is supported by multiple independent lines of evidence: RV giant planet occurrence and metallicity trends (Fulton et al. 2021; Gan et al. 2024; Moe et al. 2019), direct imaging mass functions (Nielsen et al. 2019; Wagner et al. 2019), the PDS 70 protoplanet and circumplanetary disk observations (Keppler et al. 2018; Haffert et al. 2019; Benisty et al. 2021), and theoretical fragment mass arguments (Xu et al. 2024; Kratter et al. 2010b). No quantity in the paper is fitted to a subset of data and then presented as a prediction of the same data. The authors' self-citations (e.g., streaming instability, Youdin and Goodman 2005; minimum core mass, Piso and Youdin 2014) occur in supporting theoretical context, are independently developed and tested in the broader literature, and are not used as an unexamined uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the review's conclusion. The most fragile step, the meteoritic constraint on Jupiter's core growth from the NC/CC dichotomy, is explicitly hedged by the authors, who immediately list alternative explanations including snow line migration, late CC pebbles, and thermal processing. Because that step is not the sole pillar and is caveated, it does not constitute circularity. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited with the required specificity, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. Its conclusion depends on standard assumptions from the cited literature; the entries above are the most load-bearing of these.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The NC/CC meteorite dichotomy reflects Jupiter's growth history, with the core reaching roughly 20 Earth masses in 1 Myr and staying below about 50 Earth masses for 3 to 4 Myr.
    Used in the Meteoritic Constraints section to argue that Jupiter's formation timeline favors gradual core accretion; the review itself lists alternative explanations, so this is an assumption, not an established fact.
  • domain assumption Protoplanetary disk lifetimes of 1 to 10 Myr set the deadline for core formation and gas accretion.
    Invoked in 'Growth of Heavy Element Cores' to require the core to form within the median disk lifetime; if disk lifetimes were systematically different, the core accretion timeline would change.
  • domain assumption The observed radius gap near 1.7 Earth radii separates bare rocky cores from planets with significant gas envelopes.
    Used to interpret the Kepler radius distribution as evidence for a formation or loss boundary; the review notes the gap's origin is uncertain, including formation, photoevaporation, and core-powered mass loss.
  • domain assumption The radial velocity and direct imaging surveys used, specifically Fulton et al. 2021 and Nielsen et al. 2019, give representative giant planet occurrence rates and mass distributions.
    The review bases its conclusion that giant planets peak between 1 and 10 AU and decline beyond 10 AU on these surveys; the direct imaging sample has only six detections, so this is a fragile assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Formation of Giant Planets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7IVLHEKV

@misc{pith2026250113214,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Formation of Giant Planets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7IVLHEKV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13214}
}
read the original abstract

Giant planets dominate the mass of many planetary systems, including the Solar System, and represent the best-characterized class of extrasolar planets. Understanding the formation of giant planets bridges the high mass end of the planet formation process and the low mass end of processes that produce stellar and brown dwarf companions. This review examines the latest evidence supporting the formation of Solar System giant planets and most extrasolar giant planets by core accretion. Key elements of this theory and recent advances are discussed, along with the role of gravitational fragmentation of gas disks -- a mechanism more likely to produce brown dwarfs and/or similarly massive binary companions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Atmospheric Signatures of Common Envelope Evolution in White Dwarf Planets

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    During common-envelope evolution, engulfed giant planets can accrete enough stellar material to measurably brighten their thermal emission, offering a new atmospheric diagnostic of their dynamical history.

  2. The Longest-period Young Transiting Exoplanets. A Duo of Puffy Giants inside a Debris Disk

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HD 114082 hosts two puffy, moderate-to-low-mass giants on nearly circular, coplanar, near-resonant orbits of 225.55 and ~314 days, the longest-period young transiting exoplanets known.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

177 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Prog Theor Phys 56:1756--1771

    Adachi I, Hayashi C Nakazawa K (1976) The gas drag effect on the elliptical motion of a solid body in the primordial solar nebula. Prog Theor Phys 56:1756--1771

    1976

  2. [2]

    771(2):129

    Andrews SM, Rosenfeld KA, Kraus AL Wilner DJ (2013) The Mass Dependence between Protoplanetary Disks and their Stellar Hosts . 771(2):129

    2013

  3. [3]

    Cambridge University Press

    Armitage PJ (2020) Astrophysics of Planet Formation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press

    2020

  4. [4]

    arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2412.11064

    Armitage PJ (2024) Planet formation theory: an overview . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2412.11064

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    397(2):657--665

    Ayliffe BA Bate MR (2009) Circumplanetary disc properties obtained from radiation hydrodynamical simulations of gas accretion by protoplanets . 397(2):657--665

    2009

  6. [6]

    (2019) An Ideal Testbed for Planet-Disk Interaction: Two Giant Protoplanets in Resonance Shaping the PDS 70 Protoplanetary Disk

    Bae J, Zhu Z, Baruteau C et al. (2019) An Ideal Testbed for Planet-Disk Interaction: Two Giant Protoplanets in Resonance Shaping the PDS 70 Protoplanetary Disk . 884(2):L41

    2019

  7. [7]

    (2022) Structured Distributions of Gas and Solids in Protoplanetary Disks

    Bae J, Isella A, Zhu Z et al. (2022) Structured Distributions of Gas and Solids in Protoplanetary Disks . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2210.13314

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    848(1):40

    Baehr H, Klahr H Kratter KM (2017) The Fragmentation Criteria in Local Vertically Stratified Self-gravitating Disk Simulations . 848(1):40

    2017

Show all 177 references
  1. [9]

    534(3):2953--2967

    Bailey AP Zhu Z (2024) Growing planet envelopes in spite of recycling flows . 534(3):2953--2967

    2024

  2. [10]

    Baraffe I, Chabrier G Barman T (2008) Structure and evolution of super-Earth to super-Jupiter exoplanets. I. Heavy element enrichment in the interior . 482:315--332

    2008

  3. [11]

    416(3):1971--1982

    Baruteau C, Meru F Paardekooper SJ (2011) Rapid inward migration of planets formed by gravitational instability . 416(3):1971--1982

    2011

  4. [12]

    155(4):178

    Batygin K (2018) On the Terminal Rotation Rates of Giant Planets . 155(4):178

    2018

  5. [13]

    (2017) First Millimeter Detection of the Disk around a Young, Isolated, Planetary-mass Object

    Bayo A, Joergens V, Liu Y et al. (2017) First Millimeter Detection of the Disk around a Young, Isolated, Planetary-mass Object . 841(1):L11

    2017

  6. [14]

    (2023) High atmospheric metal enrichment for a Saturn-mass planet

    Bean JL, Xue Q, August PC et al. (2023) High atmospheric metal enrichment for a Saturn-mass planet . 618(7963):43--46

    2023

  7. [15]

    (2021) A Circumplanetary Disk around PDS70c

    Benisty M, Bae J, Facchini S et al. (2021) A Circumplanetary Disk around PDS70c . 916(1):L2

    2021

  8. [16]

    834(2):149

    Berardo D, Cumming A Marleau GD (2017) The Evolution of Gas Giant Entropy During Formation by Runaway Accretion . 834(2):149

    2017

  9. [17]

    Three-dimensional isothermal simulations

    B \'e thune W Rafikov RR (2019) Envelopes of embedded super-Earths - II. Three-dimensional isothermal simulations . 488(2):2365--2379

    2019

  10. [18]

    205:41--75

    Birnstiel T, Fang M Johansen A (2016) Dust Evolution and the Formation of Planetesimals . 205:41--75

    2016

  11. [19]

    (2018) Pebble-isolation mass: Scaling law and implications for the formation of super-Earths and gas giants

    Bitsch B, Morbidelli A, Johansen A et al. (2018) Pebble-isolation mass: Scaling law and implications for the formation of super-Earths and gas giants . 612:A30

    2018

  12. [20]

    67:391--408

    Bodenheimer P Pollack JB (1986) Calculations of the accretion and evolution of giant planets The effects of solid cores . 67:391--408

    1986

  13. [21]

    143:2--14

    Bodenheimer P, Hubickyj O Lissauer JJ (2000) Models of the in situ formation of detected extrasolar giant planets. 143:2--14

    2000

  14. [22]

    207(2):509--516

    Boley AC, Hayfield T, Mayer L Durisen RH (2010) Clumps in the outer disk by disk instability: Why they are initially gas giants and the legacy of disruption . 207(2):509--516

    2010

  15. [23]

    (2010) Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results

    Borucki WJ, Koch D, Basri G et al. (2010) Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results . Science 327:977--

    2010

  16. [24]

    IV Nonisothermal collapse

    Boss AP (1984) Protostellar formation in rotating interstellar clouds. IV Nonisothermal collapse . 277:768--782

    1984

  17. [25]

    Boss AP (2021) Flux-limited Diffusion Approximation Models of Giant Planet Formation by Disk Instability. II. Quadrupled Spatial Resolution . 923(1):93

    2021

  18. [26]

    503(3):4192--4207

    Brucy N Hennebelle P (2021) A two-step gravitational cascade for the fragmentation of self-gravitating discs . 503(3):4192--4207

    2021

  19. [27]

    124(6):3404--3423

    Canup RM Ward WR (2002) Formation of the Galilean Satellites: Conditions of Accretion . 124(6):3404--3423

    2002

  20. [28]

    946(1):L1

    Chang E, Youdin AN Krapp L (2023) On the Origin of Dust Structures in Protoplanetary Disks: Constraints from the Rossby Wave Instability . 946(1):L1

    2023

  21. [29]

    925(2):L14

    Chen Z Bai X (2022) Planetary Accretion Shocks with a Realistic Equation of State . 925(2):L14

    2022

  22. [30]

    Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 38:493--522

    Chiang E Youdin AN (2010) Forming Planetesimals in Solar and Extrasolar Nebulae . Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 38:493--522

    2010

  23. [31]

    490:368--+

    Chiang EI Goldreich P (1997) Spectral Energy Distributions of T Tauri Stars with Passive Circumstellar Disks . 490:368--+

    1997

  24. [32]

    Choksi N, Chiang E, Fung J Zhu Z (2023) The maximum accretion rate of a protoplanet: how fast can runaway be? 525(2):2806--2819

    2023

  25. [33]

    The role of radiation transport for super-Earth planets

    Cimerman NP, Kuiper R Ormel CW (2017) Hydrodynamics of embedded planets' first atmospheres - III. The role of radiation transport for super-Earth planets . 471(4):4662--4676

    2017

  26. [34]

    396(2):1066--1074

    Clarke CJ (2009) Pseudo-viscous modelling of self-gravitating discs and the formation of low mass ratio binaries . 396(2):1066--1074

    2009

  27. [35]

    685:A114

    Colmenares MJ, Lambrechts M, van Kooten E Johansen A (2024) Thermal processing of primordial pebbles in evolving protoplanetary disks . 685:A114

    2024

  28. [36]

    778(1):77

    D'Angelo G Bodenheimer P (2013) Three-dimensional Radiation-hydrodynamics Calculations of the Envelopes of Young Planets Embedded in Protoplanetary Disks . 778(1):77

    2013

  29. [37]

    967(2):124

    D'Angelo G Bodenheimer P (2024) Planet Formation by Gas-assisted Accretion of Small Solids . 967(2):124

    2024

  30. [38]

    (2024) Identification of a turnover in the initial mass function of a young stellar cluster down to 0.5 M _ J

    De Furio M, Meyer MR, Greene T et al. (2024) Identification of a turnover in the initial mass function of a young stellar cluster down to 0.5 M _ J . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2409.04624

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    (2024) The classical T Tauri star CI Tau observed with SPIRou: magnetospheric accretion and planetary formation

    Donati JF, Finociety B, Cristofari PI et al. (2024) The classical T Tauri star CI Tau observed with SPIRou: magnetospheric accretion and planetary formation . 530(1):264--286

    2024

  32. [40]

    103:67--92

    Dones L Tremaine S (1993) On the origin of planetary spins . 103:67--92

    1993

  33. [41]

    (2023) Early Release Science of the exoplanet WASP-39b with JWST NIRISS

    Feinstein AD, Radica M, Welbanks L et al. (2023) Early Release Science of the exoplanet WASP-39b with JWST NIRISS . 614(7949):670--675

    2023

  34. [42]

    474(4):5036--5048

    Forgan DH, Hall C, Meru F Rice WKM (2018) Towards a population synthesis model of self-gravitating disc fragmentation and tidal downsizing II: the effect of fragment-fragment interactions . 474(4):5036--5048

    2018

  35. [43]

    (2020) Beyond Equilibrium Temperature: How the Atmosphere/Interior Connection Affects the Onset of Methane, Ammonia, and Clouds in Warm Transiting Giant Planets

    Fortney JJ, Visscher C, Marley MS et al. (2020) Beyond Equilibrium Temperature: How the Atmosphere/Interior Connection Affects the Onset of Methane, Ammonia, and Clouds in Warm Transiting Giant Planets . 160(6):288

    2020

  36. [44]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 126(3):e06,629

    Fortney JJ, Dawson RI Komacek TD (2021) Hot Jupiters: Origins, Structure, Atmospheres . Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 126(3):e06,629

    2021

  37. [45]

    (2024) Hydrogen sulfide and metal-enriched atmosphere for a Jupiter-mass exoplanet

    Fu G, Welbanks L, Deming D et al. (2024) Hydrogen sulfide and metal-enriched atmosphere for a Jupiter-mass exoplanet . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2407.06163

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    (2017) The California-Kepler Survey

    Fulton BJ, Petigura EA, Howard AW et al. (2017) The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets . 154(3):109

    2017

  39. [47]

    (2021) California Legacy Survey

    Fulton BJ, Rosenthal LJ, Hirsch LA et al. (2021) California Legacy Survey. II. Occurrence of Giant Planets beyond the Ice Line . 255(1):14

    2021

  40. [48]

    811(2):101

    Fung J, Artymowicz P Wu Y (2015) The 3D Flow Field Around an Embedded Planet . 811(2):101

    2015

  41. [49]

    Thomas Baglioni, Venice, Italy

    Galilei G (1610) Sidereus Nuncius. Thomas Baglioni, Venice, Italy

  42. [50]

    553:174--183

    Gammie CF (2001) Nonlinear Outcome of Gravitational Instability in Cooling, Gaseous Disks . 553:174--183

    2001

  43. [51]

    arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2412.06137

    Gan T, Theissen CA, Wang SX, Burgasser AJ Mao S (2024) Metallicity Dependence of Giant Planets around M Dwarfs . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2412.06137

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    487(1):681--690

    Ginzburg S Chiang E (2019) The end of runaway: how gap opening limits the final masses of gas giants . 487(1):681--690

    2019

  45. [53]

    825(1):29

    Ginzburg S, Schlichting HE Sari R (2016) Super-Earth Atmospheres: Self-consistent Gas Accretion and Retention . 825(1):29

    2016

  46. [54]

    183:1051--1062

    Goldreich P Ward WR (1973) The Formation of Planetesimals . 183:1051--1062

    1973

  47. [55]

    42:549--601

    Goldreich P, Lithwick Y Sari R (2004) Planet Formation by Coagulation: A Focus on Uranus and Neptune . 42:549--601

    2004

  48. [56]

    Gressel O, Nelson RP, Turner NJ Ziegler U (2013) Global Hydromagnetic Simulations of a Planet Embedded in a Dead Zone: Gap Opening, Gas Accretion, and Formation of a Protoplanetary Jet . 779:59

    2013

  49. [57]

    (2023) Giant Planets from the Inside-Out

    Guillot T, Fletcher LN, Helled R et al. (2023) Giant Planets from the Inside-Out . In: Inutsuka S, Aikawa Y, Muto T, Tomida K Tamura M (eds) Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol 534, p 947

    2023

  50. [58]

    (2019) Two accreting protoplanets around the young star PDS 70

    Haffert SY, Bohn AJ, de Boer J et al. (2019) Two accreting protoplanets around the young star PDS 70 . Nature Astronomy 3:749--754

    2019

  51. [59]

    Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 10:61

    Harris AW Ward WR (1982) Dynamical Constraints on the Formation and Evolution of Planetary Bodies . Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 10:61

    1982

  52. [60]

    62(1):63--111

    Hennebelle P Grudi \'c MY (2024) The Physical Origin of the Stellar Initial Mass Function . 62(1):63--111

    2024

  53. [61]

    485(1):266--285

    Hirose S Shi JM (2019) Non-linear outcome of gravitational instability in an irradiated protoplanetary disc . 485(1):266--285

    2019

  54. [62]

    158(3):109

    Hsu DC, Ford EB, Ragozzine D Ashby K (2019) Occurrence Rates of Planets Orbiting FGK Stars: Combining Kepler DR25, Gaia DR2, and Bayesian Inference . 158(3):109

    2019

  55. [63]

    (2018) Inside-out Planet Formation

    Hu X, Tan JC, Zhu Z et al. (2018) Inside-out Planet Formation. IV. Pebble Evolution and Planet Formation Timescales . 857:20

    2018

  56. [64]

    179:415--431

    Hubickyj O, Bodenheimer P Lissauer JJ (2005) Accretion of the gaseous envelope of Jupiter around a 5 10 Earth-mass core . 179:415--431

    2005

  57. [65]

    537:1013--1025

    Ikoma M, Nakazawa K Emori H (2000) Formation of Giant Planets: Dependences on Core Accretion Rate and Grain Opacity . 537:1013--1025

    2000

  58. [66]

    410:711--723

    Inaba S Ikoma M (2003) Enhanced collisional growth of a protoplanet that has an atmosphere . 410:711--723

    2003

  59. [67]

    (2019) Detection of Continuum Submillimeter Emission Associated with Candidate Protoplanets

    Isella A, Benisty M, Teague R et al. (2019) Detection of Continuum Submillimeter Emission Associated with Candidate Protoplanets . 879(2):L25

    2019

  60. [68]

    518(3):3877--3900

    Jiang H Ormel CW (2023) Efficient planet formation by pebble accretion in ALMA rings . 518(3):3877--3900

    2023

  61. [69]

    253(2):49

    Jiang YF (2021) An Implicit Finite Volume Scheme to Solve the Time-dependent Radiation Transport Equation Based on Discrete Ordinates . 253(2):49

    2021

  62. [70]

    Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 45(1):359--387

    Johansen A Lambrechts M (2017) Forming Planets via Pebble Accretion . Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 45(1):359--387

    2017

  63. [71]

    662:627--641

    Johansen A Youdin A (2007) Protoplanetary Disk Turbulence Driven by the Streaming Instability: Nonlinear Saturation and Particle Concentration . 662:627--641

    2007

  64. [72]

    (2014) The Multifaceted Planetesimal Formation Process

    Johansen A, Blum J, Tanaka H et al. (2014) The Multifaceted Planetesimal Formation Process . Protostars and Planets VI pp 547--570

    2014

  65. [73]

    (2018) Discovery of a planetary-mass companion within the gap of the transition disk around PDS 70

    Keppler M, Benisty M, M \"u ller A et al. (2018) Discovery of a planetary-mass companion within the gap of the transition disk around PDS 70 . 617:A44

    2018

  66. [74]

    In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 138

    Klahr H, Pfeil T Schreiber A (2018) Instabilities and Flow Structures in Protoplanetary Disks: Setting the Stage for Planetesimal Formation . In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 138

    2018

  67. [75]

    arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2407.09341

    Knierim H Helled R (2024) Convective mixing in giant planets and the connection to atmospheric measurements . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2407.09341

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    131:171--178

    Kokubo E Ida S (1998) Oligarchic Growth of Protoplanets . 131:171--178

    1998

  69. [77]

    (2024) A Thermodynamic Criterion for the Formation of Circumplanetary Disks

    Krapp L, Kratter KM, Youdin AN et al. (2024) A Thermodynamic Criterion for the Formation of Circumplanetary Disks . 973(2):153

    2024

  70. [78]

    54:271--311

    Kratter K Lodato G (2016) Gravitational Instabilities in Circumstellar Disks . 54:271--311

    2016

  71. [79]

    708:1585--1597

    Kratter KM, Matzner CD, Krumholz MR Klein RI (2010 a ) On the Role of Disks in the Formation of Stellar Systems: A Numerical Parameter Study of Rapid Accretion . 708:1585--1597

    2010

  72. [80]

    710:1375--1386

    Kratter KM, Murray-Clay RA Youdin AN (2010 b ) The Runts of the Litter: Why Planets Formed Through Gravitational Instability Can Only Be Failed Binary Stars . 710:1375--1386

    2010

  73. [81]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    Kruijer TS, Burkhardt C, Budde G Kleine T (2017) Age of jupiter inferred from the distinct genetics and formation times of meteorites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    2017

  74. [82]

    656(2):959--979

    Krumholz MR, Klein RI McKee CF (2007) Radiation-Hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapse and Fragmentation in Massive Protostellar Cores . 656(2):959--979

    2007

  75. [83]

    Kunimoto M Matthews JM (2020) Searching the Entirety of Kepler Data. II. Occurrence Rate Estimates for FGK Stars . 159(6):248

    2020

  76. [84]

    572:A107

    Lambrechts M Johansen A (2014) Forming the cores of giant planets from the radial pebble flux in protoplanetary discs . 572:A107

    2014

  77. [85]

    606:A146

    Lambrechts M Lega E (2017) Reduced gas accretion on super-Earths and ice giants . 606:A146

    2017

  78. [86]

    Lee EJ Chiang E (2015) To Cool is to Accrete: Analytic Scalings for Nebular Accretion of Planetary Atmospheres . 811:41

    2015

  79. [87]

    797(2):95

    Lee EJ, Chiang E Ormel CW (2014) Make Super-Earths, Not Jupiters: Accreting Nebular Gas onto Solid Cores at 0.1 AU and Beyond . 797(2):95

    2014

  80. [88]

    Leinhardt ZM Stewart ST (2012) Collisions between Gravity-dominated Bodies. I. Outcome Regimes and Scaling Laws . 745:79

    2012

  81. [89]

    (2023) Hydro-, Magnetohydro-, and Dust-Gas Dynamics of Protoplanetary Disks

    Lesur G, Flock M, Ercolano B et al. (2023) Hydro-, Magnetohydro-, and Dust-Gas Dynamics of Protoplanetary Disks . In: Inutsuka S, Aikawa Y, Muto T, Tomida K Tamura M (eds) Protostars and Planets VII, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol 534, p 465

    2023

  82. [90]

    885(1):69

    Li R, Youdin AN Simon JB (2019) Demographics of Planetesimals Formed by the Streaming Instability . 885(1):69

    2019

  83. [91]

    Science 371(6527):365--370

    Lichtenberg T, Dr a żkowska J, Sch \"o nb \"a chler M, Golabek GJ Hands TO (2021) Bifurcation of planetary building blocks during Solar System formation . Science 371(6527):365--370

    2021

  84. [92]

    (2021) A solar C/O and sub-solar metallicity in a hot Jupiter atmosphere

    Line MR, Brogi M, Bean JL et al. (2021) A solar C/O and sub-solar metallicity in a hot Jupiter atmosphere . 598(7882):580--584

    2021

  85. [93]

    199:338--350

    Lissauer JJ, Hubickyj O, D'Angelo G Bodenheimer P (2009) Models of Jupiter's growth incorporating thermal and hydrodynamic constraints . 199:338--350

    2009

  86. [94]

    From planetesimal accretion to pebble accretion

    Liu B, Ormel CW Johansen A (2019) Growth after the streaming instability. From planetesimal accretion to pebble accretion . 624:A114

    2019

  87. [95]

    Science Advances 8

    Liu B, Johansen A, Lambrechts M, Bizzarro M Haugbølle T (2022) Natural separation of two primordial planetary reservoirs in an expanding solar protoplanetary disk. Science Advances 8

    2022

  88. [96]

    792(1):1

    Lopez ED Fortney JJ (2014) Understanding the Mass-Radius Relation for Sub-neptunes: Radius as a Proxy for Composition . 792(1):1

    2014

  89. [97]

    141(2):51

    Lovelace RVE, Covey KR Lloyd JP (2011) Possible Signatures of Magnetospheric Accretion onto Young Giant Planets . 141(2):51

    2011

  90. [98]

    3(9):221

    Lu T Laughlin G (2022) Tilting Uranus via Spin-Orbit Resonance with Planet Nine . 3(9):221

    2022

  91. [99]

    685:1220-1236

    Machida MN, Kokubo E, Inutsuka Si Matsumoto T (2008) Angular Momentum Accretion onto a Gas Giant Planet . 685:1220-1236

    2008

  92. [100]

    (2024) Long-period modulation of the classical T Tauri star CI Tau

    Manick R, Sousa AP, Bouvier J et al. (2024) Long-period modulation of the classical T Tauri star CI Tau. Evidence for an eccentric close-in massive planet at 0.17 au . 686:A249

    2024

  93. [101]

    Nature Astronomy

    Mankovich CR Fuller J (2021) A diffuse core in Saturn revealed by ring seismology . Nature Astronomy

    2021

  94. [102]

    Marleau GD, Mordasini C Kuiper R (2019) The Planetary Accretion Shock. II. Grid of Postshock Entropies and Radiative Shock Efficiencies for Nonequilibrium Radiation Transport . 881(2):144

    2019

  95. [103]

    Marleau GD, Kuiper R, B \'e thune W Mordasini C (2023) The Planetary Accretion Shock. III. Smoothing-free 2.5D Simulations and Calculation of H Emission . 952(1):89

    2023

  96. [104]

    655:541--549

    Marley MS, Fortney JJ, Hubickyj O, Bodenheimer P Lissauer JJ (2007) On the Luminosity of Young Jupiters . 655:541--549

    2007

  97. [105]

    912(1):L16

    Martin RG Armitage PJ (2021) Primordial Giant Planet Obliquity Driven by a Circumplanetary Disk . 912(1):L16

    2021

  98. [106]

    230(2):15

    Moe M Di Stefano R (2017) Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars . 230(2):15

    2017

  99. [107]

    875(1):61

    Moe M, Kratter KM Badenes C (2019) The Close Binary Fraction of Solar-type Stars Is Strongly Anticorrelated with Metallicity . 875(1):61

    2019

  100. [108]

    Moldenhauer TW, Kuiper R, Kley W Ormel CW (2021) Steady state by recycling prevents premature collapse of protoplanetary atmospheres . 646:L11

    2021

  101. [109]

    In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 145

    Morbidelli A (2018) Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems . In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 145

    2018

  102. [110]

    Morbidelli A Nesvorny D (2012) Dynamics of pebbles in the vicinity of a growing planetary embryo: hydro-dynamical simulations . 546:A18

    2012

  103. [111]

    Morbidelli A, Brasser R, Tsiganis K, Gomes R Levison HF (2009) Constructing the secular architecture of the solar system. I. The giant planets . 507(2):1041--1052

    2009

  104. [112]

    Massive cores make hot planets

    Mordasini C (2013) Luminosity of young Jupiters revisited. Massive cores make hot planets . 558:A113

    2013

  105. [113]

    In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 143

    Mordasini C (2018) Planetary Population Synthesis . In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 143

    2018

  106. [114]

    408(1):L36--L40

    Nayakshin S (2010) Formation of planets by tidal downsizing of giant planet embryos . 408(1):L36--L40

    2010

  107. [115]

    In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 139

    Nelson RP (2018) Planetary Migration in Protoplanetary Disks . In: Deeg HJ Belmonte JA (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer, p 139

    2018

  108. [116]

    133(5):1962--1976

    Nesvorn \'y D, Vokrouhlick \'y D Morbidelli A (2007) Capture of Irregular Satellites during Planetary Encounters . 133(5):1962--1976

    2007

  109. [117]

    140:785--793

    Nesvorn \'y D, Youdin AN Richardson DC (2010) Formation of Kuiper Belt Binaries by Gravitational Collapse . 140:785--793

    2010

  110. [118]

    Nature Astronomy

    Nesvorn \'y D, Li R, Youdin AN, Simon JB Grundy WM (2019) Trans-neptunian binaries as evidence for planetesimal formation by the streaming instability. Nature Astronomy

    2019

  111. [119]

    In: European Planetary Science Congress, pp EPSC2024--73

    Nettelmann N Fortney J (2024) The disappearance of Jupiter's dilute core in favor of helium . In: European Planetary Science Congress, pp EPSC2024--73

    2024

  112. [120]

    (2021) Theory of Figures to the Seventh Order and the Interiors of Jupiter and Saturn

    Nettelmann N, Movshovitz N, Ni D et al. (2021) Theory of Figures to the Seventh Order and the Interiors of Jupiter and Saturn . 2(6):241

    2021

  113. [121]

    (2019) The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics from 10 to 100 au

    Nielsen EL, De Rosa RJ, Macintosh B et al. (2019) The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics from 10 to 100 au . 158(1):13

    2019

  114. [122]

    725(2):1485--1494

    Offner SSR, Kratter KM, Matzner CD, Krumholz MR Klein RI (2010) The Formation of Low-mass Binary Star Systems Via Turbulent Fragmentation . 725(2):1485--1494

    2010

  115. [123]

    (2023) The Origin and Evolution of Multiple Star Systems

    Offner SSR, Moe M, Kratter KM et al. (2023) The Origin and Evolution of Multiple Star Systems . In: Inutsuka S, Aikawa Y, Muto T, Tomida K Tamura M (eds) Protostars and Planets VII, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol 534, p 275

    2023

  116. [124]

    In: Pessah M Gressel O (eds) Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 445, p 197

    Ormel CW (2017) The Emerging Paradigm of Pebble Accretion . In: Pessah M Gressel O (eds) Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 445, p 197

    2017

  117. [125]

    arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2411.14643

    Ormel CW (2024) Pebble Accretion . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2411.14643

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Analytical expressions for the accretion of small bodies in laminar disks

    Ormel CW Klahr HH (2010) The effect of gas drag on the growth of protoplanets. Analytical expressions for the accretion of small bodies in laminar disks . 520:A43+

    2010

  119. [127]

    A rapid recycling of atmospheric gas

    Ormel CW, Shi JM Kuiper R (2015) Hydrodynamics of embedded planets' first atmospheres - II. A rapid recycling of atmospheric gas . 447(4):3512--3525

    2015

  120. [128]

    819(1):L14

    Owen JE Menou K (2016) Disk-fed Giant Planet Formation . 819(1):L14

    2016

  121. [129]

    Owen JE Wu Y (2013) Kepler Planets: A Tale of Evaporation . 775:105

    2013

  122. [130]

    421(4):3286--3299

    Paardekooper SJ (2012) Numerical convergence in self-gravitating shearing sheet simulations and the stochastic nature of disc fragmentation . 421(4):3286--3299

    2012

  123. [131]

    In: Schubert G (ed) Treatise on Geophysics, Elsevier Science, pp 559--604

    Peale SJ Canup RM (2015) The Origin of the Natural Satellites . In: Schubert G (ed) Treatise on Geophysics, Elsevier Science, pp 559--604

    2015

  124. [132]

    939(1):L10

    Pfalzner S, Dehghani S Michel A (2022) Most Planets Might Have More than 5 Myr of Time to Form . 939(1):L10

    2022

  125. [133]

    Observations

    Pinilla P Youdin A (2017) Particle Trapping in Protoplanetary Disks: Models vs. Observations . In: Pessah M Gressel O (eds) Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 445, p 91

    2017

  126. [134]

    Piso AMA Youdin AN (2014) On the Minimum Core Mass for Giant Planet Formation at Wide Separations . 786:21

    2014

  127. [135]

    Piso AMA, Youdin AN Murray-Clay RA (2015) Minimum Core Masses for Giant Planet Formation with Realistic Equations of State and Opacities . 800:82

    2015

  128. [136]

    (1996) Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas

    Pollack JB, Hubickyj O, Bodenheimer P et al. (1996) Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas . Icarus 124:62--85

    1996

  129. [137]

    128:1348--1363

    Rafikov RR (2004) Fast Accretion of Small Planetesimals by Protoplanetary Cores . 128:1348--1363

    2004

  130. [138]

    Rafikov RR (2005) Can Giant Planets Form by Direct Gravitational Instability? 621:L69--L72

    2005

  131. [139]

    648:666--682

    Rafikov RR (2006) Atmospheres of Protoplanetary Cores: Critical Mass for Nucleated Instability . 648:666--682

    2006

  132. [140]

    508(4):5886--5902

    Rogers JG, Gupta A, Owen JE Schlichting HE (2021) Photoevaporation versus core-powered mass-loss: model comparison with the 3D radius gap . 508(4):5886--5902

    2021

  133. [141]

    Moscow: Nakua

    Safronov VS (1969) Evoliutsiia doplanetnogo oblaka. Moscow: Nakua

    1969

  134. [142]

    (2022) Tilting Uranus via the migration of an ancient satellite

    Saillenfest M, Rogoszinski Z, Lari G et al. (2022) Tilting Uranus via the migration of an ancient satellite . 668:A108

    2022

  135. [143]

    282:61--74

    Sellwood JA Carlberg RG (1984) Spiral instabilities provoked by accretion and star formation . 282:61--74

    1984

  136. [144]

    410:611--621

    Semenov D, Henning T, Helling C, Ilgner M Sedlmayr E (2003) Rosseland and Planck mean opacities for protoplanetary discs . 410:611--621

    2003

  137. [145]

    (2023) Mass and Angular Momentum Transport in a Gravitationally Unstable Protoplanetary Disk with Improved 3D Radiative Hydrodynamics

    Steiman-Cameron TY, Durisen RH, Boley AC et al. (2023) Mass and Angular Momentum Transport in a Gravitationally Unstable Protoplanetary Disk with Improved 3D Radiative Hydrodynamics . 958(2):139

    2023

  138. [146]

    (2020) MIRACLES: atmospheric characterization of directly imaged planets and substellar companions at 4-5 m

    Stolker T, Marleau GD, Cugno G et al. (2020) MIRACLES: atmospheric characterization of directly imaged planets and substellar companions at 4-5 m. II. Constraints on the mass and radius of the enshrouded planet PDS 70 b . 644:A13

    2020

  139. [147]

    (2016) Circumplanetary disc or circumplanetary envelope? 460:2853--2861

    Szul \'a gyi J, Masset F, Lega E et al. (2016) Circumplanetary disc or circumplanetary envelope? 460:2853--2861

    2016

  140. [148]

    674:A193

    Takaoka K, Kuwahara A, Ida S Kurokawa H (2023) Spin of protoplanets generated by pebble accretion: Influences of protoplanet-induced gas flow . 674:A193

    2023

  141. [149]

    921(1):10

    Takasao S, Aoyama Y Ikoma M (2021) Hydrodynamic Model of H Emission from Accretion Shocks of a Proto-giant Planet and Circumplanetary Disk . 921(1):10

    2021

  142. [150]

    Tanigawa T, Ohtsuki K Machida MN (2012) Distribution of Accreting Gas and Angular Momentum onto Circumplanetary Disks . 747:47

    2012

  143. [151]

    831(1):64

    Thorngren DP, Fortney JJ, Murray-Clay RA Lopez ED (2016) The Mass-Metallicity Relation for Giant Planets . 831(1):64

    2016

  144. [152]

    900(2):182

    Tominaga RT, Takahashi SZ Inutsuka Si (2020) Secular Gravitational Instability of Drifting Dust in Protoplanetary Disks: Formation of Dusty Rings without Significant Gas Substructures . 900(2):182

    2020

  145. [153]

    89(1):85--92

    Tremaine S (1991) On the origin of the obliquities of the outer planets . 89(1):85--92

    1991

  146. [154]

    877(1):46

    Wagner K, Apai D Kratter KM (2019) On the Mass Function, Multiplicity, and Origins of Wide-orbit Giant Planets . 877(1):46

    2019

  147. [155]

    (2017) Comparing jupiter interior structure models to juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core

    Wahl SM, Hubbard WB, Militzer B et al. (2017) Comparing jupiter interior structure models to juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core. Geophysical Research Letters pp n/a--n/a

    2017

  148. [156]

    (2019) Mass-Metallicity Trends in Transiting Exoplanets from Atmospheric Abundances of H _ 2 O, Na, and K

    Welbanks L, Madhusudhan N, Allard NF et al. (2019) Mass-Metallicity Trends in Transiting Exoplanets from Atmospheric Abundances of H _ 2 O, Na, and K . 887(1):L20

    2019

  149. [157]

    arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2401.16451

    Winn JN Petigura E (2024) Planet Occurrence from Doppler and transit surveys, 2nd ed . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2401.16451

    2024 arXiv

  150. [158]

    (2022) Loss of a satellite could explain Saturn s obliquity and young rings

    Wisdom J, Dbouk R, Militzer B et al. (2022) Loss of a satellite could explain Saturn s obliquity and young rings . Science 377(6612):1285--1289

    2022

  151. [159]

    (2022) ALMA Discovery of a Disk around the Planetary-mass Companion SR 12 c

    Wu YL, Bowler BP, Sheehan PD et al. (2022) ALMA Discovery of a Disk around the Planetary-mass Companion SR 12 c . 930(1):L3

    2022

  152. [160]

    934(2):156

    Xu W (2022) Testing a New Model of Embedded Protostellar Disks against Observations: The Majority of Orion Class 0/I Disks Are Likely Warm, Massive, and Gravitationally Unstable . 934(2):156

    2022

  153. [161]

    Xu W, Jiang YF, Kunz MW Stone JM (2024) Global Simulations of Gravitational Instability in Protostellar Disks with Full Radiation Transport. I. Stochastic Fragmentation with Optical-depth-dependent Rate and Universal Fragment Mass . arXiv e-prints p arXiv:2410.12042

    2024 arXiv

  154. [162]

    In: T Montmerle, D Ehrenreich, & A-M Lagrange (ed) EAS Publications Series, EAS Publications Series, vol 41, pp 187--207

    Youdin AN (2010) From Grains to Planetesimals . In: T Montmerle, D Ehrenreich, & A-M Lagrange (ed) EAS Publications Series, EAS Publications Series, vol 41, pp 187--207

    2010

  155. [163]

    731:99--+

    Youdin AN (2011 a ) On the Formation of Planetesimals Via Secular Gravitational Instabilities with Turbulent Stirring . 731:99--+

    2011

  156. [164]

    Youdin AN (2011 b ) The Exoplanet Census: A General Method Applied to Kepler . 742:38

    2011

  157. [165]

    620:459--469

    Youdin AN Goodman J (2005) Streaming Instabilities in Protoplanetary Disks . 620:459--469

    2005

  158. [166]

    In: Oswalt TD, French LM Kalas P (eds) Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems

    Youdin AN Kenyon SJ (2013) From Disks to Planets . In: Oswalt TD, French LM Kalas P (eds) Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems. Volume 3: Solar and Stellar Planetary Systems, Springer

    2013

  159. [167]

    721:1113--1126

    Youdin AN Mitchell JL (2010) The Mechanical Greenhouse: Burial of Heat by Turbulence in Hot Jupiter Atmospheres . 721:1113--1126

    2010

  160. [168]

    580:494--505

    Youdin AN Shu FH (2002) Planetesimal Formation by Gravitational Instability . 580:494--505

    2002

  161. [169]

    (2019) Growth model interpretation of planet size distribution

    Zeng L, Jacobsen SB, Sasselov DD et al. (2019) Growth model interpretation of planet size distribution . Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 116(20):9723--9728

    2019

  162. [170]

    (2018) The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP)

    Zhang S, Zhu Z, Huang J et al. (2018) The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VII. The Planet-Disk Interactions Interpretation . 869(2):L47

    2018

  163. [171]

    Zhu W Dong S (2021) Exoplanet Statistics and Theoretical Implications . 59

    2021

  164. [172]

    799(1):16

    Zhu Z (2015) Accreting Circumplanetary Disks: Observational Signatures . 799(1):16

    2015

  165. [173]

    746(1):110

    Zhu Z, Hartmann L, Nelson RP Gammie CF (2012) Challenges in Forming Planets by Gravitational Instability: Disk Irradiation and Clump Migration, Accretion, and Tidal Destruction . 746(1):110

    2012

  166. [174]

    768(2):143

    Zhu Z, Stone JM Rafikov RR (2013) Low-mass Planets in Protoplanetary Disks with Net Vertical Magnetic Fields: The Planetary Wake and Gap Opening . 768(2):143

    2013

  167. [175]

    518(4):5808--5825

    Zhu Z, Bailey A, Mac \' as E, Muto T Andrews SM (2023) Directly detecting the envelopes of low-mass planets embedded in protoplanetary discs and the case for TW Hydrae . 518(4):5808--5825

    2023

  168. [176]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mi...

  169. [177]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap dupl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.