Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

From the Early Slope to Curvature: Future Prospects and challenges for Astrophysical Parameter Estimation Using the Core-Collapse Supernova High-Frequency Feature

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the curvature of the supernova high-frequency feature can break degeneracies inaccessible to slope-only analyses.

desk verdict A plausible forward-looking perspective on HFF curvature as a CCSN diagnostic, but the key distance-based result is an unvalidated illustration and the text has serious blemishes. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21925 v1 pith:7NJN4UXS submitted 2026-07-24 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Alejandro Casallas-Lagos , Marek Szczepańczyk , Michele Zanolin , Anthony Mezzacappa This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE
keywords core-collapsesupernovaegravitationalwaveshigh-frequencyfeatureproto-neutronstaroscillationsequationofstatecoherentWaveBurstwavescangravitational-waveparameterestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that reading only the early slope of the High-Frequency Feature (HFF) in core-collapse supernova gravitational waves throws away information. The authors propose that the curvature of the HFF's time-frequency track, how the rising frequency bends as the proto-neutron star settles toward an asymptotic state, encodes the time-dependent structure of the PNS and the transition between oscillation modes. Using cWB-XP wavescan reconstructions in real O4b noise at SNR 25, they show that curvature can be accessed in practice and that it varies across CCSN models. They further argue that comparing curvature-derived distributions at 1 kpc and 10 kpc separates noise-induced scatter from intrinsic model variability, a distinction needed to trust any future single-event equation-of-state measurement.

What carries the argument

The central object is the High-Frequency Feature (HFF), the continuous rising ridge in the time-frequency spectrogram of a CCSN gravitational-wave signal, associated with proto-neutron-star oscillation modes. The machinery that carries the argument is the cWB-XP wavescan procedure, which scans a bank of wavelets of different resolutions and picks, at each time-frequency location, the representation that minimizes spectral leakage while maximizing inter-detector coherence; this yields a reconstructed frequency track with enough fidelity to estimate not just the initial slope but its curvature. The diagnostic works by comparing reconstructed curvature-sensitive quantities, such as the inferred $M/R^3$ (mass over radius cubed, proportional to the asymptotic frequency), for the same waveforms placed at 1 kpc and 10 kpc, exploiting the scaling of SNR proportional to $1/d$ and uncertainty proportional to $1/\mathrm{SNR}$.

What would settle it

An injection-recovery study would settle it: inject the same CCSN waveforms into O4b noise over a range of distances (or SNRs), reconstruct them with cWB-XP, and compare the recovered curvature and $M/R^3$ values to the true inputs. If curvature estimates show distance-dependent bias, or if the scatter does not converge to the intrinsic value as SNR grows, the claimed noise-versus-intrinsic separation does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the HFF evolution, previously summarized by a single early-time slope, is better characterized by higher-order structure, notably its curvature, which carries information about the PNS's time-dependent structure and the transition between oscillation modes. The paper shows that cWB-XP wavescan reconstructions at a fixed SNR of 25 recover recognizable curvature across several CCSN models, and that curvature is model-dependent: some models bend clearly toward an asymptotic frequency, while others stay nearly linear. The paper's main diagnostic proposal is that curvature estimates, unlike peak frequency or early slope, depend on reconstruction fidelity and therefore on distance; because SNR scales as $1/d$, scatter in curvature-based quantities such as inferred $M/R^3$ should shrink toward 1 kpc. The observed narrowing of that distribution is presented as evidence that a substantial fraction of the scatter at larger distances is measurement-driven, making curvature a natural tool for separating noise-induced uncertainty from intrinsic physical diversity.

Load-bearing premise

The whole diagnostic rests on the unvalidated assumption that cWB-XP wavescan reconstructs the HFF time-frequency track, including its curvature, without distance-dependent bias when simulated signals at SNR 25 are placed in O4b noise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Combining early-slope and curvature measurements can break degeneracies that slope-only analyses leave unresolved, such as the degeneracy between rotation and equation of state in the HFF interpretation.
  • Curvature-based observables enable a continuous mapping from measured HFF tracks to nuclear-matter parameters, replacing or supplementing categorical EOS labels with quantitative constraints.
  • The distance-diagnostic provides a decision rule for interpreting future detections: if scatter in curvature-derived quantities contracts at higher SNR, detector noise dominates; if it persists, intrinsic model variability dominates.
  • The model-dependence of curvature, with clear bending in some models and near-linearity in others, means that a single detection's curvature will itself be a diagnostic of the explosion and PNS properties.
  • Access to late-time HFF evolution and its asymptotic frequency opens a route for next-generation detectors to constrain PNS structure well beyond the early contraction phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If curvature proves measurable in real detections, the HFF track could be fitted with physically motivated templates that approach an asymptotic frequency; the fitted asymptote and curvature timescale would then give direct asteroseismic estimates of the PNS's mean density and mode-coupling epoch from one event.
  • The distance-scaling diagnostic could be sharpened into a quantitative estimator: injecting the same waveforms over a grid of distances and measuring the variance contraction would calibrate how much of the observed scatter is noise versus intrinsic.
  • Curvature of the HFF may correlate with neutrino observables, such as the cooling timescale or shock-revival time, making it a candidate multimessenger tie between the gravitational-wave track and the neutrino light curve.
  • If curvature depends on mode transitions, comparing curvature across EOS models at fixed mass could reveal which dense-matter effects change the f-to-g transition, a testable prediction for simulation campaigns.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes extending core-collapse supernova (CCSN) gravitational-wave (GW) analysis from the early-time slope of the High-Frequency Feature (HFF) to its curvature. It reviews the physics of the HFF, describes the cWB-2G and cWB-XP pipelines with emphasis on the wavescan reconstruction method, and presents reconstructed HFF tracks at a fixed SNR of 25 in O4b noise for several CCSN models. The central suggestion is that curvature-based observables can break degeneracies and provide a diagnostic for separating measurement-induced scatter from intrinsic model variability, using a distance-dependent comparison: narrower reconstructed M/R^3 distributions at 1 kpc than at 10 kpc are interpreted as evidence that most scatter at larger distances is noise-driven. The paper is framed as a perspective/roadmap contribution, and the main claims are explicitly hedged as prospects rather than established results.

Significance. If validated, the proposal is a useful step toward quantitative CCSN parameter estimation, since curvature of the HFF is a genuinely new observable relative to the early-slope analyses and the distance-based diagnostic addresses an important practical question. The paper makes appropriate use of published simulations and real interferometric noise, and it produces a falsifiable prediction: reconstructed curvature-related quantities should narrow with increasing SNR if noise dominates the scatter. On the other hand, the quantitative support for this prediction is currently missing: there is no injection-recovery validation, no noise-only control, and the figure that is cited as the key evidence plots a quantity derived from M/R^3 rather than a direct curvature measurement. The paper's strengths are its clear physical motivation and the concrete roadmap it offers to the community.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Fig. 3] The central diagnostic in Fig. 3 assumes that cWB-XP wavescan yields an unbiased estimate of the HFF time-frequency track, including its curvature, at SNR 25 in O4b noise. This assumption is load-bearing because the narrowing of the reconstructed M/R^3 distribution at 1 kpc is interpreted as evidence that the 10 kpc scatter is noise-dominated. No injection-recovery study, noise-only test, or bias quantification is presented, so the distance-dependent narrowing could equally be produced by SNR-dependent reconstruction artifacts, such as truncation of the high-frequency tail or pixel selection in wavescan. Please add such validation or relabel Fig. 3 as an illustrative sketch rather than a demonstrated diagnostic.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 3] Fig. 3 plots the inferred M/R^3, while the text states that this quantity is proportional to the asymptotic frequency and thus to curvature. This proportionality is neither derived nor validated, and the figure therefore does not demonstrate that curvature estimates are what narrow with decreasing distance. The authors should either derive and test the mapping between the reconstructed track curvature and M/R^3 (or the asymptotic frequency) or revise the text so that the claim is restricted to the quantity actually plotted.
  3. [Section 4] The observable called 'curvature' is never defined mathematically. The reader is not told whether it is the second derivative of the reconstructed frequency track f(t), the quadratic coefficient of a polynomial fit, or something else, and no fitting window or estimator is specified. Without a precise definition, the claimed distance-dependent diagnostic cannot be reproduced or compared with other proposed HFF characterization methods. A formal definition and a description of the estimator used for the reconstructions in Figs. 2 and 3 are needed.
  4. [Section 4] The scaling sigma ~ 1/rho is asserted to connect SNR to the uncertainty in reconstructed curvature, but no derivation or simulation is provided. Distance affects not only the overall SNR but also the duration and bandwidth of the reconstructed track and the number of usable wavelet pixels, so a simple 1/rho scaling is not guaranteed to hold for curvature estimates. This matters because the main conclusion that the 1 kpc narrowing implies a substantial noise-driven component at 10 kpc follows from that scaling. A compact injection-recovery study over a grid of SNR values would directly test the scaling and make the conclusion robust.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1] The sentence beginning 'While cWB-2G serves as a general-purpose burst search pipeline, , high-frequency transients' is incomplete and obscures the intended contrast between cWB-2G and cWB-XP; please fix the wording.
  2. [Section 2] The paragraph on rotation contains the unrelated fragment 'cWB-XP has a wavelet basis with a finer time frequency, minimal frequency leakage, which is optimized for extremely short-duration HFF measurements'; this material interrupts the physical argument and should be moved to Section 3 where the pipelines are described.
  3. [Section 2] There are missing spaces and other typographical issues throughout (e.g., 'Rotationintroduces', 'Overtime'), and the overall text would benefit from a careful proofread.
  4. [Figure 2 and Table 1] The caption of Fig. 2 identifies model s15 with Kuroda et al. 2016, but Table 1 lists the Kuroda (2016) model as 'SFHxWW95' with a 15 Msun progenitor; the labels are ambiguous and should be made consistent, especially because the main text states that s15 shows significant curvature while s25 remains linear.
  5. [Reference [28]] The wavescan method is central to the reconstruction claims but is cited only as an APS meeting abstract; please cite a detailed algorithm description or add a short appendix summarizing the wavescan implementation and its known performance.
  6. [Figure 1 caption] The caption states that the 1 kHz-based regression 'tends to overestimate the curvature relative to the 2 kHz-based fit' but does not explain why; adding one sentence on this point would help readers interpret the fits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the distance-comparison diagnostic is an explicit SNR-scaling illustration, and the cited prior work provides independent methodological support rather than importing the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (1) the HFF is an established feature in CCSN simulations from external groups (CHIMERA, Kuroda, Radice, etc.); (2) early-slope estimation uses previously published cWB/cWB-XP methods [23,24]; (3) curvature is proposed as a future diagnostic; and (4) Fig. 3 compares reconstructed M/R^3 distributions at 1 kpc versus 10 kpc. Step (4) is not a fitted prediction: the paper explicitly derives the expected broadening from h ∝ 1/d and σ ∝ 1/ρ, so the narrowing at 1 kpc is a transparent consequence of the stated noise scaling rather than a hidden reuse of the data as its own prediction. No parameter is fit to a subset and then renamed as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work; and no ansatz is smuggled in solely by citation. The self-citations ([17] for HFF terminology, [23] for slope extraction, [24] for EOS-slope dependence) are contextual and methodological, and the central curvature discussion is not reduced to them. The main weakness is a validation gap in Section 4 / Fig. 3: the analysis assumes cWB-XP wavescan reconstructions are unbiased at SNR 25 in O4b noise without injection-recovery or noise-only tests, and Fig. 3 plots inferred M/R^3 rather than a directly validated curvature estimate. These are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. It depends on established simulation models, the cWB-XP pipeline, and universal asteroseismology relations. The main unpaid assumptions are the fidelity of the reconstruction and the applicability of the M/R^3 relation.

free parameters (2)
  • Reference signal-to-noise ratio (SNR=25) = 25
    Chosen by hand for all reconstructions in Figure 2; it sets the noise realization scaling but is not derived or optimized.
  • Source distances (1 kpc and 10 kpc) = 1 kpc, 10 kpc
    Chosen for the diagnostic comparison in Figure 3 to represent nearby and far Galactic sources.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The cWB-XP wavescan reconstruction returns an unbiased estimate of the HFF time-frequency track, including curvature, for signals injected at SNR 25 in real O4b noise.
    The entire curvature analysis depends on the fidelity of the reconstruction; no injection-recovery validation is presented.
  • domain assumption The asymptotic HFF frequency is proportional to the mean density (M/R^3) of the proto-neutron star via a universal relation that holds across the models in Table 1.
    Figure 3 interprets the reconstructed frequency as M/R^3 without deriving or testing the relation, relying on prior asteroseismology works such as Torres-Forné et al. 2019.
  • domain assumption The HFF is generated by PNS oscillation modes, so its slope and curvature carry physical information about the contraction and mode transitions.
    This is the foundational physical interpretation from CCSN simulation literature, cited in Section 2; the paper does not re-derive it.
  • standard math Standard least-squares polynomial regression is appropriate for extracting slope and curvature from the reconstructed HFF tracks.
    The regression approach is mentioned in reference to [23,24] and Figure 1, but the exact fitting procedure for the new curvature estimates is not specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From the Early Slope to Curvature: Future Prospects and challenges for Astrophysical Parameter Estimation Using the Core-Collapse Supernova High-Frequency Feature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7NJN4UXS

@misc{pith2026260721925,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From the Early Slope to Curvature: Future Prospects and challenges for Astrophysical Parameter Estimation Using the Core-Collapse Supernova High-Frequency Feature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7NJN4UXS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21925}
}
read the original abstract

Gravitational-wave (GW) signals from core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) contain both stochastic and deterministic components. Among these, the High-Frequency Feature (HFF), associated with PNS oscillations, has emerged as a robust observable for probing dense-matter physics. Previous studies of the HFF have primarily focused on the early-time slope as a diagnostic of PNS contraction and its dependence on the equation of state (EOS). In this work, we extend the analysis beyond the early-time linear regime. In particular, we discuss how higher-order features of the HFF evolution, such as its curvature, may encode additional information about the time-dependent structure of the PNS and the transition between oscillation modes. Using real interferometric noise and reconstruction techniques on detected candidates by the coherent WaveBurst (cWB) algorithm in its cWB-XP implementation, we illustrate how such features can be accessed. By comparing reconstructed signals at different source distances, we assess the relative impact of detector noise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21925 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The figure illustrates the strains and the spectrograms of the CCSN GW signals from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reconstructed CCSN GW signals (wavescan) using the cWB-XP algorithm at a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of inferred M/R3 (proportional to the asymptotic frequency) for five dif￾ferent CCSN GW models summarized in table 1 reconstructed at two different source distances: 1 kpc (orange) and 10 kpc (blue). While the underlying physical signals are identical, the ob￾served distributions exhibit a clear distance-dependent broadening, with the 10 kpc case showing a significantly larger spread. This behavior refl… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the nature of oscillating modes of proto-neutron stars

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new energy-based classifier separates proto-neutron star oscillation modes into four families and identifies the dominant high-frequency gravitational-wave feature as the PNS fundamental mode.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Andresen, B

    H. Andresen, B. Müller, E. Müller, and H.-Th. Janka. Gravitational wave signals from 3d neutrino hydrodynamics simulations of core-collapse supernovae.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468(2):2032–2051, mar 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Couch and Christian D

    Sean M. Couch and Christian D. Ott. Revival of the stalled core-collapse supernova shock triggered by precollapse asphericity in the progenitor star.The Astrophysical Journal, 778(1):L7, oct 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Ott, Andreas Marek, and H.-Thomas Janka

    Harald Dimmelmeier, Christian D. Ott, Andreas Marek, and H.-Thomas Janka. Gravita- tional wave burst signal from core collapse of rotating stars.Physical Review D, 78(6), sep 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Explosion mechanisms of core-collapse supernovae.Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 62(1):407–451, nov 2012

    Hans-Thomas Janka. Explosion mechanisms of core-collapse supernovae.Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 62(1):407–451, nov 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Ott, Ernazar Abdikamalov, Philipp Mösta, Roland Haas, Steve Drasco, Evan P

    Christian D. Ott, Ernazar Abdikamalov, Philipp Mösta, Roland Haas, Steve Drasco, Evan P. O'Connor, Christian Reisswig, Casey A. Meakin, and Erik Schnetter. General- relativistic simulations of three-dimensional core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophysical Journal, 768(2):115, apr 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Characterizing the gravitational wave signal from core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophys- ical Journal, 876(1):L9, apr 2019

    David Radice, Viktoriya Morozova, Adam Burrows, David Vartanyan, and Hiroki Nagakura. Characterizing the gravitational wave signal from core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophys- ical Journal, 876(1):L9, apr 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Astone, P

    P. Astone, P. Cerdá -Durán, I. Di Palma, M. Drago, F. Muciaccia, C. Palomba, and F. Ricci. New method to observe gravitational waves emitted by core collapse supernovae.Physical Review D, 98(12), dec 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Aloy, José A

    Pablo Cerdá-Durán, Nicolas DeBrye, Miguel A. Aloy, José A. Font, and Martin Ober- gaulinger. Gravitational wave signatures in black hole forming core collapse.The Astro- physical Journal, 779(2):L18, dec 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    The gravita- tional wave signal from core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophysical Journal, 861(1):10, jun 2018

    Viktoriya Morozova, David Radice, Adam Burrows, and David Vartanyan. The gravita- tional wave signal from core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophysical Journal, 861(1):10, jun 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    Font, and Renate Meyer

    Marie-Anne Bizouard, Patricio Maturana-Russel, Alejandro Torres-Forné , Martin Ober- gaulinger, Pablo Cerdá-Durán, Nelson Christensen, José A. Font, and Renate Meyer. In- ference of protoneutron star properties from gravitational-wave data in core-collapse super- novae.Physica...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Evan O'Connor and Christian D. Ott. Black hole formation in failing core-collapse super- novae.The Astrophysical Journal, 730(2):70, mar 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations of massive and rotating progenitors.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494(4):4665–4675, apr 2020

    Jade Powell and Bernhard Müller. Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations of massive and rotating progenitors.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494(4):4665–4675, apr 2020. 8

    2020

  5. [13]

    Inferring astrophysical parameters of core-collapse su- pernovae from their gravitational-wave emission.Physical Review D, 105(6), mar 2022

    Jade Powell and Bernhard Müller. Inferring astrophysical parameters of core-collapse su- pernovae from their gravitational-wave emission.Physical Review D, 105(6), mar 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Landfield, Eric J

    Anthony Mezzacappa, Pedro Marronetti, Ryan E. Landfield, Eric J. Lentz, R. Daniel Mur- phy, W. Raphael Hix, J. Austin Harris, Stephen W. Bruenn, John M. Blondin, O. E. Bron- son Messer, Jordi Casanova, and Luke L. Kronzer. Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission fo...

    2023

  7. [15]

    Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J

    R. Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J. Lentz, and Pedro Marronetti. Core collapse supernova gravitational wave sourcing and characterization based on three- dimensional models.Phys. Rev. D, 112:063062, Sep 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Universal relation for supernova gravitational waves.Phys

    Hajime Sotani, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Hajime Togashi. Universal relation for supernova gravitational waves.Phys. Rev. D, 104:123009, Dec 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Mezzacappa and M

    A. Mezzacappa and M. Zanolin. Colloquium: Gravitational waves from neutrino-driven core collapse supernovae.Rev. Mod. Phys., 97:041002, Dec 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Landfield, Eric J

    Anthony Mezzacappa, Pedro Marronetti, Ryan E. Landfield, Eric J. Lentz, R. Daniel Mur- phy, W. Raphael Hix, J. Austin Harris, Stephen W. Bruenn, John M. Blondin, O. E. Bron- son Messer, Jordi Casanova, and Luke L. Kronzer. Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission fo...

    2023

  11. [19]

    Bernhard Müller, Thomas M Tauris, Alexander Heger, Projjwal Banerjee, Yong-Zhong Qian, Jade Powell, Conrad Chan, Daniel W Gay, and Norbert Langer. Three-dimensional simulations of neutrino-driven core-collapse supernovae from low-mass single and binary star progenitors.Monthly...

    2019

  12. [20]

    Couch, and Felix Malmenbeck

    John Ryan Westernacher-Schneider, Evan O’Connor, Erin O’Sullivan, Irene Tamborra, Meng-Ru Wu, Sean M. Couch, and Felix Malmenbeck. Multimessenger asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae.Phys. Rev. D, 100:123009, Dec 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    Consistent perturbative modeling of pseudo-newtonian core-collapse supernova simulations.Phys

    John Ryan Westernacher-Schneider. Consistent perturbative modeling of pseudo-newtonian core-collapse supernova simulations.Phys. Rev. D, 101:083021, Apr 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Alejandro Torres-Forné , Pablo Cerdá-Durán, Martin Obergaulinger, Bernhard Müller, and José A. Font. Universal relations for gravitational-wave asteroseismology of protoneutron stars.Physical Review Letters, 123(5), jul 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Antelis, Claudia Moreno, Michele Zanolin, Anthony Mezzacappa, and Marek J

    Alejandro Casallas-Lagos, Javier M. Antelis, Claudia Moreno, Michele Zanolin, Anthony Mezzacappa, and Marek J. Szczepańczyk. Characterizing the temporal evolution of the high-frequency gravitational wave emission for a core collapse supernova with laser interfer- ometric data:...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Daniel Murphy, Alejandro Casallas-Lagos, Anthony Mezzacappa, Michele Zanolin, Ryan E

    R. Daniel Murphy, Alejandro Casallas-Lagos, Anthony Mezzacappa, Michele Zanolin, Ryan E. Landfield, Eric J. Lentz, Pedro Marronetti, Javier M. Antelis, and Claudia Moreno. Dependence of the reconstructed core-collapse supernova gravitational wave high- frequency feature on the...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Morales, and Michele Zanolin

    Zidu Lin, Abhinav Rijal, Cecilia Lunardini, Manuel D. Morales, and Michele Zanolin. Char- acterizing a supernova’s standing accretion shock instability with neutrinos and gravita- tional waves.Phys. Rev. D, 107:083017, Apr 2023. 9

    2023

  18. [26]

    Font, and Re- nate Meyer

    Tristan Bruel, Marie-Anne Bizouard, Martin Obergaulinger, Patricio Maturana-Russel, Alejandro Torres-Forné, Pablo Cerdá-Durán, Nelson Christensen, José A. Font, and Re- nate Meyer. Inference of protoneutron star properties in core-collapse supernovae from a gravitational-wave ...

    2023

  19. [27]

    Cerdá-Durán, M

    P. Cerdá-Durán, M. López, A. Favali, I. Di Palma, M. Drago, and F. Ricci. Phenomeno- logical gravitational waveforms for core-collapse supernovae.Phys. Rev. D, 111(8):083022, April 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Wavescan: multiresolution regression of gravitational-wave data

    Sergey Klimenko. Wavescan: multiresolution regression of gravitational-wave data. InAPS April Meeting Abstracts, volume 2022 ofAPS Meeting Abstracts, page E17.004, April 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    DeMaio, and Christian D

    Ernazar Abdikamalov, Sarah Gossan, Alexandra M. DeMaio, and Christian D. Ott. Mea- suring the angular momentum distribution in core-collapse supernova progenitors with grav- itational waves.Physical Review D, 90(4), aug 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Andresen, E

    H. Andresen, E. Müller, H. Th. Janka, A. Summa, K. Gill, and M. Zanolin. Gravitational waves from 3D core-collapse supernova models: The impact of moderate progenitor rotation. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 486(2):2238–2253, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    A new multi-dimensional general relativistic neutrino hydrodynamics code for core-collapse supernovae

    Bernhard Müller, Hans-Thomas Janka, and Andreas Marek. A new multi-dimensional general relativistic neutrino hydrodynamics code for core-collapse supernovae. ii. relativistic explosion models of core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophysical Journal, 756(1):84, aug 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    A new multi-dimensional gen- eral relativistic neutrino hydrodynamics code of core-collapse supernovae

    Bernhard Müller, Hans-Thomas Janka, and Andreas Marek. A new multi-dimensional gen- eral relativistic neutrino hydrodynamics code of core-collapse supernovae. iii. gravitational wave signals from supernova explosion models. 766(1):43, mar 2013

    2013

  25. [33]

    Tobias Melson, Hans-Thomas Janka, Robert Bollig, Florian Hanke, Andreas Marek, and Bernhard Müller. Neutrino-driven explosion of a 20 solar-mass star in three dimensions enabled by strange-quark contributions to neutrino–nucleon scattering.The Astrophysical Journal, 808(2):L42...

    2015

  26. [34]

    Toward Realistic Models of Core Collapse Supernovae: A Brief Review.IAU Symposium, 362:215–227, January 2023

    Anthony Mezzacappa. Toward Realistic Models of Core Collapse Supernovae: A Brief Review.IAU Symposium, 362:215–227, January 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Takami Kuroda, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Kei Kotake. A new multi-energy neutrino radiation- hydrodynamics code in full general relativity and its application to the gravitational collapse of massive stars.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 222(2):20, feb 2016

    2016

  28. [36]

    O’Connor and Sean M

    Evan P. O’Connor and Sean M. Couch. Exploring fundamentally three-dimensional phe- nomena in high-fidelity simulations of core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophysical Journal, 865(2):81, sep 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progen- itors – III

    M Obergaulinger and M Á Aloy. Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progen- itors – III. three-dimensional models.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503(4):4942–4963, feb 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Warren, Sean M

    MacKenzie L. Warren, Sean M. Couch, Evan P. O’Connor, and Viktoriya Morozova. Con- straining properties of the next nearby core-collapse supernova with multimessenger signals. The Astrophysical Journal, 898(2):139, jul 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Pajkos, Sean M

    Michael A. Pajkos, Sean M. Couch, Kuo-Chuan Pan, and Evan P. O’Connor. Features of accretion-phase gravitational-wave emission from two-dimensional rotating core-collapse supernovae.The Astrophysical Journal, 878(1):13, jun 2019. 10

    2019

  32. [40]

    Austin Harris, Pedro Marronetti, Reuben D

    StephenW.Bruenn, JohnM.Blondin, W.RaphaelHix, EricJ.Lentz, O.E.BronsonMesser, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eirik Endeve, J. Austin Harris, Pedro Marronetti, Reuben D. Budi- ardja, Merek A. Chertkow, and Ching-Tsai Lee. Chimera: A massively parallel code for core- collapse supernova sim...

    2020

  33. [41]

    Landfield.Sensitivity of neutrino-driven core-collapse supernova models to the microphysical equation of state

    Ryan E. Landfield.Sensitivity of neutrino-driven core-collapse supernova models to the microphysical equation of state. Ph.d. thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    S. E. Woosley and A. Heger. Nucleosynthesis and Remnants in Massive Stars.Phys. Rep., 442:269–350, 2007

    2007

  35. [43]

    I. Tews, J. M. Lattimer, A. Ohnishi, and E. E. Kolomeitsev. Variable Equation of State for Core-collapse Supernova Simulations.Astrophys. J., 848:105, 2017

    2017

  36. [44]

    The Einstein Telescope.Class

    M Punturo et al. The Einstein Telescope.Class. Quantum Grav., 27:194002, 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    Cosmic Explorer

    David Reitze et al. Cosmic Explorer. InBulletin of the AAS, volume 51, 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.arXiv, 2017

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.arXiv, 2017. 11

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.