Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Superconductivity from dual-surface carriers in rhombohedral graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Superconductivity arises in the dual-surface semimetallic regime of rhombohedral graphene, where valence and conduction carriers occupy opposite crystal faces.

desk verdict A careful, honest transport paper that credibly extends superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene to 8 layers and a moiré 7-layer device; the distinctive dual-surface-semimetal interpretation is plausible but leans on a symmetric-ansatz Hartree-Fock calculation, and referees should push on exactly that. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18598 v1 pith:7O4QCXZD submitted 2025-07-24 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Manish Kumar , Derek Waleffe , Anna Okounkova , Raveel Tejani , Vo Tien Phong , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Cyprian Lewandowski
show 2 more authors
Joshua Folk Matthew Yankowitz
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con PACS 73.22.Pr74.25.-q
keywords superconductivityrhombohedralgraphenedual-surfacesemimetalband-overlapregimeHartree-FockanomalousHalleffectmoirésuperlatticegate-tracking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene whose normal state is an unusual semimetal: conduction-band electrons sit almost entirely on one outer surface of the stack while valence-band holes sit on the opposite surface, with almost nothing in between. The authors find ten dome-shaped pockets of strongly suppressed resistance in eight-layer samples, five for each sign of the displacement field, plus two pockets in a heptalayer sample carrying a moiré superlattice; critical temperatures range from roughly 20 to 170 millikelvin. The claim is that this dual-surface semimetallic regime is a genuine host of superconductivity, so the c-axis shape of the electronic wavefunction matters for pairing in a way no previously known superconductor exhibits. If correct, the result extends graphene superconductivity beyond six layers and ties it to the same band feature that produces a quantized anomalous Hall state in the moiré device, raising the possibility of coupling superconductivity to topological order.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dual-surface charge distribution in rhombohedral graphene: because band-edge wavefunctions are surface-localized (the SSH-chain picture), the valence band and conduction band can be polarized onto opposite outer faces of the stack, with the low-density middle layers acting as a weak coupling between them. Self-consistent Hartree–Fock band-structure calculations with a layer-dependent Coulomb potential predict a contiguous band-overlap region around charge neutrality in which both band Fermi pockets coexist at the Fermi level, and the experimental map of that region is traced by jets of elevated resistivity that track nearly fixed top- or bottom-gate voltages. That single-gate tracking, resistance features locked to one gate rather than to density-field axes, is the paper's experimental signature of the bifurcated charge distribution, since each surface screens the gate nearest to it. The superconducting pockets sit within the band-overlap region near a local maximum of the density of states, at the crossing of the tracked resistive bumps, where a Lifshitz transition of the valence band coincides with a small, simply connected conduction-band pocket.

What would settle it

A measurement that would settle the matter: resolve the Fermi surface directly at the gate voltages of a superconducting pocket, for instance via compressibility or per-band quantum-oscillation analysis in the band-overlap region, and check whether valence and conduction pockets genuinely coexist on opposite surfaces there. If only a single band crosses the Fermi level at those voltages, or if both carriers sit on the same face, the dual-surface pairing claim fails even though the resistive drops themselves might still be superconductivity. Equivalently, recomputing the Hartree–Fock phase diagram with $\varepsilon_r$ varied over its plausible range and showing the pockets fall outside the band-overlap region would falsify the assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the rhombohedral (ABC) stacking sequence, the low-energy electronic wavefunction is exponentially localized on the two outer crystal faces, like the edge states of a Su–Schrieffer–Heeger chain. The paper's central observation is that in the band-overlap regime, where the Fermi level cuts through both the valence and conduction bands, those two bands are split to opposite surfaces, so the sample acts as two nearly isolated electron gases coupled through a low-density bulk. In this regime the authors find multiple pockets of deeply suppressed resistivity that close with temperature and magnetic field in dome shapes, with nonlinear dV/dI traces characteristic of superconductivity: five pockets per sign of the displacement field in octalayer graphene, and two more in a moiré heptalayer sample. In the heptalayer device, the same sharp resistive feature that hosts superconductivity at low displacement field becomes a Chern-number-one anomalous Hall insulator with $ ho_{xy} = \pm h/e^2$ at larger displacement field near one electron per moiré cell. The paper's claim is that the dual-surface semimetal is the superconducting normal state and that the c-axis charge separation is itself a new degree of freedom in the pairing problem, distinct from conventional semimetals, where electron and hole carriers overlap in space.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim leans on the assignment of the resistivity pockets to the dual-surface semimetallic regime, which comes from a self-consistent Hartree–Fock phase diagram whose dielectric constant ($\varepsilon_r = 16$) is fitted to reproduce the onset of the correlated insulator rather than the superconducting data, together with Landau-fan and Fourier analyses that the authors acknowledge are ambiguous wherever bands overlap, Fermi surfaces are annular, or isospin may be polarized.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Superconductivity now extends beyond six-layer rhombohedral graphene; the authors argue it may persist into even thicker stacks and ultimately bulk rhombohedral graphite, with layer-number spacing tuning the pairing.
  • In the moiré device, superconductivity and a quantized anomalous Hall state arise from the same conduction-band feature at different displacement fields, so the platform can be used to study the transition between superconducting and topological order in one continuously tunable sample.
  • The charge-separated normal state changes the theoretical landscape: pairing models must now account for two spatially separated reservoirs, whether through enhanced screening of Coulomb repulsion by the opposite-surface carriers or through synthetic or excitonic pairing mechanisms.
  • Because the two surfaces are linked only through a low-density bulk, the superconducting pockets should be highly sensitive to layer number and to perturbations of individual surfaces, giving a sharp experimental test of the proposed mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: if the dual-surface assignment is correct, then separately gating or contacting the two faces would split the superconductor into two weakly coupled electron sheets, making the system a tunable analogue of a proximitized bilayer and allowing direct tests of whether a superconducting gap forms on both bands.
  • My inference: the same surface-localization principle should apply to other chiral stacks; measuring gate-tracking behavior and zero-resistance pockets in differently aligned or thickness-graded rhombohedral samples would show whether dual-surface semimetallicity, rather than the specific layer count, is the organizing condition.
  • My inference: a decisive extension would map the superconducting dome as a function of displacement-field sign in the aligned sample, since the paper's own Hartree–Fock results predict pocket coexistence is favored only when the conduction band sits away from the moiré interface; flipping that orientation should suppress or shift the pockets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports transport evidence for superconductivity in rhombohedral octa- and heptalayer graphene in a semimetallic regime where valence- and conduction-band carriers are spatially separated onto opposite crystal surfaces. The authors identify multiple low-resistance pockets in the R8G device and two pockets in a moiré R7G device, with dome-like resistance suppression as a function of temperature and magnetic field, and dV/dI characteristics suggestive of a critical current. They argue, using self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations, that these pockets lie inside a band-overlapping 'dual-surface' semimetallic region, and they further report an integer quantum anomalous Hall state at higher displacement field in the moiré device. The paper emphasizes that the c-axis wavefunction distribution is a new degree of freedom for pairing.

Significance. If the identification of the normal state is correct, the results open a genuinely new regime for superconductivity in graphene multilayers: a charge-bifurcated semimetal in which pairing involves carriers on opposite crystal faces. The experimental data are extensive and internally consistent: ten pockets in R8G, two in moiré R7G, with complementary temperature, field, and dV/dI measurements, plus a quantum anomalous Hall state in the same device. The paper is also commendably transparent about its limitations, including the symmetric-ansatz restriction in the Hartree-Fock calculation, the ambiguity of the Fermi surface interpretation, the non-zero residual resistance, and the use of a fitted dielectric constant. These admissions are important because the central new claim is not merely the existence of superconductivity but the identification of the normal state as a dual-surface semimetal; that identification rests on assumptions that are not independently verified. With additional work on the normal-state assignment, this could be a high-impact contribution to the graphene superconductivity literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'Self-consistent mean-field calculation'; Fig. 1e; Fig. 3c]
  2. [Methods, 'Key parameters of the superconducting states'; Extended Data Table S1]
  3. [Methods, 'Theoretical determination of displacement field'; Methods, 'Self-consistent mean-field calculation']
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption]
  2. [Fig. 3 and Methods 'Fermiology analysis']
  3. [Extended Data, Table S1]
  4. [Main text, 'Superconductivity in semimetallic R8G']
  5. [Methods, 'Transport measurements']

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction of the central claim: the superconducting pockets are measured directly, and neither the fitted dielectric constant nor the self-cited gate-tracking model forces the result by construction.

full rationale

The central claim is an experimental observation, not a derivation: the superconducting pockets in R8G and moiré R7G are identified from directly measured resistive domes versus temperature and magnetic field and from dV/dI nonlinearities (Figs. 2c,d, 3d,e, Extended Data Figs. 3, 5, 6). There is no model output that is equated with the SC pockets. The normal-state assignment does rely on a self-consistent Hartree-Fock phase diagram, but the only fitted parameter is the dielectric constant, chosen to reproduce a different feature: Methods, 'Self-consistent mean-field calculation' states, 'The dielectric constant is chosen to be εr = 16. This value is chosen to reproduce the onset of insulating behavior at charge neutrality seen in the experiment.' The SC pockets at finite n and D are not inputs to that calibration, so the phase diagram is not a statistically forced prediction of the superconductivity. The paper also cites its own group's preprint, Ref. 32, for single-gate tracking behavior, but it simultaneously provides its own electrostatic calculation and compares with measured Landau fans and FFTs, and the superconducting character of the pockets does not reduce to that citation. The explicit limitations in the paper are weighed: the HF calculation only treats symmetric isospin states ('we do not search for symmetry-broken states'), the FFT interpretation 'can be ambiguous' under overlapping bands, annular Fermi surfaces, and isospin polarization, and the HF calculation cannot reproduce the |C| = 1 IQAH state. These are correctness and robustness caveats about the normal state that hosts the superconductivity, not circular constructions. No equation defines a predicted quantity in terms of a fitted input or a self-cited conclusion, so the paper is not significantly circular; the score of 2 reflects one minor self-citation and a calibrated parameter rather than any circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental observation (superconductivity) does not depend on the theory, but the paper's framing of it as a new dual-surface semimetallic regime does. The only genuinely fitted parameter is εr=16, which controls all Hartree-Fock results used to place the pockets in the band-overlap region. The moiré calculations also assume a specific continuum model and check two alignments (Type I/II). No new physical entities are postulated, but the layer count of the moiré sample and the superconducting interpretation of the resistive drops are unproved background assumptions.

free parameters (3)
  • Dielectric constant εr = 16
    Chosen to reproduce the onset of insulating behavior at charge neutrality in the experiment (Methods, 'Self-consistent mean-field calculation'). It controls the strength of Coulomb interactions in all Hartree-Fock calculations, including the D-Δ conversion and the band-overlap phase boundary that places the superconducting pockets in the semimetallic regime.
  • DOS broadening η = 1-2 meV
    Lorentzian broadening used to smooth the density of states over the numerical momentum mesh (Methods, 'Self-consistent mean-field calculation'). It affects the DOS map but not the qualitative phase boundaries.
  • 90% threshold for Tc and Bc = 0.90 of normal-state resistance
    Tc and Bc are defined as the temperature or field where ρxx falls to 90% of the normal-state value (Methods, 'Key parameters of the superconducting states'). This is an analysis convention chosen by hand that sets the reported critical values.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Tight-binding Hamiltonian for rhombohedral graphene with hopping parameters {γ0, γ1, γ2, γ3, γ4} = {3.1, 0.38, -0.015, -0.29, -0.141} eV and dimerization δdimer = 10.5 meV
    Used for all band structure and Hartree-Fock calculations (Methods, Eqs. 1-2). Parameters are taken from prior literature [1-5, 52].
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock mean-field approximation with a symmetric, isospin-unpolarized ansatz
    The calculations do not search for symmetry-broken states (Methods, 'Self-consistent mean-field calculation'), so the theory cannot capture the IQAH state and may miss the true normal state near the superconducting pockets. The authors acknowledge this in Methods and Supplementary Information.
  • domain assumption Layer-dependent Coulomb potential with background charge subtraction and a symmetric device geometry with dg = 40 nm
    Used for self-consistent screening and D-Δ conversion (Methods, Eqs. 5-7). Assumes the flake sits symmetrically between the top and bottom gates.
  • domain assumption The moiré R7G sample is exactly seven layers, determined by optical contrast step counting
    The layer number of the moiré device cannot be determined by the νLL = -2N Landau fan method, so optical contrast is used (Methods, 'Layer number determination'; Supplementary Information Fig. 2). A miscount would change the sample label but not necessarily the central SC observation.
  • ad hoc to paper The normal state in the SC pocket regions is the dual-surface semimetallic state, as assigned by the Hartree-Fock phase diagram and Landau fan analysis
    This is crucial to the 'new regime' framing. The assignment depends on a calculation with a fitted dielectric constant (εr=16) and on FFT interpretations that the authors acknowledge are ambiguous in regions with overlapping bands and possible isospin polarization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconductivity from dual-surface carriers in rhombohedral graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7O4QCXZD

@misc{pith2026250718598,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconductivity from dual-surface carriers in rhombohedral graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7O4QCXZD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18598}
}
abstract

Intrinsic rhombohedral graphene hosts an unusual low-energy electronic wavefunction, predominantly localized at its outer crystal faces with negligible presence in the bulk. Increasing the number of graphene layers amplifies the density of states near charge neutrality, greatly enhancing the susceptibility to symmetry-breaking phases. Here, we report superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene arising from an unusual charge-delocalized semimetallic normal state, characterized by coexisting valence- and conduction-band Fermi pockets split to opposite crystal surfaces. In octalayer graphene, the superconductivity appears in five apparently distinct pockets for each sign of an external electric displacement field ($D$). In a moir\'e superlattice sample where heptalayer graphene is aligned on one side to hexagonal boron nitride, two pockets of superconductivity emerge from a single sharp resistive feature. At higher $D$ the same resistive feature additionally induces an $h/e^{2}$-quantized anomalous Hall state at dopings near one electron per moir\'e unit cell. Our findings reveal a novel superconducting regime in multilayer graphene and create opportunities for coupling to nearby topological states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18598 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. c we see a dispersing sequence of QOs with fv = 1/4 for Vt < −4.75 V and screening of those QOs with a corresponding rapid increase of fv for Vt > −4.75 V, suggesting that the jet from the CNP defines the band￾overlapping to -isolated region, analogous to the behavior seen in the R8G sample. Figures 3d,e show measurements of ρxx for SC17 ver￾sus T and B as Vt is swept at fixed Vb ≈ 1.40 V. Both exhibit characteristi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The ρxx bump that develops into the two supercon￾ducting pockets in R7G seems clearly to be a feature of the conduction band, since it persists into the electron￾doped region (n > 0) at large D when a gap opens at the CNP, and because its trajectory becomes nearly in￾d…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anomalous metal and superconducting phases in rhombohedral graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gate-tuned rhombohedral graphene hosts adjacent zero-resistance superconducting and finite-resistance anomalous-metal pockets with similar Tc but distinct critical fields, constraining extrinsic origins of anomalous metals.

  2. Berry-Flux-Controlled Cascade of Chiral Superconducting States

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Berry-curvature flux through the Fermi sea makes the leading superconducting pairing switch between chiral channels m=1,3,5,..., with first-order transitions and Little-Parks-like Tc oscillations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Xiao, R. et al. Density functional investigation of rhom- bohedral stacks of graphene: Topological surface states, 13 nonlinear dieletric response, and bulk limit.Phys. Rev. B 84, 165404 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Guinea, F., Castro Neto, A. H. & Peres, N. M. R. Elec- tronic states and landau levels in graphene stacks.Phys. Rev. B 73, 245426 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    & MacDonald, A

    Min, H. & MacDonald, A. H. Chiral decomposition in the electronic structure of graphene multilayers. Phys. Rev. B 77, 155416 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    & McCann, E

    Koshino, M. & McCann, E. Trigonal warping and berry’s phasenπ in abc-stacked multilayer graphene.Phys. Rev. B 80, 165409 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    & Fal’ko, V

    Slizovskiy, S., McCann, E., Koshino, M. & Fal’ko, V. I. Films of rhombohedral graphite as two-dimensional topo- logical semimetals. Communications Physics 2, 164 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Shi, Y. et al. Electronic phase separation in multilayer rhombohedral graphite. Nature 584, 210–214 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    & Young, A

    Zhou, H., Xie, T., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 434–438 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Zhou, H. et al. Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in bernal bilayer graphene. Science 375, 774–778 (2022)

    2022

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, Y. et al. Enhanced superconductivity in spin- orbit proximitized bilayer graphene. Nature 613, 268– 273 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Holleis, L. et al. Nematicity and orbital depairing in superconducting bernal bilayer graphene.Nature Physics 21, 444–450 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Patterson, C. L.et al. Superconductivity and spin cant- ing in spin-orbit-coupled trilayer graphene.Nature 641, 632–638 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Superconductivity and quantized anoma- lous hall effect in rhombohedral graphene.Nature 639, 342–347 (2025)

    Choi, Y.et al. Superconductivity and quantized anoma- lous hall effect in rhombohedral graphene.Nature 639, 342–347 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Zhang, Y. et al. Twist-programmable superconductivity in spin-orbit-coupled bilayer graphene.Nature 641, 625– 631 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Impact of spin-orbit coupling on supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral graphene

    Yang, J.et al. Impact of spin-orbit coupling on supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral graphene. Nature Materials (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Morisette, E. et al. Superconductivity, anomalous hall effect, and stripe order in rhombohedral hexalayer graphene. arXiv:2504.05129 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Li, C. et al. Tunable superconductivity in electron- and hole-doped bernal bilayer graphene. Nature 631, 300– 306 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Han, T. et al. Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene. arXiv:2408.15233 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Half- and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene

    Zhou, H.et al. Half- and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 429–433 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Correlatedinsulatorandcherninsulatorsin pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene.Nature Nan- otechnology 19, 181–187 (2024)

    Han, T.et al. Correlatedinsulatorandcherninsulatorsin pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene.Nature Nan- otechnology 19, 181–187 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Liu, K. et al. Spontaneous broken-symmetry insulator and metals in tetralayer rhombohedral graphene.Nature Nanotechnology 19, 188–195 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Layer-polarized ferromagnetism in rhom- bohedral multilayer graphene

    Zhou, W.et al. Layer-polarized ferromagnetism in rhom- bohedral multilayer graphene. Nature Communications 15 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene

    Lu, Z.et al. Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature 626, 759–764 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Lu, Z. et al. Extended quantum anomalous hall states in graphene/hbn moiré superlattices.Nature 637, 1090– 1095 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Waters, D. et al. Chern insulators at integer and frac- tional filling in moiré pentalayer graphene.Phys. Rev. X 15, 011045 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Xie, J. et al. Tunable fractional chern insulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices. Nature Materials (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Electric-field switchable chirality in rhom- bohedral graphene chern insulators stabilized by tung- sten diselenide

    Ding, J.et al. Electric-field switchable chirality in rhom- bohedral graphene chern insulators stabilized by tung- sten diselenide. Physical Review X (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    P., Schrieffer, J

    Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698–1701 (1979)

    1979

  20. [28]

    Myhro, K. et al. Large tunable intrinsic gap in rhombohedral-stacked tetralayer graphene at half filling. 2D Materials 5, 045013 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    A., Niu, Q

    Zhang, F., Jung, J., Fiete, G. A., Niu, Q. & MacDon- ald, A. H. Spontaneous quantum hall states in chirally stacked few-layer graphene systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156801 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    Transport spectroscopy of symmetry- broken insulating states in bilayer graphene.Nature Nan- otechnology 7, 155–160 (2012)

    Velasco Jr, J.et al. Transport spectroscopy of symmetry- broken insulating states in bilayer graphene.Nature Nan- otechnology 7, 155–160 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Orbital multiferroicity in pentalayer rhom- bohedral graphene

    Han, T.et al. Orbital multiferroicity in pentalayer rhom- bohedral graphene. Nature 623, 41–47 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    & Lewandowski, C

    Kolář, K., Waters, D., Folk, J., Yankowitz, M. & Lewandowski, C. Single-gate tracking behavior in flat- band multilayer graphene devices. arXiv:2503.10749 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Xie, J. et al. Unconventional orbital magnetism in graphene-based fractional chern insulators. arXiv:2506.01485 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Su, R. et al. Moiré-driven topological electronic crystals in twisted graphene.Nature 637, 1084–1089 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Tolmachev, V. V. Logarithmic criterion for supercon- ductivity. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 140:3, 563–566 (1961)

    1961

  28. [36]

    & Anderson, P

    Morel, P. & Anderson, P. W. Calculation of the su- perconducting state parameters with retarded electron- phonon interaction. Phys. Rev. 125, 1263–1271 (1962). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.125.1263

    1962

  29. [37]

    Little, W. A. Possibility of synthesizing an or- ganic superconductor. Phys. Rev. 134, A1416–A1424 (1964). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.134.A1416

    1964

  30. [38]

    On surface superconductivity.Physics Let- ters 13, 101–102 (1964)

    Ginzburg, V. On surface superconductivity.Physics Let- ters 13, 101–102 (1964). URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/0031-9163(64)90672-9

    1964

  31. [39]

    & Bardeen, J

    Allender, D., Bray, J. & Bardeen, J. Model for an exci- ton mechanism of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 7, 1020–1029 (1973). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.1020

    1973 doi

  32. [40]

    Malozovsky, Y. M. & Fan, J. D. The metal - insu- lator phase transition, quasiparticle damping and su- perconductivity in a layered fermi gas. Superconduc- tor Science and Technology 9, 622–638 (1996). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/9/8/003

    1996 doi

  33. [41]

    Electron attraction mediated by coulomb repulsion

    Hamo, A.et al. Electron attraction mediated by coulomb repulsion. Nature535, 395–400 (2016). URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1038/nature18639

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    & Ruhman, J

    Fatemi, V. & Ruhman, J. Synthesizing coulombic su- perconductivity in van der waals bilayers.Phys. Rev. B 98, 094517 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.094517. 14

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    Chubukov, A. V. & Kivelson, S. A. Superconductivity in engineered two-dimensional electron gases.Phys. Rev. B 96, 174514 (2017). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.174514

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    Scalapino, D. J. A common thread: The pairing inter- action for unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383–1417 (2012). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1383

    2012 doi

  37. [45]

    Li, H. et al. Electrode-free anodic oxidation nanolithog- raphy of low-dimensional materials. Nano Letters 18, 8011–8015 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    & Hafner, J

    Kern, G., Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio calculation of the lattice dynamics and phase diagram of boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 59, 8551–8559(1999). URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.8551

    1999 doi

  39. [47]

    H., Guinea, F., Peres, N

    Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109– 162 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.81.109

    2009

  40. [48]

    & Klusek, Z

    Sławińska, J., Zasada, I. & Klusek, Z. Energy gap tuning in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride bilayer system. Phys. Rev. B 81, 155433 (2010). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.155433

    2010 doi

  41. [49]

    & Miller, D

    Kindermann, M., Uchoa, B. & Miller, D. L. Zero- energy modes and gate-tunable gap in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115415 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.86.115415

    2012

  42. [50]

    & Koshino, M

    Moon, P. & Koshino, M. Electronic properties of graphene/hexagonal-boron-nitride moiré superlattice. Phys. Rev. B 90, 155406 (2014). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155406

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    & MacDonald, A

    Jung, J., Raoux, A., Qiao, Z. & MacDonald, A. H. Ab initio theory of moiré superlattice bands in lay- ered two-dimensional materials. Phys. Rev. B 89, 205414 (2014). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.89.205414

    2014

  44. [52]

    Electron energy band structure and elec- tronic properties of rhombohedral graphite

    McClure, J. Electron energy band structure and elec- tronic properties of rhombohedral graphite. Carbon 7, 425–432 (1969)

    1969

  45. [53]

    & MacDonald, A

    Xie, M. & MacDonald, A. H. Nature of the correlated insulator states in twisted bilayer graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 097601 (2020). URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.097601

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    A., Song, Z.-D., Regnault, N

    Bernevig, B. A., Song, Z.-D., Regnault, N. & Lian, B. Twisted bilayer graphene. iii. interacting hamil- tonian and exact symmetries. Phys. Rev. B 103, 205413 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.103.205413

    2021

  47. [55]

    CoulombInteraction- Stabilized Isolated Narrow Bands with Chern Num- bers C > 1 in Twisted Rhombohedral Trilayer-Bilayer Graphene

    TienPhong, V.&Lewandowski, C. CoulombInteraction- Stabilized Isolated Narrow Bands with Chern Num- bers C > 1 in Twisted Rhombohedral Trilayer-Bilayer Graphene. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2505.07981 (2025). 2505.07981

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kolář, K. c. v., Zhang, Y., Nadj-Perge, S., von Oppen, F. & Lewandowski, C. Electrostatic fate ofn-layer moiré graphene. Phys. Rev. B 108, 195148 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Parra-Martinez, G. et al. Band renormalization, quar- ter metals, and chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19474 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Asymmetry gap in the electronic band structure of bilayer graphene

    McCann, E. Asymmetry gap in the electronic band structure of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403 (2006). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.74.161403

    2006

  51. [59]

    Gava, P., Lazzeri, M., Saitta, A. M. & Mauri, F. Ab initio study of gap opening and screening ef- fects in gated bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 165431 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.79.165431. 15 EXTENDED DATA pocket Tc (mK) Bc (mT) ξ (nm) SC17 89 1...

    2009

  52. [60]

    the bands are rigid against density variation

    Non-interacting limit:The first approximation operates with just the non-interacting band structure (which presumably does account for some effects from Coulomb interactions inab initio calculations at charge neutrality and zero displacement field) and assume that it does not ...

  53. [61]

    (2) We note that this layer-independent potential is equivalent to V(q) = lim zℓ,zℓ′→dg/2 e2csch (|q|dg) 2ϵ0ϵr|q| [cosh (|q|{dg−|zℓ−zℓ′|})− cosh (|q|{dg−|zℓ +zℓ′|})]

    Layerless interacting limit: The second approximation accounts for electron-electron interactions in the mean-field limit as described in the Methods section of the main text except that here, we use the layer- independent, dual-gated Coulomb potential V(q) = e2 2ϵrϵ0|q| tanh ...

  54. [62]

    Layerful interacting limit:This last approximation accounts for electron-electron interactions in the mean- field limit with both gate screening and layer-charge screening as described in the Methods section of the main text. In this approximation, the layer-dependent Hartree ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.