REVIEW 2 cited by
Large Language Models as Agents in Two-Player Games
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
By formally defining the training processes of large language models (LLMs), which usually encompasses pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning with human feedback, within a single and unified machine learning paradigm, we can glean pivotal insights for advancing LLM technologies. This position paper delineates the parallels between the training methods of LLMs and the strategies employed for the development of agents in two-player games, as studied in game theory, reinforcement learning, and multi-agent systems. We propose a re-conceptualization of LLM learning processes in terms of agent learning in language-based games. This framework unveils innovative perspectives on the successes and challenges in LLM development, offering a fresh understanding of addressing alignment issues among other strategic considerations. Furthermore, our two-player game approach sheds light on novel data preparation and machine learning techniques for training LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
AutomataGPT: Forecasting and Ruleset Inference for Two-Dimensional Cellular Automata
A transformer pretrained on 100 cellular automaton rules forecasts unseen rules at 98.5% one-step accuracy and infers new rules with up to 96% functional accuracy.
-
Seed-X: Building Strong Multilingual Translation LLM with 7B Parameters
A 7B open-weight translation model matches or outperforms far larger commercial systems across 28 languages in automatic and human evaluations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.