Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 110 references

The same factorization and evolution methods that founded QCD now underpin precision electroweak measurements and new-physics searches.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 15:37 UTC pith:7RYHNYQB

load-bearing objection Solid invited foundations review by Sterman; no new results, but clear, accurate, and useful for the Physics Reports collection.

arxiv 2607.07908 v1 pith:7RYHNYQB submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph

QCD for electroweak precision measurements: Foundations

George Sterman This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords QCD factorizationparton distributionsDGLAP evolutiondeep inelastic scatteringDrell-Yan processQT resummationelectroweak precisionasymptotic freedom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review traces how electroweak probes of hadrons, beginning with deep inelastic scattering, revealed scaling that the parton model explained and that asymptotic freedom in QCD reconciled with strong interactions. Collinear factorization separates short-distance electroweak hard scatterings, computable in perturbation theory, from universal parton distributions that absorb long-distance physics. Evolution of those distributions with scale, plus extensions to leptonic annihilation, Drell-Yan production, and transverse-momentum resummation, then let the same distributions predict electroweak boson and Higgs rates in hadron collisions. The result is that techniques forged to understand the strong force now supply the calculational foundation for high-energy precision electroweak physics and searches beyond the Standard Model.

Core claim

Collinear factorization, DGLAP evolution, and QT resummation, first developed to turn scaling into a controlled theory of QCD, furnish the infrared-safe hard functions and universal parton distributions that make precision calculations of electroweak processes at colliders possible. Once coefficient functions are computed in an infrared-regulated theory, measured structure functions determine portable distributions that can be evolved and reused for Drell-Yan, vector-boson, and Higgs production, thereby linking the strong and electroweak sectors for both Standard-Model tests and new-physics searches.

What carries the argument

Collinear factorization: the convolution of infrared-safe short-distance coefficient (hard) functions with universal parton distributions (or fragmentation functions, or TMDs) that absorb all long-distance collinear physics; its scale independence immediately yields DGLAP evolution equations that transport the distributions between energies.

Load-bearing premise

Infrared-safe hard functions calculated for free partons in a regulated theory remain exactly the same when the factorization formula is applied to real hadrons.

What would settle it

A clear, process-dependent failure of universality: parton distributions extracted from deep-inelastic structure functions at one scale, evolved with the known DGLAP kernels, fail to describe measured Drell-Yan or electroweak-boson transverse-momentum spectra at another collider energy after all higher-order and nonperturbative corrections are accounted for.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Parton distributions determined once from DIS or lattice data can be evolved and reused to predict W, Z, and Higgs cross sections and rapidity distributions at any collider energy.
  • QT-resummed spectra of electroweak bosons become precision observables that constrain both Standard-Model parameters and possible new-physics contributions in the same final state.
  • Jet and event-shape cross sections built from energy-flow operators remain infrared-safe and therefore calculable, furnishing additional handles on electroweak decays and associated production.
  • Any short-distance new-physics process that couples to quarks or gluons inherits the same factorized structure and can be predicted from the same universal distributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same light-cone operator definitions that make parton distributions portable also open a direct path from lattice matrix elements to collider predictions, tightening the theory-experiment loop without new accelerators.
  • Because soft-gluon cancellations rely on inclusivity, any future precision measurement that tags additional soft hadronic activity will require a controlled extension of the factorization theorems themselves.
  • QT resummation already reaches vanishing transverse momentum; applying the identical separation-of-variables logic to other multi-scale electroweak observables (for example, joint threshold and QT logs) should yield comparable all-order control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review traces the historical and conceptual foundations linking QCD to electroweak precision physics. It begins with QED infrared and ultraviolet issues, moves through deep-inelastic scattering, Bjorken scaling, and the parton model (Secs. 2–3), then develops collinear factorization, the double-cycle extraction of parton distributions, one-loop coefficient functions (Eqs. 19–27), all-order arguments via Coleman–Norton configurations and the optical theorem (Fig. 2), DGLAP evolution (Eq. 31), and the crossed channels of leptonic annihilation and Drell–Yan production, including Collins–Soper–Sterman QT factorization and resummation (Eqs. 38–46). The central claim is that the same infrared-safe techniques that reconcile scaling with asymptotic freedom supply the calculational basis for precision electroweak measurements and new-physics searches.

Significance. If accepted as a foundations piece for the Electroweak Precision Physics collection, the manuscript supplies a compact, heuristic exposition of the classic results (factorization, evolution, QT resummation) that underwrite virtually all high-energy electroweak analyses. It correctly reproduces the standard one-loop DIS formulae, the optical-theorem argument for all-order collinear factorization, and the CSS double-log resummation, all supported by the foundational literature. The pedagogical clarity and explicit statement of the factorization hypothesis (Sec. 3.3) make it a useful entry point for readers whose primary expertise lies in electroweak phenomenology rather than QCD technicalities. No new theorems or numerical claims are advanced; the value is expository and archival.

minor comments (5)
  1. Section headings contain residual spacing artifacts (“2 F rom currents to partons”, “3 F rom partons to QCD”). These should be cleaned for the published version.
  2. The subsection labeled “4. Extensions” (immediately before Sec. 5) appears to be an unfinished outline containing bullet points and a garbled figure caption for Fig. 3. Either complete the material or remove the placeholder.
  3. Typographical slips remain: “singlulark T” (after Eq. 26), “reummation” and “beautry” (Sec. 5.3), and occasional missing spaces around math. A final proofreading pass is needed.
  4. Eq. (14) writes the one-loop running coupling with an extraneous square on the logarithm; the conventional form is 1/(b0 ln(µ^{2}/Λ^{2})).
  5. A few classic references (e.g., the original CSS papers) are cited, but a short pointer to modern global PDF fits or recent N^{3}LO coefficient-function results would help readers who wish to move from foundations to current practice.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pure pedagogical review of established factorization, evolution and resummation; no new predictions or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The manuscript is an invited foundations review that walks through the historical and technical development of collinear factorization, DGLAP evolution and QT resummation. Coefficient functions are computed order-by-order in an infrared-regulated partonic theory (Secs. 3.3–3.4, Eqs. 19–26); parton distributions are independently defined as light-cone matrix elements (Eq. 28) and extracted from data (or lattice). The “double-cycle” procedure of Sec. 3.3 is the standard matching of IR-safe hard functions onto non-perturbative distributions; it does not redefine one in terms of the other. All-order arguments (Coleman–Norton + optical theorem, Sec. 4.1) and the evolution equations (Eqs. 29–31) are standard textbook material. Self-citations are to classic results already verified in the literature; none are load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansätze that close a circular loop. No parameters are fitted and then re-labeled as predictions. The paper therefore contains no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review of established QCD, the paper inherits the standard axioms of the Standard Model and of collinear factorization proofs; it introduces no free parameters or new entities.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Asymptotic freedom of non-Abelian gauge theories (Gross-Wilczek, Politzer)
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1 to reconcile scaling with strong interactions; taken as established.
  • domain assumption Collinear factorization theorems hold for DIS, Drell-Yan and single-particle inclusive annihilation (Collins-Soper-Sterman)
    Central technical premise of Secs. 3-5; proofs are cited rather than re-derived in full.
  • domain assumption Infrared-safe coefficient functions computed with partonic external states apply unchanged to hadronic external states
    Explicitly stated as an assumption in Sec. 3.3 when cycling from regulated theory to real data.
  • standard math Optical theorem / unitarity cancels final-state soft and collinear singularities in inclusive cross sections
    Used in Sec. 4.1 (Fig. 2) to reduce the cut diagram to a short-distance coefficient times a parton distribution.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 32078 in / 2212 out tokens · 28834 ms · 2026-07-10T15:37:26.288279+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The couplings of the strong to electroweak sectors of the Standard Model enable the exploration of each using our growing knowledge of the other. In this review, we will follow the sweep of history. Starting with QED as a precision theory, deep inelastic scattering served as a gateway to the strong interactions, followed by leptonic annihilation and quark-antiquark annihilation in hadron-hadron scattering. In turn, the resulting understanding of QCD helped establish the Standard Model. The same techniques form the basis for many precision electroweak measurements at high energy and searches for signs of new physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07908 by George Sterman.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cartoon of the proof of factorization in DIS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Crossing from DIS and parton distributions to 1PI in leptonic annihilation and frag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Inward bound Of matter and forces in the physical world

    A. Pais, “Inward bound Of matter and forces in the physical world.” Cambridge University Press (1986)

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Note on the Radiation Field of the electron,

    F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck, “Note on the Radiation Field of the electron,” Phys. Rev.52, 54-59 (1937) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.52.54

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.52.54 1937

  3. [3]

    Radiative Corrections: From Medium to High Energy Experiments

    A. Afanasev, J. C. Bernauer, P. Blunden, J. Bl¨ umlein, E. W. Cline, J. M. Friedrich, F. Hagel- stein, T. Husek, M. Kohl and F. Myhrer,et al.Eur. Phys. J. A60, no.4, 91 (2024) doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01281-y [arXiv:2306.14578 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01281-y 2024

  4. [4]

    Factorized QED and QCD Contribution to Deeply Inelastic Scattering

    J. Cammarota, J. W. Qiu, K. Watanabe and J. Y. Zhang, [arXiv:2505.23487 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    High-energy electron and photon physics: exploring the unknown with the known,

    W. K. H. Panofsky, “High-energy electron and photon physics: exploring the unknown with the known,” Talk at National Academy of Sciences SymposiumRevelations and Prospects in High Energy PhysicsApril 24, 1968 SLAC-PUB-0406.(1968)

    work page 1968

  6. [6]

    High-Energy Inelas- tic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees,

    E. D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. C. DeStaebler, J. Drees, G. Miller, L. W. Mo, R. E. Tay- lor, M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman and G. C. Hartmann,et al.“High-Energy Inelas- tic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 930-934 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.930

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.930 1969

  7. [7]

    Observed behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,

    M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, E. D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. C. DeStaebler, J. Drees, L. W. Mo and R. E. Taylor, “Observed behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 935-939 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.935

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.935 1969

  8. [8]

    Very high-energy collisions of hadrons,

    R. P. Feynman, “Very high-energy collisions of hadrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 1415-1417 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.1415 22

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.1415 1969

  9. [9]

    Inelastic Electron Proton and gamma Proton Scattering, and the Structure of the Nucleon,

    J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, “Inelastic Electron Proton and gamma Proton Scattering, and the Structure of the Nucleon,” Phys. Rev.185, 1975-1982 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.185.1975

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.185.1975 1975

  10. [10]

    Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions: Sec- ond Edition,

    C. Quigg, “Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions: Sec- ond Edition,” Princeton University Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0-691-13548-9, 978-1-4008-4822-5 doi:10.1515/9781400848225

    work page doi:10.1515/9781400848225 2013

  11. [11]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model,

    M. D. Schwartz, “Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model,” Cambridge University Press, 2014, ISBN 978-1-107-03473-0, 978-1-107-03473-0

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0,

    R. Brocket al.[CTEQ], “Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0,” Rev. Mod. Phys.67, 157-248 (1995) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.67.157

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.67.157 1995

  13. [13]

    QCD and collider physics,

    R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling and B. R. Webber, “QCD and collider physics,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.8, 1-435 (1996) Cambridge University Press, 2011, ISBN 978-0-511-82328-2, 978-0-521-54589-1 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628788

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628788 1996

  14. [14]

    Foundations of Perturbative QCD,

    J. Collins, “Foundations of Perturbative QCD,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.32, 1-624 (2011) Cambridge University Press, 2011, ISBN 978-1-009-40184-5, 978-1- 009-40183-8, 978-1-009-40182-1 doi:10.1017/9781009401845

    work page doi:10.1017/9781009401845 2011

  15. [15]

    The Black Book of Quantum Chromodynam- ics: a Primer for the LHC Era,

    J. Campbell, J. Huston and F. Krauss, “The Black Book of Quantum Chromodynam- ics: a Primer for the LHC Era,” Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 978-0-19-965274-7 doi:10.1093/oso/9780199652747.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780199652747.001.0001 2018

  16. [16]

    Deep-Inelastic Scattering: What do we know ?

    J. Bl¨ umlein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, no.09n10, 2441004 (2024) doi:10.1142/S0217751X24410045 [arXiv:2306.01362 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x24410045 2024

  17. [17]

    Asymptotic Sum Rules at Infinite Momentum,

    J. D. Bjorken, “Asymptotic Sum Rules at Infinite Momentum,” Phys. Rev.179, 1547-1553 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.179.1547

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.179.1547 1969

  18. [18]

    Polarized deep inelastic scattering at high energies and parity violating structure functions

    M. Anselmino, P. Gambino and J. Kalinowski, “Polarized deep inelastic scattering at high-energies and parity violating structure functions,” Z. Phys. C64, 267-274 (1994) doi:10.1007/BF01557397 [arXiv:hep-ph/9401264 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/bf01557397 1994

  19. [19]

    Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1343-1346 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30.1343 1973

  20. [20]

    Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories - I,

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories - I,” Phys. Rev. D8, 3633-3652 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.3633

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.8.3633 1973

  21. [21]

    ASYMPTOTICALLY FREE GAUGE THEORIES. 2.,

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “ASYMPTOTICALLY FREE GAUGE THEORIES. 2.,” Phys. Rev. D9, 980-993 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.980

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.980 1974

  22. [22]

    Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,

    H. D. Politzer, “Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1346-1349 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1346

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30.1346 1973

  23. [23]

    Freedom at Moderate Energies: Masses in Color Dynamics,

    H. Georgi and H. D. Politzer, “Freedom at Moderate Energies: Masses in Color Dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D14, 1829 (1976) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.1829 23

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.1829 1976

  24. [24]

    Singularities of current commutators on the light cone,

    H. Leutwyler and J. Stern, “Singularities of current commutators on the light cone,” Nucl. Phys. B20, 77-101 (1970) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90197-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90197-5 1970

  25. [25]

    Scale invariance and current commutators near the light cone,

    Y. Frishman, “Scale invariance and current commutators near the light cone,” Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 966-969 (1970) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.966

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.25.966 1970

  26. [26]

    Operator product expansions near the light cone,

    R. A. Brandt and G. Preparata, “Operator product expansions near the light cone,” Nucl. Phys. B27, 541-567 (1971) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(71)90265-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(71)90265-3 1971

  27. [27]

    Light cone behavior of perturbation theory,

    N. H. Christ, B. Hasslacher and A. H. Mueller, “Light cone behavior of perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D6, 3543 (1972) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.6.3543

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.6.3543 1972

  28. [28]

    High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and D. J. Gross, “High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current,” Phys. Rev. Lett.22, 156-159 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.156

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.22.156 1969

  29. [29]

    Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, “Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,” Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.5, 1-91 (1989) doi:10.1142/9789814503266 0001 [arXiv:hep- ph/0409313 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814503266 1989

  30. [30]

    Comments on collinear factorization

    G. Sterman, “Comments on collinear factorization,” [arXiv:2207.06507 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language,

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, “Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language,” Nucl. Phys. B126, 298-318 (1977) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4 1977

  32. [32]

    Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory,

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, “Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.15, 438-450 (1972) IPTI-381-71

    work page 1972

  33. [33]

    Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics.,

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, “Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics.,” Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641-653 (1977)

    work page 1977

  34. [34]

    Jet Structure in e+ e- Annihilation with Massless Hadrons,

    G. F. Sterman, “Jet Structure in e+ e- Annihilation with Massless Hadrons,” ILL-TH-75-32

    work page

  35. [35]

    Jets from Quantum Chromodynamics,

    G. F. Sterman and S. Weinberg, “Jets from Quantum Chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1436 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1436

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.1436 1977

  36. [36]

    Parton Physics on Euclidean Lattice

    X. Ji, “Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 262002 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.262002 [arXiv:1305.1539 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.262002 2013

  37. [37]

    Quasi-PDFs, momentum distributions and pseudo-PDFs

    A. V. Radyushkin, “Quasi-parton distribution functions, momentum distributions, and pseudo-parton distribution functions,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.3, 034025 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034025 [arXiv:1705.01488 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.034025 2017

  38. [38]

    Parton distributions and lattice QCD calculations: a community white paper

    H. W. Lin, E. R. Nocera, F. Olness, K. Orginos, J. Rojo, A. Accardi, C. Alexandrou, A. Bacchetta, G. Bozzi and J. W. Chen,et al.“Parton distributions and lattice QCD calculations: a community white paper,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.100, 107-160 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.01.007 [arXiv:1711.07916 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.01.007 2018

  39. [39]

    Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek and R. D. Young, “Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, no.2, 025001 (2018) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025001 [arXiv:1706.06223 [hep-lat]]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.025001 2018

  40. [40]

    Parton Distribution and Decay Functions,

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, “Parton Distribution and Decay Functions,” Nucl. Phys. B 194, 445-492 (1982) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90021-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90021-9 1982

  41. [41]

    The third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt and S. Moch, “The Third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange,” Nucl. Phys. B724, 3-182 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.06.020 [arXiv:hep-ph/0504242 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.06.020 2005

  42. [42]

    The massless three-loop Wilson coefficients for the deep-inelastic structure functions $F_2, F_L, xF_3$ and $g_1$

    J. Bl¨ umlein, P. Marquard, C. Schneider and K. Sch¨ onwald, “The massless three-loop Wilson coefficients for the deep-inelastic structure functions F 2, F L, xF 3 and g 1,” JHEP11, 156 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022)156 [arXiv:2208.14325 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)156 2022

  43. [43]

    A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs

    A. Accardi, S. Alekhin, J. Bl¨ umlein, M. V. Garzelli, K. Lipka, W. Melnitchouk, S. Moch, J. F. Owens, R. Plaˇ cakyt˙ e and E. Reya,et al.“A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs,” Eur. Phys. J. C76, no.8, 471 (2016) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4285-4 [arXiv:1603.08906 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4285-4 2016

  44. [44]

    Hadron structure in high-energy collisions

    K. Kovaˇ r´ ık, P. M. Nadolsky and D. E. Soper, “Hadronic structure in high-energy col- lisions,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92, no.4, 045003 (2020) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.045003 [arXiv:1905.06957 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.045003 2020

  45. [45]

    Partons, Factorization and Resummation, TASI95

    G. F. Sterman, “Partons, factorization and resummation, TASI 95,” [arXiv:hep-ph/9606312 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Singularities in the physical region,

    S. Coleman and R. E. Norton, “Singularities in the physical region,” Nuovo Cim.38, 438-442 (1965) doi:10.1007/BF02750472

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02750472 1965

  47. [47]

    Jet and Lepton Pair Production in High- Energy Lepton-Hadron and Hadron-Hadron Scattering,

    S. B. Libby and G. F. Sterman, “Jet and Lepton Pair Production in High- Energy Lepton-Hadron and Hadron-Hadron Scattering,” Phys. Rev. D18, 3252 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3252

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.3252 1978

  48. [48]

    Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory

    T. Becher, A. Broggio and A. Ferroglia, “Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory,” Lect. Notes Phys.896, pp.1-206 (2015) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14848-9 [arXiv:1410.1892 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14848-9 2015

  49. [49]

    Factorization at the LHC: From PDFs to Initial State Jets

    I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann and W. J. Waalewijn, “Factorization at the LHC: From PDFs to Initial State Jets,” Phys. Rev. D81, 094035 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.094035 [arXiv:0910.0467 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.094035 2010

  50. [50]

    Hard Scattering in QCD with Polarized Beams

    J. C. Collins, “Hard scattering in QCD with polarized beams,” Nucl. Phys. B394, 169-199 (1993) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90105-X [arXiv:hep-ph/9207265 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90105-x 1993

  51. [51]

    Extraction of Spin-Dependent Parton Densities and Their Uncertainties

    D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann and W. Vogelsang, “Extraction of Spin- Dependent Parton Densities and Their Uncertainties,” Phys. Rev. D80, 034030 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.034030 [arXiv:0904.3821 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.034030 2009

  52. [52]

    Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

    A. Accardi, J. L. Albacete, M. Anselmino, N. Armesto, E. C. Aschenauer, A. Bacchetta, D. Boer, W. K. Brooks, T. Burton and N. B. Chang,et al.“Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all,” Eur. Phys. J. A52, no.9, 268 (2016) doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 [arXiv:1212.1701 [nucl-ex]]. 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 2016

  53. [53]

    Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report,

    R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, D. Adamiak, W. Akers, M. Albaladejo, A. Al- bataineh, M. G. Alexeev, F. Ameli and P. Antonioli,et al.“Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report,” Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 [arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 2022

  54. [54]

    The Three-Loop Splitting Functions in QCD: The Singlet Case

    A. Vogt, S. Moch and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The Three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The Singlet case,” Nucl. Phys. B691, 129-181 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.04.024 [arXiv:hep-ph/0404111 [hep-ph]]. 12x

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.04.024 2004

  55. [55]

    The Three-Loop Splitting Functions in QCD: The Non-Singlet Case

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, “The Three loop splitting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case,” Nucl. Phys. B688, 101-134 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.030 [arXiv:hep-ph/0403192 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.030 2004

  56. [56]

    Additional moments and x-space approximations of four-loop splitting functions in QCD,

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, “Additional moments and x-space approximations of four-loop splitting functions in QCD,” Phys. Lett. B849, 138468 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138468 [arXiv:2310.05744 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138468 2024

  57. [57]

    Measurement of the parity-violating longitudinal single-spin asymmetry for $W^{\pm}$ boson production in polarized proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 500 $GeV

    M. M. Aggarwalet al.[STAR], “Measurement of the parity-violating longitudinal single- spin asymmetry forW ± boson production in polarized proton-proton collisions at √s= 500−GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 062002 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.062002 [arXiv:1009.0326 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.062002 2011

  58. [58]

    Measurement of parity-violating spin asymmetries in W$^{\pm}$ production at midrapidity in longitudinally polarized $p$$+$$p$ collisions

    A. Adareet al.[PHENIX], “Measurement of parity-violating spin asymmetries in W ± pro- duction at midrapidity in longitudinally polarizedp+pcollisions,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.5, 051103 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.051103 [arXiv:1504.07451 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.051103 2016

  59. [59]

    Cut Vertices and their Renormalization: A Generalization of the Wilson Expansion,

    A. H. Mueller, “Cut Vertices and their Renormalization: A Generalization of the Wilson Expansion,” Phys. Rev. D18, 3705 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3705

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.3705 1978

  60. [60]

    G. C. Nayak, J. W. Qiu and G. F. Sterman, ‘Fragmentation, NRQCD and NNLO fac- torization analysis in heavy quarkonium production,” Phys. Rev. D72, 114012 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.114012 [arXiv:hep-ph/0509021 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.114012 2005

  61. [61]

    Statistical Model for electron-Positron Annihilation Into Hadrons,

    J. D. Bjorken and S. J. Brodsky, “Statistical Model for electron-Positron Annihilation Into Hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D1, 1416-1420 (1970) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.1.1416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.1.1416 1970

  62. [62]

    Evidence for Jet Struc- ture in Hadron Production by e+ e- Annihilation,

    G. Hanson, G. S. Abrams, A. Boyarski, M. Breidenbach, F. Bulos, W. Chinowsky, G. J. Feld- man, C. E. Friedberg, D. Fryberger and G. Goldhaber,et al.“Evidence for Jet Struc- ture in Hadron Production by e+ e- Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1609-1612 (1975) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1609

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.35.1609 1975

  63. [63]

    Zero Mass Limit for a Class of Jet Related Cross-sections,

    G. F. Sterman, “Zero Mass Limit for a Class of Jet Related Cross-sections,” Phys. Rev. D 19, 3135 (1979) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.3135

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.3135 1979

  64. [64]

    Energy Correlations in electron - Positron Annihilation: Testing QCD,

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis and S. T. Love, “Energy Correlations in electron - Positron Annihilation: Testing QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 1585 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.41.1585

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.41.1585 1978

  65. [65]

    Jets and Quantum Field Theory

    N. A. Sveshnikov and F. V. Tkachov, “Jets and quantum field theory,” Phys. Lett. B382, 403-408 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00558-8 [arXiv:hep-ph/9512370 [hep-ph]]. 26

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00558-8 1996

  66. [66]

    Power Corrections and Nonlocal Operators

    G. P. Korchemsky, G. Oderda and G. F. Sterman, “Power corrections and nonlocal operators,” AIP Conf. Proc.407, no.1, 988 (1997) doi:10.1063/1.53732 [arXiv:hep-ph/9708346 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.53732 1997

  67. [67]

    Energy Correlation Functions for Jet Substructure

    A. J. Larkoski, G. P. Salam and J. Thaler, “Energy Correlation Functions for Jet Substruc- ture,” JHEP06, 108 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)108 [arXiv:1305.0007 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)108 2013

  68. [68]

    Conformal Colliders Meet the LHC

    K. Lee, B. Me¸ caj and I. Moult, “Conformal collider physics meets LHC data,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.1, L011502 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L011502 [arXiv:2205.03414 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.l011502 2025

  69. [69]

    Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC

    J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin and G. P. Salam, “Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 242001 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.242001 [arXiv:0802.2470 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.242001 2008

  70. [70]

    Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A Review of Recent Advances in Theory and Machine Learning

    A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult and B. Nachman, “Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A Review of Recent Advances in Theory and Machine Learning,” Phys. Rept.841, 1-63 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.11.001 [arXiv:1709.04464 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.11.001 2020

  71. [71]

    The Transverse Mass and Width of theWBoson,

    J. Smith, W. L. van Neerven and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The Transverse Mass and Width of theWBoson,” Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1738 (1983) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1738

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.1738 1983

  72. [72]

    Massive Lepton Pair Production in Hadron-Hadron Collisions at High-Energies,

    S. D. Drell and T. M. Yan, “Massive Lepton Pair Production in Hadron-Hadron Collisions at High-Energies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 316-320 (1970) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 902 (1970)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.25.316 1970

  73. [73]

    High-precision measurement of theWboson mass with the CDF II detector,

    T. Aaltonenet al.[CDF], “High-precision measurement of theWboson mass with the CDF II detector,” Science376, no.6589, 170-176 (2022) doi:10.1126/science.abk1781

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abk1781 2022

  74. [74]

    High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment

    V. Chekhovskyet al.[CMS], “High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” [arXiv:2412.13872 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at √s= 540 GeV,

    G. Arnisonet al.[UA1], “Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at √s= 540 GeV,” Phys. Lett. B122, 103-116 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91177-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91177-2 1983

  76. [76]

    Experimental Observation of Lepton Pairs of Invariant Mass Around 95-GeV/c**2 at the CERN SPS Collider,

    G. Arnisonet al.[UA1], “Experimental Observation of Lepton Pairs of Invariant Mass Around 95-GeV/c**2 at the CERN SPS Collider,” Phys. Lett. B126, 398-410 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90188-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90188-0 1983

  77. [77]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyanet al.[CMS], “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716, 30-61 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  78. [78]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716, 1-29 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  79. [79]

    Large Perturbative Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process in QCD,

    G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis and G. Martinelli, “Large Perturbative Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B157, 461-497 (1979) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90116-0 27

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90116-0 1979

  80. [80]

    Antisymmetric Tensor Gauge Theories and Nonlinear Sigma Models

    G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis, M. Greco and G. Martinelli, “Vector Boson Production at Col- liders: A Theoretical Reappraisal,” Nucl. Phys. B246, 12-44 (1984) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(84)90112-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550- 1984

Showing first 80 references.