Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Global Symmetry and Maximal Chaos

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper conjectures that a chemical potential widens the chaos bound to $\lambda_L \leq \frac{2\pi T}{\hbar(1 - |\mu/\mu_c|)}$ for operators that can create arbitrarily large charge.

desk verdict A serious conjecture paper that plausibly extends the MSS chaos bound to chemical potentials and checks against rotating BTZ, but the central analytic-step depends on an unproved vertical-edge bound (2.34) and an admitted exponential ansatz, so the abstract's 'we find' overstates a conditional result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05281 v6 pith:7TCWGFJQ submitted 2019-08-14 hep-th cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP

Indranil Halder This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP
keywords quantumchaosLyapunovexponentout-of-time-orderedcorrelatorglobalsymmetrychemicalpotentialconformalfieldtheoryBTZblackholescrambling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a conserved charge, probed through a chemical potential, changes the universal speed limit on quantum chaos. For operators that can create only a bounded amount of charge, the paper argues the standard bound $\lambda_L \leq 2\pi T/\hbar$ still holds. For operators that can create arbitrarily large charge, it conjectures that the instantaneous Lyapunov exponent obeys $\lambda_L \leq \frac{2\pi T}{\hbar(1 - |\mu/\mu_c|)}$, where $\mu_c$ is the largest chemical potential for which the thermal ensemble exists. The interest is that conserved charges, not just temperature, can set the scrambling rate, and the paper shows the bound is saturated for rotation in a holographic two-dimensional conformal field theory. If correct, the result predicts faster scrambling as the chemical potential approaches its critical value, with the effect controlled by the large-charge spectrum.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the domain of analyticity of the out-of-time-ordered correlator in complex time: a half-strip of width $\beta_{\mathrm{eff}}/4$ in the imaginary-time direction. A chemical potential for a continuous global symmetry shrinks this strip when the operators can excite arbitrarily large charge, because the Boltzmann factor $e^{-\beta E + \beta \mu Q}$ converges only for $\mu < \mu_c$. The proof maps the strip to a unit disk and applies the Schwarz-Pick lemma to bound the logarithmic derivative of the correlator by $2\pi/\beta_{\mathrm{eff}}$; at zero chemical potential the same mechanism gives the standard bound. In the holographic example, the rotating exponent is obtained from the Virasoro identity block after a conformal map from the thermal cylinder to the plane.

What would settle it

In any charged quantum system with a conserved $U(1)$ and a finite $\mu_c$, compute the instantaneous Lyapunov exponent from the out-of-time-ordered correlator at finite chemical potential; observing $\lambda_L > \frac{2\pi T}{1 - |\mu/\mu_c|}$ for any $\mu$ would falsify the conjecture, while a direct evaluation of $|F(t_0 + i\tau)|$ in the same model would test the existence assumption independently of the bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central conjecture is that the instantaneous Lyapunov exponent of the out-of-time-ordered correlator $F(t) = \mathrm{tr}[y z W(t) y z V(0) y z W(t) y z V(0)]$ in a thermal ensemble with inverse temperature $\beta$ and chemical potential $\mu$ is bounded by $\lambda_L \leq 2\pi/\beta_{\mathrm{eff}}$ with $\beta_{\mathrm{eff}} = \beta(1 - |\mu/\mu_c|)$, for local operators that can transfer arbitrarily large charge and for times near the scrambling time at small $\mu/\mu_c$. Here $\mu_c$ is fixed by the asymptotic spectrum, $|Q_n| \simeq E_n/\mu_c$, as the maximum chemical potential for which the partition function converges. The argument traces the change to the analyticity strip of $F$ in complex time, whose width shrinks from $\beta/4$ to $\beta_{\mathrm{eff}}/4$ when charge can grow with energy; a Schwarz-Pick estimate on that strip converts the narrower domain into the weaker bound. Operators that only create charge up to a fixed amount leave the strip width unchanged, so for them the standard bound $\lambda_L \leq 2\pi/\beta$ survives. In a two-dimensional conformal field theory dual to Einstein gravity, rotation gives $\mu = \Omega_H$, $\mu_c = 1$, and $\lambda_L = \frac{2\pi}{\beta(1 - \Omega_H)}$, saturating the conjectured bound for modes co-rotating with the horizon.

Load-bearing premise

There must be a moment $t_0$, after thermalization and before scrambling, at which the chaos correlator with imaginary time stays below its factorized late-time value $F_f$; the proof gives no independent reason that such a moment exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At nonzero chemical potential, chaotic growth can proceed faster than $2\pi T/\hbar$ whenever the scrambling operators carry unbounded charge; the ceiling is set by how close $\mu$ is to $\mu_c$.
  • Operators that only change charge by a fixed amount are blind to the chemical potential: their Lyapunov bound remains the standard $\lambda_L \leq 2\pi T/\hbar$.
  • In the holographic rotating case, the bound is saturated by modes that rotate with the black hole, giving $\lambda_L = \frac{2\pi T}{1 - \Omega_H}$, while counter-rotating modes have $\lambda_L = \frac{2\pi T}{1 + \Omega_H}$.
  • Near $\mu_c$ the exponential-growth window closes, so the formula is not expected to apply too close to the critical potential; nevertheless the scrambling time could be significantly shortened there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjecture holds generally, the large-charge spectrum of a theory becomes extractable from chaos: measuring $\lambda_L$ at finite density would give the slope $|Q_n|/E_n$ that defines $\mu_c$.
  • The same analyticity mechanism should extend to higher-dimensional rotating black holes, where a near-extremal throat may reproduce $\lambda_L = \frac{2\pi T}{1 - \Omega_H}$ from an effective Schwarzian sector; this goes beyond the paper's explicit two-dimensional example.
  • A direct numerical check of the assumption $|F(t_0 + i\tau)| \leq F_f$ in a charged large-$N$ model would isolate the proof's most fragile input without needing to confirm or refute the final bound itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper conjectures a generalization of the Maldacena-Shenker-Stanford (MSS) chaos bound to thermal ensembles with a chemical potential for a continuous global symmetry. For operators whose charge transfer is bounded, the standard bound λ_L ≤ 2πT/ħ is claimed to hold; for operators that can transfer arbitrarily large charge, the bound is conjectured to weaken to λ_L ≤ 2πT/[ħ(1−|μ/μ_c|)], where μ_c is the maximum chemical potential for which the ensemble exists. The argument follows MSS by studying the analyticity domain of the regularized out-of-time-order correlator, which shrinks from a strip of width β/4 to β_eff/4 = (β/4)(1−|μ/μ_c|), and then applying a Schwarz-Pick/Phragmén-Lindelöf bound. The paper applies the result to CFTs: internal U(1) symmetries have μ_c = ∞ and reproduce the standard bound, while a rotating BTZ black hole (dual to a 2D CFT with μ = Ω_H, μ_c = 1) is argued to saturate the modified bound, as verified by a Virasoro-block computation.

Significance. If the conjecture is correct, it provides a plausible and useful generalization of the MSS bound to systems with conserved charges and chemical potentials, with potential applications to rotating black holes and charged ensembles. The derivation is parameter-free, with β_eff and μ_c defined from the spectrum and partition function, and the BTZ saturation is computed independently from Virasoro blocks, providing a concrete check. The paper is honest about the conjectural status of the central claim, but the abstract overstates the result as a definite finding. The main novelty is the general analyticity argument and the explicit chemical-potential dependence; however, the derivation rests on a key unproven assumption (eq. 2.34) that controls the vertical edge of the analyticity strip, without which the Schwarz-Pick step is invalid. The examples are illustrative but the internal-symmetry case is straightforward and the BTZ saturation was already known; the interest lies in the general conjecture and its proof strategy.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.34)] The assumption that there exists a time t0 with td ≤ t0 ≤ t* such that |F(t0+iτ)| ≤ Ff for all τ in the strip is load-bearing and unproven. The horizontal edges of the half-strip are controlled by (2.30) and (2.32), but the vertical edge at t′ = 0 is not; without a bound on this edge, the function ff need not satisfy |ff| ≤ 1 on the boundary of the half-strip, so the Schwarz-Pick bound (2.35) does not follow. The later discussion after Eq. (2.37) offers only an order-of-magnitude estimate for when (2.34) might hold, not a derivation. I request that the authors either derive (2.34) from explicit assumptions (for example, by showing that max_τ |F_d^±(τ)| ≤ Ff over the strip, together with (2.26), implies the vertical-edge bound) or incorporate (2.34) as an explicit assumption in the conjecture statement and temper the abstract accordingly.
  2. [Abstract and §2.1] The abstract states that for operators of arbitrarily high charge 'we find that exponent must satisfy' λ_L ≤ 2πT/[ħ(1−|μ/μ_c|)], whereas the body of the paper presents this as a conjecture whose derivation relies on the unproven assumption (2.34) and the exponential ansatz (2.36). This overstates the status of the result. The conjecture as stated in §2.1 should either list all auxiliary assumptions explicitly, or the proof should be completed to justify the word 'find' in the abstract.
  3. [§3.2] The claim that the rotating BTZ result saturates the modified bound requires that the operators in the Virasoro-block computation can transfer arbitrarily large charge, as required by the conjecture's regime. The paper does not explicitly verify this, nor does it check the ETH-like assumption (2.17). A primary operator has a fixed charge difference at leading order; only through its Virasoro descendants can it transfer arbitrarily large charge. The authors should clarify how the local operators used in (3.7) satisfy the unbounded-charge condition, or restrict the saturation claim to the modes for which the modified bound is established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] In the last sentence of the abstract, 'later bound' should be 'latter bound'.
  2. [§2.1, after Eq. (2.3)] The phrase 'sub-leading terms in En→∞ limit' should read 'sub-leading terms in the E_n → ∞ limit'.
  3. [Eq. (2.17)] The notation in the limit 'lim_{En→∞} ∑_{En level} W_{m,n}V_{n,k} e^{−ϵ En} = 0' is unclear; please specify the summation range and the meaning of 'En level'.
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (3.14)] The hypergeometric function in (3.14) should be written with commas, e.g., {}_2F_1(2,2;4;z), and the overall factor is presumably 2h_v h_w/c; please correct the notation.
  5. [§3.2, Eq. (3.16)] The coefficient '48π i h_w h_v / (ϵ±12 ϵ±34)' contains an imaginary unit i that may be a typo after analytic continuation; please check the sign and phase of this expression.
  6. [§2.2, footnote 16] Footnote 16 states that the discussion is restricted to 0+1 dimensional field theories, but this restriction appears in the middle of the argument; consider moving it to the statement of the conjecture in §2.1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the chemical-potential-dependent chaos bound is derived from an analyticity strip whose width is fixed by the spectrum, not by fitting or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Eq. (2.37), is obtained by an MSS-style Schwarz-Pick argument applied to the half-strip (2.20), whose width beta_eff is derived from the convergence condition (2.18) together with the spectral assumption (2.19), E_n >= mu_c |Q_n|. Neither beta_eff nor mu_c is fitted to reproduce the claimed bound; mu_c is defined as the limiting chemical potential at which the partition function diverges via (2.4). The BTZ saturation in Sec. 3.2 is computed independently from Virasoro identity-block exchange and matched to the known bulk result of Refs. [38-40], so it is not a renaming or a recycled prediction. The only self-citation, Ref. [20], appears in footnote 7 in a background remark about tensor models and is not load-bearing for the conjecture. The proof does contain an explicitly stated unproven assumption, Eq. (2.34), requiring the existence of t0 with |F(t0 + i tau)| <= Ff; the paper itself flags this with 'with these assumptions in mind' and limits the claim to small mu/mu_c. That is a genuine fragility of the derivation, but it is a correctness caveat, not circularity: assumption (2.34) is not equivalent to the bound (2.37), and no parameter of the conclusion is fed back into the assumption. The derivation is self-contained modulo the stated analyticity and growth assumptions, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on spectral and analyticity assumptions about the theory, not on fitted constants. The most questionable inputs are the ETH-like matrix element decay (2.17) and the ad hoc assumptions (2.34) and (2.36). No new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The partition function diverges for μ > μ_c, and the spectrum satisfies |Q_n| ≈ E_n/μ_c at large E_n (eq. 2.4).
    Defines μ_c and the domain of analyticity; assumed for the ensemble to make sense.
  • domain assumption Matrix elements of local operators W,V in the energy basis do not grow exponentially with energy (eq. 2.17).
    Needed to ensure convergence of the spectral sum (2.18) and analyticity of F in the strip (2.20); justified by ETH, not proven.
  • domain assumption The spectrum is charge conjugation symmetric at asymptotically large energies (footnote 20).
    Without it the bound could be stronger; used to symmetrize the domain.
  • ad hoc to paper There exists a time t0 with td ≤ t0 ≤ t* such that |F(t0 + iτ)| ≤ Ff (eq. 2.34).
    Central to applying Schwarz-Pick to ff; introduced as an assumption without proof.
  • ad hoc to paper The OTOC has the exponential form Ff - F(t) ≈ ε e^{λ_L t} Ff (eq. 2.36).
    The author states 'we have no concrete justification for this particular form of F'.
  • standard math Standard complex analysis results: maximum modulus, Schwarz-Pick, Phragmen-Lindelöf, corollary 1 (Appendix A).
    Foundation of the bound; accepted mathematical theorems.
  • domain assumption For 2D CFT dual to Einstein gravity, the Virasoro identity block dominates in the large c limit and the sparseness condition (3.19) holds.
    Used to compute the OTOC (3.16); otherwise other blocks contribute.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global Symmetry and Maximal Chaos." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7TCWGFJQ

@misc{pith2026190805281,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global Symmetry and Maximal Chaos},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7TCWGFJQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05281}
}
abstract

In this note we study chaos in generic quantum systems with a global symmetry generalizing seminal work [arXiv : 1503.01409] by Maldacena, Shenker and Stanford. We conjecture a bound on instantaneous chaos exponent in a thermodynamic ensemble at temperature $T$ and chemical potential $\mu$ for the continuous global symmetry under consideration. For local operators which could create excitation up to some fixed charge, the bound on chaos (Lyapunov) exponent is independent of chemical potential $\lambda_L \leq \frac{2 \pi T}{ \hbar} $. On the other hand when the operators could create excitation of arbitrary high charge, we find that exponent must satisfy $\lambda_L \leq \frac{2 \pi T}{(1-|\frac{\mu}{\mu_c}|) \hbar} $, where $\mu_c$ is the maximum value of chemical potential for which the thermodynamic ensemble makes sense. As specific examples of quantum mechanical systems we consider conformal field theories. In a generic conformal field theory with internal $U(1)$ symmetry living on a cylinder the former bound is applicable, whereas in more interesting examples of holographic two dimensional conformal field theories dual to Einstein gravity, we argue that later bound is saturated in presence of a non-zero chemical potential for rotation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superluminal chaos after a quantum quench

    hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In BTZ-Vaidya holographic quenches, out-of-time-order correlators imply a transient superluminal butterfly velocity v_B = r_+/r_- > 1 while Lyapunov growth saturates the chaos bounds set by the local temperatures.

  2. Chaos in the butterfly cone

    hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The velocity-dependent Lyapunov exponent inside the butterfly cone satisfies λ(v) ≤ 2πT(1-|v|/v_B), a generalization of the chaos bound, saturated in SYK chains, holographic theories, and large N CFTs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Peres, Ergodicity and mixing in quantum theory

    A. Peres, Ergodicity and mixing in quantum theory. I , Phys. Rev. A30 (1984) 504–508

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    Feingold, N

    M. Feingold, N. Moiseyev, and A. Peres, Ergodicity and mixing in quantum theory. II, Phys. Rev. A30 (1984) 509–511

    work page 1984

  3. [3]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 28 (June,

    work page

  4. [4]

    Stanford, Many-body chaos at weak coupling , JHEP 10 (2016) 009, [arXiv:1512.07687]

    D. Stanford, Many-body chaos at weak coupling , JHEP 10 (2016) 009, [arXiv:1512.07687]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 199–204. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.72,377(1977)]

    1977

  6. [6]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast Scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065, [arXiv:0808.2096]

    arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Chowdhury and B

    D. Chowdhury and B. Swingle, Onset of many-body chaos in the O(N) model, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 6 065005, [ arXiv:1703.02545]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Steinberg and B

    J. Steinberg and B. Swingle, Thermalization and chaos in QED 3, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 7 076007, [ arXiv:1901.04984]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Gur-Ari, M

    G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, and S. H. Shenker, Chaos in Classical D0-Brane Mechanics, JHEP 02 (2016) 091, [ arXiv:1512.00019]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect , JHEP 03 (2014) 067, [arXiv:1306.0622]. – 21 –

    2014 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Multiple Shocks, JHEP 12 (2014) 046, [arXiv:1312.3296]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind, Localized shocks, JHEP 03 (2015) 051, [arXiv:1409.8180]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    D. A. Roberts and D. Stanford, Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), no. 13 131603, [ arXiv:1412.5123]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Jackson, L

    S. Jackson, L. McGough, and H. Verlinde, Conformal Bootstrap, Universality and Gravitational Scattering, Nucl. Phys. B901 (2015) 382–429, [ arXiv:1412.5205]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Stringy effects in scrambling , JHEP 05 (2015) 132, [arXiv:1412.6087]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    D. J. Gross, J. Kruthoff, A. Rolph, and E. Shaghoulian, TT in AdS2 and Quantum Mechanics, [arXiv:1907.04873]

    1907 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos , JHEP 08 (2016) 106, [arXiv:1503.01409]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, talk given at KITP Program: , Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter (2015)

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, talk given at KITP Program: , Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 10 106002, [ arXiv:1604.07818]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Choudhury, A

    S. Choudhury, A. Dey, I. Halder, L. Janagal, S. Minwalla, and R. Poojary, Notes on melonic O(N)q−1 tensor models, JHEP 06 (2018) 094, [ arXiv:1707.09352]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Murthy and M

    C. Murthy and M. Srednicki, Bounds on chaos from the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, [arXiv:1906.10808]

    1906 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Raju and P

    S. Raju and P. Shrivastava, Critique of the fuzzball program , Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 6 066009, [ arXiv:1804.10616]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Romero-Bermdez, K

    A. Romero-Bermdez, K. Schalm, and V. Scopelliti, Regularization dependence of the OTOC. Which Lyapunov spectrum is the physical one? , JHEP 07 (2019) 107, [arXiv:1903.09595]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems , Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 32 (Feb, 1999) 1163–1175, [cond-mat/9809360]

    M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems , Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 32 (Feb, 1999) 1163–1175, [cond-mat/9809360]

    1999 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Matsumoto, Y

    H. Matsumoto, Y. Nakano, H. Umezawa, F. Mancini, and M. Marinaro, Thermo Field Dynamics in Interaction Representation , Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1983) 599–602

    1983

  18. [26]

    Matsumoto, Y

    H. Matsumoto, Y. Nakano, and H. Umezawa, AN EQUIVALENCE CLASS OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORIES AT FINITE TEMPERATURE , J. Math. Phys. 25 (1984) 3076–3085

    1984

  19. [27]

    Hellerman, D

    S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, and M. Watanabe, On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge, JHEP 12 (2015) 071, [ arXiv:1505.01537]. – 22 –

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Monin, D

    A. Monin, D. Pirtskhalava, R. Rattazzi, and F. K. Seibold, Semiclassics, Goldstone Bosons and CFT data , JHEP 06 (2017) 011, [ arXiv:1611.02912]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Jafferis, B

    D. Jafferis, B. Mukhametzhanov, and A. Zhiboedov, Conformal Bootstrap At Large Charge, JHEP 05 (2018) 043, [ arXiv:1710.11161]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Turiaci and H

    G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, On CFT and Quantum Chaos , JHEP 12 (2016) 110, [arXiv:1603.03020]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Jain, and S. Kundu, Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory, JHEP 05 (2016) 099, [ arXiv:1509.00014]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and M. T. Walters, Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap , JHEP 08 (2014) 145, [ arXiv:1403.6829]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Perlmutter, Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form , JHEP 08 (2015) 088, [arXiv:1502.07742]

    E. Perlmutter, Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form , JHEP 08 (2015) 088, [arXiv:1502.07742]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Chang, D

    C.-M. Chang, D. M. Ramirez, and M. Rangamani, Spinning constraints on chaotic largec CFTs, JHEP 03 (2019) 068, [ arXiv:1812.05585]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Caputa, T

    P. Caputa, T. Numasawa, and A. Veliz-Osorio, Out-of-time-ordered correlators and purity in rational conformal field theories , PTEP 2016 (2016), no. 11 113B06, [arXiv:1602.06542]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gu and X.-L

    Y. Gu and X.-L. Qi, Fractional Statistics and the Butterfly Effect , JHEP 08 (2016) 129, [arXiv:1602.06543]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Birmingham, I

    D. Birmingham, I. Sachs, and S. N. Solodukhin, Conformal field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal modes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 151301, [hep-th/0112055]

    2002 arXiv

  30. [38]

    R. R. Poojary, BTZ dynamics and chaos , [arXiv:1812.10073]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Jahnke, K.-Y

    V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim, and J. Yoon, On the Chaos Bound in Rotating Black Holes , JHEP 05 (2019) 037, [ arXiv:1903.09086]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Mezei and G

    M. Mezei and G. Srosi, Chaos in the butterfly cone , [arXiv:1908.03574]

    1908 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Banerjee, K

    S. Banerjee, K. Papadodimas, S. Raju, P. Samantray, and P. Shrivastava, A Bound on Thermal Relativistic Correlators at Large Spacelike Momenta , [arXiv:1902.07203]

    1902 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Almheiri and J

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 11 (2015) 014, [ arXiv:1402.6334]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space , PTEP 2016 (2016), no. 12 12C104, [arXiv:1606.01857]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Nayak, A

    P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R. M. Soni, S. P. Trivedi, and V. Vishal, On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes, JHEP 09 (2018) 048, [ arXiv:1802.09547]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Moitra, S

    U. Moitra, S. P. Trivedi, and V. Vishal, Extremal and near-extremal black holes and near-CFT1, JHEP 07 (2019) 055, [ arXiv:1808.08239]. – 23 –

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Moitra, S

    U. Moitra, S. K. Sake, S. P. Trivedi, and V. Vishal, Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity and Rotating Black Holes , [arXiv:1905.10378]

    1905 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Grozdanov, K

    S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm, and V. Scopelliti, Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 23 231601, [ arXiv:1710.00921]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Blake, H

    M. Blake, H. Lee, and H. Liu, A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos, JHEP 10 (2018) 127, [ arXiv:1801.00010]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    F. M. Haehl and M. Rozali, Effective Field Theory for Chaotic CFTs , JHEP 10 (2018) 118, [ arXiv:1808.02898]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Blake, R

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov, and H. Liu, Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography, JHEP 10 (2018) 035, [ arXiv:1809.01169]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Grozdanov, On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections, JHEP 01 (2019) 048, [arXiv:1811.09641]

    S. Grozdanov, On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections, JHEP 01 (2019) 048, [arXiv:1811.09641]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Polchinski, Chaos in the black hole S-matrix , [arXiv:1505.08108]

    J. Polchinski, Chaos in the black hole S-matrix , [arXiv:1505.08108]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Hayden and J

    P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120, [ arXiv:0708.4025]

    2007 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Hosur, X.-L

    P. Hosur, X.-L. Qi, D. A. Roberts, and B. Yoshida, Chaos in quantum channels , JHEP 02 (2016) 004, [ arXiv:1511.04021]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Yoshida, Soft mode and interior operator in Hayden-Preskill thought experiment , [arXiv:1812.07353]

    B. Yoshida, Soft mode and interior operator in Hayden-Preskill thought experiment , [arXiv:1812.07353]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis

    W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis . International series in pure and applied mathematics. McGraw-Hill, 1976

    1976

  49. [57]

    Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis

    W. Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis . Mathematics series. McGraw-Hill, 1987. – 24 –

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.