pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28482 · v1 · pith:7YTYEHT5new · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Strongest constraints on dark acoustic oscillations from the Lyman-alpha forest

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 01:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords dark acoustic oscillationsLyman-alpha forestdark mattermatter power spectrumcosmological constraintshydrodynamical simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lyman-alpha forest data limits dark acoustic oscillations to at most 30% of dark matter at small scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets the first constraints on small-scale dark acoustic oscillations in the linear matter power spectrum using a full forward model of the Lyman-alpha forest. It finds that no more than 30% of dark matter can form DAOs peaking at wavenumbers below 50 h Mpc^{-1} at 95% confidence, reaching scales 25 times smaller than CMB constraints. The analysis relies on a deep kernel learning emulator of hydrodynamical simulations to isolate the oscillatory imprints amid covariance with nuisance parameters.

Core claim

Using a deep kernel learning emulator of hydrodynamical simulations, Lyman-alpha forest observations constrain the fraction of dark matter that can participate in dark acoustic oscillations peaking below 50 h Mpc^{-1} to no more than 30% at 95% confidence level.

What carries the argument

Deep kernel learning emulator of hydrodynamical simulations that isolates linear DAO imprints in the Ly-alpha forest transmission despite covariance with nuisance parameters.

If this is right

  • Dark sector interaction models must keep any DAO component subdominant on these scales.
  • The Lyman-alpha forest now provides the leading probe of linear power spectrum oscillations below CMB scales.
  • Similar emulator-based forward modeling can be applied to other small-scale features in future forest analyses.
  • The 30% limit tightens viable parameter space for interacting dark matter scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same emulator technique could test for other oscillatory or suppressed features in the small-scale power spectrum.
  • Dominant dark matter must remain effectively cold and non-interacting on scales around 50 h Mpc^{-1} to satisfy the bound.
  • Cross-checks with other tracers like the 21 cm signal could independently verify or strengthen the DAO fraction limit.

Load-bearing premise

The deep kernel learning emulator accurately reproduces the effects of DAO oscillations on the Lyman-alpha forest despite their covariance with other parameters.

What would settle it

A Lyman-alpha forest power spectrum measurement showing DAO signatures from more than 30% of dark matter at wavenumbers below 50 h Mpc^{-1} would contradict the reported upper limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28482 by Caleb Gemmell, David Curtin, Jared Barron, Keir K. Rogers, Norman Murray, Sandip Roy, Zhihan Yuan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Blue contours show the 2D marginalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The difference between the flux power spectra at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: 1D flux power spectrum ratio at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: 1D flux power spectra ratios at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: A test of convergence in the simulated flux power spectra with respect to the number of simulation particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: A test of convergence in the simulated flux power spectra with respect to the simulation volume with fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Deep kernel learning emulator flow chart with the feature extractor at the top and GP at the bottom. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The convergence of summary statistics of the posterior distribution of DAO, cosmological and IGM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Leave-one-out cross-validation emulator test. Distribution of the ratio of empirical empirical error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Distribution of the logarithm of the ratio of empirical empirical error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: As Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: As Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: As Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We set the first constraints on a small-scale dark acoustic oscillation (DAO) in the linear matter power spectrum arising from dark sector interactions, with a full forward model of the Ly-$\alpha$ forest. No more than 30\% of dark matter can form DAOs if they peak at wavenumbers $< 50\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ (95\% c.l.), probing scales $25 \times$ smaller than the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Given the complex covariance of DAO and nuisance parameters, we use a deep kernel learning emulator of hydrodynamical simulations to capture imprints of linear oscillations in the Ly-$\alpha$ forest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims the first constraints on small-scale dark acoustic oscillations (DAOs) in the linear matter power spectrum from a full forward model of the Lyman-alpha forest. Using a deep kernel learning emulator of hydrodynamical simulations to capture the imprints of linear DAO oscillations, it concludes that no more than 30% of dark matter can form DAOs peaking at wavenumbers <50 h Mpc^{-1} (95% c.l.), extending 25x beyond CMB scales.

Significance. If the emulator validation holds, the result would provide the strongest existing limits on DAO models from small-scale structure probes, directly constraining dark sector interactions at wavenumbers inaccessible to the CMB. The forward-modeling approach with explicit nuisance covariance handling is a methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Emulator and forward-modeling sections] The 30% DAO fraction limit at k<50 h Mpc^{-1} is obtained by forward-modeling linear oscillations through the deep kernel learning emulator. No explicit test is described that isolates recovery of DAO wiggle amplitude and phase in the 1D flux power spectrum after marginalization over the full nuisance covariance (thermal history, IGM pressure, etc.). This is load-bearing for the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. The major comment identifies a gap in the presented validation of the emulator's ability to recover DAO features after nuisance marginalization. We address this point directly below and agree that additional explicit tests are warranted to support the central claim.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Emulator and forward-modeling sections] The 30% DAO fraction limit at k<50 h Mpc^{-1} is obtained by forward-modeling linear oscillations through the deep kernel learning emulator. No explicit test is described that isolates recovery of DAO wiggle amplitude and phase in the 1D flux power spectrum after marginalization over the full nuisance covariance (thermal history, IGM pressure, etc.). This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not describe an explicit test that isolates recovery of the DAO wiggle amplitude and phase in the 1D flux power spectrum after full marginalization over the nuisance covariance. This is a substantive point. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in the emulator validation section presenting mock-data recovery tests. These will inject DAO signals of controlled amplitude and phase into simulated flux power spectra, then recover the parameters using the emulator while sampling the full nuisance space (thermal history, IGM pressure smoothing, etc.). The tests will quantify any bias or degradation in the recovered DAO parameters relative to the input values. We view this addition as necessary to make the central claim fully robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; DAO limit obtained via independent forward modeling and emulator comparison to data

full rationale

The paper's central result is a 95% upper limit on the DAO dark-matter fraction obtained by training a deep kernel learning emulator on hydrodynamical simulations that include linear DAO oscillations in the initial power spectrum, then performing a full forward-model likelihood comparison against observed Ly-α forest flux power spectra while marginalizing over nuisance parameters. No equation or section reduces the reported limit to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing step rely on a self-citation whose content is itself unverified within the paper. The emulator is presented as a computational tool whose fidelity is an assumption (as noted by the reader), but that assumption is external to the derivation chain and does not create a self-definitional or renaming circularity. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of the hydrodynamical forward model and emulator for translating linear DAO features into observable forest statistics; no new particles or forces are postulated beyond standard dark sector interactions.

free parameters (2)
  • DAO peak wavenumber cutoff
    The scale threshold of 50 h Mpc^{-1} is used to define the regime where the 30% limit applies.
  • DAO dark matter fraction = 0.3
    The reported 30% upper limit is the fitted parameter being constrained.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear DAO features in the matter power spectrum are faithfully imprinted in the Ly-alpha forest through hydrodynamical evolution
    Invoked when using the emulator to capture imprints of linear oscillations.
  • domain assumption The deep kernel learning emulator reproduces the full covariance between DAO parameters and nuisance parameters without bias
    Required for the complex covariance handling mentioned in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5653 in / 1285 out tokens · 44837 ms · 2026-06-30T01:31:54.008211+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Atomic Dark Matter,

    D. E. Kaplan, G. Z. Krnjaic, K. R. Rehermann, and C. M. Wells, “Atomic Dark Matter,”JCAP05(2010) 021,arXiv:0909.0753 [hep-ph]

  2. [2]

    Cosmology of atomic dark matter,

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and K. Sigurdson, “Cosmology of atomic dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D87no. 10, (2013) 103515,arXiv:1209.5752 [astro-ph.CO]

  3. [3]

    Constraints on Large-Scale Dark Acoustic Oscillations from Cosmology,

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, R. de Putter, A. Raccanelli, and K. Sigurdson, “Constraints on Large-Scale Dark Acoustic Oscillations from Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D 89no. 6, (2014) 063517,arXiv:1310.3278 [astro-ph.CO]

  4. [4]

    Partially Acoustic Dark Matter, Interacting Dark Radiation, and Large Scale Structure,

    Z. Chacko, Y. Cui, S. Hong, T. Okui, and Y. Tsai, “Partially Acoustic Dark Matter, Interacting Dark Radiation, and Large Scale Structure,”JHEP12 (2016) 108,arXiv:1609.03569 [astro-ph.CO]

  5. [5]

    Mirror twin Higgs cosmology: constraints and a possible resolution to the H 0 and S8 tensions,

    S. Bansal, J. H. Kim, C. Kolda, M. Low, and Y. Tsai, “Mirror twin Higgs cosmology: constraints and a possible resolution to the H 0 and S8 tensions,”JHEP 05(2022) 050,arXiv:2110.04317 [hep-ph]

  6. [6]

    The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,

    N. Sch¨ oneberg, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. P´ erez S´ anchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin, and J. Lesgourgues, “The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,”Phys. Rept.984(2022) 1–55,arXiv:2107.10291 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [7]

    Stepped partially acoustic dark matter, large scale structure, and the Hubble tension,

    M. A. Buen-Abad, Z. Chacko, C. Kilic, G. Marques-Tavares, and T. Youn, “Stepped partially acoustic dark matter, large scale structure, and the Hubble tension,”JHEP06(2023) 012, arXiv:2208.05984 [hep-ph]

  8. [8]

    Dark Acoustic Oscillations as an Early-Universe Explanation of the DESI Anomaly,

    M. Garny, F. Niedermann, and M. S. Sloth, “Dark Acoustic Oscillations as an Early-Universe Explanation of the DESI Anomaly,” arXiv:2512.15870 [astro-ph.CO]

  9. [9]

    Dark Acoustic Oscillations and the Hubble Tension,

    M. Garny, F. Niedermann, and M. S. Sloth, “Dark Acoustic Oscillations and the Hubble Tension,” arXiv:2602.23895 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [10]

    Constraining Dark Acoustic Oscillations with the High-Redshift UV Luminosity Function,

    J. Barron, D. Curtin, H. Liu, J. Munoz, and S. Roy, “Constraining Dark Acoustic Oscillations with the High-Redshift UV Luminosity Function,” arXiv:2512.01998 [astro-ph.CO]

  11. [11]

    Pushing the Limits of Atomic Dark Matter: First-Principles Recombination Rates and Cosmological Constraints,

    J. Barron, R. Essig, M. H. McDuffie, J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, and G. Suczewski, “Pushing the Limits of Atomic Dark Matter: First-Principles Recombination Rates and Cosmological Constraints,”arXiv:2602.10197 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    Simulating Atomic Dark Matter in Milky Way Analogs,

    S. Roy, X. Shen, M. Lisanti, D. Curtin, N. Murray, and P. F. Hopkins, “Simulating Atomic Dark Matter in Milky Way Analogs,”Astrophys. J. Lett.954no. 2, (2023) L40,arXiv:2304.09878 [astro-ph.GA]

  13. [13]

    Dissipative Dark Substructure: The Consequences of Atomic Dark Matter on Milky Way Analog Subhalos,

    C. Gemmell, S. Roy, X. Shen, D. Curtin, M. Lisanti, N. Murray, and P. F. Hopkins, “Dissipative Dark Substructure: The Consequences of Atomic Dark Matter on Milky Way Analog Subhalos,”Astrophys. J. 967no. 1, (2024) 21,arXiv:2311.02148 [astro-ph.GA]

  14. [14]

    Aggressively-Dissipative Dark Dwarfs: The Effects of Atomic Dark Matter on the Inner Densities of Isolated Dwarf Galaxies,

    S. Roy, X. Shen, J. Barron, M. Lisanti, D. Curtin, N. Murray, and P. F. Hopkins, “Aggressively-Dissipative Dark Dwarfs: The Effects of Atomic Dark Matter on the Inner Densities of Isolated Dwarf Galaxies,”arXiv:2408.15317 [astro-ph.GA]

  15. [15]

    Probing Atomic Dark Matter with Stellar Streams in Milky Way-Mass Galaxies,

    L. S. Mandacar´ u Guerra, S. O’Neil, M. Lisanti, S. Roy, R. Sanderson, A. Kundu, A. Arora, L. Necib, N. Shipp, and X. Shen, “Probing Atomic Dark Matter with Stellar Streams in Milky Way-Mass Galaxies,” arXiv:2603.20367 [astro-ph.GA]

  16. [16]

    Direct Detection of Atomic Dark Matter in White Dwarfs,

    D. Curtin and J. Setford, “Direct Detection of Atomic Dark Matter in White Dwarfs,”JHEP03(2021) 166, arXiv:2010.00601 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    How To Discover Mirror Stars,

    D. Curtin and J. Setford, “How To Discover Mirror Stars,”Phys. Lett. B804(2020) 135391, arXiv:1909.04071 [hep-ph]

  18. [18]

    Mirror neutron stars,

    M. Hippert, J. Setford, H. Tan, D. Curtin, J. Noronha-Hostler, and N. Yunes, “Mirror neutron stars,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 3, (2022) 035025, arXiv:2103.01965 [astro-ph.HE]

  19. [19]

    Electromagnetic Signatures of Mirror Stars,

    I. Armstrong, B. Gurbuz, D. Curtin, and C. D. Matzner, “Electromagnetic Signatures of Mirror Stars,”Astrophys. J.965no. 1, (2024) 42, arXiv:2311.18086 [astro-ph.HE]

  20. [20]

    Generalized Predictions for the Electromagnetic Signatures of Mirror Stars,

    F. Cabral, S. Williamson, D. Curtin, and C. D. Matzner, “Generalized Predictions for the Electromagnetic Signatures of Mirror Stars,” arXiv:2604.00106 [astro-ph.HE]. 7

  21. [21]

    Gravitational Waves from Binary Mergers of Subsolar Mass Dark Black Holes,

    S. Shandera, D. Jeong, and H. S. G. Gebhardt, “Gravitational Waves from Binary Mergers of Subsolar Mass Dark Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120no. 24, (2018) 241102,arXiv:1802.08206 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [22]

    Molecular Chemistry for Dark Matter II: Recombination, Molecule Formation, and Halo Mass Function in Atomic Dark Matter,

    J. Gurian, D. Jeong, M. Ryan, and S. Shandera, “Molecular Chemistry for Dark Matter II: Recombination, Molecule Formation, and Halo Mass Function in Atomic Dark Matter,”Astrophys. J.934 (2022) 121,arXiv:2110.11964 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    A Lower Bound on the Mass of Compact Objects from Dissipative Dark Matter,

    J. Gurian, M. Ryan, S. Schon, D. Jeong, and S. Shandera, “A Lower Bound on the Mass of Compact Objects from Dissipative Dark Matter,”Astrophys. J. Lett.939no. 1, (2022) L12,arXiv:2209.00064 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 949, L44 (2023), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 949, L44 (2023)]

  24. [24]

    Gravitational-wave limit on the Chandrasekhar mass of dark matter,

    D. Singh, M. Ryan, R. Magee, T. Akhter, S. Shandera, D. Jeong, and C. Hanna, “Gravitational-wave limit on the Chandrasekhar mass of dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 4, (2021) 044015,arXiv:2009.05209 [astro-ph.CO]

  25. [25]

    Exotic compact objects: The dark white dwarf,

    M. Ryan and D. Radice, “Exotic compact objects: The dark white dwarf,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 11, (2022) 115034,arXiv:2201.05626 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry,

    Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh, and R. Harnik, “The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 231802, arXiv:hep-ph/0506256

  27. [27]

    Cosmology in Mirror Twin Higgs and Neutrino Masses,

    Z. Chacko, N. Craig, P. J. Fox, and R. Harnik, “Cosmology in Mirror Twin Higgs and Neutrino Masses,”JHEP07(2017) 023,arXiv:1611.07975 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    Cosmological Signals of a Mirror Twin Higgs,

    N. Craig, S. Koren, and T. Trott, “Cosmological Signals of a Mirror Twin Higgs,”JHEP05(2017) 038, arXiv:1611.07977 [hep-ph]

  29. [29]

    Minimal Mirror Twin Higgs,

    R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, “Minimal Mirror Twin Higgs,”JHEP11(2016) 172, arXiv:1609.05589 [hep-ph]

  30. [30]

    Solving the Hierarchy Problem at Reheating with a Large Number of Degrees of Freedom,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Cohen, R. T. D’Agnolo, A. Hook, H. D. Kim, and D. Pinner, “Solving the Hierarchy Problem at Reheating with a Large Number of Degrees of Freedom,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117no. 25, (2016) 251801,arXiv:1607.06821 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    Asymmetric Twin Dark Matter,

    M. Farina, “Asymmetric Twin Dark Matter,”JCAP 11(2015) 017,arXiv:1506.03520 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    Baryogenesis through asymmetric reheating in the mirror twin Higgs,

    G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, D. Curtin, A. Rasovic, and Z. Yuan, “Baryogenesis through asymmetric reheating in the mirror twin Higgs,”JHEP05(2024) 069, arXiv:2311.06341 [hep-ph]

  33. [33]

    Cosmic microwave background and large scale structure limits on the interaction between dark matter and baryons,

    X. Chen, S. Hannestad, and R. J. Scherrer, “Cosmic microwave background and large scale structure limits on the interaction between dark matter and baryons,” Physical Review D65no. 12, (June, 2002) 123515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.123515

  34. [34]

    Constraints on dark matter interactions from structure formation: damping lengths,

    C. Boehm and R. Schaeffer, “Constraints on dark matter interactions from structure formation: damping lengths,”Astronomy & Astrophysics438no. 2, (July,

  35. [35]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042238

    419–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042238

  36. [36]

    Constraining dark matter-baryon scattering with linear cosmology,

    C. Dvorkin, K. Blum, and M. Kamionkowski, “Constraining dark matter-baryon scattering with linear cosmology,”Physical Review D89no. 2, (Jan.,

  37. [37]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023519

    023519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023519

  38. [38]

    Probing sub-gev dark matter-baryon scattering with cosmological observables,

    W. L. Xu, C. Dvorkin, and A. Chael, “Probing sub-gev dark matter-baryon scattering with cosmological observables,”Physical Review D97 no. 10, (May, 2018) 103530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103530

  39. [39]

    Constraints on scattering of kev–tev dark matter with protons in the early universe,

    V. Gluscevic and K. K. Boddy, “Constraints on scattering of kev–tev dark matter with protons in the early universe,”Physical Review Letters121no. 8, (Aug., 2018) 081301.http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.081301

  40. [40]

    N-body simulations of dark matter–baryon interactions,

    M. S. Fischer, K. Dolag, M. Garny, V. Gluscevic, F. Groth, and E. O. Nadler, “N-body simulations of dark matter–baryon interactions,”Astronomy & Astrophysics700(Aug., 2025) A145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554983

  41. [41]

    Ethos—an effective theory of structure formation: From dark particle physics to the matter distribution of the universe,

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurdson, J. Zavala, T. Bringmann, M. Vogelsberger, and C. Pfrommer, “Ethos—an effective theory of structure formation: From dark particle physics to the matter distribution of the universe,”Physical Review D93no. 12, (June,

  42. [42]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123527

    123527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123527

  43. [43]

    ETHOS – an effective parametrization and classification for structure formation: the non-linear regime at z >∼ 5,

    S. Bohr, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, M. Vogelsberger, T. Bringmann, and C. Pfrommer, “ETHOS – an effective parametrization and classification for structure formation: the non-linear regime at z >∼ 5,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498no. 3, (2020) 3403–3419,arXiv:2006.01842 [astro-ph.CO]

  44. [44]

    Gravitational collapse of small scale structure as the origin of the Lyman alpha forest,

    R.-y. Cen, J. Miralda-Escude, J. P. Ostriker, and M. Rauch, “Gravitational collapse of small scale structure as the origin of the Lyman alpha forest,” Astrophys. J. Lett.437(1994) L9, arXiv:astro-ph/9409017

  45. [45]

    Recovery of the power spectrum of mass fluctuations from observations of the Lyman alpha forest,

    R. A. C. Croft, D. H. Weinberg, N. Katz, and L. Hernquist, “Recovery of the power spectrum of mass fluctuations from observations of the Lyman alpha forest,”Astrophys. J.495(1998) 44, arXiv:astro-ph/9708018

  46. [46]

    Precision cosmological constraints on atomic dark matter,

    S. Bansal, J. Barron, D. Curtin, and Y. Tsai, “Precision cosmological constraints on atomic dark matter,”JHEP10(2023) 095,arXiv:2212.02487 [hep-ph]. [48]Atacama Cosmology TelescopeCollaboration, T. Louiset al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters,”JCAP11(2025) 062,arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]. [49]Atacama...

  47. [47]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Probing new signatures of ultralight axions with gravitational lensing,

    A. Lagu¨ eet al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Probing new signatures of ultralight axions with gravitational lensing,”arXiv:2606.06410 [astro-ph.CO]. [51]SPT-3GCollaboration, F. Geet al., “Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019–2020 SPT-3G polarization data,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 083534,arXiv:2411.06000 [astro-ph.CO]

  48. [48]

    Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift 8 Lyman-αforest data,

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, and M. G. Haehnelt, “Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift 8 Lyman-αforest data,”Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 043502, arXiv:1306.2314 [astro-ph.CO]

  49. [49]

    New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-αforest data,

    V. Irˇ siˇ cet al., “New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-αforest data,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 2, (2017) 023522,arXiv:1702.01764 [astro-ph.CO]

  50. [50]

    New constraints on warm dark matter from the Lyman-αforest power spectrum,

    B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau, and E. Schneider, “New constraints on warm dark matter from the Lyman-αforest power spectrum,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 2, (2023) 023502,arXiv:2209.14220 [astro-ph.CO]

  51. [51]

    Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest,

    V. Irˇ siˇ cet al., “Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 4, (2024) 043511,arXiv:2309.04533 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [52]

    Strong Bound on Canonical Ultralight Axion Dark Matter from the Lyman-Alpha Forest,

    K. K. Rogers and H. V. Peiris, “Strong Bound on Canonical Ultralight Axion Dark Matter from the Lyman-Alpha Forest,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 7, (2021) 071302,arXiv:2007.12705 [astro-ph.CO]

  53. [53]

    General framework for cosmological dark matter bounds usingN-body simulations,

    K. K. Rogers and H. V. Peiris, “General framework for cosmological dark matter bounds usingN-body simulations,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 4, (2021) 043526, arXiv:2007.13751 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [54]

    Post-inflationary axion constraints from the Lyman-αforest,

    O. Garcia-Gallego, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, and J. S. Bolton, “Post-inflationary axion constraints from the Lyman-αforest,”arXiv:2603.04401 [astro-ph.CO]

  55. [55]

    Limits on the light dark matter–proton cross section from cosmic large-scale structure,

    K. K. Rogers, C. Dvorkin, and H. V. Peiris, “Limits on the light dark matter–proton cross section from cosmic large-scale structure,”Physical Review Letters128 no. 17, (Apr., 2022) 171301.http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.171301

  56. [56]

    Lyman-αconstraints on cosmic heating from dark matter annihilation and decay,

    H. Liu, W. Qin, G. W. Ridgway, and T. R. Slatyer, “Lyman-αconstraints on cosmic heating from dark matter annihilation and decay,”Phys. Rev. D104 no. 4, (2021) 043514,arXiv:2008.01084 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [57]

    CMB and Lyman-αconstraints on dark matter decays to photons,

    F. Capozzi, R. Z. Ferreira, L. Lopez-Honorez, and O. Mena, “CMB and Lyman-αconstraints on dark matter decays to photons,”JCAP06(2023) 060, arXiv:2303.07426 [astro-ph.CO]

  58. [58]

    Lyman-αForest Constraints on Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,

    R. Murgia, G. Scelfo, M. Viel, and A. Raccanelli, “Lyman-αForest Constraints on Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123no. 7, (2019) 071102,arXiv:1903.10509 [astro-ph.CO]

  59. [59]

    Lyman-αconstraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe,

    T. Kobayashi, R. Murgia, A. De Simone, V. Irˇ siˇ c, and M. Viel, “Lyman-αconstraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 12, (2017) 123514, arXiv:1708.00015 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [60]

    Constraining mixed dark matter models with high-redshift Lyman-alpha forest data,

    O. Garcia-Gallego, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. G. Haehnelt, M. Viel, and J. S. Bolton, “Constraining mixed dark matter models with high-redshift Lyman-alpha forest data,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 4, (2025) 043502, arXiv:2504.06367 [astro-ph.CO]

  61. [61]

    ETHOS – an Effective Theory of Structure Formation: detecting dark matter interactions through the Lyman-αforest,

    S. Bose, M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, C. Pfrommer, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, S. Bohr, and T. Bringmann, “ETHOS – an Effective Theory of Structure Formation: detecting dark matter interactions through the Lyman-αforest,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 487no. 1, (2019) 522–536,arXiv:1811.10630 [astro-ph.CO]

  62. [62]

    Wandering in the Lyman-alpha Forest: A Study of Dark Matter-Dark Radiation Interactions,

    R. Krall, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and C. Dvorkin, “Wandering in the Lyman-alpha Forest: A Study of Dark Matter-Dark Radiation Interactions,”JCAP09 (2017) 003,arXiv:1705.08894 [astro-ph.CO]

  63. [63]

    Lyman-αforest constraints on interacting dark sectors,

    M. Garny, T. Konstandin, L. Sagunski, and S. Tulin, “Lyman-αforest constraints on interacting dark sectors,”JCAP09(2018) 011,arXiv:1805.12203 [astro-ph.CO]

  64. [64]

    Constraining Dark Matter-Dark Radiation interactions with CMB, BAO, and Lyman-α,

    M. Archidiacono, D. C. Hooper, R. Murgia, S. Bohr, J. Lesgourgues, and M. Viel, “Constraining Dark Matter-Dark Radiation interactions with CMB, BAO, and Lyman-α,”JCAP10(2019) 055, arXiv:1907.01496 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    The Coyote Universe Extended: Precision Emulation of the Matter Power Spectrum,

    K. Heitmann, E. Lawrence, J. Kwan, S. Habib, and D. Higdon, “The Coyote Universe Extended: Precision Emulation of the Matter Power Spectrum,”Astrophys. J.780no. 1, (Jan., 2014) 111,arXiv:1304.7849 [astro-ph.CO]

  66. [66]

    Bayesian emulator optimisation for cosmology: application to the Lyman-alpha forest,

    K. K. Rogers, H. V. Peiris, A. Pontzen, S. Bird, L. Verde, and A. Font-Ribera, “Bayesian emulator optimisation for cosmology: application to the Lyman-alpha forest,”JCAP02(2019) 031, arXiv:1812.04631 [astro-ph.CO]

  67. [67]

    An Emulator for the Lyman-alpha Forest,

    S. Bird, K. K. Rogers, H. V. Peiris, L. Verde, A. Font-Ribera, and A. Pontzen, “An Emulator for the Lyman-alpha Forest,”JCAP02(2019) 050, arXiv:1812.04654 [astro-ph.CO]

  68. [68]

    C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams,Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, Mass. Mit Press, 2008

  69. [69]

    Revealing Reionization with the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium: New Constraints from the LyαFlux Power Spectrum,

    E. Boera, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, and F. Nasir, “Revealing Reionization with the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium: New Constraints from the LyαFlux Power Spectrum,”Astrophys. J.872no. 1, (2019) 101,arXiv:1809.06980 [astro-ph.CO]

  70. [70]

    HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope,

    S. S. Vogt, S. L. Allen,et al., “HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope,” inInstrumentation in Astronomy VIII, D. L. Crawford and E. R. Craine, eds., vol. 2198 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, p. 362. June, 1994

  71. [71]

    Design, construction, and performance of UVES, the echelle spectrograph for the UT2 Kueyen Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory,

    H. Dekker, S. D’Odorico, A. Kaufer, B. Delabre, and H. Kotzlowski, “Design, construction, and performance of UVES, the echelle spectrograph for the UT2 Kueyen Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory,” inOptical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, M. Iye and A. F. Moorwood, eds., vol. 4008 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (...

  72. [72]

    ”Non-cold

    R. Murgia, A. Merle, M. Viel, M. Totzauer, and A. Schneider, “”Non-cold” dark matter at small scales: a general approach,”JCAP11(2017) 046, arXiv:1704.07838 [astro-ph.CO]

  73. [73]

    Massive neutrinos and degeneracies in Lyman-alpha forest simulations,

    C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera, T. D. Kitching, P. McDonald, S. Bird, A. Slosar, K. K. Rogers, and A. Pontzen, “Massive neutrinos and degeneracies in Lyman-alpha forest simulations,”JCAP04(2020) 025,arXiv:1911.09596 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [74]

    5σtension between Planck cosmic microwave background and eBOSS Lyman-alpha forest and constraints on physics beyond ΛCDM,

    K. K. Rogers and V. Poulin, “5σtension between Planck cosmic microwave background and eBOSS Lyman-alpha forest and constraints on physics beyond ΛCDM,”Phys. Rev. Res.7no. 1, (2025) L012018, arXiv:2311.16377 [astro-ph.CO]

  75. [75]

    A cosmic UV/X-ray background model update,

    C.-A. Faucher-Gigu` ere, “A cosmic UV/X-ray background model update,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493no. 2, (2020) 1614–1632,arXiv:1903.08657 9 [astro-ph.CO]

  76. [76]

    Self-Consistent Modeling of Reionization in Cosmological Hydrodynamical Simulations,

    J. O˜ norbe, J. F. Hennawi, and Z. Luki´ c, “Self-Consistent Modeling of Reionization in Cosmological Hydrodynamical Simulations,” Astrophys. J.837no. 2, (2017) 106, arXiv:1607.04218 [astro-ph.CO]

  77. [77]

    Novel constraints on noncold, nonthermal dark matter from Lyman-α forest data,

    R. Murgia, V. Irˇ siˇ c, and M. Viel, “Novel constraints on noncold, nonthermal dark matter from Lyman-α forest data,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 8, (2018) 083540, arXiv:1806.08371 [astro-ph.CO]

  78. [78]

    A new class of accurate, mesh-free hydrodynamic simulation methods,

    P. F. Hopkins, “A new class of accurate, mesh-free hydrodynamic simulation methods,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.450no. 1, (2015) 53–110, arXiv:1409.7395 [astro-ph.CO]

  79. [79]

    2012, MNRAS, 419, 2195, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19870.x

    O. Hahn and T. Abel, “Multi-scale initial conditions for cosmological simulations,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society415no. 3, (08, 2011) 2101–2121.https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18820.x

  80. [80]

    Effect of separate initial conditions on the lyman-α forest in simulations,

    M. A. Fernandez, S. Bird, and P. Upton Sanderbeck, “Effect of separate initial conditions on the lyman-α forest in simulations,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503no. 2, (2021) 1668–1679,arXiv:2009.09119 [astro-ph.CO]

Showing first 80 references.