Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rethinking Why Intermediate-Task Fine-Tuning Works

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.11696 v2 pith:A2JMMUMZ submitted 2021-08-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords intermediatestiltstasktaskscomplexfine-tuninglanguagemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Tasks (STILTs) is a widely applied technique, which first fine-tunes the pretrained language models on an intermediate task before on the target task of interest. While STILTs is able to further improve the performance of pretrained language models, it is still unclear why and when it works. Previous research shows that those intermediate tasks involving complex inference, such as commonsense reasoning, work especially well for RoBERTa. In this paper, we discover that the improvement from an intermediate task could be orthogonal to it containing reasoning or other complex skills -- a simple real-fake discrimination task synthesized by GPT2 can benefit diverse target tasks. We conduct extensive experiments to study the impact of different factors on STILTs. These findings suggest rethinking the role of intermediate fine-tuning in the STILTs pipeline.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Health Mention Classification Performance: A Study on Advancements in Parameter Efficient Tuning

    cs.CL 2025-04 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Applying prompt tuning and POS tagger features to health mention classification yields small F1 improvements over plain fine-tuning, but the paper does not compare with actual state-of-the-art systems.

Pith tools