Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dialogue Response Ranking Training with Large-Scale Human Feedback Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.06978 v1 pith:A5ICW2TN submitted 2020-09-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords feedbackhumanmodelsdatadialogrankingbaselineengaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing open-domain dialog models are generally trained to minimize the perplexity of target human responses. However, some human replies are more engaging than others, spawning more followup interactions. Current conversational models are increasingly capable of producing turns that are context-relevant, but in order to produce compelling agents, these models need to be able to predict and optimize for turns that are genuinely engaging. We leverage social media feedback data (number of replies and upvotes) to build a large-scale training dataset for feedback prediction. To alleviate possible distortion between the feedback and engagingness, we convert the ranking problem to a comparison of response pairs which involve few confounding factors. We trained DialogRPT, a set of GPT-2 based models on 133M pairs of human feedback data and the resulting ranker outperformed several baselines. Particularly, our ranker outperforms the conventional dialog perplexity baseline with a large margin on predicting Reddit feedback. We finally combine the feedback prediction models and a human-like scoring model to rank the machine-generated dialog responses. Crowd-sourced human evaluation shows that our ranking method correlates better with real human preferences than baseline models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Findings of the BEA 2025 Shared Task on Pedagogical Ability Assessment of AI-powered Tutors

    cs.CY 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Best submitted systems scored 58-72 macro F1 on four three-class pedagogical assessment tracks and 97 macro F1 on nine-class tutor identification, showing automatic evaluation of AI math tutors works but still has roo...

Pith tools