Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 107 references

Diffusion Models in Finance: A Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims to be the first dedicated overview of diffusion-family generative models in finance, organizing the literature by the type of financial data being generated rather than by model family.

desk verdict A useful, well-organized survey of diffusion models in finance; the 'first survey' claim is under-supported but the data-type taxonomy stands on its own. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12583 v1 pith:AAR2RGE7 submitted 2026-08-12 q-fin.CP

Zhuohan Wang , Carmine Ventre This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-fin.CP
keywords DiffusionmodelsFlowFinanceSurveyFinancialtimeseriesLimitorderbooksTabulardataGenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that diffusion-family generative models, including denoising diffusion probabilistic models, score-based models, flow matching, and stochastic interpolants, have formed a distinct research area in finance and that this area is now mature enough to warrant a dedicated survey organized by financial data type. It reviews work on financial time series, limit order books, tabular data, and structured objects such as correlation matrices, implied-volatility surfaces, yield curves, and derivative paths, and it identifies evaluation, scaling, and decision-making as the open directions. The stated reason to care is that diffusion models' stochastic differential equation formulation, stable training, flexible conditioning, and mode coverage match the needs of financial data generation, stress testing, and portfolio and trading decisions.

What carries the argument

The survey's organizing device is a taxonomy that sorts papers by financial data type, separating time series, limit order books, tabular records, and other structured financial objects, and within each type by modeling goal such as unconditional generation, conditional generation, prediction and trading, synthesis and augmentation, and privacy and trustworthiness. The technical ground it uses to unify the field is the score-SDE formulation of diffusion models, in which a forward noising stochastic differential equation is reversed by learning a neural score or noise predictor, together with flow matching's alternative view of generation as learning a vector field that transports noise into data. This shared formalism is what lets the survey treat very different applications as instances of one design space.

What would settle it

A reproducible literature search across preprint servers and bibliographic databases, using explicit queries for diffusion, score-based, and flow-matching models combined with finance terms and explicit date ranges and inclusion criteria, that surfaces a peer-reviewed survey dedicated to diffusion models for financial data published before this one would falsify the priority claim; finding a substantial body of diffusion finance work in a data modality the taxonomy omits would falsify its completeness claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that existing surveys cover synthetic data in finance, diffusion models for generic time series, diffusion for tabular data, and large language models in finance, but none is dedicated to diffusion-family models across financial applications. The paper therefore asserts, to the best of its knowledge, that it is the first survey dedicated specifically to diffusion-family models for financial data, and it defends a data-first reading: the literature is best organized not by model family but by the financial object being generated, with the validity of a generator defined by the constraints of that object, such as tick sizes and event coherence for order books, mixed-type and privacy constraints for tabular records, positive semidefiniteness for correlation matrices, and martingale conditions for pricing paths.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the papers selected for review, chosen without any stated search or inclusion/exclusion protocol, represent the full universe of diffusion-family finance research; if significant work was missed, the taxonomy and the 'first survey' claim would not stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners can use the data-type taxonomy as a directory to locate relevant diffusion work for their object of interest and to see which modeling goals have already been tried.
  • The open-problem list implies that the next phase should be finance-specific benchmark suites, because current comparisons are fragmented across proprietary data, incompatible horizons, preprocessing choices, and weak baselines.
  • It implies that scaling behavior of financial diffusion models should be studied directly, relating compute, data, and conditioning to generation quality rather than assuming scaling laws transfer from language or image models.
  • It implies a shift in research target from realistic samples toward decision value: portfolio construction, hedging, execution, and market making framed as diffusion-generated actions rather than merely market paths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The priority claim is the most brittle part of the paper: a documented systematic search that surfaces any earlier dedicated survey of diffusion models for financial data would overturn that claim without necessarily damaging the taxonomic contribution.
  • The data-type split is not the only plausible axis; organizing the same literature by decision task, such as forecasting, simulation, privacy, or pricing, might reveal different clusters, and future surveys could test which axis better predicts methodological choices.
  • A testable extension of the data-first thesis is a transfer experiment: training a financial diffusion generator on one asset class and sampling another should degrade unless the model is conditioned appropriately, which would support the paper's claim that validity is tied to the financial object.
  • The paper's benchmark argument points to a concrete next step: a shared leaderboard covering the four data types with common metrics for fidelity, downstream utility, privacy, and constraint satisfaction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper surveys diffusion-family generative models applied to financial data. The survey is organized primarily by financial data modality: time series, limit order books, tabular data, and other structured financial objects such as correlation matrices, implied-volatility surfaces, yield curves, and derivative paths. It provides a compact technical background covering score-based diffusion, the score-SDE formulation, flow matching, guidance, sampling accelerators, and common architectural backbones. The bulk of the paper reviews roughly forty works drawn from the authors' open-source repository, and it closes with three open directions: finance-specific evaluation benchmarks, scaling laws for financial diffusion models, and moving from generation to decision-making. The paper claims in the abstract and introduction to be the first survey dedicated specifically to diffusion-family models for financial data.

Significance. If the corpus is representative and the priority claim holds, this survey would serve as a useful entry point for researchers entering the intersection of diffusion-based generative modeling and finance. The technical background is largely correct and the data-type-driven taxonomy is sensible and reasonably well executed. The open-problems section (§7) is constructive and identifies real weaknesses in the current literature, and the open-source repository is a useful transparency artifact. However, the survey introduces no new methods or results; its value is entirely in coverage and synthesis. That value is contingent on two claims—representativeness of the selected papers and priority of the 'first survey' assertion—neither of which is currently supported by a documented methodology.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1 and Table 1] The survey's central claim of comprehensiveness rests on an undocumented selection process. The paper states that it 'reviews the growing literature' and claims to be the first dedicated survey, but it provides no search protocol, database list, search strings, date range, or inclusion/exclusion criteria. Table 1 is explicitly captioned as 'illustrative rather than exhaustive,' which concedes that the corpus is a selection. Because the paper contributes no new methods or results, the completeness and representativeness of this selection are load-bearing; without a methodology section, the reader cannot verify the taxonomy or the priority claim. I recommend adding a 'Scope and Method' subsection describing how papers were identified, screened, and categorized, and either expanding the coverage to be exhaustive within a clearly stated scope or explicitly reframing the contribution as a structured overview of a representative subset.
  2. [Abstract and Section 1] The claim 'this is the first survey dedicated specifically to diffusion-family models for financial data' is asserted only with the hedge 'to the best of our knowledge' and is not supported by a systematic literature check. The paper mentions adjacent surveys on synthetic data in finance [65], generic time-series diffusion [93], tabular diffusion [50], and LLM agents in finance [49, 70], but it does not demonstrate that no earlier dedicated survey of diffusion models for financial data exists. The linked repository is a list of papers, not a search protocol, so it does not repair this verifiability gap. This is particularly important because the priority claim is part of the paper's stated contribution; I ask the authors to either document a reproducible search that supports the claim or weaken the claim to 'to the best of our knowledge, no prior survey has focused on this specific combination,' with the search evidence reported in an appendix.
  3. [Section 7] The paper calls for benchmark and evaluation discipline in the field, yet it does not apply such discipline to its own corpus construction. Section 7 argues that the field suffers from proprietary data, incompatible horizons, and weak baselines, but the survey itself does not report any quality screening (e.g., peer-reviewed versus preprint status), any verification of the contributions of the included papers, or any criteria for why some borderline works (such as ByteGen [47], which the paper itself says is 'not a standard diffusion model') are included. The open-problems list, however reasonable, is derived from a selection that the authors acknowledge is illustrative; the list might look different had the corpus been assembled with a documented protocol. Please add a description of the inclusion criteria and a per-paper quality/venue classification, at least in an appendix.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The phrase 'stable likelihood-based training' is imprecise: diffusion models are typically trained with a variational lower bound or score-matching objective rather than exact likelihood, and the standard DDPM objective is a denoising objective, not a likelihood. Consider rephrasing to 'stable training based on denoising objectives' or similar.
  2. [Section 4.1] The inclusion of ByteGen [47] as an order-flow generation method, while the paper explicitly states it is not a standard diffusion model, is potentially confusing in a survey of diffusion-family models. Please clarify whether ByteGen is included as a baseline/context or whether the survey explicitly covers adjacent generative models; if the latter, state the inclusion criterion.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Section 3.3] The distinction between 'conditional generation' and 'prediction and trading' is based on the stated purpose of each paper rather than on architecture or objective, which is a reasonable organizational principle, but it leads to the same paper being discussed in one subsection while some of its generated outputs are also relevant to the other. A short sentence at the beginning of Section 3.3 noting that the division is functional rather than architectural would reduce ambiguity.
  4. [Table 1 and Repository] Many entries in Table 1 are arXiv preprints with 2025 or 2026 dates, and the survey does not indicate which have been peer-reviewed. Since the survey aims to be a reference, please add a column or footnote indicating the publication status (peer-reviewed conference/journal, arXiv preprint, or forthcoming) for each entry.
  5. [General] There are several minor grammar issues, for example: Section 3.2 'Guo et al. [24] uses' should be 'Guo et al. [24] use'; Section 3.2 'Zarifis et al. [95] use multivariate energy price time series and generates conditional scenario paths' should be 'generate conditional scenario paths.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey has no derivation chain to reduce; its literature-review claims are external and verifiable, and its self-citations are transparent corpus entries.

full rationale

This paper is a survey, not a derivation, so there is no fitted parameter, prediction, or equation chain whose output reduces to its input. Its two central claims are priority and representativeness: the abstract states, 'To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey dedicated specifically to diffusion-family models for financial data,' and Section 1 organizes the literature by data type. Both claims are external assertions about the state of the literature, checkable by a systematic search, not conclusions forced by construction from the paper's own definitions or equations. The closest thing to a limitation is Table 1's caption, which honestly says, 'The table is illustrative rather than exhaustive; entries are selected to span the main data objects, applications, and model families used in this survey.' That is an explicit verification gap concerning corpus construction, but it is not circularity. The only self-citations ([87] Wang and Ventre 2024, [88] DiffVolume 2025, [89] DiffLOB 2026) are ordinary entries in the reviewed corpus and are described as such; they are not used to justify the survey's priority claim, taxonomy, or open-problem list. Section 7's call for 'benchmark and evaluation discipline' is a forward-looking limitation statement, not a circular justification. No step in the paper reduces an output to its input by definition, by fitting, by renaming, or by a load-bearing self-citation chain, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. It relies on standard diffusion and flow background and on the accuracy of its reading of the cited literature. The main unstated input is the selection of papers, which is not justified by a documented protocol.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Score-based generative models can be trained by denoising score matching and sampled via a reverse SDE (Eqs. 1 and 2).
    Background from Song et al. [80] and Ho et al. [27]; the survey uses this to frame all diffusion applications.
  • standard math Flow matching with a linear conditional path learns a vector field whose terminal distribution approximates the data distribution (Eq. 4).
    Background from Lipman et al. [52]; used in Section 2 and in flow-based finance papers.
  • domain assumption Financial data exhibit heavy tails, volatility clustering, nonlinear dependence, and regime changes, making traditional parametric models insufficient.
    Asserted in Section 1 with citations [8, 22, 25]; this motivates the survey's scope and is not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption The survey's characterizations of the cited papers are accurate.
    The survey is only as reliable as its reading of the literature; no independent validation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diffusion Models in Finance: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AAR2RGE7

@misc{pith2026260812583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diffusion Models in Finance: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AAR2RGE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12583}
}
read the original abstract

Diffusion generative models have rapidly emerged as powerful tools for modeling complex financial data. Their appeal is both structural and practical: they offer stable likelihood-based training, strong mode coverage, flexible conditioning, and a stochastic-differential-equation formulation that aligns naturally with the It\^o calculus and stochastic control frameworks widely used in finance. This survey reviews the growing literature on diffusion-family generative models for financial applications. We organize prior work primarily by financial data type, covering time series, limit order books, tabular data, and other structured financial objects, while discussing the modeling goals and application contexts that arise within each category. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey dedicated specifically to diffusion-family models for financial data. For more detailed information, we have open-sourced a repository https://github.com/ZhuoHan1998/Diffusion-Models-In-Finance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12583 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Taxonomy of diffusion-family models in finance organized by financial data type. Data are generated through noising and guided [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [65]

    Vamsi K Potluru, Daniel Borrajo, Andrea Coletta, Niccolò Dalmasso, Yousef El-Laham, Elizabeth Fons, Mohsen Ghassemi, Sriram Gopalakrishnan, Vikesh Gosai, Eleonora Kreačić, et al . 2023. Synthetic data applications in finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00081(2023)

    arXiv 2023

  2. [93]

    Yiyuan Yang, Ming Jin, Haomin Wen, Chaoli Zhang, Yuxuan Liang, Lintao Ma, Yi Wang, Chenghao Liu, Bin Yang, Zenglin Xu, Shirui Pan, and Qingsong Wen

  3. [50]

    Zhong Li, Qi Huang, Lincen Yang, Jiayang Shi, Zhao Yang, Niki van Stein, Thomas Bäck, and Matthijs van Leeuwen. 2025. Diffusion models for tabu- lar data: Challenges, current progress, and future directions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17119(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  4. [47]

    Yang Li and Zhi Chen. 2025. ByteGen: A Tokenizer-Free Generative Model for Orderbook Events in Byte Space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02247(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  5. [1]

    Ahmad Aghapour, Erhan Bayraktar, and Fengyi Yuan. 2025. Solving Dynamic Portfolio Selection Problems via Score-Based Diffusion Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09916(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  6. [2]

    Albergo, Nicholas M

    Michael S. Albergo, Nicholas M. Boffi, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden. 2023. Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08797(2023)

    arXiv 2023

  7. [3]

    Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz and Nils Strodthoff. 2022. Diffusion-based Time Series Imputation and Forecasting with Structured State Space Models.Trans- actions on Machine Learning Research(2022)

    2022

  8. [4]

    Ali Atiah Alzahrani. 2025. Multi-Agent Regime-Conditioned Diffusion (MARCD) for CVaR-Constrained Portfolio Decisions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10807(2025). Diffusion Models in Finance: A Survey

    work page arXiv 2025

Show all 107 references
  1. [5]

    Alfred Backhouse, Kang Li, Jakob Foerster, Anisoara Calinescu, and Stefan Zohren. 2025. Painting the Market: Generative Diffusion Models for Financial Limit Order Book Simulation and Forecasting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05107 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  2. [6]

    Avi Bagchi, Michael Tesfaye, and Om Shastri. 2026. Factor Dimensionality and the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Diffusion Portfolio Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10385(2026)

    2026

  3. [7]

    Leonardo Berti, Bardh Prenkaj, and Paola Velardi. 2025. TRADES: Gener- ating Realistic Market Simulations with Diffusion Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07071(2025)

    2025

  4. [8]

    Tim Bollerslev. 1986. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic- ity.Journal of Econometrics31, 3 (1986), 307–327

    1986

  5. [9]

    Munoz, Oscar Barrera, Shreyas K

    Michael Cardei, Jose M. Munoz, Oscar Barrera, Shreyas K. Chandrahas, and Partha Saha. 2025. Constrained Tabular Diffusion for Finance. InProceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. 543–551

    2025

  6. [10]

    Minshuo Chen, Renyuan Xu, Yumin Xu, and Ruixun Zhang. 2025. Diffusion Factor Models: Generating High-Dimensional Returns with Factor Structure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06566(2025)

    2025

  7. [11]

    Weijun Chen and Yanze Wang. 2025. Dhmoe: Diffusion generated hierarchi- cal multi-granular expertise for stock prediction. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39. 11490–11499

    2025

  8. [12]

    So-Yoon Cho, Jin-Young Kim, Kayoung Ban, Hyeng Keun Koo, and Hyun- Gyoon Kim. 2025. Diffolio: A Diffusion Model for Multivariate Probabilistic Financial Time-Series Forecasting and Portfolio Construction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07014(2025)

    2025

  9. [13]

    Himanshu Choudhary, Arishi Orra, and Manoj Thakur. 2025. Diffusion- Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Robust Portfolio Optimization under Stress Scenarios.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07099(2025)

    2025

  10. [14]

    Divyanshu Daiya, Monika Yadav, and Harshit Singh Rao. 2024. DiffSTOCK: Probabilistic Relational Stock Market Predictions using Diffusion Models. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

    2024

  11. [15]

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Ieee, 248–255

    2009

  12. [16]

    Prafulla Dhariwal and Alexander Quinn Nichol. 2021. Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 34. 8780–8794

    2021

  13. [17]

    Yupeng Fang, Ruirui Liu, Huichou Huang, Peilin Zhao, and Qingyao Wu. 2024. A spatio-temporal diffusion model for missing and real-time financial data inference. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. 602–611

    2024

  14. [18]

    Yosuke Fukunishi, Haorong Qiu, Akihiko Takahashi, and Fan Ye. 2025. Generat- ing the Term Structure of Interest Rates with Diffusion Models.Expert Systems with Applications (forthcoming); CIRJE Discussion Paper CF-1262(2025)

    2025

  15. [19]

    Xuefeng Gao, Mengying He, Xuedong He, and Jiale Zha. 2025. Factor-Based Conditional Diffusion Model for Contextual Portfolio Optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22088(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  16. [20]

    Xuefeng Gao, Jiale Zha, and Xun Yu Zhou. 2025. Generating Solution Paths of Markovian Stochastic Differential Equations using Diffusion Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08731(2025)

    2025

  17. [21]

    Yuan Gao, Haokun Chen, Xiang Wang, Zhicai Wang, Xue Wang, Jinyang Gao, and Bolin Ding. 2024. DiffsFormer: A Diffusion Transformer on Stock Factor Augmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06656(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [22]

    Jim Gatheral, Thibault Jaisson, and Mathieu Rosenbaum. 2018. Volatility is Rough.Quantitative Finance18, 6 (2018), 933–949

    2018

  19. [23]

    Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde- Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2020. Generative adversarial networks.Commun. ACM63, 11 (2020), 139–144

    2020

  20. [24]

    Zhengyi Guo, Jiatu Li, Wenpin Tang, and David D. Yao. 2025. Diffusion Gen- erative Models Meet Compressed Sensing, with Applications to Imaging and Finance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03898(2025)

    2025

  21. [25]

    Steven L. Heston. 1993. A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options.The Review of Financial Studies6, 2 (1993), 327–343

    1993

  22. [26]

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. 2017. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  23. [27]

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. 2020. Denoising Diffusion Proba- bilistic Models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33. 6840–6851

    2020

  24. [28]

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. 2022. Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance. In NeurIPS Workshop on Deep Generative Models

    2022

  25. [29]

    Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. 2022. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556(2022)

    2022 arXiv

  26. [30]

    Peter Holderrieth and Ezra Erives. 2026. An Introduction to Flow Matching and Diffusion Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02070(2026)

    2026

  27. [31]

    Li, Sheng Wang, Jiheng Zhang, Ziyun Li, and Tianlong Chen

    Yang Hu, Xiao Wang, Zezhen Ding, Lirong Wu, Huatian Zhang, Stan Z. Li, Sheng Wang, Jiheng Zhang, Ziyun Li, and Tianlong Chen. 2024. FlowTS: Time Series Generation via Rectified Flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07506(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  28. [32]

    Yu-Hao Huang, Chang Xu, Yang Liu, Weiqing Liu, Wu-Jun Li, and Jiang Bian

  29. [33]

    Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianxing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, et al. 2024. Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision ...

    2024

  30. [34]

    Tawfique Ihsan, Md

    Md. Tawfique Ihsan, Md. Rakibul Hasan Rafi, Ahmed Shoyeb Raihan, Imtiaz Ahmed, and Abdullahil Azeem. 2025. Boosting Predictive Performance on Tab- ular Data through Data Augmentation with Latent-Space Flow-Based Diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16571(2025)

    2025

  31. [35]

    Chen Jin and Ankush Agarwal. 2025. Forecasting Implied Volatility Surface with Generative Diffusion Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07571(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  32. [36]

    Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Scaling laws for neural language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361(2020)

    2020 arXiv

  33. [37]

    Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, and Samuli Laine. 2022. Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 35. 26565–26577

    2022

  34. [38]

    Gihun Kim, Sun-Yong Choi, and Yeoneung Kim. 2025. A Diffusion-Based Generative Model for Financial Time Series via Geometric Brownian Motion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19003(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  35. [39]

    Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. 2013. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114(2013)

    2013 arXiv

  36. [40]

    Kelvin JL Koa, Yunshan Ma, Ritchie Ng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2023. Diffusion variational autoencoder for tackling stochasticity in multi-step regression stock price prediction. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1087–1096

    2023

  37. [41]

    Marcel Kollovieh, Abdul Fatir Ansari, Michael Bohlke-Schneider, Jasper Zschieg- ner, Hao Wang, and Yuyang Wang. 2023. Predict, Refine, Synthesize: Self- Guiding Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    2023

  38. [42]

    Akim Kotelnikov, Dmitry Baranchuk, Ivan Rubachev, and Artem Babenko. 2023. TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Models. InProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning

    2023

  39. [43]

    Szymon Kubiak, Tillman Weyde, Oleksandr Galkin, Daniel Philps, and Ram Gopal. 2024. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Realistic Financial Correlation Matrices. InProceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. 1–9

    2024

  40. [44]

    En-Ya Kuo and Sebastien Motsch. 2026. EmDT: Embedding Diffusion Trans- former for Tabular Data Generation in Fraud Detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.13566(2026)

    2026 arXiv

  41. [45]

    Taegyeong Lee, Jiwon Park, Kyunga Bang, Seunghyun Hwang, and Ung-Jin Jang. 2025. Exploring Diffusion Models for Generative Forecasting of Financial Charts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02308(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  42. [46]

    Andrew Lesniewski and Giulio Trigila. 2024. Beyond Monte Carlo: Harness- ing Diffusion Models to Simulate Financial Market Dynamics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00036(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  43. [48]

    Yang Li, Zhi Chen, and Steve Yang. 2025. FlowHFT: Imitation Learning via Flow Matching Policy for Optimal High-Frequency Trading under Diverse Market Conditions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05784(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  44. [49]

    Yinheng Li, Shaofei Wang, Han Ding, and Hang Chen. 2023. Large language models in finance: A survey. InProceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on AI in finance. 374–382

    2023

  45. [51]

    Zhengyang Liang, Hao He, Ceyuan Yang, and Bo Dai. 2024. Scaling laws for diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08184(2024)

    2024

  46. [52]

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le. 2023. Flow Matching for Generative Modeling. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations

    2023

  47. [53]

    Changshuo Liu and Canyao Liu. 2024. Entity-based Financial Tabular Data Synthesis with Diffusion Models. InProceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance

    2024

  48. [54]

    Shujie Liu and JW Wan. 2024. Synthetic asset price paths generation using denoising diffusion probabilistic model. InInternational Conference on Scientific Computing and Machine Learning. Anonymous Author(s)

    2024

  49. [55]

    Xingchao Liu, Chengyue Gong, and Qiang Liu. 2023. Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations

    2023

  50. [56]

    Hou-Wan Long, Zhoufei Tang, Jianhui Zhang, Zhuoyang Zhan, Tao Lu, and Xiaoquan Michael Zhang. 2025. InterDiff: Synthesizing Financial Time Series with Inter-Stock Correlations via Classifier-Free Guided Diffusion. InJoint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge D...

    2025

  51. [58]

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongxuan Li, and Jun Zhu

  52. [59]

    Giuseppe Masi, Andrea Coletta, and Novella Bartolini. 2026. High-Quality Synthetic Financial Time-Series using a GAN-Diffusion Framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.27113(2026)

    2026 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Thi-Thu Nguyen, Xuan-Thong Truong, Thai-Binh Nguyen, and Nhat-Hai Nguyen. 2026. VARDiff: vision-augmented retrieval-guided diffusion for stock forecasting.Information Sciences(2026), 123113

    2026

  54. [61]

    Hao Ni, Lukasz Szpruch, Marc Sabate-Vidales, Baoren Xiao, Magnus Wiese, and Shujian Liao. 2021. Sig-Wasserstein GANs for Time Series Generation. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on AI in Finance

    2021

  55. [62]

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. 2021. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. InInternational conference on machine learning. PmLR, 8162–8171

    2021

  56. [63]

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. 2023. Scalable Diffusion Models with Trans- formers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    2023

  57. [64]

    Ethan Perez, Florian Strub, Harm De Vries, Vincent Dumoulin, and Aaron Courville. 2018. Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 32

    2018

  58. [66]

    Yurii Pushkarenko and Volodymyr Zaslavskyi. 2024. Synthetic data generation for fraud detection using diffusion models.Information & Security55, 2 (2024), 185–198

    2024

  59. [67]

    Kashif Rasul, Calvin Seward, Ingmar Schuster, and Roland Vollgraf. 2021. Au- toregressive Denoising Diffusion Models for Multivariate Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting. InProceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. 8857–8868

    2021

  60. [68]

    Danilo Rezende and Shakir Mohamed. 2015. Variational inference with normal- izing flows. InInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1530–1538

    2015

  61. [69]

    Rožanec, Tina Žezlin, Laurentiu Vasiliu, Dunja Mladenić, Radu Prodan, and Dumitru Roman

    Jože M. Rožanec, Tina Žezlin, Laurentiu Vasiliu, Dunja Mladenić, Radu Prodan, and Dumitru Roman. 2025. Fiaingen: A Financial Time Series Generative Method Matching Real-World Data Quality.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01169 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    Preetha Saha, Jingrao Lyu, Arnav Saxena, Tianjiao Zhao, and Dhagash Mehta

  63. [71]

    Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. 2016. Improved techniques for training gans.Advances in neural information processing systems29 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    Timur Sattarov, Marco Schreyer, and Damian Borth. 2023. FinDiff: Diffusion Models for Financial Tabular Data Generation. InProceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance

    2023

  65. [73]

    Timur Sattarov, Marco Schreyer, and Damian Borth. 2024. Federated Diffusion Modeling with Differential Privacy for Tabular Data Synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16083(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    InProceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance

    Large language model agents for investment management: Foundations, benchmarks, and research frontiers. InProceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. 736–744

  67. [75]

    Timur Sattarov, Marco Schreyer, and Damian Borth. 2025. Privacy Preserving Diffusion Models for Mixed-Type Tabular Data Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00638(2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Gan- guli

    Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric A. Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Gan- guli. 2015. Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynam- ics. InProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. 2256–2265

    2015

  69. [77]

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. 2021. Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations

    2021

  70. [78]

    Timur Sattarov, Marco Schreyer, and Damian Borth. 2024. Imb-FinDiff: Con- ditional Diffusion Models for Class Imbalance Synthesis of Financial Tabular Data. InProceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance

    2024

  71. [79]

    Yang Song and Stefano Ermon. 2019. Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 32

    2019

  72. [80]

    Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Ste- fano Ermon, and Ben Poole

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Ste- fano Ermon, and Ben Poole. 2021. Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations. InInternational Conference on Learning Rep- resentations

    2021

  73. [81]

    Tomonori Takahashi and Takayuki Mizuno. 2025. Generation of Synthetic Financial Time Series by Diffusion Models.Quantitative Finance(2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    Yang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. 2023. Consistency Models. InProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning

    2023

  75. [83]

    Yusuke Tashiro, Jiaming Song, Yang Song, and Stefano Ermon. 2021. CSDI: Con- ditional Score-based Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Time Series Imputation. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 34. 24804–24816

    2021

  76. [84]

    Nilay Tiwari. 2026. Generative Diffusion Model for Risk-Neutral Derivative Pricing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20582(2026)

    2026

  77. [85]

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd Van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. 2018. Towards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717(2018)

    2018 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Yuki Tanaka, Ryuji Hashimoto, Takehiro Takayanagi, Zhe Piao, Yuri Murayama, and Kiyoshi Izumi. 2025. CoFinDiff: Controllable Financial Diffusion Model for Time Series Generation. InProceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 9357–9365

    2025

  79. [87]

    Zhuohan Wang and Carmine Ventre. 2024. A Financial Time Series Denoiser Based on Diffusion Model. InProceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance

    2024

  80. [88]

    Zhuohan Wang and Carmine Ventre. 2025. Diffvolume: Diffusion models for vol- ume generation in limit order books. InProceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. 587–595

    2025

  81. [89]

    Zhuohan Wang and Carmine Ventre. 2026. DiffLOB: Diffusion Models for Counterfactual Generation in Limit Order Books. InProceedings of the 35th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-ECAI 2026)

    2026

  82. [90]

    Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R Bowman. 2018. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461(2018)

    2018 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Changfu Xu, Jianxiong Guo, Yuzhu Liang, Haiyang Huang, Haodong Zou, Xi Zheng, Shui Yu, Xiaowen Chu, Jiannong Cao, and Tian Wang. 2025. Diffusion Models for Reinforcement Learning: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12253(2025)

    2025

  84. [92]

    Ling Yang, Zhilong Zhang, Yang Song, Shenda Hong, Runsheng Xu, Yue Zhao, Wentao Zhang, Bin Cui, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2023. Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications.ACM computing surveys 56, 4 (2023), 1–39

    2023

  85. [94]

    Magnus Wiese, Robert Knobloch, Ralf Korn, and Peter Kretschmer. 2020. Quant GANs: Deep Generation of Financial Time Series.Quantitative Finance20, 9 (2020)

    2020

  86. [95]

    Stelios Zarifis, Ioannis Kordonis, and Petros Maragos. 2025. Diffusion-Based Scenario Tree Generation for Multivariate Time Series Prediction and Multistage Stochastic Optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14832(2025)

    2025

  87. [96]

    Hengrui Zhang, Jiani Zhang, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan, Zhengyuan Shen, Xiao Qin, Christos Faloutsos, Huzefa Rangwala, and George Karypis. 2024. Mixed-Type Tabular Data Synthesis with Score-based Diffusion in Latent Space. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations

    2024

  88. [97]

    Wei Zhang, Brian Barr, and John Paisley. 2026. Tabular diffusion counterfactual explanations.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence9 (2026), 1743495

    2026

  89. [98]

    Yingxiao Zhang, Jiaxin Duan, Junfu Zhang, and Ke Feng. 2026. TF-CoDiT: Conditional Time Series Synthesis with Diffusion Transformers for Treasury Futures.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11880(2026)

    2026

  90. [99]

    Xinyu Yuan and Yan Qiao. 2024. Diffusion-TS: Interpretable Diffusion for General Time Series Generation. InInternational Conference on Learning Repre- sentations

    2024

  91. [100]

    Wenliang Zhao, Lujia Bai, Yongming Rao, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. 2023. Unipc: A unified predictor-corrector framework for fast sampling of diffusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36 (2023), 49842–49869

    2023

  92. [101]

    Zetao Zheng, Guoan Li, Deqiang Ouyang, Decui Liang, and Jie Shao. 2024. Limit Order Book Event Stream Prediction with Diffusion Model.Data Science and Engineering(2024)

    2024

  93. [102]

    Zhengbang Zhu, Hanye Zhao, Haoran He, Yichao Zhong, Shenyu Zhang, Hao- quan Guo, Tingting Chen, and Weinan Zhang. 2023. Diffusion models for reinforcement learning: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01223(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Michael Zuo, Inwon Kang, Stacy Patterson, and Oshani Seneviratne. 2026. Measuring Privacy Risks and Tradeoffs in Financial Synthetic Data Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.09288(2026)

    2026

  95. [104]

    Helin Zhao and Junchi Shen. 2025. Valuation of Exotic Options and Counter- party Games Based on Conditional Diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.13374 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  96. [2022]

    Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps.Advances in neural information processing systems35 (2022), 5775–5787

    2022

  97. [2024]

    A Survey on Diffusion Models for Time Series and Spatio-Temporal Data. Comput. Surveys(2024)

    2024

  98. [2025]

    Dpm-solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models.Machine Intelligence Research22, 4 (2025), 730–751

    2025

  99. [2026]

    InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Controllable Financial Market Generation with Diffusion Guided Meta Agent. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.