Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progress

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.06877 v3 pith:AARAWT6T submitted 2018-06-18 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords problemchallengesmethodslearningrewardsurveyarticlecurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring the reward function of an agent, given its policy or observed behavior. Analogous to RL, IRL is perceived both as a problem and as a class of methods. By categorically surveying the current literature in IRL, this article serves as a reference for researchers and practitioners of machine learning and beyond to understand the challenges of IRL and select the approaches best suited for the problem on hand. The survey formally introduces the IRL problem along with its central challenges such as the difficulty in performing accurate inference and its generalizability, its sensitivity to prior knowledge, and the disproportionate growth in solution complexity with problem size. The article elaborates how the current methods mitigate these challenges. We further discuss the extensions to traditional IRL methods for handling: inaccurate and incomplete perception, an incomplete model, multiple reward functions, and nonlinear reward functions. This survey concludes the discussion with some broad advances in the research area and currently open research questions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is Optimal Transport Necessary for Inverse Reinforcement Learning?

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Simple nearest-neighbor and segment-matching reward functions match or beat Optimal Transport based Inverse RL across 32 benchmarks.

  2. Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: A Review

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of generative models (VAEs, GANs, diffusion, transformers, LLMs) applied to map generation, scenario generation, trajectory prediction, and motion planning for autonomous driving.

Pith tools