Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

NUTs, Bolts, and Spindles

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs regular Euclidean supergravity solutions whose bulk is an orbifold line bundle over a spindle and whose boundary is a branched lens space, and shows that twist versus anti-twist of the graviphoton controls the…

desk verdict The non-accelerating spindle-bolt families are solid and well worth refereeing; the accelerating families are explicitly built on an unproven sufficiency claim and should be flagged as conjectural unless a Killing spinor is supplied. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00428 v2 pith:ACNHPG3B submitted 2024-11-30 hep-th gr-qcmath.DG

Matteo Kevin Crisafio , Alessio Fontanarossa , Dario Martelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcmath.DG
keywords spindleboltminimalgaugedsupergravityEuclideansupersymmetricsolutionsbranchedlensspaceSeifertorbifoldstwist/anti-twistequivariantlocalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Supersymmetric Euclidean solutions of four-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity are usually nuts or spherical bolts; this paper builds infinite families in which the bolt is a spindle, a two-sphere with two conical points, and the conformal boundary is generically a squashed, branched lens space. The central claim is a dichotomy: when the graviphoton twists through the spindle bolt, the holographically renormalized on-shell action is fixed purely by the integer topological data, while in the anti-twist case the action keeps one continuous parameter. Both types of action match equivariant localization, and the old 1/4-BPS and 1/2-BPS spherical bolt solutions are recovered as limits. This yields concrete holographic predictions: for a given Seifert orbifold boundary, the large-$N$ limit of the localized partition function is either a topologically fixed number or a one-parameter family, depending on the twist.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the local Plebański-Demianski family of Einstein-Maxwell metrics together with its non-accelerating specialization, whose metric functions $P(p)$ and $Q(q)$ factorize into $P_\pm$ and $Q_\pm$ under the supersymmetry conditions. The signs $\eta,\sigma,\kappa$ select which roots $p_\pm,q_+$ are paired; $\sigma=+1$ gives twist and $\sigma=-1$ gives anti-twist on the spindle bolt. The quantization conditions (3.34), (3.36), and (3.48) convert the continuous local parameters into coprime integers $(m_-,m_+,v,t)$, and the resulting toric orbifold is encoded in the labelled fan $\vec v_1=(r_-,-m_+)$, $\vec v_2=(v,0)$, $\vec v_3=(r_+,m_-)$. The on-shell action is then computed in two independent ways, by holographic renormalization and by the equivariant-localization fixed-point formula (4.19), and the identity between the two is what forces the twist action to depend only on topology while leaving the anti-twist action parameter-dependent.

What would settle it

Substitute the accelerating sub-family defined by $\alpha=P^2$, $A=\omega/Q$, and Eq. (5.35) into the Killing spinor equation (2.4) with a general spinor ansatz and check whether a nonzero, single-valued solution exists at generic values of the two continuous parameters; a negative answer would refute the Section 5 claims, since the paper assumes the algebraic integrability conditions are equivalent to supersymmetry without writing the spinor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors show that the $U(1)\times U(1)$-invariant Euclidean sector of four-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity admits supersymmetric orbifold completions of topology $\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{Z}_v \hookrightarrow \mathcal{O}(-t) \to \Sigma[m_-,m_+]$, where $\Sigma[m_-,m_+]$ is a spindle bolt and the conformal boundary is a branched lens space $L(t,1)$. The graviphoton flux through the bolt is $$\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{L_2}F = \frac{\eta}{2}\left(\frac{m_-+\$\sigma$ m_+}{m_-m_+} - \kappa\frac{t/v}{m_-m_+}\right),$$ with $\sigma=+1$ for twist and $\sigma=-1$ for anti-twist. In the twist case the renormalized on-shell action is $$S_{\rm ren} = \frac{\pi}{8G_4 v}\left[2\chi_\Sigma - \kappa\frac{t/v}{m_-m_+} - \kappa\frac{v(m_- - m_+)^2}{t\, m_- m_+}\right],$$ depending only on integer data, while in the anti-twist case it depends on a continuous parameter $\tilde q_+$, as in Eq. (4.12). Both results agree with the equivariant-localization fixed-point formula, and the boundary inherits two types of rigid Killing spinors together with specific flat connections that encode the bulk spindle data. The known 1/4-BPS and 1/2-BPS spherical-bolt solutions appear as limits of the twist and anti-twist families respectively.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for the accelerating solutions, satisfying a list of algebraic conditions on the parameters is enough to guarantee that a spinor solving the actual supersymmetry equation exists, since no such spinor is explicitly constructed for them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The old 1/4-BPS and 1/2-BPS spherical bolt solutions of minimal gauged supergravity are recovered as limits of spindle-bolt solutions with twist and anti-twist respectively, so their different on-shell actions are the same dichotomy in disguise.
  • For branched lens-space boundaries there are two distinct types of rigid Killing spinors plus specific flat connections, so the large-$N$ limit of the localized partition function should jump between a topologically fixed value and a continuously parametrized one according to the twist.
  • In the twist case the supersymmetric Killing vector of the explicit solution coincides with the extremum of the off-shell localized action, while in the anti-twist case no extremization occurs, sharpening when extremization is part of the existence problem.
  • The accelerating Plebański-Demianski sub-family with special parameter choice realizes twist as well as anti-twist, so twist is not confined to non-accelerating solutions.
  • The same orbifold topology $\mathcal{O}(-t)\to\Sigma[m_-,m_+]$ with the same integer data can be filled by non-diffeomorphic solutions in the non-accelerating and accelerating families, so bulk data are not uniquely fixed by topology alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the dichotomy suggests a general selection rule—Euclidean supergravity fillings of twist type should exist only at extremal values of the off-shell action, while anti-twist fillings should exist for generic boundary R-symmetry choices.
  • Editorial inference: the anti-twist action's dependence on $\tilde q_+$ implies the same lens-space boundary can have inequivalent gravity fillings; a search for a second sub-family with identical $(t,v,m_\pm)$ but different $\tilde q_+$ would test this directly.
  • Editorial inference: the accepted complex-valued anti-twist metrics imply that the holographic contour should be interpreted over complex metrics, so real-ness of the bulk metric is not part of the stationarity condition.
  • Editorial inference: a direct superconformal field theory test would compute the large-$N$ localized partition function on the branched lens space $L[m_-,m_+](t,1)$; in the anti-twist case it should depend on a parameter mirroring $\tilde q_+$, something a topologically fixed twist result would not do.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs families of Euclidean supersymmetric solutions of minimal gauged supergravity in four dimensions, with U(1)×U(1) invariance and asymptotically locally hyperbolic metrics. The bulk is an orbifold line bundle O(-t) over a spindle bolt, and the boundary is a squashed, possibly branched, lens space. For the non-accelerating Carter-Plebanski subclass (A=0) the authors give explicit Killing spinors, perform a detailed regularity analysis, derive quantization conditions, exhibit both twist and anti-twist graviphoton fluxes, and compute the holographically renormalized on-shell action, matching it against equivariant localization. For the accelerating Plebanski-Demianski sector (A≠0) they compute the general renormalized action, infer a supersymmetric Killing vector from boundary data, and specialize to a class with simplified parameters, again finding twist-type actions and comparing with localization. The paper also provides toric data, limits to previously known NUT and bolt solutions, an M-theory uplift analysis, and a Ricci-flat analogue in an appendix.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper gives the first explicit spindle-bolt solutions in which the spindle appears in the bulk of asymptotically locally hyperbolic spaces, with both twist and anti-twist realizations, and shows that the distinction is encoded in boundary flat connections. The non-accelerating part is supported by explicit Killing spinors, a careful global regularity analysis, successful reduction to old solutions, and a non-trivial match between holographic renormalization and equivariant localization. The paper also supplies machine-checkable algebraic data, such as the toric polytopes and the quantization conditions, and makes falsifiable predictions for large-N localized partition functions on Seifert orbifolds. These are valuable contributions. The accelerating part, however, is conditional on an unproven sufficiency claim about integrability conditions, and therefore the full advertised scope of the paper is not yet established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1 after Eq. (2.22), §5.2, §5.4] The accelerating-sector results are not yet established. For A≠0 no Killing spinor solving (2.4) is exhibited: after (2.22) the text says only that the authors "believe" the algebraic conditions (2.21)-(2.22) are necessary and sufficient, and §5.2 explicitly declines to solve (2.4), inferring the supersymmetric Killing vector from boundary data. The integrability condition (2.14) is necessary but not shown to be sufficient, and the explicit spinor (3.12) is constructed only for A=0. The subsequent checks are therefore conditional: eq. (5.43) is obtained by feeding the boundary-inferred Killing vector into the localization formula (4.19), which itself is derived under the assumption of a bulk Killing spinor. Please either construct the Killing spinor for the special class (5.34)-(5.35), or prove local sufficiency of (2.21)-(2.22) for this class, or explicitly restrict the paper's central claims to A=0 until such a proof is supplied.
  2. [§4.3, Eq. (4.45)] The claimed matching of the anti-twist on-shell action with equivariant localization relies on the identity (4.45), which is stated with "it is possible to show" and no derivation. This identity is the step that converts the localization expression (4.40) into the gravitational formula (4.12), so the equality is not independently checkable from the text. Please provide the derivation in an appendix or as a supplementary computation; this is needed to substantiate the statement in §4.3 that the matching is a highly non-trivial check.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3.37)] The displayed denominator of the second equality appears to contain a typo: it should presumably be (q_+^2-p_+^2)(q_+^2-p_-^2), not (q_+^2-p_-^2)(p_+^2-p_-^2). This follows from combining (3.33), (3.34), and (3.36).
  2. [Eqs. (4.9), (4.43), (5.43)] The denominator written as "tm_-m_+" should be "t m_- m_+" (that is, t times m_- times m_+). The missing spacing makes the formula ambiguous and could be misread as (t m_-) - m_+.
  3. [Throughout] The paper uses many signs (η, δ, λ, σ, κ, ρ±) and the reading would be much easier if a compact glossary or table of these signs and their roles were included, perhaps near the end of Section 3.1.
  4. [Appendix C and Section 6] There are several typographical and grammatical slips, e.g. "not directl y" near the end of §3.5.3 and "do the metrics" in §6. These do not affect the mathematics but should be corrected in a final proofread.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the on-shell actions are computed directly via holographic renormalization and only cross-checked against the independent equivariant localization formula; the accelerating-sector supersymmetry rests on an explicitly stated unproven sufficiency belief, which is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The renormalized on-shell actions are evaluated directly from the explicit metrics and gauge fields: the CP action via the integral (4.8) yielding twist (4.9) and anti-twist (4.12), and the general PD action (5.14) yielding (5.43) for the special class. The equivariant localization formula (4.19) is imported from [30,31], which have no author overlap with this paper, and is used only as a consistency check: the matching (4.43)=(4.9) and (4.40)=(4.12) requires the non-trivial algebraic identities (4.41) and (4.45), so the agreement is not imposed by construction. Supersymmetry conditions (2.21)-(2.22) come from the external reference [20]; for A=0 an explicit Killing spinor (3.12) is constructed and verified, and for A!=0 the paper openly states a belief in sufficiency ('we believe that these conditions are (necessary and) sufficient for supersymmetry', Section 2.1 after (2.22)) and infers the Killing vector from boundary data via [8,7] (Section 5.2) rather than solving (2.4). This is an explicitly flagged, conditional claim - a correctness and rigor risk that does not make the argument circular, because the accelerating actions are still computed from the explicit bosonic data and the localization check is independent of the sufficiency conjecture. Self-citations to [15,16,34,35,7,8,3] are used for methodology, comparison, and limit-taking (Section 3.6), none load-bearing for the central results; recovering the old solutions as limits is a check, not a premise. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the twist/anti-twist dichotomy is established by separately computing the bulk flux (3.130) and the boundary transition functions (3.67), whose agreement is a derived fact, not a definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard PD local ansatz, the validity of holographic renormalization and equivariant localization, and two paper-specific assumptions: that the algebraic integrability conditions are sufficient for supersymmetry when A != 0, and that complexified solutions are acceptable. The free continuous parameters are solution moduli, not fitted constants.

free parameters (3)
  • twist CP continuous parameters (P~, q~+)
    Two free real parameters after fixing twist and topology (t,m±,v); they do not enter the on-shell action (Section 3.5.1).
  • anti-twist CP continuous parameters (P, q~+)
    Two continuous parameters; the action depends only on q~+ (Section 3.5.2, eq. (4.12)).
  • special PD continuous parameters (omega, P)
    Two free real parameters in the accelerating special class, absent from the twist action (5.43).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Euclidean action (2.1) and Killing spinor equation (2.4) describe the bosonic sector of minimal d=4 N=2 gauged supergravity.
    The paper works within this theory, citing [36].
  • domain assumption The Plebanski-Demianski metric (2.5)-(2.9) is the most general Petrov type D solution of the Maxwell-Einstein-Lambda theory.
    Standard classification result, used as the starting point, citing [21,20,44].
  • domain assumption Orbifold singularities such as spindle poles and normal singularities C/Z_v are allowed in supergravity solutions.
    The paper allows local conical singularities following the spindle literature.
  • ad hoc to paper For A != 0, the algebraic conditions (2.21)-(2.22) are sufficient for the existence of a Killing spinor.
    The paper states 'we believe' and does not construct the spinor; this is load-bearing for Section 5.
  • domain assumption Complex-valued metrics and gauge fields are acceptable in the Euclidean holographic setup.
    The paper declines to impose reality 'from the point of view of holography'; needed for generic anti-twist solutions.
  • standard math The equivariant localization formula (4.19) from [30,31,32] applies to the constructed orbifold solutions.
    Published general result invoked as an independent check.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NUTs, Bolts, and Spindles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACNHPG3B

@misc{pith2026241200428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NUTs, Bolts, and Spindles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACNHPG3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00428}
}
abstract

We construct new infinite classes of Euclidean supersymmetric solutions of four dimensional minimal gauged supergravity comprising a $U (1) \times U (1)$-invariant asymptotically locally hyperbolic metric on the total space of orbifold line bundles over a spindle (bolt). The conformal boundary is generically a squashed, branched, lens space and the graviphoton gauge field can have either twist or anti-twist through the spindle bolt. Correspondingly, the boundary geometry inherits two types of rigid Killing spinors, that we refer to as twist and anti-twist for the three-dimensional Seifert orbifolds, as well as some specific flat connections for the background gauge field, determined by the data of the spindle bolt. For all our solutions we compute the holographically renormalized on-shell action and compare it to the expression obtained via equivariant localization, uncovering a markedly distinct behaviour in the cases of twist and anti twist. Our results provide precise predictions for the large $N$ limit of the corresponding localized partition functions of three-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal field theories placed on Seifert orbifolds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00428 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Summary of supersymmetric euclidean AdS4 solutions to d = 4, N = 2 mini￾mal gauged supergravity containing nuts and bolts. In the central column the symmetry and the bulk content are sketched, while the lateral columns show when a certain super￾symmetric solution is contained in another one by some limiting procedure which will be explained in detail in section 3.6. Notice that these are consistent with the general … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Labelled polytope associated to normal vectors ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Equivariant localization for $D=4$ gauged supergravity

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Supersymmetric Euclidean D=4 N=2 gauged supergravity actions and fluxes localize onto R-symmetry fixed points, proving large-N SCFT free-energy formulas and UV-IR relations.

  2. Supersymmetric $\mathbb{WCP}^n$, AdS near horizons and orbifolds

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Weighted projective spaces WCP² and WCP³ can be made supersymmetric for tuned integer weights, yielding new AdS₅×WCP²×S¹, AdS₄×WCP³, and AdS₃×WT(1,1) supergravity solutions.

  3. Localisation of $\mathcal{N} = (2,2)$ theories on spindles of both twists

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Exact partition functions for N=(2,2) theories on spindles are computed via localisation for both twist and anti-twist, yielding a unified formula.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Ferrero, J.P

    P. Ferrero, J.P. Gauntlett, J.M. Pérez Ipiña, D. Martell i and J. Sparks, D3-Branes Wrapped on a Spindle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 111601 [2011.10579]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Ferrero, J.P

    P. Ferrero, J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, M5-branes wrapped on a spindle, JHEP 11 (2021) 002 [2105.13344]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Faedo and D

    F. Faedo and D. Martelli, D4-branes wrapped on a spindle , JHEP 02 (2022) 101 [2111.13660]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Ferrero, J.P

    P. Ferrero, J.P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks, Supersymmetric spindles , JHEP 01 (2022) 102 [2112.01543]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Ferrero, J.P

    P. Ferrero, J.P. Gauntlett, J.M.P. Ipiña, D. Martelli an d J. Sparks, Accelerating black holes and spinning spindles , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 046007 [2012.08530]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Cassani, J.P

    D. Cassani, J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Thermodynamics of accelerating and supersymmetric AdS4 black holes , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 086005 [2106.05571]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Inglese, D

    M. Inglese, D. Martelli and A. Pittelli, Supersymmetry and Localization on Three-Dimensional Orbifolds, 2312.17086

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Inglese, D

    M. Inglese, D. Martelli and A. Pittelli, The spindle index from localization , J. Phys. A 57 (2024) 085401 [2303.14199]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    Colombo, S.M

    E. Colombo, S.M. Hosseini, D. Martelli, A. Pittelli and A . Zaffaroni, Microstates of Accelerating and Supersymmetric AdS4 Black Holes from the S pindle Index , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 031603 [2404.07173]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Classification of Gravitational Instanton Symmetries, Commun. Math. Phys. 66 (1979) 291

    1979

  3. [11]

    D. Martelli, From wrapped branes to spindles , in Branes, black holes and geometry: a meeting in celebration o f Jerome Gauntlett’s 60th birthday , 25-26 April 2024, Imperial College, London

    2024

  4. [12]

    Fontanarossa, Nuts, bolts, and spindles , in Eurostrings 2024, 2-6 September 2024, University of Southampton, Southampton

    A. Fontanarossa, Nuts, bolts, and spindles , in Eurostrings 2024, 2-6 September 2024, University of Southampton, Southampton

    2024

  5. [13]

    Martelli, A

    D. Martelli, A. Passias and J. Sparks, The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed three-sphere , Nucl. Phys. B 864 (2012) 840 [1110.6400]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a biaxially squashed three-sphere , Nucl. Phys. B 866 (2013) 72 [1111.6930]. 72

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Martelli, A

    D. Martelli, A. Passias and J. Sparks, The supersymmetric NUTs and bolts of holography, Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 810 [1212.4618]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Martelli and A

    D. Martelli and A. Passias, The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a two-parameter deformed three-sphere, Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013) 51 [1306.3893]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Carter, Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Ei nstein ’s equations, Commun

    B. Carter, Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Ei nstein ’s equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 10 (1968) 280

    1968

  10. [18]

    Plebañski, A class of solutions of einstein-maxwell equations , Annals of Physics 90 (1975) 196

    J.F. Plebañski, A class of solutions of einstein-maxwell equations , Annals of Physics 90 (1975) 196

    1975

  11. [19]

    Alonso-Alberca, P

    N. Alonso-Alberca, P. Meessen and T. Ortin, Supersymmetry of topological Kerr-Newman-Taub-NUT-AdS space-times, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 2783 [hep-th/0003071]

    2000 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Klemm and M

    D. Klemm and M. Nozawa, Supersymmetry of the C-metric and the general Plebanski-Demianski solution , JHEP 05 (2013) 123 [1303.3119]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Plebanski and M

    J. Plebanski and M. Demianski, Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity , Annals of Physics 98 (1976) 98

    1976

  14. [22]

    Griffiths and J

    J.B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky, A New look at the Plebanski-Demianski family of solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 335 [gr-qc/0511091]

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Podolsky and J.B

    J. Podolsky and J.B. Griffiths, Accelerating Kerr-Newman black holes in (anti-)de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 044018 [gr-qc/0601130]

    2006 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Podolsky and A

    J. Podolsky and A. Vratny, New form of all black holes of type D with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 084034 [2212.08865]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Astorino, Most general Type-D Black Hole and Accelerating Reissner-Nordstrom-NUT-(A)dS, 2404.06551

    M. Astorino, Most general Type-D Black Hole and Accelerating Reissner-Nordstrom-NUT-(A)dS, 2404.06551

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Martelli, J

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks and S.-T. Yau, The Geometric dual of a-maximisation for Toric Sasaki-Einstein manifolds , Commun. Math. Phys. 268 (2006) 39 [hep-th/0503183]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Martelli, J

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks and S.-T. Yau, Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation, Commun. Math. Phys. 280 (2008) 611 [hep-th/0603021]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Futaki, H

    A. Futaki, H. Ono and G. Wang, Transverse Kahler geometry of Sasaki manifolds and toric Sasaki-Einstein manifolds , J. Diff. Geom. 83 (2009) 585 [ math/0607586]

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Farquet, J

    D. Farquet, J. Lorenzen, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Gravity duals of supersymmetric gauge theories on three-manifolds , JHEP 08 (2016) 080 [1404.0268]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Benetti Genolini, J.M

    P. Benetti Genolini, J.M. Perez Ipiña and J. Sparks, Localization of the action in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2019) 252 [1906.11249]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Benetti Genolini, J.P

    P. Benetti Genolini, J.P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks, Equivariant Localization in Supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 121602 [2306.03868]. 73

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Benetti Genolini, J.P

    P. Benetti Genolini, J.P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. Lüsche r and J. Sparks, Localization of the Free Energy in Supergravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 141601 [2407.02554]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Benetti Genolini, J.P

    P. Benetti Genolini, J.P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. Lüsche r and J. Sparks, Toric gravitational instantons in gauged supergravity , 2410.19036

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Faedo, A

    F. Faedo, A. Fontanarossa and D. Martelli, Branes wrapped on orbifolds and their gravitational blocks, Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023) 51 [2210.16128]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Faedo, A

    F. Faedo, A. Fontanarossa and D. Martelli, Branes wrapped on quadrilaterals , 2402.08724

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Freedman and A.K

    D.Z. Freedman and A.K. Das, Gauge Internal Symmetry in Extended Supergravity , Nucl. Phys. B 120 (1977) 221

    1977

  29. [37]

    LeBrun, The Einstein-Maxwell Equations, Extremal Kahler Metrics, and Seiberg-Witten Theory, (2008), DOI [0803.3734]

    C. LeBrun, The Einstein-Maxwell Equations, Extremal Kahler Metrics, and Seiberg-Witten Theory, (2008), DOI [0803.3734]

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Caldarelli and D

    M.M. Caldarelli and D. Klemm, Supersymmetry of Anti-de Sitter black holes , Nucl. Phys. B 545 (1999) 434 [hep-th/9808097]

    1999 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gauntlett and O

    J.P. Gauntlett and O. Varela, Consistent Kaluza-Klein reductions for general supersymmetric AdS solutions , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 126007 [0707.2315]

    2007 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gauntlett, S

    J.P. Gauntlett, S. Kim, O. Varela and D. Waldram, Consistent supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein truncations with massive modes , JHEP 04 (2009) 102 [0901.0676]

    2009 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and S. Murthy, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS 5 black holes , JHEP 10 (2019) 062 [1810.11442]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Cassani and L

    D. Cassani and L. Papini, The BPS limit of rotating AdS black hole thermodynamics, JHEP 09 (2019) 079 [1906.10148]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Astorino, Accelerating and charged type I black holes , Phys

    M. Astorino, Accelerating and charged type I black holes , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124025 [2307.10534]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Apostolov, D.M.J

    V. Apostolov, D.M.J. Calderbank and P. Gauduchon, Ambitoric geometry I: Einstein metrics and extremal ambikähler structures , J. Reine Angew. Math. 2016 (2016) 109 [1302.6975]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Apostolov, D.M.J

    V. Apostolov, D.M.J. Calderbank and P. Gauduchon, Ambitoric geometry II: Extremal toric surfaces and Einstein 4-orbifolds , arXiv e-prints (2013) arXiv:1302.6979 [1302.6979]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Benetti Genolini, D

    P. Benetti Genolini, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and J. Spar ks, Holographic renormalization and supersymmetry , JHEP 02 (2017) 132 [1612.06761]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Toldo and B

    C. Toldo and B. Willett, Partition functions on 3d circle bundles and their gravity duals, JHEP 05 (2018) 116 [1712.08861]. 74

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Hong, Perturbatively exact supersymmetric partition functions of ABJM theory on Seifert manifolds and holography , 2411.09006

    J. Hong, Perturbatively exact supersymmetric partition functions of ABJM theory on Seifert manifolds and holography , 2411.09006

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Resolutions of non-regular Ricci-flat Kahler cones , J. Geom. Phys. 59 (2009) 1175 [0707.1674]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett, Seifert fibering operators in 3d N = 2 theories, JHEP 11 (2018) 004 [1807.02328]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Geiges and C

    H. Geiges and C. Lange, Seifert fibrations of lens spaces , arXiv e-prints (2016) arXiv:1608.06844 [1608.06844]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Lerman and S

    E. Lerman and S. Tolman, Hamiltonian torus actions on symplectic orbifolds and toric varieties , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997) 4201 [dg-ga/9511008]

    1997 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Toric geometry, Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and a new infinite class of AdS/CFT duals , Commun. Math. Phys. 262 (2006) 51 [hep-th/0411238]

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Martelli and A

    D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni, Equivariant localization and holography , Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 15 [2306.03891]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Benetti Genolini and C

    P. Benetti Genolini and C. Toldo, Magnetic charge and black hole supersymmetric quantum statistical relation , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) L121902 [2304.00605]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Emparan, C.V

    R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers, Surface terms as counterterms in the AdS / CFT correspondence , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 104001 [hep-th/9903238]

    1999 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization , Class

    K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization , Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

    2002 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Duistermaat and G.J

    J.J. Duistermaat and G.J. Heckman, On the Variation in the cohomology of the symplectic form of the reduced phase space , Invent. Math. 69 (1982) 259

    1982

  51. [59]

    Berline and M

    N. Berline and M. Vergne, Classes caractéristiques équivariantes. formule de localisation en cohomologie équivariante , CR Acad. Sci. Paris 295 (1982) 539

    1982

  52. [60]

    Atiyah and R

    M.F. Atiyah and R. Bott, The Moment map and equivariant cohomology , Topology 23 (1984) 1

    1984

  53. [61]

    Benetti Genolini, J.P

    P. Benetti Genolini, J.P. Gauntlett and J. Sparks, Equivariant localization for AdS/CFT, JHEP 02 (2024) 015 [2308.11701]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Boido, J.P

    A. Boido, J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Entropy Functions For Accelerating Black Holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 091603 [2210.16069]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Boido, J.P

    A. Boido, J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Gravitational Blocks, Spindles and GK Geometry , Commun. Math. Phys. 403 (2023) 917 [2211.02662]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Benetti Genolini, J.P

    P. Benetti Genolini, J.P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, A. Lüsche r and J. Sparks, Localization and attraction, JHEP 05 (2024) 152 [2401.10977]. 75

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Hristov, Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4d N = 2 higher derivative supergravity, 6, 2024 [ 2406.18648]

    K. Hristov, Equivariant localization and gluing rules in 4d N = 2 higher derivative supergravity, 6, 2024 [ 2406.18648]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Ferrero, M

    P. Ferrero, M. Inglese, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Multicharge accelerating black holes and spinning spindles , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 126001 [2109.14625]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Couzens, A tale of (M)2 twists , JHEP 03 (2022) 078 [2112.04462]

    C. Couzens, A tale of (M)2 twists , JHEP 03 (2022) 078 [2112.04462]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Benini and A

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni, A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories, JHEP 07 (2015) 127 [1504.03698]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, Thermodynamics of asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes, JHEP 08 (2005) 004 [hep-th/0505190]

    2005 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Anabalón, F

    A. Anabalón, F. Gray, R. Gregory, D. Kubizňák and R.B. Ma nn, Thermodynamics of Charged, Rotating, and Accelerating Black Holes , JHEP 04 (2019) 096 [1811.04936]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Fefferman and C.R

    C. Fefferman and C.R. Graham, Conformal invariants , in Élie Cartan et les mathématiques d’aujourd’hui - Lyon, 25-29 juin 1984 , no. S131 in Astérisque, pp. 95–116, Société mathématique de France (1985)

    1985

  64. [72]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, D.N. Page and C.N. Pope, New Einstein-Sasaki spaces in five and higher dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 071101 [hep-th/0504225]

    2005 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Toric Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S**2 x S**3 , Phys. Lett. B 621 (2005) 208 [hep-th/0505027]

    2005 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Cacciatori and D

    S.L. Cacciatori and D. Klemm, Supersymmetric AdS(4) black holes and attractors , JHEP 01 (2010) 085 [0911.4926]

    2010 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Ovcharenko, J

    H. Ovcharenko, J. Podolsky and M. Astorino, Black holes of type D revisited: relating their various metric forms , 2409.02308

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Chong, M

    Z.W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C.N. Pope, General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 161301 [hep-th/0506029]

    2005 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Cassani, J

    D. Cassani, J. Lorenzen and D. Martelli, Comments on supersymmetric solutions of minimal gauged supergravity in five dimensions , Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 115013 [1510.01380]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Cvetic, G.W

    M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu and C.N. Pope, Rotating black holes in gauged supergravities: Thermodynamics, supersymmetric limits, topological solitons and time machines , hep-th/0504080

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Apostolov and G

    V. Apostolov and G. Maschler, Conformally Kähler, Einstein-Maxwell Geometry , arXiv e-prints (2015) arXiv:1512.06391 [1512.06391]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [80]

    LeBrun, The einstein–maxwell equations, kähler metrics, and hermi tian geometry, Journal of Geometry and Physics 91 (2015) 163–171

    C. LeBrun, The einstein–maxwell equations, kähler metrics, and hermi tian geometry, Journal of Geometry and Physics 91 (2015) 163–171 . 76

    2015

  73. [81]

    LeBrun, The einstein–maxwell equations and conformally kähler geo metry, Communications in Mathematical Physics 344 (2016) 621–653

    C. LeBrun, The einstein–maxwell equations and conformally kähler geo metry, Communications in Mathematical Physics 344 (2016) 621–653

    2016

  74. [82]

    Koca and C.W

    C. Koca and C.W. Tønnesen-Friedman, Strongly Hermitian Einstein-Maxwell Solutions on Ruled Surfaces , arXiv e-prints (2015) arXiv:1511.06805 [1511.06805]

    2015 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Futaki and H

    A. Futaki and H. Ono, Conformally Einstein-Maxwell Kähler metrics and structur e of the automorphism group , arXiv e-prints (2017) arXiv:1708.01958 [1708.01958]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Futaki and H

    A. Futaki and H. Ono, Volume minimization and Conformally Kähler, Einstein-Maxwell geometry , arXiv e-prints (2017) arXiv:1706.07953 [1706.07953]

    2017 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Couzens, J.P

    C. Couzens, J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, A geometric dual of c-extremization, JHEP 01 (2019) 212 [1810.11026]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Apostolov, D.M.J

    V. Apostolov, D.M.J. Calderbank and P. Gauduchon, The geometry of weakly selfdual kahler surfaces , arXiv: Differential Geometry (2001)

    2001

  79. [87]

    Apostolov, D.M

    V. Apostolov, D.M. Calderbank and P. Gauduchon, Hamiltonian 2-Forms in Kähler Geometry, I General Theory , Journal of Differential Geometry 73 (2006) 359

    2006

  80. [88]

    Ferrero, D6 branes wrapped on a spindle and Y p,q manifolds, JHEP 05 (2024) 182 [2403.03988]

    P. Ferrero, D6 branes wrapped on a spindle and Y p,q manifolds, JHEP 05 (2024) 182 [2403.03988]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Gravitational Multi - Instantons , Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 430 . 77

    1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.