Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 88 references

Dissipation-induced bulk and boundary criticality in the Haldane chain

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Haldane chain's protected edge modes create a boundary universality class of their own under dissipation.

desk verdict A careful QMC paper whose central claim—distinct dissipation-induced boundary criticality for the Haldane chain—holds up; the unverified epsilon-expansion premise is a caveat, not a flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05984 v1 pith:AK7VTWSU submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.str-el

Zhenjiu Wang , Manuel Weber This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Haldanechaindissipativequantumphasetransitionohmicbathsymmetry-protectedtopologicalorderstringparameterboundarycriticalityMonteCarloepsilonexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that when a symmetry-protected topological (SPT) spin-1 Haldane chain is driven through a dissipation-induced ordering transition, its protected S=1/2 edge modes respond to the critical bulk in a way that cannot be described by the standard dissipative O(3) field theory. Using large-scale quantum Monte Carlo, the authors find a second-order transition to antiferromagnetic order with dynamical exponent z≈2 and bulk exponents matching the dissipative $phi^{4}$ epsilon expansion. They introduce a generalized string order parameter built from the conserved total angular momentum of spin plus bath, showing the SPT order survives up to the critical point and acquires scaling dimension Delta_string=0.154(5). The boundary spin susceptibility at criticality gives eta_parallel=-0.28(1), clearly distinct from the trivial dimerized chain's 1.27(3) and the epsilon-expansion value 1.288, signaling a distinct boundary universality class induced by the topological edge state. The result matters because it identifies dissipation as a continuously tunable control for boundary criticality in a nonconformal setting.

What carries the argument

The machinery has three parts. First, a generalized string order parameter C_string(i,j)=<S^z_i prod_{k=i+1}^{j-1} $e^{{i pi J^z_k}}$ S^z_j>, normalized by the bosonic parity expectation, where J_i=S_i+L_i is the conserved total angular momentum of spin plus local bosonic bath; this restores the hidden Z2xZ2 symmetry that is explicitly broken by coupling to the bath and is measured through a parity-reweighting estimator in the quantum Monte Carlo. Second, the dissipative $phi^{4}$ theory with ordinary boundary conditions, whose epsilon expansion about the upper critical dimension d=1 for the boundary gives eta_parallel=2-(N+2)/(N+8) epsilon plus order-$epsilon^{2}$ corrections (1.288 for N=3). Third, the exact quantum Monte Carlo method for retarded interactions using wormhole updates, which supplies the spin, string, edge, and edge-bulk correlation functions. The boundary anomalous dimension eta_parallel is extracted from the edge susceptibility chi_edge ~ $beta^{{(2-d-eta_parallel)/z}}$ and from C_edge(tau) ~ $tau^{{-(d+z-2+eta_parallel)/z}}$.

What would settle it

Compute the two-loop boundary renormalization in the dissipative O(3) $phi^{4}$ theory about d=1: if the simple-pole contribution does not vanish, the order-$epsilon^{2}$ boundary exponent differs from 1.288, and the claimed agreement with the dimerized-chain quantum Monte Carlo value 1.27(3) would need re-examination. A direct alternative is to measure eta_parallel for the Haldane chain at larger system sizes and lower temperatures; if it drifts toward the positive value of the trivial chain, the claimed distinct boundary universality class would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the dissipation-driven quantum phase transition out of the Haldane SPT phase shares the bulk universality class of the corresponding transition out of a trivial dimerized chain, but has a different boundary universality class. The bulk transition, at alpha_c=0.04348(2), is second order into an SO(3)-broken antiferromagnet with z≈2, nu=0.697(8), and eta=0.01(2); the generalized string order parameter shows the SPT state remains ordered up to the critical point and decays algebraically there with Delta_string=0.154(5). The protected edge modes, detected through the local susceptibility, yield eta_parallel=-0.28(1), while the same transition out of the dimerized chain gives eta_parallel=1.27(3), in agreement with the authors' epsilon expansion for ordinary boundary conditions in the dissipative O(3) theory (1.288). The authors conclude that the topological edge state acts as a spin impurity in a critical but nonconformal antiferromagnet, producing boundary criticality not captured by the bulk field theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that a particular two-loop correction to the boundary renormalization in the dissipative field theory vanishes, just as it does in the classical O(N) model; the authors state that checking this is left for future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The SPT ground state of the Haldane chain remains stable under weak ohmic dissipation and is destroyed only at the same critical coupling where long-range antiferromagnetic order sets in.
  • The bulk critical exponents of the dissipation-induced transition are the same for the Haldane and trivial dimerized chains, both matching the dissipative O(3) epsilon expansion; SPT character does not change bulk criticality.
  • Boundary criticality distinguishes the two: the Haldane edge gives eta_parallel=-0.28(1) while the dimerized edge gives 1.27(3), so the protected edge mode defines a separate boundary universality class.
  • Because eta_parallel is unchanged when the boundary dissipation strength alpha_1/alpha is varied from 0.2 to 6, the boundary universality class is robust against local bath-coupling variations.
  • The mixed edge-bulk exponent eta_perp=(eta+eta_parallel)/2 is fixed by the bulk and boundary anomalous dimensions, so edge-bulk correlations carry no independent exponent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if the Haldane boundary behaves like a spin impurity in a critical antiferromagnet, then tuning the bath exponent s below 1 (sub-ohmic) could drive the edge mode through the fixed-point annihilation predicted for the SU(2) spin-boson model, yielding a crossover away from eta_parallel≈-0.28; the authors mention this as an open direction.
  • Editorial extension: the string order parameter's scaling dimension Delta_string=0.154(5) is smaller than the bulk spin scaling dimension, suggesting SPT order is the slowest-decaying probe at criticality; a natural test is to compute the overlap of the generalized string operator with the leading scaling field in the dissipative O(3) theory.
  • Editorial extension: since the bulk critical theory is nonconformal (z≈2), the boundary criticality may escape boundary conformal-field-theory selection rules; one could search for a dissipative analog of the ordinary-to-extraordinary boundary transition by tuning a surface enhancement term.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the S=1 Haldane chain coupled to an ohmic bath. Using a wormhole QMC method, it identifies a continuous bulk transition from the SPT phase to AFM order with exponents ν=0.697(8), η=0.01(2), z=1.96(4), in agreement with the dissipative O(3) fixed point. A generalized string order parameter, defined through the total angular momentum of spin plus bath, remains long-range ordered up to the critical point and acquires a scaling dimension Δ_string=0.154(5). For open chains, the edge local susceptibility yields η∥=-0.28(1) for the Haldane chain, in sharp contrast to the dimerized chain (η∥=1.27(3)) and the dissipative O(3) rotor model (Δ_e=1.16(2)), indicating a boundary universality class induced by the protected edge modes. The authors also derive an epsilon expansion for the ordinary boundary criticality of the dissipative φ^4 theory.

Significance. If correct, these results establish that protected edge modes of a one-dimensional SPT phase can qualitatively change boundary criticality while leaving bulk critical exponents unchanged, and they identify a nonconformal, tunable setting for boundary criticality. The numerical work is substantial: the boundary exponent is stable under a 30-fold change of the boundary coupling, edge autocorrelations collapse over L=96–384, and the QMC estimator for the string operator is benchmarked against DMRG. The independent rotor-model simulation and the analytic epsilon expansion provide useful cross-checks. The main caveats are the unverified two-loop boundary contribution in the epsilon expansion and the underdocumented fit for the string scaling dimension.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM S2, Eqs. (S57)–(S62)] The analytic prediction η∥=1.288 quoted in Table I rests on the assumption that the two-loop simple-pole contribution to the boundary renormalization constant Z1 vanishes for the dissipative O(N) model. The authors state explicitly in SM S2 that this 'remains for future studies to check.' This assumption is load-bearing for the epsilon-expansion entry in Table I and for the text's contrast between the Haldane boundary and the 'ordinary' dissipative O(3) prediction. The central boundary distinction is not solely dependent on this value, because the dimerized-chain QMC (η∥=1.27(3)) and the rotor-model QMC (Δ_e=1.16(2)) independently support the trivial boundary class. Still, the paper should either verify the two-loop cancellation or present the epsilon value with a clear caveat and base the 'distinct universality class' conclusion primarily on the direct QMC comparison.
  2. [Main text Fig. 1(d) and SM S3] The claim that the generalized string operator has a nontrivial scaling dimension Δ_string=0.154(5) is one of the paper's main results, but the extraction is not documented. The SM's exponent section describes finite-size extrapolations for ν, η, and z+η, yet no analogous analysis is given for Δ_string from C_string(r); there is no stated scaling ansatz, fitting window, correction-to-scaling treatment, or finite-size extrapolation plot. This missing support should be supplied before the string-scaling result can be assessed.
  3. [Main text Fig. 2(b) and SM S3 B2] The quoted error bar on η∥=-0.28(1) does not include the uncertainty in the bulk dynamical exponent z, even though the conversion from the measured edge scaling dimension uses 2Δ_e = d+z-2+η∥ with z fixed to 2. Using the independently measured z=1.96(4) shifts η∥ by about 0.03, comparable to the stated error. In addition, the boundary analysis is performed at the periodic-boundary critical coupling α_c=0.04348(2) without an independent finite-size estimate for open chains. Please state the assumed value of z in the conversion, propagate its uncertainty into η∥, and comment on the sensitivity of the boundary fit to the precise location of α_c.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text, Figs. 2 and 3] The boundary dissipation strength α1 appears in figures and the text without a formal definition; please define it near Eq. (2) or in the caption of Fig. 2.
  2. [SM S3 B4, Eq. (S70)] For the dissipative O(3) rotor model, please state the boundary condition used in Fig. S7 and specify how the boundary coupling is treated in that simulation.
  3. [Main text, footnote [60]] The caveat about dangling edge states for δ<0 is important; consider moving a version of this discussion into the main text so that the choice δ>0 is not perceived as arbitrary.
  4. [General] No data or code availability statement is included; for a QMC paper with several nontrivial extrapolations, sharing the raw correlation data and fit details would substantially improve reproducibility.
  5. [Main text, first use of 'nonconformal'] The term 'nonconformal' is used to describe the bulk critical theory; please define at first use what is meant by the absence of conformality here, namely the lack of Lorentz invariance due to z≈2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; central boundary-criticality results are measured QMC observables, not derived from the theory being tested.

full rationale

The paper's central claims — bulk exponents, the generalized string-order scaling dimension, and the boundary anomalous dimension η∥ — are extracted from QMC correlation functions via standard finite-size scaling (Eqs. S63–S65), not from the ϵ-expansion being tested. The generalized string operator (Eq. 6) is defined independently from the total angular momentum J_i = S_i + L_i and reduces to the known string order at α=0; its QMC parity estimator (Eq. S35) is benchmarked against DMRG (Fig. S1). The dissipative O(3) ϵ-expansion for ordinary boundary criticality (SM S2) is a separate analytic calculation based on the bulk fixed point of Ref. [8] and on the classical O(N) boundary renormalization of Ref. [74]; no QMC constant is fed into it. The only explicitly flagged assumption — that the two-loop simple pole in Z1 vanishes for the dissipative O(N) model — is a stated limitation ('it remains for future studies to check'), and it affects only the benchmark value η∥ = 1.288, not the direct Haldane-vs-dimerized QMC comparison. Self-citations [51, 55, 56, 62] are methodological or contextual and are not load-bearing for the boundary-criticality claim; the derivation of the ϵ-expansion is presented in the paper's own Supplemental Material rather than imported as an unverified black box. Overall, the central results are self-contained against external benchmarks and the comparison with the trivial chain and the dissipative rotor model provides independent support, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculations rest on a small set of model choices (dimerization, cutoff, temperature scaling), the standard O(3) nonlinear-sigma-model description, the exact integration over a quadratic bath, and one explicitly unverified analytic assumption about two-loop boundary renormalization. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Dimerization delta = 0.4
    Chosen by hand to realize a topologically trivial gapped phase for comparison with the Haldane phase (Eq. 1). The transition exists for a range of delta; the specific value is a model choice, not fitted to the target physics.
  • Bath frequency cutoff omega_c = 10 J
    Ultraviolet cutoff of the ohmic spectral function; chosen large enough compared to microscopic scales; standard for the model, but its finite value affects quantitative couplings in the QMC.
  • Temperature scaling betaJ = L^2/48
    Inverse temperature scaling used to keep the system at the quantum critical point with z close to 2; this is a scaling choice and is itself validated by the z measurement, not an independent fit.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The two-loop pole contribution to the boundary renormalization constant Z1 vanishes for the dissipative O(N) model, as it does for the classical O(N) model.
    Stated in SM S2: 'We assume that the two-loop simple pole contribution to Z1 vanishes, as for the ordinary boundary transition of the non-dissipative phi^4 theory.' The authors note this 'remains for future studies to check'; the resulting O(epsilon^2) boundary exponent depends on it.
  • standard math Wick's theorem applies when integrating out the bath, so the retarded spin-spin interaction captures the bath exactly.
    The bath is quadratic; integrating it out gives the retarded interaction with propagator K(tau) (Eq. 3 and SM S1 A).
  • domain assumption The S=1 chain is described at low energies by the O(3) nonlinear sigma model plus topological term; the topological term is irrelevant in the bulk but produces S=1/2 edge states at open boundaries.
    Used in the Low-energy theory section to connect the lattice model to the dissipative phi^4 theory and to explain the boundary differences.
  • domain assumption At the boundary of the Haldane chain, the relevant degrees of freedom are a single S=1/2 edge mode; higher edge modes are gapped.
    This is the basis for interpreting the boundary criticality as a spin-impurity problem; no quantitative proof for the dissipative case is given.
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized string operator normalized by the noninteracting bath parity C_b_string is the correct extension of the string order parameter to finite dissipation.
    Definition in Eq. (6); its normalization and QMC estimator are new to this paper and validated only against single-boson DMRG and internal consistency checks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissipation-induced bulk and boundary criticality in the Haldane chain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AK7VTWSU

@misc{pith2026260805984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissipation-induced bulk and boundary criticality in the Haldane chain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AK7VTWSU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05984}
}
abstract

We study the Haldane chain coupled to a dissipative ohmic bath. Using large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we identify a second-order quantum phase transition into an antiferromagnetic state with spontaneously broken SO(3) symmetry that is governed by an interacting fixed point with dynamical exponent $z\approx 2$. We derive a generalized string order parameter which indicates that the symmetry-protected topological ground state of the Haldane chain is stable for weak dissipation and develops a nontrivial scaling dimension at criticality. In particular, its topological edge modes display nontrivial boundary criticality that is distinct from an equivalent transition out of a trivial state; for the latter, we perform an accurate $\epsilon$ expansion of a dissipative $\phi^4$ theory with ordinary boundary conditions. Our setup realizes a spin impurity in a critical yet nonconformal antiferromagnet and paves the way for continuously tunable boundary criticality controlled by dissipation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05984 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Bulk criticality of the Haldane chain. Correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Boundary response of the dimerized chain. (a) Finite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hereβ= 1/Tis the inverse temperature. Low-energy theory.—The isolated quantum spin chain is described by the nonlinear sigma modelS s =S top + 1 2 R dτ R dr χ⊥ (∂τ n(r, τ))2 +ρ s (∂rn(r, τ))2 , wherenis anN= 3 component unit vector. The additional topo- logical termS top does not affect the bulk properties of the two gapped ground states ofH s, but become...

  2. [2]

    Fazio and H

    R. Fazio and H. van der Zant, Quantum phase transi- tions and vortex dynamics in superconducting networks, Physics Reports355, 235 (2001)

    2001

  3. [3]

    Chakravarty, G.-L

    S. Chakravarty, G.-L. Ingold, S. Kivelson, and A. Luther, Onset of Global Phase Coherence in Josephson-Junction Arrays: A Dissipative Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2303 (1986)

    1986

  4. [4]

    Sachdev, P

    S. Sachdev, P. Werner, and M. Troyer, Universal conduc- tance of nanowires near the superconductor-metal quan- tum transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 237003 (2004)

    2004

  5. [5]

    Refael, E

    G. Refael, E. Demler, Y. Oreg, and D. S. Fisher, Superconductor-to-normal transitions in dissipative chains of mesoscopic grains and nanowires, Phys. Rev. B75, 014522 (2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    A. H. Castro Neto, C. de C. Chamon, and C. Nayak, Open Luttinger Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 4629 (1997)

    1997

  7. [7]

    M. A. Cazalilla, F. Sols, and F. Guinea, Dissipation- Driven Quantum Phase Transitions in a Tomonaga- Luttinger Liquid Electrostatically Coupled to a Metallic Gate, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 076401 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    A. M. Lobos, A. Iucci, M. M¨ uller, and T. Giamarchi, Dissipation-driven phase transitions in superconducting wires, Phys. Rev. B80, 214515 (2009)

    2009

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    Pankov, S

    S. Pankov, S. Florens, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, and S. Sachdev, Non-Fermi-liquid behavior from two-dimensional antiferromagnetic fluctuations: A renormalization-group and large-Nanalysis, Phys. Rev. B69, 054426 (2004)

    2004

  2. [10]

    Werner, M

    P. Werner, M. Troyer, and S. Sachdev, Quantum spin chains with site dissipation, Journal of the Physical So- ciety of Japan74, 67 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    A. M. Lobos, M. A. Cazalilla, and P. Chudzinski, Mag- netic phases in the one-dimensional Kondo chain on a metallic surface, Phys. Rev. B86, 035455 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Weber, D

    M. Weber, D. J. Luitz, and F. F. Assaad, Dissipation- Induced Order: TheS= 1/2 Quantum Spin Chain Cou- pled to an Ohmic Bath, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 056402 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    B. Danu, M. Vojta, T. Grover, and F. F. Assaad, Spin chain on a metallic surface: Dissipation-induced order versus Kondo entanglement, Phys. Rev. B106, L161103 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Martin and T

    S. Martin and T. Grover, Critical phase induced by Berry phase and dissipation in a spin chain, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043270 (2023). 6

    2023

  7. [15]

    Danu and F

    B. Danu and F. F. Assaad, Phases and phase transitions of anS= 3 2 chain on metallic and semimetallic surfaces, Phys. Rev. B113, 075144 (2026)

    2026

  8. [16]

    L. Lu, S. Cui, and W. Guo, Deconfined quantum critical point in a dissipative spin-1/2 chain (2026), arXiv:2607.16039 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kuklov, N

    A. Kuklov, N. Prokof’ev, L. Radzihovsky, and B. Svis- tunov, Transverse quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. B109, L100502 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    A. L. S. Ribeiro, P. McClarty, P. Ribeiro, and M. We- ber, Dissipation-induced long-range order in the one- dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B110, 115145 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Radzihovsky and E

    L. Radzihovsky and E. Pellett, Quantum Phases and Transitions of Bosons on a Comb Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 016001 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    M. A. Cazalilla, Superconductor-”metal” transition of one-dimensional interacting bosons with ohmic quan- tum dissipation (2026), arXiv:2605.30746 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    2026 arXiv

  13. [21]

    M. Hu, C. Zhang, D. Zhang, Y. Sun, Y. Deng, and J.-P. Lv, Long-Range Order in a Strictly Short-Range Quasi- 2D XY Model: When Critical Fluctuations Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 237101 (2026)

    2026

  14. [22]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear Field Theory of Large-Spin Heisenberg Antiferromagnets: Semiclassically Quantized Solitons of the One-Dimensional Easy-Axis N´ eel State, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1153 (1983)

    1983

  15. [23]

    Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: Identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model, Physics Letters A93, 464 (1983)

    F. Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: Identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model, Physics Letters A93, 464 (1983)

    1983

  16. [24]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topo- logical order, Phys. Rev. B80, 155131 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one di- mension, Phys. Rev. B81, 064439 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B83, 035107 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Pollmann, E

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Os- hikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B85, 075125 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    den Nijs and K

    M. den Nijs and K. Rommelse, Preroughening transitions in crystal surfaces and valence-bond phases in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B40, 4709 (1989)

    1989

  21. [29]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden Z 2×Z2 symmetry breaking in Haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 45, 304 (1992)

    1992

  22. [30]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rig- orous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 799 (1987)

    1987

  23. [31]

    Toskovic, R

    R. Toskovic, R. van den Berg, A. Spinelli, I. S. Eliens, B. van den Toorn, B. Bryant, J. S. Caux, and A. F. Otte, Atomic spin-chain realization of a model for quantum criticality, Nature Physics12, 656 EP (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    J. A. Hertz, Quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 14, 1165 (1976)

    1976

  25. [33]

    A. J. Millis, Effect of a nonzero temperature on quantum critical points in itinerant fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7183 (1993)

    1993

  26. [34]

    Grover and A

    T. Grover and A. Vishwanath, Quantum criticality in topological insulators and superconductors: Emer- gence of strongly coupled majoranas and supersymmetry (2012), arXiv:1206.1332 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2012 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Zhang and F

    L. Zhang and F. Wang, Unconventional Surface Criti- cal Behavior Induced by a Quantum Phase Transition from the Two-Dimensional Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki Phase to a N´ eel-Ordered Phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 087201 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    W. Zhu, C. Ding, L. Zhang, and W. Guo, Surface critical behavior of coupled Haldane chains, Phys. Rev. B103, 024412 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Z. Wang, F. Zhang, and W. Guo, Extraordinary sur- face critical behavior induced by the symmetry-protected topological states of a two-dimensional quantum magnet, Phys. Rev. B108, 014409 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Y. Ge, H. Yao, and S.-K. Jian, Boundary criticality in two-dimensional interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B113, L121108 (2026)

    2026

  31. [39]

    F. P. Toldin, F. F. Assaad, and M. A. Metlitski, Extraor- dinary transition at the edge of a correlated topological insulator (2025), arXiv:2508.00999 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Scaffidi, D

    T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur, Gapless Symmetry-Protected Topological Order, Phys. Rev. X7, 041048 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Poll- mann, Gapless Topological Phases and Symmetry- Enriched Quantum Criticality, Phys. Rev. X11, 041059 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    H. W. Diehl, The Theory of Boundary Critical Phenom- ena, International Journal of Modern Physics B11, 3503 (1997)

    1997

  35. [43]

    M. A. Metlitski, Boundary criticality of the O(N) model in d = 3 critically revisited, SciPost Phys.12, 131 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Parisen Toldin and M

    F. Parisen Toldin and M. A. Metlitski, Boundary Criti- cality of the 3D O(N) Model: From Normal to Extraor- dinary, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 215701 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Sachdev, C

    S. Sachdev, C. Buragohain, and M. Vojta, Quantum Im- purity in a Nearly Critical Two-Dimensional Antiferro- magnet, Science286, 2479 (1999)

    1999

  38. [46]

    Vojta, C

    M. Vojta, C. Buragohain, and S. Sachdev, Quantum impurity dynamics in two-dimensional antiferromagnets and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B61, 15152 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, M. Mezei, and A. Raviv- Moshe, Spin impurities, Wilson lines and semi- classics, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 10.1007/jhep06(2022)112 (2022)

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Komargodski, F

    Z. Komargodski, F. K. Popov, and B. C. Rayhaun, De- fect Anomalies, a Spin-Flux Duality, and Boson-Kondo Problems (2025), arXiv:2508.14963 [hep-th]

    2025

  41. [49]

    Sarma, Z

    A. Sarma, Z. Zhou, R. A. Lanzetta, and Y.-C. He, For- tuitous Universality of Bose-Kondo Impurities (2026), arXiv:2604.07554 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Huang, A

    Y. Huang, A. M. Lobos, and Z. Cai, Dissipative Majorana Quantum Wires, iScience21, 241 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Z. Wang, Q. Li, W. Li, and Z. Cai, Symmetry-Protected Topological Edge Modes and Emergent Partial Time- Reversal Symmetry Breaking in Open Quantum Many- Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 237201 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    See Supplemental Material for details on our QMC method and our estimator for the generalized string order parameter, for ourϵexpansion calculation for the ordi- nary surface criticality, for further details on our analysis of bulk and boundary critical exponents, and referenc...

  45. [53]

    Ng, Edge states in antiferromagnetic quantum spin 7 chains, Phys

    T.-K. Ng, Edge states in antiferromagnetic quantum spin 7 chains, Phys. Rev. B50, 555 (1994)

    1994

  46. [54]

    The disordered state at finite dissipation exhibits an ⟨n(r, τ)·n(r,0)⟩ ∝1/τ2 decay at large times [19]

  47. [55]

    Werner, K

    P. Werner, K. V¨ olker, M. Troyer, and S. Chakravarty, Phase Diagram and Critical Exponents of a Dissipative Ising Spin Chain in a Transverse Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 047201 (2005)

    2005

  48. [56]

    Weber, F

    M. Weber, F. F. Assaad, and M. Hohenadler, Directed- Loop Quantum Monte Carlo Method for Retarded Inter- actions, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 097401 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Weber, Quantum Monte Carlo simulation of spin- boson models using wormhole updates, Phys

    M. Weber, Quantum Monte Carlo simulation of spin- boson models using wormhole updates, Phys. Rev. B 105, 165129 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic series expansion method with operator-loop update, Phys. Rev. B59, R14157 (1999)

    1999

  51. [59]

    O. F. Sylju ˚ asen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum monte carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E66, 046701 (2002)

    2002

  52. [60]

    Note that the use ofχ(q) instead ofC(q) significantly reduces finite-size corrections in our crossing analysis

  53. [61]

    (1) we made a specific choice of boundary condi- tion

    In Eq. (1) we made a specific choice of boundary condi- tion. Reversing the sign ofδleaves an unpairedS= 1 degree of freedom at the boundary. The role of dangling edge states for boundary criticality without symmetry protection is still under debate. Here we only focus on thet...

  54. [62]

    A. M. Sengupta, Spin in a fluctuating field: The Bose(+Fermi) Kondo models, Phys. Rev. B61, 4041 (2000)

    2000

  55. [63]

    Weber and M

    M. Weber and M. Vojta, SU(2)-Symmetric Spin-Boson Model: Quantum Criticality, Fixed-Point Annihilation, and Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 186701 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    K. H. H¨ oglund, A. W. Sandvik, and S. Sachdev, Impurity Induced Spin Texture in Quantum Critical 2D Antifer- romagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 087203 (2007)

    2007

  57. [65]

    K. H. H¨ oglund and A. W. Sandvik, Impurity effects at fi- nite temperature in the two-dimensionalS= 1/2 Heisen- berg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B70, 024406 (2004)

    2004

  58. [66]

    I. B. Sperstad, E. B. Stiansen, and A. Sudbø, Quan- tum criticality in spin chains with non-Ohmic dissipation, Phys. Rev. B85, 214302 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    Weber, Tunable quantum criticality and pseud- ocriticality across the fixed-point annihilation in the anisotropic spin-boson model, Phys

    M. Weber, Tunable quantum criticality and pseud- ocriticality across the fixed-point annihilation in the anisotropic spin-boson model, Phys. Rev. B112, 235153 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    Whitsitt and S

    S. Whitsitt and S. Sachdev, Critical behavior of an im- purity at the boson superfluid–Mott-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. A96, 053620 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    K. Chen, Y. Huang, Y. Deng, and B. Svistunov, Halon: A quasiparticle featuring critical charge fractionalization, Phys. Rev. B98, 214516 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    Parisen Toldin, Boundary critical behavior of the three-dimensional heisenberg universality class, Phys

    F. Parisen Toldin, Boundary critical behavior of the three-dimensional heisenberg universality class, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 135701 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    A. W. Sandvik, R. R. P. Singh, and D. K. Campbell, Quantum Monte Carlo in the interaction representation: Application to a spin-Peierls model, Phys. Rev. B56, 14510 (1997)

    1997

  64. [72]

    Kawashima and J

    N. Kawashima and J. E. Gubernatis, Loop Algorithms for Monte Carlo Simulations of Quantum Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 1295 (1994)

    1994

  65. [73]

    E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Continuous-time monte carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    H. W. Diehl and S. Dietrich, Field-theoretical approach to static critical phenomena in semi-infinite systems, Z. Phys. B42, 65 (1981)

    1981

  68. [76]

    Luijten and H

    E. Luijten and H. W. J. Bl¨ ote, Monte Carlo method for spin models with long-range interactions, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics C06, 359 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183195000265. 8 Supplemental Material for Dissipation-induced bulk and boundary criticality...

    1995 doi

  69. [77]

    Configuration space and Monte Carlo weights Our QMC method [55, 56] is based on a perturbation expansion of the partition function in Eq. (S4). Because we expand in the full exponentH, this is in close analogy to the stochastic series expansion which can be reformu- lated in t...

  70. [78]

    Therefore, we rede- fine the vertex variables asν={Γ, ν Γ}

    Interaction vertices BecauseHconsists of two distinct interactions, we also need to define two types of vertices. Therefore, we rede- fine the vertex variables asν={Γ, ν Γ}. Here, Γ dis- tinguishes between Heisenberg and retarded interactions andν Γ includes the internal verte...

  71. [79]

    This symmetry is automat- ically conserved in the presence of an SO(3) spin rota- tional symmetry, but it is broken for any finite coupling to the environment

    Definition of the string operator For the isolated Haldane chain, the string operator is closely related to theZ 2×Z2 dihedral symmetry of global πrotations about the spinx,y, andzaxes (but only two of them are independent). This symmetry is automat- ically conserved in the pr...

  72. [80]

    Basis transformation In second quantization, thezcomponent of the bath angular momentum operator takes the form Lz i =−i X q a† iqxaiqy −a † iqy aiqx =− X q b† iq1biq1 −b † iq2biq2 .(S19) 10 In the last step, we have used the basis transformation biq1 biq2 ! = 1√ 2 1 i 1−i aiq...

  73. [81]

    We drop the pure spin partH s to simplify our notation

    Bosonic parity operator To keep our derivation of the parity operator as generic as possible, we use the generalized representation of the spin-boson HamiltonianH=H b +H sb where Hb = X µ ωµb† µbµ , H sb = X µ b† µϱµ +ϱ † µbµ .(S23) Here we introduce a superindexµfor the bath ...

  74. [82]

    Implementation and testing Now that we know how to calculate the bosonic parity operator, we can return to the string correlation function defined in Eq. (S18). For a given Monte Carlo configu- rationC={n,C n, α}, the spin expectation values can be easily calculated from the s...

    2000

  75. [83]

    In the absence of scaling corrections and at fixedβ/L z, it fulfills the scaling ansatz R(α, L) =f(L1/ν(α−α c)).(S63) If we calculateR(α) for different system sizesL, Eq

    Critical coupling and correlation-length exponent We first estimate the bulk critical coupling using the correlation ratioRwhich becomes renormalization-group invariant atα c. In the absence of scaling corrections and at fixedβ/L z, it fulfills the scaling ansatz R(α, L) =f(L1...

  76. [84]

    Anomalous dimension and scaling dimension Right at the bulk critical pointα=α c, we can estimate a variety of critical exponents using the same technique: Consider an observableO∝L µ (1 +g L−ωµ ) that scales with a dimensionµ. Using a pair of system sizes (L− ∆L, L), we can ca...

  77. [85]

    We therefore distinguish three cases: (i) If bothiandjare far away from the boundary, we only probe the bulk properties

    Correlation functions and scaling dimensions At the bulk critical point, correlation functions C(i, j;τ) =⟨S x i (τ)S x j (0)⟩(S66) experience distinct asymptotic behavior depending on whether zero, one, or two of the spin operators are placed in the vicinity of the boundary. ...

  78. [86]

    Note that for all simula- tions we keepβJ=L 2/48 fixed

    Transition out of the Haldane phase We first consider the transition from the Haldane phase to the AFM state atδ= 0 and extract the boundary scal- ing dimension from the spin-spin correlation functions defined in Eqs (S68) and (S69). Note that for all simula- tions we keepβJ=L...

  79. [87]

    S6 we repeat the same analysis for the quantum phase transition from the topologically-trivial dimerized phase to the AFM state at fixedδ= 0.4

    Transition out of the dimerized phase In Fig. S6 we repeat the same analysis for the quantum phase transition from the topologically-trivial dimerized phase to the AFM state at fixedδ= 0.4. Again, our estimates for the scaling dimensions are collected in Ta- ble S2, but now th...

  80. [88]

    Dissipative quantum rotor model The transition from the dimerized to the AFM phase is described by the O(3)-symmetric nonlinear sigma model without topological term but with ohmic dissipation. Its action can be discretized (here ∆τ=β/N τ ), S=− LX i=1 NτX τ=1 [Kx ni,τ ·n i+1,τ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.