Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

JWST NIRCam Imaging of NGC 4258: I. Observation Overview

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read JWST images tie NGC 4258's radio structure to slow AGN winds.

desk verdict New JWST narrow-band imaging of NGC 4258's anomalous radio structure points to low-velocity AGN winds, but the abstract alone lacks the line-ratio evidence to pin down 50-100 km/s. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11044 v1 pith:ANDN3TZV submitted 2025-08-14 astro-ph.GA

Travis C. Fischer , Nicholas F. Cothard , Omnarayani Nayak , Henrique Schmitt , Erin Smith , Jason Glenn This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords JWSTNIRCamNGC4258AGN-drivenwindsshockexcitationnear-infraredemissionlinesPAHdestructionAGNfeedbackinterstellarmedium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses JWST NIRCam narrow-band imaging to test what is energizing the anomalous radio structure in the nearby active galaxy NGC 4258. By mapping [Fe II], Paα, H2, 3.3 μm PAH, Brα, and Pfβ emission at parsec scales and comparing with UV, optical, radio, and X-ray data, it argues that the brightest shocked regions are powered by slow shocks moving at 50–100 km/s. That points to AGN-driven winds, not fast relativistic jets, as the main mechanism carrying energy into the galaxy's disk. The paper also finds that PAH emission fades exactly where shocks are strongest, indicating destruction of small dust grains, and suggests that surveys for enhanced [Fe II] in AGN hosts could uncover many systems where AGN feedback is actively coupled to the interstellar medium.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument is JWST NIRCam's narrow-band imaging of six near-infrared tracers—[Fe II] at 1.64 $\mu$m, Paα at 1.87 $\mu$m, H2 at 2.21 $\mu$m, 3.3 $\mu$m PAH, Brα at 4.05 $\mu$m, and Pfβ at 4.66 $\mu$m—which jointly separate shock excitation from radiative excitation and give parsec-scale resolution in NGC 4258. These line maps are the machinery because they let the authors locate shock fronts, measure multi-phase [Fe II]/H2 emission, and compare positions and ratios against published shock models and multiwavelength maps to assign shock velocities and identify dust destruction.

What would settle it

Observe the [Fe II] 1.64 $\mu$m and H2 2.21 $\mu$m lines at high spectral resolution in the brightest shock knots. If the line profiles show velocity broadening well beyond 100 km/s, or if the measured [Fe II]/H2 and line-to-continuum ratios sit outside the slow-shock model grid, the low-velocity AGN-wind interpretation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the brightest parts of NGC 4258's anomalous radio structure emit co-spatial [Fe II] and H2 line radiation whose ratios and multiwavelength context match low-velocity shocks at 50–100 km s$^{-1}$. It concludes that these features are AGN-driven winds colliding with the host disk and mechanically depositing energy, rather than being dominated by fast jet impacts. The multi-phase character of the shocks is shown by the joint [Fe II] and H2 emission, while the relative weakness or absence of 3.3 μm PAH emission in the most shock-excited regions is read as evidence that the shocks destroy small dust grains. The proposed observational consequence is that [Fe II]-bright AGN hosts form a recognizable class in which AGN feedback is significantly coupled to the surrounding interstellar medium.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim stands or falls on whether the near-infrared line ratios are interpreted with published shock models whose assumed cloud conditions—density, magnetic field, metal content, and background ionization—apply to NGC 4258, and those assumptions are not displayed in the abstract.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the interpretation is right, AGN feedback in at least some Seyfert galaxies acts through slow mechanical winds that push on the disk, not only through fast jets.
  • The shock regions should show gas that has been decelerated and heated to roughly 50–100 km/s, with energy being deposited into the interstellar medium at parsec scales.
  • PAH-poor, [Fe II]-bright zones in other galaxies can serve as a signature that AGN winds have destroyed small grains and are actively modifying the ISM.
  • Surveys that identify enhanced [Fe II] in AGN hosts could systematically pick out galaxies where AGN feedback is coupled to star-forming gas, informing how feedback regulates star formation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension is to measure the intrinsic line widths of [Fe II] 1.64 $\mu$m and H2 2.21 $\mu$m with an integral-field spectrograph; broad profiles would directly confirm or rule out the 50–100 km/s shock speeds.
  • Combining the inferred shock speeds with gas density estimates from the same line ratios would let observers turn this detection into a mechanical energy injection rate for NGC 4258's disk.
  • The same NIRCam narrow-band set could be applied to a small sample of nearby AGN to see whether low-velocity wind shocks and PAH destruction are common or special to NGC 4258.
  • If PAH destruction is real, the shocked zones should show a grain-size gradient, with larger grains surviving closer to the shock front; high-resolution mid-infrared imaging could test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports JWST NIRCam narrow-band imaging of the Seyfert 1.9 galaxy NGC 4258, covering [Fe II] 1.64 μm, Paα 1.87 μm, H2 2.21 μm, 3.3 μm PAH, Brα 4.05 μm, and Pfβ 4.66 μm at parsec-scale resolution. From comparing these data with available UV, optical, radio, and X-ray images, the abstract claims that the brightest regions of the anomalous radio structure host low-velocity (50–100 km s⁻¹) shocks, that co-spatial [Fe II] and H2 emission traces multi-phase shocks, that PAH emission is weaker or absent in the most shock-excited regions, and that AGN-driven winds are the likely origin. The supplied full text is a mojibake-encoded and largely unreadable body, so the quantitative analysis, tables, and equations cannot be assessed from the record as provided; the conclusions currently rest on the abstract alone.

Significance. If the physical inference holds, the paper would provide a compelling parsec-scale view of AGN wind–ISM interaction in a nearby galaxy, with a falsifiable prediction that [Fe II]-selected AGN hosts systematically reveal a population with significant AGN feedback coupling. The primary strength is the dataset itself: multi-tracer narrow-band NIRCam imaging of a well-studied target is a valuable community asset. The proposed selection criterion for shock-dominated AGN hosts is a testable prediction. However, the supplied record contains none of the quantitative evidence required to support the central claim: no line-ratio values, no error bars, no shock-model grid, no preshock conditions, and no readable body text. The claim is not circular because it references external shock models, but it is unanchored unless those models and the measured ratios are actually presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The inference that shocks in the brightest regions of the anomalous radio structure are 'likely of low-velocity (50-100 km s⁻¹)' is unsupported in the supplied record: no measured line ratios, no diagnostic line-ratio diagram, no error bars, and no shock-model grid are given. Because the [Fe II]/H2 ratio used to separate fast J-shocks from slower C-shocks is degenerate with preshock density, magnetic field strength, and H2 excitation mechanism, the authors should show the actual data plotted on published model grids and state the assumed preshock conditions, with a sensitivity test showing how the inferred velocity changes over a plausible range of density and magnetic field for NGC 4258's ISM.
  2. [Full text (body)] The supplied full text is mojibake and unreadable: equations, tables, and section content are garbled, so the data reduction, continuum subtraction, flux calibration, aperture selection, and error propagation cannot be verified. This is a load-bearing problem because the abstract's quantitative claims (line ratios, PAH weakness, shock velocities) depend on those details. The authors must provide a readable manuscript before the claims can be independently assessed.
  3. [Abstract, PAH claim] The statement that 'PAH emission is relatively weaker or absent in the most shock-excited regions' is presented without quantitative support: no PAH-to-Brα or PAH-to-continuum ratios, no region-selection criteria, and no significance tests are reported. The authors should define 'relatively weaker or absent' operationally and provide the measured values with uncertainties for the shocked regions compared with control regions.
  4. [Abstract, multi-wavelength comparison] The abstract says the conclusion follows from 'comparing these near-infrared observations with available ultraviolet, optical, radio, and X-ray imaging,' but no such comparison is shown or quantified in the supplied record. To rule out photoionization by the AGN or fluorescent H2 excitation as alternatives to shock excitation, the authors should present the relevant spatial correlations and diagnostic separations, for example maps of line-ratio changes along the anomalous radio structure.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists both Paα 1.87 μm and Pfβ 4.66 μm among the tracers but never states how Pfβ is used; please clarify whether it enters the line-ratio analysis or is only a detection target.
  2. [Title/Abstract] The title indicates this is 'I. Observation Overview'; if the quantitative shock modeling appears in a companion paper, that should be stated explicitly in the abstract so the reader knows which claims are established here and which are deferred.
  3. [Full text (body)] Even after correcting the encoding, the body should be checked for undefined symbols in the equations; the garbled text shows several equation-like fragments that cannot currently be verified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the low-velocity shock inference is anchored to external shock-model line-ratio diagnostics and multi-wavelength comparison, not to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the brightest regions of the anomalous radio structure host low-velocity (50-100 km/s) shocks—rests on comparing NIR line ratios ([Fe II] 1.64 um, Pa-alpha, H2 2.21 um, PAH, Br-alpha, Pf-beta) with available UV, optical, radio, and X-ray imaging, and on published shock-model diagnostics. Nothing in the abstract defines the inferred shock velocity in terms of itself, and no parameter appears to be fitted to the target conclusion. The PAH destruction inference is likewise an observed spatial correlation between shock-excited regions and weaker PAH emission. The main risk is model applicability: if the adopted shock grids assume preshock conditions that do not match NGC 4258's ISM, the velocity range could shift. That is an assumptions problem, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation chain is visible, and no specific equation can be quoted showing that an output is equivalent to an input by construction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or new entities are visible at the abstract level. The analysis inherits standard shock-model calibrations and multiwavelength alignment assumptions, which are listed as axioms.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Infrared line ratios (e.g., [Fe II]/Pa alpha, H2/Br alpha) are calibrated shock diagnostics across the relevant density and temperature range.
    The low-velocity shock inference in the abstract rests on comparing observed narrow-band images to shock models from the literature; these calibrations are not shown in the abstract.
  • domain assumption PAH emission weakness in shock regions is interpreted as small-grain destruction rather than excitation or extinction effects.
    The abstract states PAH emission is 'relatively weaker or absent' and reads this as dust destruction; alternative explanations are not addressed in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Astrometric alignment of JWST NIRCam images with UV, optical, radio, and X-ray maps is accurate enough for co-spatiality claims.
    The paper's claim of co-spatial [Fe II] and H2 and of PAH deficits depends on cross-instrument registration; not verifiable from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST NIRCam Imaging of NGC 4258: I. Observation Overview." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ANDN3TZV

@misc{pith2026250811044,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST NIRCam Imaging of NGC 4258: I. Observation Overview},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ANDN3TZV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11044}
}
abstract

We present James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) NIRCam imaging of the nearby Seyfert 1.9 galaxy NGC 4258, which hosts strong star formation regions as well as an anomalous jet-like radio structure that extends through a significant portion of its disk. This galaxy provides a unique environment to study Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN)-driven shocks and their impact on the interstellar medium (ISM) as its proximity allows for narrow-band observations of various near-infrared tracers sensitive to multiple levels of shock and radiative excitation: [Fe II] (1.64 $\mu$m), Pa$\alpha$ (1.87 $\mu$m), H$_2$ (2.21 $\mu$m), 3.3 $\mu$m polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emission, Br$\alpha$ (4.05 $\mu$m), and Pf$\beta$ (4.66 $\mu$m), allowing us to trace shocks with parsec-scale resolution. Comparing these near-infrared observations with available ultraviolet, optical, radio, and X-ray imaging, we find that shocks present in the brightest regions of the anomalous radio structure are likely of low-velocity (50-100 km s$^{-1}$), suggesting that these features originate from AGN-driven winds that interact with the host medium and mechanically impart energy into the disk. Further, while co-spatial [Fe II] and H$_2$ emission indicate multi-phase shocks, PAH emission is relatively weaker or absent in the most shock-excited regions, consistent with the destruction of small dust grains. Finally, we propose that surveys identifying enhanced [Fe II] in AGN host galaxies may systematically reveal a key population where AGN feedback is significantly coupled with the surrounding ISM and actively shaping galaxy evolution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Correlations of ALMA CO(2-1) with JWST mid-infrared fluxes down to scale of $\lesssim$100 parsec in nearby star-forming galaxies from PHANGS

    astro-ph.GA 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At 100-pc scales in 19 PHANGS galaxies, CO(2-1) correlates log-linearly with JWST PAH and dust emission, with the intercept—not slope—varying bimodally with host star-formation strength.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  2. [2]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 '...

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  4. [4]

    2013, , 549, A39

    Aladro , R., Viti , S., Bayet , E., et al. 2013, , 549, A39

    2013

  5. [5]

    J., Tielens , A

    Allamandola , L. J., Tielens , A. G. G. M., & Barker , J. R. 1989, , 71, 733

    1989

  6. [6]

    G., Groves , B

    Allen , M. G., Groves , B. A., Dopita , M. A., Sutherland , R. S., & Kewley , L. J. 2008, , 178, 20

    2008

  7. [7]

    J., Rieke , G

    Alonso-Herrero , A., Rieke , M. J., Rieke , G. H., & Ruiz , M. 1997, , 482, 747

    1997

  8. [8]

    2014, , 443, 2766

    Alonso-Herrero , A., Ramos Almeida , C., Esquej , P., et al. 2014, , 443, 2766

    2014

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    N., Xu , K

    Appleton , P. N., Xu , K. C., Reach , W., et al. 2006, , 639, L51

    2006

  2. [10]

    N., Diaz-Santos, T., Fadda, D., et al

    Appleton, P. N., Diaz-Santos, T., Fadda, D., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 869, 61

    2018

  3. [11]

    N., Guillard , P., Emonts , B., et al

    Appleton , P. N., Guillard , P., Emonts , B., et al. 2023, , 951, 104

    2023

  4. [12]

    2012, , 745, L28

    Asada , K., & Nakamura , M. 2012, , 745, L28

    2012

  5. [13]

    Barbosa , F. K. B., Storchi-Bergmann , T., McGregor , P., Vale , T. B., & Rogemar Riffel , A. 2014, , 445, 2353

    2014

  6. [14]

    H., & van Dishoeck , E

    Black , J. H., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 1987, , 322, 412

    1987

  7. [15]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    2023

  8. [16]

    C., Sabbi , E., et al

    Calzetti , D., Lee , J. C., Sabbi , E., et al. 2015, , 149, 51

    2015

  9. [17]

    J., DePree , C

    Cecil , G., Greenhill , L. J., DePree , C. G., et al. 2000, , 536, 675

    2000

  10. [18]

    E., Evans , A

    Chary , R., Becklin , E. E., Evans , A. S., et al. 2000, , 531, 756

    2000

  11. [19]

    2023, , 944, L12

    Chastenet , J., Sutter , J., Sandstrom , K., et al. 2023, , 944, L12

    2023

  12. [20]

    2024, , 690, A348

    Chastenet , J., De Looze , I., Rela \ n o , M., et al. 2024, , 690, A348

    2024

  13. [21]

    2024, , 975, 35

    Chen , S., Laor , A., Behar , E., et al. 2024, , 975, 35

    2024

  14. [22]

    J., Kewley , L

    D'Agostino , J. J., Kewley , L. J., Groves , B. A., et al. 2019, , 487, 4153

    2019

  15. [23]

    M., Paraschos , G

    Dasyra , K. M., Paraschos , G. F., Combes , F., et al. 2024, , 977, 156

    2024

  16. [24]

    2024, , 689, A263

    Davies , R., Shimizu , T., Pereira-Santaella , M., et al. 2024, , 689, A263

    2024

  17. [25]

    I., M \"u ller S \'a nchez , F., Genzel , R., et al

    Davies , R. I., M \"u ller S \'a nchez , F., Genzel , R., et al. 2007, , 671, 1388

    2007

  18. [26]

    2013, , 765, 63

    Doi , A., Kohno , K., Nakanishi , K., et al. 2013, , 765, 63

    2013

  19. [27]

    R., Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Rigopoulou , D., et al

    Donnan , F. R., Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Rigopoulou , D., et al. 2023, , 519, 3691

    2023

  20. [28]

    R., Rigopoulou , D., & Garc \' a-Bernete , I

    Donnan , F. R., Rigopoulou , D., & Garc \' a-Bernete , I. 2024, , 532, L75

    2024

  21. [29]

    A., Groves , B

    Dopita , M. A., Groves , B. A., Fischera , J., et al. 2005, , 619, 755

    2005

  22. [30]

    Draine , B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  23. [31]

    T., Li , A., Hensley , B

    Draine , B. T., Li , A., Hensley , B. S., et al. 2021, , 917, 3

    2021

  24. [32]

    M., Fischer , T

    Falcone , J., Crenshaw , D. M., Fischer , T. C., et al. 2024, , 971, 17

    2024

  25. [33]

    2017, , 601, A143

    Fiore , F., Feruglio , C., Shankar , F., et al. 2017, , 601, A143

    2017

  26. [34]

    C., Johnson , M

    Fischer , T. C., Johnson , M. C., Secrest , N. J., Crenshaw , D. M., & Kraemer , S. B. 2023, , 953, 87

    2023

  27. [35]

    C., Machuca , C., Diniz , M

    Fischer , T. C., Machuca , C., Diniz , M. R., et al. 2017, , 834, 30

    2017

  28. [36]

    C., Kraemer , S

    Fischer , T. C., Kraemer , S. B., Schmitt , H. R., et al. 2018, , 856, 102

    2018

  29. [37]

    C., Secrest , N

    Fischer , T. C., Secrest , N. J., Johnson , M. C., et al. 2021, , 906, 88

    2021

  30. [38]

    R., & Pineau Des For \^e ts , G

    Flower , D. R., & Pineau Des For \^e ts , G. 2010, , 406, 1745

    2010

  31. [39]

    2022, , 666, L5

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Rigopoulou , D., Alonso-Herrero , A., et al. 2022, , 666, L5

    2022

  32. [40]

    R., et al

    Garc \' a-Bernete , I., Rigopoulou , D., Donnan , F. R., et al. 2024, , 691, A162

    2024

  33. [41]

    M., Mainieri , V., et al

    Girdhar , A., Harrison , C. M., Mainieri , V., et al. 2022, , 512, 1608

    2022

  34. [42]

    Guillard , P., Boulanger , F., Pineau Des For \^e ts , G., & Appleton , P. N. 2009, , 502, 515

    2009

  35. [43]

    Guillet , V., Pineau Des For \^e ts , G., & Jones , A. P. 2011, , 527, A123

    2011

  36. [44]

    M., & Ramos Almeida , C

    Harrison , C. M., & Ramos Almeida , C. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 17

    2024

  37. [45]

    2024, , 690, A350

    Hermosa Mu \ n oz , L., Alonso-Herrero , A., Pereira-Santaella , M., et al. 2024, , 690, A350

    2024

  38. [46]

    R., Moran , J

    Herrnstein , J. R., Moran , J. M., Greenhill , L. J., & Trotter , A. S. 2005, , 629, 719

    2005

  39. [47]

    R., Moran , J

    Herrnstein , J. R., Moran , J. M., Greenhill , L. J., et al. 1999, , 400, 539

    1999

  40. [48]

    Hollenbach , D., & McKee , C. F. 1989, , 342, 306

    1989

  41. [49]

    F., Quataert , E., & Murray , N

    Hopkins , P. F., Quataert , E., & Murray , N. 2012, , 421, 3522

    2012

  42. [50]

    E., Harrison , C

    Jarvis , M. E., Harrison , C. M., Thomson , A. P., et al. 2019, , 485, 2710

    2019

  43. [51]

    H., Im , M., Lee , H

    Kim , J. H., Im , M., Lee , H. M., et al. 2012, , 760, 120

    2012

  44. [52]

    A., Armus , L., Larkin , J

    Knop , R. A., Armus , L., Larkin , J. E., et al. 1996, , 112, 81

    1996

  45. [53]

    2015, Publication of Korean Astronomical Society, 30, 145

    Koo , B.-C., & Lee , Y.-H. 2015, Publication of Korean Astronomical Society, 30, 145

    2015

  46. [54]

    C., & Kim , H.-J

    Koo , B.-C., Raymond , J. C., & Kim , H.-J. 2016, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 49, 109

    2016

  47. [55]

    E., Godard, B., Guillard, P., Gusdorf, A., & Pineau des Forêts, G

    Kristensen, L. E., Godard, B., Guillard, P., Gusdorf, A., & Pineau des Forêts, G. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 675

    2023

  48. [56]

    Lai , T. S. Y., Armus , L., U , V., et al. 2022, , 941, L36

    2022

  49. [57]

    S., & Siopis , C

    Laine , S., Krause , M., Tabatabaei , F. S., & Siopis , C. 2010, , 140, 1084

    2010

  50. [58]

    A., et al

    Launhardt , R., Loinard , L., Dzib , S. A., et al. 2022, , 931, 43

    2022

  51. [59]

    R., Hollenbach , D

    Maloney , P. R., Hollenbach , D. J., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 1996, , 466, 561

    1996

  52. [60]

    A., Neufeld , D

    Maret , S., Bergin , E. A., Neufeld , D. A., et al. 2009, , 698, 1244

    2009

  53. [61]

    V., Celotti , A., & Boorman , P

    Masini , A., Wijesekera , J. V., Celotti , A., & Boorman , P. G. 2022, , 663, A87

    2022

  54. [62]

    E., Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Packham , C., et al

    Mason , R. E., Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Packham , C., et al. 2012, , 144, 11

    2012

  55. [63]

    M., Schmitt , H

    Meena , B., Crenshaw , D. M., Schmitt , H. R., et al. 2023, , 943, 98

    2023

  56. [64]

    Y., et al

    Meenakshi , M., Mukherjee , D., Wagner , A. Y., et al. 2022, , 511, 1622

    2022

  57. [65]

    R., Jones , A

    Micelotta , E. R., Jones , A. P., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2010, , 510, A36

    2010

  58. [66]

    V., Wagner , A

    Mukherjee , D., Bicknell , G. V., Wagner , A. Y., Sutherland , R. S., & Silk , J. 2018, , 479, 5544

    2018

  59. [67]

    A., Melnick , G

    Neufeld , D. A., Melnick , G. J., Sonnentrucker , P., et al. 2006, , 649, 816

    2006

  60. [68]

    2002, , 393, 1035

    Nisini , B., Caratti o Garatti , A., Giannini , T., & Lorenzetti , D. 2002, , 393, 1035

    2002

  61. [69]

    M., Lanz, L., & Appleton, P

    Ogle, P. M., Lanz, L., & Appleton, P. N. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 788, L33

    2014

  62. [70]

    2001, , 369, L5

    Oliva , E., Marconi , A., Maiolino , R., et al. 2001, , 369, L5

    2001

  63. [71]

    E., & Ferland , G

    Osterbrock , D. E., & Ferland , G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  64. [72]

    A., Alatalo , K., Rowlands , K., et al

    Otter , J. A., Alatalo , K., Rowlands , K., et al. 2024, , 975, 142

    2024

  65. [73]

    D., Laor , A., et al

    Panessa , F., Baldi , R. D., Laor , A., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 387

    2019

  66. [74]

    Peeters , E., Spoon , H. W. W., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2004, , 613, 986

    2004

  67. [75]

    2022, , 665, L11

    Pereira-Santaella , M., \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Garc \' a-Bernete , I., et al. 2022, , 665, L11

    2022

  68. [76]

    E., Revalski , M., Crenshaw , D

    Polack , G. E., Revalski , M., Crenshaw , D. M., et al. 2024, , 975, 129

    2024

  69. [77]

    2022, , 658, A155

    Ramos Almeida , C., Bischetti , M., Garc \' a-Burillo , S., et al. 2022, , 658, A155

    2022

  70. [78]

    J., Pesce, D

    Reid, M. J., Pesce, D. W., & Riess, A. G. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 886, L27

    2019

  71. [79]

    2024, JWST/HST Alignment Tool, https://github.com/arminrest/jhat

    Rest, A. 2024, JWST/HST Alignment Tool, https://github.com/arminrest/jhat

    2024

  72. [80]

    J., & Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A

    Richings , A. J., & Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A. 2018, , 474, 3673

    2018

  73. [81]

    H., Alonso-Herrero, A., Weiner, B

    Rieke, G. H., Alonso-Herrero, A., Weiner, B. J., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 692, 556

    2009

  74. [82]

    H., & Lebofsky, M

    Rieke, G. H., & Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, ApJ, 288, 618

    1985

  75. [83]

    J., Kelly, D

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D. M., Misselt, K., et al. 2023, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 135, 028001, publisher: The Astronomical Society of the Pacific

    2023

  76. [84]

    2013, , 430, 2002

    Riffel , R., Rodr \' guez-Ardila , A., Aleman , I., et al. 2013, , 430, 2002

    2013

  77. [85]

    A., Vale, T

    Riffel, R. A., Vale, T. B., Storchi-Bergmann, T., & McGregor, P. J. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 442, 656

    2014

  78. [86]

    R., Garc \' a-Bernete , I., et al

    Rigopoulou , D., Donnan , F. R., Garc \' a-Bernete , I., et al. 2024, , 532, 1598

    2024

  79. [87]

    J., Lee , J

    Rodr \' guez , M. J., Lee , J. C., Whitmore , B. C., et al. 2023, , 944, L26

    2023

  80. [88]

    G., Viegas , S., Sigut , T

    Rodr \' guez-Ardila , A., Pastoriza , M. G., Viegas , S., Sigut , T. A. A., & Pradhan , A. K. 2004, , 425, 457

    2004

  81. [89]

    Rodr \' guez-Ardila , A., Riffel , R., & Pastoriza , M. G. 2005, , 364, 1041

    2005

  82. [90]

    P., Opitsch , M., Erwin , P., et al

    Saglia , R. P., Opitsch , M., Erwin , P., et al. 2016, , 818, 47

    2016

  83. [91]

    M., Koch , E

    Sandstrom , K. M., Koch , E. W., Leroy , A. K., et al. 2023, , 944, L8

    2023

  84. [92]

    Sawada-Satoh , S., Ho , P. T. P., Muller , S., Matsushita , S., & Lim , J. 2007, , 658, 851

    2007

  85. [93]

    R., Donley , J

    Schmitt , H. R., Donley , J. L., Antonucci , R. R. J., Hutchings , J. B., & Kinney , A. L. 2003, , 148, 327

    2003

  86. [94]

    2013, , 772, 112

    Silk , J. 2013, , 772, 112

    2013

  87. [95]

    2025, , 537, 817

    Sivasankaran , A., Blecha , L., Torrey , P., et al. 2025, , 537, 817

    2025

  88. [96]

    L., Koss , M., Mushotzky , R., et al

    Smith , K. L., Koss , M., Mushotzky , R., et al. 2020, , 904, 83

    2020

  89. [97]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.07314

    Sotira , S., Vazza , F., & Brighenti , F. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.07314

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    J., Riffel, R

    Storchi-Bergmann, T., McGregor, P. J., Riffel, R. A., et al. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 394, 1148

    2009

  91. [99]

    F., et al

    Storchi-Bergmann , T., Dall'Agnol de Oliveira , B., Longo Micchi , L. F., et al. 2018, , 868, 14

    2018

  92. [100]

    R., & Finkbeiner , D

    Su , M., Slatyer , T. R., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2010, , 724, 1044

    2010

  93. [101]

    2024, , 971, 178

    Sutter , J., Sandstrom , K., Chastenet , J., et al. 2024, , 971, 178

    2024

  94. [102]

    L., & Ho , P

    Turner , J. L., & Ho , P. T. P. 1994, , 421, 122

    1994

  95. [103]

    S., Akhil , K

    Ujjwal , K., Kartha , S. S., Akhil , K. R., et al. 2024, , 684, A71

    2024

  96. [104]

    M., Hummel , E., Davies , R

    van der Hulst , J. M., Hummel , E., Davies , R. D., Pedlar , A., & van Albada , G. D. 1983, , 306, 566

    1983

  97. [105]

    P., Genzel , R., Krabbe , A., et al

    van der Werf , P. P., Genzel , R., Krabbe , A., et al. 1993, , 405, 522

    1993

  98. [106]

    2004, , 611, 928

    van Diedenhoven , B., Peeters , E., Van Kerckhoven , C., et al. 2004, , 611, 928

    2004

  99. [107]

    2021, , 648, A17

    Venturi , G., Cresci , G., Marconi , A., et al. 2021, , 648, A17

    2021

  100. [108]

    P., & V \'e ron , P

    V \'e ron-Cetty , M. P., & V \'e ron , P. 2006, , 455, 773

    2006

  101. [109]

    2014, , 570, A28

    Viti , S., Garc \' a-Burillo , S., Fuente , A., et al. 2014, , 570, A28

    2014

  102. [110]

    Y., Bicknell , G

    Wagner , A. Y., Bicknell , G. V., & Umemura , M. 2012, , 757, 136

    2012

  103. [111]

    2024, jwst - Tools for processing and analyzing JWST data, https://github.com/chriswillott/jwst

    Willott, C. 2024, jwst - Tools for processing and analyzing JWST data, https://github.com/chriswillott/jwst

    2024

  104. [112]

    G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M

    Wolfire , M. G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M. 2022, , 60, 247

    2022

  105. [113]

    2014, , 52, 529

    Yuan , F., & Narayan , R. 2014, , 52, 529

    2014

  106. [114]

    2013, , 433, 3079

    Zubovas , K., Nayakshin , S., King , A., & Wilkinson , M. 2013, , 433, 3079

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.