Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.07687 v2 pith:AOTFVQZO submitted 2018-06-20 cs.CL

Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directions

classification cs.CL
keywords researchtaskcheckingfactautomatedbeenformulationsacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recently increased focus on misinformation has stimulated research in fact checking, the task of assessing the truthfulness of a claim. Research in automating this task has been conducted in a variety of disciplines including natural language processing, machine learning, knowledge representation, databases, and journalism. While there has been substantial progress, relevant papers and articles have been published in research communities that are often unaware of each other and use inconsistent terminology, thus impeding understanding and further progress. In this paper we survey automated fact checking research stemming from natural language processing and related disciplines, unifying the task formulations and methodologies across papers and authors. Furthermore, we highlight the use of evidence as an important distinguishing factor among them cutting across task formulations and methods. We conclude with proposing avenues for future NLP research on automated fact checking.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mitigating hallucinations in healthcare LLMs with granular fact-checking and domain-specific adaptation

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0

    A deterministic, proposition-level fact-checker that compares clinical summaries against electronic health records via (entity, attribute, value, time) claims and hard-coded logical checks reports 0.8904 precision and...