Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GraphXAIN: Narratives to Explain Graph Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02540 v3 pith:APYR5IGI submitted 2024-11-04 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords graphxaingraphexplanationsmethodlanguagenarrativesexplanationfeature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a powerful technique for machine learning on graph-structured data, yet they pose challenges in interpretability. Existing GNN explanation methods usually yield technical outputs, such as subgraphs and feature importance scores, that are difficult for non-data scientists to understand and thereby violate the purpose of explanations. Motivated by recent Explainable AI (XAI) research, we propose GraphXAIN, a method that generates natural language narratives explaining GNN predictions. GraphXAIN is a model- and explainer-agnostic method that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to translate explanatory subgraphs and feature importance scores into coherent, story-like explanations of GNN decision-making processes. Evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate GraphXAIN's ability to improve graph explanations. A survey of machine learning researchers and practitioners reveals that GraphXAIN enhances four explainability dimensions: understandability, satisfaction, convincingness, and suitability for communicating model predictions. When combined with another graph explainer method, GraphXAIN further improves trustworthiness, insightfulness, confidence, and usability. Notably, 95% of participants found GraphXAIN to be a valuable addition to the GNN explanation method. By incorporating natural language narratives, our approach serves both graph practitioners and non-expert users by providing clearer and more effective explanations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How good is my story? Towards quantitative metrics for evaluating LLM-generated XAI narratives

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper introduces an automated evaluation framework with extraction-based faithfulness metrics, perplexity for assumptions, and embedding-based human similarity, and shows it can reveal LLM sign self-correction on...

  2. Explainable Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) with KG-SMILE

    cs.AI 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    KG-SMILE applies perturbation and linear regression to a knowledge graph to attribute which entities and relations drive a GraphRAG system's answers.

Pith tools