Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 45 references

Bulk Excitations of Invertible Phases

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that every low-entanglement bulk excitation of an invertible phase—SPT, Majorana chain, or p+ip superconductor—corresponds one-to-one with an excitation of a trivial product state, so the defects of invertible phases are…

desk verdict Solid and worth refereeing, but the flagship p+ip argument has a real gap: the quasi-local pumping unitary is not shown to preserve the finite-depth-equivalence classes that define low-entanglement excitations. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11288 v1 pith:AS73S5MV submitted 2025-06-12 cond-mat.str-el

Wenjie Ji , David T. Stephen , Michael Levin , Xie Chen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords invertiblephaseslow-entanglementexcitationssymmetry-protectedtopologicalp+ipsuperconductorMajoranazeromodesholographyhighercategoriesgappedboundaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the bulk excitations of an invertible gapped phase—an SPT state, a Majorana chain, or a p+ip superconductor (a chiral topological superconductor)—carry no extra structure beyond those of a trivial product state. Specifically, the $d$-dimensional low-entanglement excitations (LEEs) of a nontrivial invertible phase form the same higher category as $d$-dimensional gapped quantum phases, with the equivalence relations and fusion rules inherited from the trivial side. The paper gives three routes: a symmetric quantum cellular automaton mapping product states to SPT states, a one-higher-dimensional pumping procedure for chiral phases like p+ip, and a topological-holography argument based on the relative rather than absolute distinction between gapped boundaries. If correct, this means higher-dimensional defects in invertible phases cannot fractionalize beyond what lower-dimensional gapped phases already allow, so the endpoint of a flux line in 2+1D p+ip can be a Majorana zero mode but nothing more exotic.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the low-entanglement excitation (LEE): a $d$-dimensional modification of the ground state that keeps the entanglement area law, with equivalence defined by $d$-dimensional finite-depth circuits and a recursive defect-on-defect structure. The arguments use three mechanisms. First, a symmetric quantum cellular automaton (a locality-preserving unitary commuting with the symmetry) maps the product state to an SPT fixed point and pushes the whole LEE classification from one phase to the other. Second, for chiral phases, a quasi-local pumping unitary moves a stack of p+ip layers through a three-dimensional bulk; it is strictly locality-preserving along the stacking direction and only quasi-local, with exponentially decaying tails, in the transverse directions. Third, in topological holography, certain gapped boundaries of a topological bulk state have only relative distinctions: every local experiment near one boundary can be simulated near the partner boundary by conjugating with a finite-depth (quasi-)local unitary, while the difference between the two boundaries shows up only across a domain wall between them.

What would settle it

Probe the pi-flux endpoint in a 2+1D p+ip superconductor: the paper predicts its local degeneracy and fusion behavior are exactly those of a Majorana zero mode on a trivial or nontrivial 1+1D chain, so detecting an endpoint with fractional charge or non-Majorana anyonic fusion rules would settle the claim false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a bijection between low-entanglement excitations in a nontrivial invertible phase and those in a product state. For every $d$-dimensional LEE in the trivial state, the symmetry-preserving entangler, the higher-dimensional pumping map, or the sandwich construction produces a $d$-dimensional LEE in the invertible state; the map runs in both directions and preserves the equivalence classes, fusion rules, and defect-on-defect structure of the higher category. The paper states the result as: the $d$-dimensional LEEs of an invertible phase form the same $d$-category as $d$-dimensional gapped phases. This is a higher-dimensional version of the familiar statement that point excitations in invertible phases cannot fractionalize: line, surface, and other excitations also cannot fractionalize beyond what lower-dimensional gapped phases allow.

Load-bearing premise

For the chiral p+ip case, the argument treats the exponentially decaying tails of the quasi-local pumping unitary as irrelevant, assuming they can be truncated without changing low-entanglement-equivalence classes; if that truncation fails, the bijection for p+ip would need a separate argument.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The classification of defects inside any invertible phase reduces to the classification of gapped phases in the defect's own dimension.
  • A flux line in a 2+1D p+ip superconductor is either a trivial or a nontrivial 1+1D superconducting chain, so its endpoint carries a Majorana zero mode and no further fractionalization.
  • The same reasoning extends to other chiral invertible phases such as Chern insulators and the E8 state, giving their bulk excitations the same structure as trivial states.
  • Because the correspondence comes with explicit operator maps, corresponding excitations in the trivial and invertible phases can be constructed in pairs rather than merely counted.
  • Phase transitions driven by condensing $d$-dimensional excitations in an invertible phase are controlled by the same condensable excitations as in the trivial phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bijection survives away from fixed points, the full higher category of LEEs is likely a Hamiltonian-independent invariant, so measuring defect structure could identify which invertible phase a material realizes.
  • The relative-distinction principle may be general: for any topological order with an emergent symmetry, microscopic boundary 'types' related by that symmetry may be gauge-like choices rather than absolute properties, with the physical data living on domain walls.
  • A sharp testable consequence is the absence of fractional charge or non-Majorana anyons at pi-flux endpoints in chiral topological superconductors; engineered Majorana wires and cold-atom p+ip realizations could look for exactly this.
  • The pumping argument's reliance on exponentially decaying tails suggests the bijection could fail for phases connected to trivial by transformations with algebraically decaying tails, which would define the precise boundary of the claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies higher-dimensional bulk excitations, which it calls Low-Entanglement Excitations (LEEs), in invertible phases. The central claim is that the LEEs of any invertible phase form the same higher-category structure as those of a trivial product state, so that, for example, d-dimensional LEEs in an invertible phase correspond to d-dimensional gapped phases. The argument is developed through three complementary routes: a symmetric quantum cellular automaton argument for group-cohomology SPT phases; a pumping construction in one higher dimension for chiral phases such as the p+ip superconductor; and a topological-holography/sandwich construction that uses the claimed 'relative distinction' between certain gapped boundaries of topological orders. Explicit examples include the 1D cluster state, the Kitaev chain, the 2D Z2 SPT state, and the 2+1D p+ip superconductor.

Significance. If the central correspondence is correct, it is a conceptually important and broadly applicable statement: higher-dimensional defects inside invertible phases are as 'non-fractional' as point excitations, and the paper gives concrete predictions such as the claim that a flux-line defect in a p+ip superconductor is either a trivial or a nontrivial 1+1D superconducting chain whose endpoint carries at most a Majorana zero mode. The paper's main strength is its explicit, construction-based style: the SPT entangler, the pumping unitary in Eq. (3), the sandwich Hamiltonians, and the sequential circuits are written down concretely, and the LEE equivalence is derived by pulling back through these explicit locality-preserving maps rather than by fitting parameters. The work also connects three currently active perspectives (QCAs, pumping, and topological holography) on the same question. The main weakness is that the chiral, p+ip case relies on a quasi-local unitary with exponentially decaying tails while the LEE equivalence relation is defined with strictly finite-depth circuits; this gap is load-bearing for the flagship chiral example.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (3); also §5.2.4] The p+ip bijection rests on the pumping unitary U in Eq. (3), which is a finite-time evolution generated by a quasi-local Hamiltonian, not a strictly finite-depth circuit. The LEE equivalence relation in Section 2 is defined using FDLUs, whereas conjugation by U generically produces only a finite-depth quasi-local unitary (FDqLU) with exponentially decaying tails in x and y. Section 5.1.2 shows that FDqLUs preserve the geometry of operator supports only 'up to an exponentially decaying tail'; it does not prove that two LEEs related by an FDqLU lie in the same FDLU equivalence class. Since Eq. (3) is the only map connecting LEEs of the trivial and p−ip states, and since Section 4.1 explicitly states that U cannot be replaced by a QCA even allowing exponential tails, the flagship chiral example is not fully proven as written. The same issue enters the Topological Holography p+ip argument through the FDqLU used in Section 5.2.4. The authors should either prove that the exponential tails can be truncated to a strict FDLU without changing LEE equivalence classes, or extend the equivalence relation to FDqLUs and prove that the resulting classification is unchanged.
  2. [§4.2] The layer-counting step is not fully justified. The argument maps an LEE supported in the bottom n layers of the trivial 3D slab to an LEE in the bottom n+2 layers of a slab whose bottom layer is a p−ip state and whose top layer is a p+ip state. The paper says this change can be accommodated by the freedom to add ancillas, but that freedom is normally for product-state ancillas, whereas the added layers here include a non-product p+ip layer. Comparing with the 2D p−ip LEE classification requires a locality/limiting argument showing that a distant p+ip layer does not affect the FDLU equivalence classes of excitations near the bottom boundary; this is plausible but is not supplied.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos and unresolved references: 'Figure ??' appears in Section 5.2.2, 'excitaiton' in the Figure 1 caption, 'beteween' in Section 5.1.5, and 'F ermionic' in the Section 5.1.7 heading.
  2. [Eq. (10)] The symbols g^a, W(f), N(f), S(f), and E(f) in Eq. (10) are not defined in the text; they should be defined explicitly so that the FDLU can be read without reference to the figure and surrounding discussion.
  3. [Sections 4 and 6] The notation oscillates between 'p+ip' and 'p−ip' when describing the chiral superconductor; Section 4 proves the statement for p−ip after pumping, while the Introduction and Discussion state it for p+ip. The mirror symmetry makes this harmless, but the intended target should be stated consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the LEE correspondence is constructed via explicit locality-preserving maps, with only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation and a technical FDqLU/FDLU gap.

full rationale

The paper proves the claimed one-to-one correspondence by explicit constructions rather than by assuming the conclusion. For SPT phases, the symmetric QCA/SPT entangler maps product-state LEEs to SPT LEEs and pulls finite-depth circuits back through conjugation; this is a derivation, not a restatement of the result. For p+ip, the pumping unitary U in Eq. (3) is an explicit finite-time quasi-local evolution, and the argument that conjugation by U maps LEEs and finite-depth circuits between the trivial and p-ip states is a constructive map. The main technical caveat is that U is only a FDqLU in the x,y directions, so the step 'applying U we get a finite-depth circuit' is not strictly justified; this is a proof gap (and a correctness risk), but it is not circular, because the paper does not define p+ip LEEs in terms of U or assume the equivalence it is trying to prove. The Topological Holography argument similarly builds two sandwiches and obtains the LEE bijection by conjugating boundary operators with explicit FDLUs/FDqLUs such as Eqs. (10), (13), (35), (36); the 'relative distinction' claim is derived from the geometry-preserving property of these unitaries rather than imported as an input. Self-citations are present (Refs. [2], [7], [33]), but they are not load-bearing for the central bijection: Ref. [2] is used only for the optional statement that all trivial-phase LEEs can be created by sequential circuits, and that statement is explicitly flagged as an assumption. No fitted parameters, normalization choices, or hidden identifications force the conclusion by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants or new postulated entities. It relies on standard background assumptions of the gapped-phases program and on the existence of explicit SPT entanglers and pumping unitaries, all sourced from prior literature.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gapped phases are classified by finite-depth and sequential quantum circuits.
    Used throughout Section 1 to define phase equivalence and LEE equivalence; from Refs [1,2].
  • domain assumption Every group-cohomology SPT state is prepared from a product state by a symmetric QCA (SPT entangler).
    Used in Section 3.1; from Ref [24].
  • domain assumption Quasi-adiabatic continuation produces a finite-time quasi-local unitary pumping p+ip layers without closing a gap.
    Used in Section 4.1; relies on the adiabatic path having a gap (Ref [30]).
  • domain assumption The invertible phases discussed are realizable by a topological-holography sandwich with a gapped topological boundary.
    Used in Section 5; demonstrated for the specific examples, not proven generally.
  • standard math FDLUs and FDqLUs preserve the dimensionality of operator support.
    Stated and argued in Section 5.1.2 via the light-cone structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bulk Excitations of Invertible Phases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AS73S5MV

@misc{pith2026250611288,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bulk Excitations of Invertible Phases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AS73S5MV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11288}
}
read the original abstract

Recent developments in the study of topological defects highlight the importance of understanding the multi-dimensional structure of bulk excitations inside a quantum system. When the bulk ground state is trivial, i.e. a product state, excitations on top of it are decoupled from each other and correspond to lower-dimensional phases and their defects within. In this paper, we expand the discussion to invertible phases and study the bulk excitations in, for example, SPT phases, Majorana chains, p + ip superconductors etc. We find that there is a one-to-one correspondence between bulk excitations inside a nontrivial invertible phase and those in a product state. For SPT phases, this can be shown using the symmetric Quantum Cellular Automaton that maps from the product state to the SPT state. More generally, for invertible phases realizable using the Topological Holography construction, we demonstrate the correspondence using the fact that certain gapped boundary conditions of a topological bulk state have only relative distinctions but no absolute ones.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11288 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multi-dimensional excitations and their fusion. (a) a 1-dimensional excitaiton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The pumping procedure that generates a p + ip state in the top layer and a p−ip state in the bottom layer of a 3D system while the bulk of the system remains in the trivial product state. The procedure can be realized through a finite-time evolution with a quasi-local Hamiltonian. The blue box indicates a strictly local operator which, after the procedure, is mapped to an operator strictly local in the z direction a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The ‘sandwich’ realization of a D-dimensional system in the Topological Holography formalism. In this formalism, a D-dimensional system is realized as a ‘sandwich’ structure with a D + 1-dimensional topological bulk. The bulk and the gapped top boundary determines the symmetry of the D-dimensional system, while the bottom boundary contains all its (symmetric) dynamics. In the sandwich structure, different invertible… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (25 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The topological bulk state (say two copies of toric codes) with both types of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Toric code with a m-condensed boundary. (b) Toric code with a e-condensed boundary, which is obtained from (a) by applying the FDLU in (11). Relative distinction Even though within a single gapped boundary, we cannot detect the type of gapped boundary through local…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The toric code with both types of boundary states in presence. On black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The toric code model in 3D, with the “smooth” boundary state and the “twisted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The fermionic toric code model in 3D, with the “smooth” boundary state and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic illustration for the “sandwich constructions” of phases with relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Operator mapping from the “sandwich” to a quasi-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: “Sandwich construction” from two copies of toric codes in 2D. The top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The explicit Hamiltonians are shown in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: “Sandwich construction” from the toric code in 2D. The top (topological) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Operator mapping from the “sandwich” to a quasi-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: “Sandwich construction” from the toric code in 3D. The top (topological) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Sandwich constructions that reduce to 2D trivial superconductor [(a) and (b)] and 2D p + ip superconductor [(c) and (d)]. (a) A simple sandwich equivalent to a 2D fermionic state with total fermion parity symmetry; (b) An auxiliary construction obtained from (a) by th…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: “Sandwich construction” from the fermionic toric code. The top (topological) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (a) A bulk stabilizer AvGfv fully supported in upper half-space, while individually neither Av or Gf(v) is a bulk stabilizer. (b) A choice of generators of the operator algebra, red edge represents Pauli-X and blue edge represents Pauli-Z. The terms are derived from c…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: On each edge, there is a qubit. On each face, there is one complex fermions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Four-Majorana-interacting terms. Each term represents that a pair of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Two phases after fermionization. Left: fermionization of the deconfined phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: The ground state of the fermionization of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Stabilizers in the Z2 gauge theory with a fermion-condensed boundary. (a) untwisted f-condensed boundary. (b) Twisted f-condensed boundary. The two sets are related by the 2d unitary (35). This way of applying the unitary could be more natural to understand in the fer…
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: The unitary U = V1dUpump in Eq. (35) that pushes a gauged Kitaev chain defect to the boundary. Upump has three steps. In each step, one applies Q (ee′) R(Oee′) on pairs of edges (ee′ ) indicated by the color. V1d = Q violet f R(Bf ). Within the subspace Wm(C ∨ bdy) = …
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Hamiltonian terms in the “Sandwich construction” from the toric code in 2D. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: A defect line in a two-dimensional trivial fermion superconductor. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Stabilizers of the toric code in the presence of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: A Kitaev chain in the background of trivial fermion superconductor. Along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_27.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.155138

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.155138 2010

  2. [2]

    X. Chen, A. Dua, M. Hermele, D. T. Stephen, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Vanhove and J.-Y. Zhao, Sequential quantum circuits as maps between gapped phases , Physical Review B 109(7), 075116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry i: Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases (2019), 1912.02817

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Johnson-Freyd, On the classification of topological orders , Communications in Mathematical Physics 393(2), 989 (2022), doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04380-3

    T. Johnson-Freyd, On the classification of topological orders , Communications in Mathematical Physics 393(2), 989 (2022), doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04380-3

    doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04380-3 2022

  5. [5]

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang and H. Zheng, Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry: A holographic and entanglement view of symmetry , Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043086 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043086

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043086 2020

  6. [6]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki and A. Tiwari, Non- invertible higher-categorical symmetries , SciPost Phys. 14, 007 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.1.007

    doi:10.21468/scipostphys.14.1.007 2023

  7. [7]

    D. T. Stephen and X. Chen, Fusion of one-dimensional gapped phases and their domain walls (2024), 2403.19068

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Kong, X.-G

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen and H. Zheng, Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers (2015), 1502.01690

    arXiv 2015

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry- breaking and topological phase transitions , Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033417 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033417

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Lichtman, R

    T. Lichtman, R. Thorngren, N. H. Lindner, A. Stern and E. Berg, Bulk anyons as edge symmetries: Boundary phase diagrams of topologically ordered states, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075141 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.075141

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle , Phys. Rev. B 107, 155136 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.155136, 2203.03596

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Moradi, S

    H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian and A. Tiwari, Topological holography: Towards a unification of landau and beyond-landau physics (2022), 2207.10712

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory (2023), 2209.07471

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri and Y. Tachikawa, Asymptotic density of states in 2d cfts with non-invertible symmetries , Journal of High Energy Physics 2023(3), 1 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, Gapless edges of 2d topological orders and enriched monoidal categories, Nuclear Physics B 927, 140 (2018). 39

    2018

  8. [16]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. part ii , Nuclear Physics B 966, 115384 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Kong, X.-G

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen and H. Zheng, One dimensional gapped quantum phases and enriched fusion categories, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022(3), 1 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, Categories of quantum liquids i , Journal of High Energy Physics 2022(8), 1 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, Categories of quantum liquids ii , Communications in Mathematical Physics 405(9), 203 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Xu and Z.-H

    R. Xu and Z.-H. Zhang, Categorical descriptions of one-dimensional gapped phases with abelian onsite symmetries , Physical Review B 110(15), 155106 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Aasen, E

    D. Aasen, E. Lake and K. Walker, Fermion condensation and super pivotal categories, Journal of Mathematical Physics 60(12) (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Tantivasadakarn and X

    N. Tantivasadakarn and X. Chen, String operators for cheshire strings in topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165149 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.165149

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Farrelly, A review of Quantum Cellular Automata , Quantum 4, 368 (2020), doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-30-368

    T. Farrelly, A review of Quantum Cellular Automata , Quantum 4, 368 (2020), doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-30-368

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group , Phys. Rev. B 87, 155114 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155114

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. part i, Phys. Rev. 60, 252 (1941), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.60.252

    1941 doi

  18. [26]

    Fidkowski, J

    L. Fidkowski, J. Haah and M. B. Hastings, Exactly solvable model for a 4 + 1D beyond-cohomology symmetry-protected topological phase, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155124 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.155124

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.910

    2001 doi

  20. [28]

    W. Son, L. Amico and V. Vedral, Topological order in 1d cluster state protected by symmetry, Quantum Information Processing 11(6), 1961 (2011), doi:10.1007/s11128- 011-0346-7

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    Huang, X

    Y. Huang, X. Chen et al., Quantum circuit complexity of one-dimensional topological phases, Physical Review B 91(19), 195143 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    M. B. Hastings and X.-G. Wen, Quasiadiabatic continuation of quantum states: The stability of topological ground-state degeneracy and emergent gauge invariance , Phys. Rev. B 72, 045141 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045141

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    Barkeshli, Y.-A

    M. Barkeshli, Y.-A. Chen, S.-J. Huang, R. Kobayashi, N. Tantivasadakarn and G. Zhu, Codimension-2 defects and higher symmetries in (3+ 1) d topological phases , SciPost Physics 14(4), 065 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Zhao, J.-Q

    J. Zhao, J.-Q. Lou, Z.-H. Zhang, L.-Y. Hung, L. Kong and Y. Tian, String condensations in 3+ 1d and lagrangian algebras , arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07865 (2022). 40

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    W. Ji, N. Tantivasadakarn and C. Xu, Boundary states of three dimensional topological order and the deconfined quantum critical point , SciPost Physics 15(6), 231 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Wang and M

    C. Wang and M. Levin, Braiding statistics of loop excitations in three dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 080403 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.080403

    2014 doi

  27. [35]

    Jiang, A

    S. Jiang, A. Mesaros and Y. Ran, Generalized modular transformations in (3 + 1)D topologically ordered phases and triple linking invariant of loop braiding , Phys. Rev. X 4, 031048 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.4.031048

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    Fidkowski and M

    L. Fidkowski and M. B. Hastings, Pumping chirality in three dimensions , arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15903 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires , Physics-uspekhi 44(10S), 131 (2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    Y.-A. Chen, A. Kapustin and D. Radicevic, Exact bosonization in two spatial dimensions and a new class of lattice gauge theories , Annals of Physics 393, 234 (2018), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.03.024

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. Levin, Integer quantum hall effect for bosons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 046801 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.046801

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    Cimasoni and N

    D. Cimasoni and N. Reshetikhin, Dimers on surface graphs and spin structures. i , Communications in Mathematical Physics 275, 187 (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    Tarantino and L

    N. Tarantino and L. Fidkowski, Discrete spin structures and commuting projector models for two-dimensional fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases, Physical Review B 94(11), 115115 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Y.-A. Chen, Y. Xu et al. , Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions, PRX Quantum 4(1), 010326 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Chen and S

    Y.-A. Chen and S. Tata, Higher cup products on hypercubic lattices: application to lattice models of topological phases , arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05274 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    P. M. Tam, J. W. F. Venderbos and C. L. Kane, Toric-code insula- tor enriched by translation symmetry , Phys. Rev. B 105, 045106 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.045106

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Rao and I

    P. Rao and I. Sodemann, Theory of weak symmetry breaking of translations in z 2 topologically ordered states and its relation to topological superconductivity from an exact lattice z 2 charge-flux attachment , Physical Review Research 3(2), 023120 (2021). 41

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.